Cancers Staged Using This Staging System
Adult Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas
Cancers Not Staged Using This Staging System
These histopathologic types of cancer | Are staged according to the classification for | and can be found in chapter |
---|---|---|
Ocular adnexal lymphoma | Ocular adnexal lymphoma | 71 |
Pediatric lymphoma | Pediatric lymphoma | 80 |
Primary cutaneous Lymphoma | Primary cutaneous lymphoma | 81 |
Multiple myeloma | Plasma cell myeloma | 82 |
Summary of Changes
Change | Details of Change | Level of Evidence |
---|---|---|
Ann Arbor staging | The Cotswold modification1 of the Ann Arbor staging system2,3 has been updated to the Lugano classification4 | I |
A and B Classification (Symptoms) | B symptoms were eliminated for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (retained for Hodgkin lymphoma). | I |
X subscript | X subscript for bulk was eliminated. The diameter of the largest mass must be recorded. | I |
Stage III | The extension of disease into extralymphatic sites (E lesions) was eliminated from Stage III; any extralymphatic involvement with nodal disease above and below the diaphragm is Stage IV. | I |
Stage IIIS | Involvement of the spleen no longer part of stage grouping. | I |
Stage II | Although four staging categories are retained, the concept of the Lugano classification is to divide patients into limited and advanced stages. Stage II bulky is variably categorized as limited- or advanced-stage based on the histology and prognostic factors. | I |
Imaging | Posteroanterior chest X-ray is no longer required for the determination of bulk in Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. | I |
ICD-O-3 Topography Codes
Code | Description |
---|---|
C00.0 | External upper lip |
C00.1 | External lower lip |
C00.2 | External lip, NOS |
C00.3 | Mucosa of upper lip |
C00.4 | Mucosa of lower lip |
C00.5 | Mucosa of lip, NOS |
C00.6 | Commissure of lip |
C00.8 | Overlapping lesion of lip |
C00.9 | Lip, NOS |
C01.9 | Base of tongue, NOS |
C02.0 | Dorsal surface of tongue, NOS |
C02.1 | Border of tongue |
C02.2 | Ventral surface of tongue, NOS |
C02.3 | Anterior 2/3 of tongue, NOS |
C02.4 | Lingual tonsil |
C02.8 | Overlapping lesion of tongue |
C02.9 | Tongue, NOS |
C03.0 | Upper gum |
C03.1 | Lower gum |
C03.9 | Gum, NOS |
C04.0 | Anterior floor of mouth |
C04.1 | Lateral floor of mouth |
C04.8 | Overlapping lesion of floor of mouth |
C04.9 | Floor of mouth, NOS |
C05.0 | Hard palate |
C05.1 | Soft palate, NOS |
C05.2 | Uvula |
C05.8 | Overlapping lesion of palate |
C05.9 | Palate, NOS |
C06.0 | Cheek mucosa |
C06.1 | Vestibule of mouth |
C06.2 | Retromolar area |
C06.8 | Overlapping lesion of other and unspecified parts of mouth |
C06.9 | Mouth, NOS |
C07.9 | Parotid gland |
C08.0 | Submandibular gland |
C08.1 | Sublingual gland |
C08.1 | Sublingual gland duct |
C08.8 | Overlapping lesion of major salivary glands |
C08.9 | Major salivary gland, NOS |
C09.0 | Tonsillar fossa |
C09.1 | Tonsillar pillar |
C09.8 | Overlapping lesion of tonsil |
C09.9 | Tonsil, NOS |
C10.0 | Vallecula |
C10.1 | Anterior surface of epiglottis |
C10.2 | Lateral wall of oropharynx |
C10.3 | Posterior wall of oropharynx |
C10.4 | Branchial cleft |
C10.8 | Overlapping lesion of oropharynx |
C10.9 | Oropharynx, NOS |
C11.0 | Superior wall of nasopharynx |
C11.1 | Posterior wall of nasopharynx |
C11.2 | Lateral wall of nasopharynx |
C11.3 | Anterior wall of nasopharynx |
C11.8 | Overlapping lesion of nasopharynx |
C11.9 | Nasopharynx, NOS |
C12.9 | Pyriform sinus |
C13.0 | Postcricoid region |
C13.1 | Hypopharyngeal aspect of aryepiglottic fold |
C13.2 | Posterior wall of hypopharynx |
C13.8 | Overlapping lesion of hypopharynx |
C13.9 | Hypopharynx, NOS |
C14.0 | Pharynx, NOS |
C14.2 | Waldeyer ring |
C14.8 | Overlapping lesion of lip, oral cavity and pharynx |
C15.0 | Cervical esophagus |
C15.1 | Thoracic esophagus |
C15.2 | Abdominal esophagus |
C15.3 | Upper third of esophagus |
C15.4 | Middle third of esophagus |
C15.5 | Lower third of esophagus |
C15.8 | Overlapping lesion of esophagus |
C15.9 | Esophagus, NOS |
C16.0 | Cardia, NOS |
C16.1 | Fundus of stomach |
C16.2 | Body of stomach |
C16.3 | Gastric antrum |
C16.4 | Pylorus |
C16.5 | Lesser curvature of stomach, NOS |
C16.6 | Greater curvature of stomach, NOS |
C16.8 | Overlapping lesion of stomach |
C16.9 | Stomach, NOS |
C17.0 | Duodenum |
C17.1 | Jejunum |
C17.2 | Ileum |
C17.3 | Meckel diverticulum |
C17.8 | Overlapping lesion of small intestine |
C17.9 | Small intestine, NOS |
C18.0 | Cecum |
C18.1 | Appendix |
C18.2 | Ascending colon |
C18.3 | Hepatic flexure of colon |
C18.4 | Transverse colon |
C18.5 | Splenic flexure of colon |
C18.6 | Descending colon |
C18.7 | Sigmoid colon |
C18.8 | Overlapping lesion of colon |
C18.9 | Colon, NOS |
C19.9 | Rectosigmoid junction |
C20.9 | Rectum, NOS |
C21.0 | Anus, NOS |
C21.1 | Anal canal |
C21.2 | Cloacogenic zone |
C21.8 | Overlapping lesion of rectum, anus and anal canal |
C22.0 | Liver |
C22.1 | Intrahepatic bile duct |
C23.9 | Gallbladder |
C24.0 | Extrahepatic bile duct |
C24.1 | Ampulla of Vater |
C24.8 | Overlapping lesion of biliary tract |
C24.9 | Biliary tract, NOS |
C25.0 | Head of pancreas |
C25.1 | Body of pancreas |
C25.2 | Tail of pancreas |
C25.3 | Pancreatic duct |
C25.4 | Islets of Langerhans |
C25.7 | Other specified parts of pancreas |
C25.8 | Overlapping lesion of pancreas |
C25.9 | Pancreas, NOS |
C26.0 | Intestinal tract, NOS |
C26.8 | Overlapping lesion of digestive system |
C26.9 | Gastrointestinal tract, NOS |
C30.0 | Nasal cavity |
C30.1 | Middle ear |
C31.0 | Maxillary sinus |
C31.1 | Ethmoid sinus |
C31.2 | Frontal sinus |
C31.3 | Sphenoid sinus |
C31.8 | Overlapping lesion of accessory sinuses |
C31.9 | Accessory sinus, NOS |
C32.0 | Glottis |
C32.1 | Supraglottis |
C32.2 | Subglottis |
C32.3 | Laryngeal cartilage |
C32.8 | Overlapping lesion of larynx |
C32.9 | Larynx, NOS |
C33.9 | Trachea |
C34.0 | Main bronchus |
C34.1 | Upper lobe, lung |
C34.2 | Middle lobe, lung |
C34.3 | Lower lobe, lung |
C34.8 | Overlapping lesion of lung |
C34.9 | Lung, NOS |
C37.9 | Thymus |
C38.0 | Heart |
C38.1 | Anterior mediastinum |
C38.2 | Posterior mediastinum |
C38.3 | Mediastinum, NOS |
C38.4 | Pleura, NOS |
C38.8 | Overlapping lesion of heart, mediastinum and pleura |
C39.0 | Upper respiratory tract, NOS |
C39.8 | Overlapping lesion of respiratory system and intrathoracic organs |
C39.9 | Ill-defined sites within respiratory system |
C40.0 | Long bones of upper limb, scapula and associated joints |
C40.1 | Short bones of upper limb and associated joints |
C40.2 | Long bones of lower limb and associated joints |
C40.3 | Short bones of lower limb and associated joints |
C40.8 | Overlapping lesion of bones, joints and articular cartilage of limbs |
C40.9 | Bone of limb, NOS |
C41.0 | Bones of skull and face and associated joints |
C41.1 | Mandible |
C41.2 | Vertebral column |
C41.3 | Rib, sternum, clavicle and associated joints |
C41.4 | Pelvic bones, sacrum, coccyx and associated joints |
C41.8 | Overlapping lesion of bones, joints and articular cartilage |
C41.9 | Bone, NOS |
C42.0 | Blood |
C42.1 | Bone marrow |
C42.2 | Spleen |
C42.3 | Reticuloendothelial system, NOS |
C42.4 | Hematopoietic system, NOS |
C47.0 | Peripheral nerves and autonomic nervous system of head, face, and neck |
C47.1 | Peripheral nerves and autonomic nervous system of upper limb and shoulder |
C47.2 | Peripheral nerves and autonomic nervous system of lower limb and hip |
C47.3 | Peripheral nerves and autonomic nervous system of thorax |
C47.4 | Peripheral nerves and autonomic nervous system of abdomen |
C47.5 | Peripheral nerves and autonomic nervous system of pelvis |
C47.6 | Peripheral nerves and autonomic nervous system of trunk, unspecified |
C47.8 | Overlapping lesion of peripheral nerves and autonomic nervous system |
C47.9 | Autonomic nervous system, NOS |
C48.0 | Retroperitoneum |
C48.1 | Specified parts of peritoneum |
C48.2 | Peritoneum, NOS |
C48.8 | Overlapping lesion of retroperitoneum and peritoneum |
C49.0 | Connective, subcutaneous and other soft tissues of head, face, and neck |
C49.1 | Connective, subcutaneous and other soft tissues of upper limb and shoulder |
C49.2 | Connective, subcutaneous and other soft tissues of lower limb and hip |
C49.3 | Connective, subcutaneous and other soft tissues of thorax |
C49.4 | Connective, subcutaneous and other soft tissues of abdomen |
C49.5 | Connective, subcutaneous and other soft tissues of pelvis |
C49.6 | Connective, subcutaneous and other soft tissues of trunk NOS |
C49.8 | Overlapping lesion of connective, subcutaneous and other soft tissues |
C49.9 | Connective, subcutaneous and other soft tissues, NOS |
C50.0 | Nipple |
C50.1 | Central portion of breast |
C50.2 | Upper-inner quadrant of breast |
C50.3 | Lower-inner quadrant of breast |
C50.4 | Upper-outer quadrant of breast |
C50.5 | Lower-outer quadrant of breast |
C50.6 | Axillary tail of breast |
C50.8 | Overlapping lesion of breast |
C50.9 | Breast, NOS |
C51.1 | Labium minus |
C51.2 | Clitoris |
C51.8 | Overlapping lesion of vulva |
C51.9 | Vulva, NOS |
C52.9 | Vagina, NOS |
C53.0 | Endocervix |
C53.1 | Exocervix |
C53.8 | Overlapping lesion of cervix uteri |
C53.9 | Cervix uteri |
C54.0 | Isthmus uteri |
C54.1 | Endometrium |
C54.2 | Myometrium |
C54.3 | Fundus uteri |
C54.8 | Overlapping lesion of corpus uteri |
C54.9 | Corpus uteri |
C55.9 | Uterus, NOS |
C56.9 | Ovary |
C57.0 | Fallopian tube |
C57.1 | Broad ligament |
C57.2 | Round ligament |
C57.3 | Parametrium |
C57.4 | Uterine adnexa |
C57.7 | Other specified parts of female genital organs |
C57.8 | Overlapping lesion of female genital organs |
C57.9 | Female genital tract, NOS |
C58.9 | Placenta |
C60.0 | Prepuce |
C60.1 | Glans penis |
C60.2 | Body of penis |
C60.8 | Overlapping lesion of penis |
C61.9 | Prostate gland |
C62.0 | Undescended testis |
C62.1 | Descended testis |
C62.9 | Testis, NOS |
C63.0 | Epididymis |
C63.1 | Spermatic cord |
C63.7 | Other specified parts of male genital organs |
C63.8 | Overlapping lesion of male genital organs |
C63.9 | Male genital organs, NOS |
C64.9 | Kidney, NOS |
C65.9 | Renal pelvis |
C66.9 | Ureter |
C67.0 | Trigone of bladder |
C67.1 | Dome of bladder |
C67.2 | Lateral wall of bladder |
C67.3 | Anterior wall of bladder |
C67.4 | Posterior wall of bladder |
C67.5 | Bladder neck |
C67.6 | Ureteric orifice |
C67.7 | Urachus |
C67.8 | Overlapping lesion of bladder |
C67.9 | Bladder, NOS |
C68.0 | Urethra |
C68.1 | Paraurethral gland |
C68.8 | Overlapping lesion of urinary organs |
C68.9 | Urinary system, NOS |
C69.1 | Cornea, NOS |
C69.2 | Retina |
C69.3 | Choroid |
C69.4 | Ciliary body |
C73.9 | Thyroid gland |
C74.0 | Cortex of adrenal gland |
C74.1 | Medulla of adrenal gland |
C74.9 | Adrenal gland, NOS |
C76.0 | Head, face or neck, NOS |
C76.1 | Thorax, NOS |
C76.2 | Abdomen, NOS |
C76.3 | Pelvis, NOS |
C76.4 | Upper limb, NOS |
C76.5 | Lower limb, NOS |
C76.7 | Other ill-defined sites |
C76.8 | Overlapping lesion of ill-defined sites |
C77.0 | Lymph nodes of head, face, and neck |
C77.1 | Intrathoracic lymph nodes |
C77.2 | Intra-abdominal lymph nodes |
C77.3 | Lymph nodes of axilla or arm |
C77.4 | Lymph nodes of inguinal region or leg |
C77.5 | Pelvic lymph nodes |
C77.8 | Lymph nodes of multiple regions |
C77.9 | Lymph node, NOS |
C80.9 | Unknown primary site |
WHO Classification of Tumors
This list includes histology codes and preferred terms from the WHO Classification of Tumors and the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O). Most of the terms in this list represent malignant behavior. For cancer reporting purposes, behavior codes /3 (denoting malignant neoplasms), /2 (denoting in situ neoplasms), and in some cases /1 (denoting neoplasms with uncertain and unknown behavior) may be appended to the 4-digit histology codes to create a complete morphology code.
Code | Description |
---|---|
9823 | B-cell lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma |
International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. ICD-O-3-Online.http://codes.iarc.fr/home. Accessed August 16, 2017. Used with permission.
All newly diagnosed patients with malignant lymphomas should have formal documentation of the anatomic disease extent before the initial therapeutic intervention; that is, clinical stage must be assigned and recorded. Although patients with recurrent disease generally do not have a new clinical stage assigned at the time of relapse, some prognostic models include stage at the time of second-line therapy, particularly in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with intent to proceed with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell rescue.5-8 In all cases, recording of the anatomic disease extent at the time of relapse is recommended.
Lugano Classification Modification of the Ann Arbor Staging System
Anatomic staging of lymphomas traditionally has been based on the Ann Arbor classification system, which was originally developed more than 30 years ago for HL. It was based on the relatively predictable pattern of spread of HL and improved the ability to determine which patients might be suitable candidates for radiation therapy.2 It was updated as the Cotswold system to address some of the issues present in the original staging system and to accommodate newer diagnostic techniques, including computed tomography (CT) scan.1 It subsequently was applied to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) as well, despite the fact that the pattern of spread is less predictable than that of HL. The Ann Arbor classification has been accepted as the best means of describing the anatomic disease extent and has been useful as a universal system for a variety of lymphomas; therefore, it was adopted by the AJCC and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) as the official system for classifying the anatomic extent of disease in HL and NHL, with the exception of cutaneous lymphomas (e.g., mycosis fungoides), which are discussed later in this chapter. However, advances in diagnostics and therapy provided the impetus to review and modernize the evaluation and staging of lymphoma. Workshops were held at the 11th and 12th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma to study areas in need of clarification or updating and then to review the proposed changes. The Lugano classification was published and forms the basis for revised recommendations regarding anatomic staging and evaluation of disease before and after therapy.4 This staging system is adopted by the AJCC.
For the purposes of coding and staging, lymph nodes, Waldeyer's ring, thymus, and spleen are considered nodal or lymphatic sites. Extranodal or extralymphatic sites include the adrenal glands, blood, bone, bone marrow, central nervous system (CNS; leptomeningeal and parenchymal brain disease), gastrointestinal (GI) tract, gonads, kidneys, liver, lungs, skin, ocular adnexae (conjunctiva, lacrimal glands, and orbital soft tissue), skin, uterus, and others. HL rarely presents in an extranodal site alone, but about 25% of NHLs are extranodal at presentation. The frequency of extranodal presentation varies dramatically among different lymphomas, however, with some (e.g., mycosis fungoides and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue [MALT] lymphomas) being virtually always extranodal, except in advanced stages of the diseases, and some (e.g., follicular lymphoma) seldom being extranodal, except for bone marrow involvement.
The Lugano classification includes an E suffix for lymphomas with either localized extralymphatic presentation (Stage IE) or by contiguous spread from nodal disease (Stage IIE). For example, lymphoma presenting in the thyroid gland with cervical lymph node involvement should be staged as IIE. However, in a change from the Cotswold modification of the Ann Arbor staging system, E lesions do not apply to patients with Stage III nodal disease; any patient with nodal disease above and below the diaphragm with concurrent contiguous extralymphatic involvement is Stage IV (previously Stage IIIE). Frequently, extensive lymph node involvement is associated with extranodal extension of disease that also may directly invade other organs. Such extension should be described with the E suffix if the nodal disease is on one side of the diaphragm. For example, mediastinal lymph nodes with adjacent lung extension should be classified as Stage IIE disease. Other examples of Stage IIE diseases include extension into the anterior chest wall and into the pericardium from a large mediastinal mass (two areas of extralymphatic involvement) and no nodal involvement below the diaphragm; involvement of the iliac bone in the presence of adjacent iliac lymph node involvement and no nodal involvement above the diaphragm; involvement of a lumbar vertebral body in conjunction with para-aortic lymph node involvement and no nodal involvement above the diaphragm; and involvement of the pleura or chest wall as an extension from adjacent internal mammary nodes. A pleural or pericardial effusion with negative (or unknown) cytology is not an E lesion. Liver involvement is an exception; any liver involvement by contiguous or noncontiguous spread should be recorded as Stage IV.
The definition of disease bulk varies according to lymphoma histology. In HL, the extent of mediastinal disease is defined as the ratio between the maximum diameter of the mediastinal mass and maximal intrathoracic diameter based on CT imaging in the Lugano classification. In HL, bulk at other sites is defined as a mass >10 cm. A recent analysis has suggested that in early stage disease, masses > 7 cm (at any site) may dictate the inclusion of radiation to provide optimal outcomes.9 For NHL, the recommended definitions of bulk vary by lymphoma subtype. In follicular lymphoma, 6 cm has been suggested based on the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index, version 2 (FLIPI-2) and its validation.10,11 In DLBCL, cutoffs ranging from 5 to 10 cm have been used, although 10 cm is recommended.12
Lymph Node Regions
The staging classification for lymphoma uses the term lymph node region. The lymph node regions were defined at the Rye Symposium in 1965 and have been used in the Ann Arbor classification; this is unchanged in the Lugano classification (Figure 103.1). They are not based on any physiologic principles but rather have been agreed upon by convention. The currently accepted classification of core nodal regions is as follows:
In addition to these core regions, HL and NHLs may involve epitrochlear lymph nodes, popliteal lymph nodes, internal mammary lymph nodes (considered mediastinal by convention), occipital lymph nodes, submental lymph nodes, preauricular lymph nodes (all considered cervical, Figure 103.1), and many other small nodal areas. Clinical prognostic models may include specific definitions of nodal regions. For example, in follicular lymphoma, the FLIPI-2 uses a different definition of nodal regions (see prognostic factors for follicular lymphoma). This is also the case in determination of favorable versus unfavorable early-stage HL as proposed by the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC; see prognostic factors for HL).
A and B Classification (Symptoms)
For HL, each stage should be classified as either A or B according to the absence or presence of defined constitutional symptoms. The designation A or B is not included in the revised staging of NHL,4 although clinicians are encouraged to record the presence of these symptoms in the medical record. The symptoms are as follows:
Other symptoms, such as chills, pruritus, alcohol-induced pain, and fatigue, are not included in the A or B designation but are recorded in the medical record, as the reappearance of these symptoms may be a harbinger of recurrence.
Criteria for Organ Involvement
Lymph Node Involvement
Lymph node involvement is demonstrated by enlargement of a node detected clinically or by imaging when alternative pathology may reasonably be ruled out. Imaging criteria include demonstration of fludeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity on FDG positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) or unexplained node enlargement on CT. Suspicious nodes should always be biopsied if treatment decisions are based on their involvement, preferably with an excisional biopsy; fine-needle aspirations are strongly discouraged because of the potential for false negatives or misdiagnosis because of loss of lymph node architecture. Core needle biopsy may be able to provide adequate material for diagnosis, particularly of a secondary site.
Spleen Involvement
Spleen involvement is suggested by unequivocal palpable splenomegaly and demonstrated by radiologic confirmation (FDG-PET or CT). Positive findings on FDG-PET include diffuse uptake, a solitary mass, miliary lesions, or nodules and those on CT include enlargement of >13 cm in cranial-caudal dimension, a mass, or nodules that are neither cystic nor vascular.
Liver Involvement
Liver involvement is demonstrated on FDG-PET by diffuse uptake or mass lesions and on CT by nodules that are neither cystic nor vascular. Clinical enlargement alone, with or without abnormalities of liver function tests, is not adequate. Liver biopsy may be used to confirm the presence of liver involvement in a patient with abnormal liver function tests or when imaging assessment is equivocal, if treatment will be altered on the basis of those results.
Lung Involvement
Lung involvement is demonstrated by FDG-avid pulmonary nodules on FDG-PET and evidence of parenchymal involvement on CT in the absence of other likely causes, especially infection. Lung biopsy may be required to clarify equivocal cases.
Bone Involvement
Bone involvement is demonstrated in FDG-avid lymphoma by avid lesions on FDG-PET. It is quite common for FDG-PET to demonstrate more sites of bone involvement than CT imaging. A bone biopsy from an involved area of bone may be necessary for a precise diagnosis, if treatment decisions depend on the findings.
CNS Involvement
CNS involvement often is heralded by symptoms and is demonstrated by (a) a spinal intradural deposit or spinal cord or meningeal involvement, which may be diagnosed on the basis of the clinical history and findings supported by plain radiology, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination with flow cytometry, CT, and/or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (spinal extradural deposits should be carefully assessed because they may be the result of soft tissue disease that represents extension from bone metastasis or disseminated disease) and (b) parenchymal brain disease demonstrated on CT and/or MR imaging, which may be confirmed by biopsy.
Bone Marrow Involvement
Bone marrow involvement is assessed by an aspiration and bone marrow biopsy. In HL, it is rare to have bone marrow involvement in the absence FDG-avid bone site. Therefore, if FDG-PET/CT is performed as part of the staging evaluation, routine bone marrow aspiration and biopsy is not required for staging of HL. In DLBCL, the presence of FDG-avid skeletal lesions precludes the need for a bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. However, the procedure generally should be done in the absence of FDG-avid bone disease because of the risk of identifying discordant bone marrow involvement by a small cell lymphoma. For the indolent B-cell lymphoma, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy remains the standard for evaluation; however, it may be deferred in patients who are candidates for initial observation. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or flow cytometry may be useful adjuncts to histologic interpretation to determine whether a lymphocytic infiltrate is malignant.
Clinical staging includes careful recording of medical history and physical examination; imaging of chest, abdomen, and pelvis; blood chemistry determination; complete blood count; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; in HL); and bone marrow biopsy (if indicated) (Table 103.1).
The basic staging investigation in HL and NHLs includes physical examination; complete blood count; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) measurement; liver function tests; FDG-PET (for FDG-avid lymphomas); contrast-enhanced CT scan of the neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis; and bone marrow aspiration and biopsy in selected cases. In the Lugano classification, both FDG-PET and diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT scanning are recommended. However, in clinical practice, FDG-PET (for FDG-avid lymphomas) may suffice for diagnosis and response evaluation; however, at the end of treatment, contrast-enhanced CT may be useful if imaging is planned during follow up. In patients presenting with extranodal lymphoma, imaging of the presenting area with either CT or MR is required to define local disease extent. In patients at high risk for occult CNS involvement (see Table 103.1), CSF cytology is performed, preferably with flow cytometry. Biopsies of any suspicious lesions also may be conducted as part of the initial clinical staging, especially if this would alter stage assignment. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy is recommended in indolent lymphoma and aggressive NHL if there is no FDG-avid skeletal disease. It is not routinely necessary for staging of HL. Liver biopsy is not required as part of clinical staging, unless abnormal liver function occurs in the presence of otherwise limited-stage disease. Clinical staging is repeated at the end of therapy and forms the basis for defining response.
Additionally, baseline evaluation of HIV status should be done in all cases, as this may have an impact on treatment. Evaluation of hepatitis B serology is essential if anti-CD20 therapy is contemplated and is recommended in all cases because of the risk of reactivation of occult hepatitis B with chemotherapy alone. In patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy and for patients with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL)/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), baseline quantitative immunoglobulins are helpful to evaluate for the presence of hypogammaglobulinemia.
CLL and SLL are a clinical continuum of a single entity characterized by clonal expansion of small B cells involving the bone marrow, the peripheral blood, and often the lymph nodes. The neoplastic cells express CD5, CD19, CD20, and CD23 on their surface and have low levels of surface immunoglobulin. The diagnosis of CLL requires demonstration of more than 5,000 clonal B lymphocytes per microliter of peripheral blood, with or without demonstrated adenopathy. If there is adenopathy with fewer than 5,000 clonal B lymphocytes per microliter of peripheral blood, the diagnosis is SLL. Fewer than 5,000 clonal CLL-phenotype cells in the peripheral blood in the absence of adenopathy is monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL). CLL/SLL has a variable clinical course, ranging from an asymptomatic disease requiring no treatment for many years to a rapidly progressive disease necessitating prompt and repeated treatment.
CLL most often is diagnosed in asymptomatic individuals, often when a complete blood count (CBC) is obtained as part of an annual physical examination. Modest lymphocytosis may be the only presenting abnormality and often is overlooked unless it is very high. An initial evaluation should include a clinical history and physical examination, including careful assessment for adenopathy or organomegaly. The diagnosis of CLL/SLL is established by flow cytometry analysis of a peripheral blood sample and/or results of a lymph node biopsy. A bone marrow examination is not required to establish the diagnosis.
Monoclonal B Lymphocytosis (MBL)
MBL is defined as the presence of monoclonal B-cell populations in the peripheral blood of up to 5 x 109/L, usually with the phenotype of CLL, in the absence of lymphomatous features diagnostic of SLL. Found in up to 12% of healthy individuals, in some it may be an extremely small population, but in others it may be associated with clinically evident lymphocytosis. MBL precedes virtually all cases of CLL/SLL. Current practice distinguishes between low count MBL, defined as a peripheral blood CLL count of <0.5 x 109/L, from high count MBL. Low-count MBL has an extremely small chance of progression and does not require active clinical monitoring. High-count MBL requires routine/yearly follow-up and has phenotypic and genetic/molecular features very similar to those of Rai stage 0 CLL, although IGHV-mutated cases are more frequent in MBL. Recently, a nodal equivalent of MBL was described with a variable rate of progression to CLL/SLL, correlating with nodal size and presence of growth centers. Non-CLL-type MBLs, at least some of which may be closely related to SMZL, are less common, although they recently were recognized.
Pathological Classification
The use of the term pathological staging is reserved for patients who undergo staging laparotomy with an explicit intent to assess the presence of abdominal disease or to define histologic microscopic disease extent in the abdomen. As a result of improved diagnostic imaging, staging laparotomy and pathological staging generally are no longer performed.
|
|
*CNS risk score: 1 point for each of the following risk factors: age >60 years; performance status (PS) ≤2; LDH greater than upper limit of normal; two or more extralymphatic sites; Stage III/IV; adrenal or renal involvement.
Prognostic Factors Required for Stage Grouping
Stage is only one component in clinical prognostication. Clinical prognostic models have become the cornerstone for categorization of patients into various risk groups and in some cases, to guide therapy. However, the clinical prognostic models vary by lymphoma histology. In addition, important insights have been gained into the biology of the lymphoid neoplasms that also have had a profound impact on outcome and an emerging impact on therapy. These important factors for determination of clinical risk are discussed by disease entity.
Although SLL and CLL represent different clinical presentations of the same disease, traditionally they have been staged by using distinct staging systems. SLL generally was staged with Ann Arbor staging and now is staged with the Lugano classification. For CLL, two staging systems are commonly used: the Rai and Binet staging systems. Both are based on physical examination and CBC measurement. CT scans are not required for application of these staging systems. However, in clinical practice, CT scans commonly are performed. In most cases, this information is not used to determine CLL stage but may indicate more extensive disease than appreciated by physical examination and may influence treatment decisions. CT may be used to evaluate the spleen and peripheral nodes in an obese patient if the physical examination is limited. A finding of retroperitoneal or mesenteric adenopathy on CT does not alter stage. The modified Rai system is predominant in North America, whereas the Binet system is in wide use outside the United States. These staging systems provide prognostic information and also guide decisions regarding the start of therapy.
Stage | Risk | Findings | Survival (mo) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | Low | Lymphocytosis only | greater than 120 |
I | Intermediate | + Adenopathy | 95 |
II | Intermediate | + Enlarged spleen and/or liver | 72 |
III | High | Lymphocytosis + Hgb less than 11 g/dL | 30 |
IV | High | Lymphocytosis + Plt less than 100,000/μL | 30 |
Stage | Findings | Survival (mo) |
---|---|---|
A | Lymphocytosis only | greater than 120 |
B | + Adenopathy | 95 |
C | + Enlarged spleen and/or liver | 72 |
Definition: ALC >5,000 cells/μL
Clinical significance: SLL with ALC >5,000 cells/μL is CLL and should be staged as such.
Definition: Presence of lymph nodes >1.5 cm on physical examination (PE)
Clinical significance: Defines stage
Definition: Enlarged liver and/or spleen on PE
Clinical significance: Defines stage
Definition: Hgb <11.0 g/dL
Clinical significance: Defines stage
Definition: Platelets (Plt) <100,000/μL
Clinical significance: Defines stage
Additional Factors Recommended for Clinical Care
The modern era of prognostic markers in SLL/CLL is based on two key findings: recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities detected by FISH and the correlation of outcome with IGHV mutation status. Karyotypic analysis of SLL/CLL classically has been associated with limited results, because metaphases have been obtained in only 40-50% of cases secondary to the low mitotic rate. A landmark study evaluating a panel of FISH probes identified four recurrent abnormalities in SLL/CLL: del(11q), del(13q), trisomy 12, and del(17p).17 The del(13q) was the most common abnormality (occurring in 18-54% of cases) and is associated with a favorable OS (median, 11-15 years). Patients with trisomy 12 (occurring in 14-19%) had a median OS similar to that of patients with a normal FISH study (median, 10 years). Patients with del(11q) (11-20%) had a median OS of 6 to 9 years. Those with del(17p) (6-16% of patients) had the worst outcome, with a median OS of 2 to 4 years. In addition to del(17p), TP53 mutation was shown to be prognostic in CLL, as was mutation of ATM, which is almost invariably lost in del(11q). Neither trisomy 12 nor del(13q) as sole abnormalities drive treatment decisions and therefore are not included in this section.
IGHV Mutation Status. The role of IGHV mutation status is well established in SLL/CLL.18,19 This reflects the fact that some CLLs develop directly from naïve B cells and express a germline IGHV whereas others are derived from B cells that have transited through the germinal center (IGHV mutated). Evaluation of ZAP70 expression by flow cytometry has been suggested as a surrogate for IGHV testing. However, the results of ZAP70 flow cytometry may vary from laboratory to laboratory, and IHGV mutation testing is now readily available commercially. The cutoff for mutation is 2%, which reliably identifies a favorable IGHV-mutant group with a superior OS (median, >20 years) compared with the IGHV germline patients (median, 7-10 years). IGHV is invariant, thus needs to be tested only once during the course of the disease. It is an important predictor of time for first therapy.20 Notably, CLL with a rearranged VH3-21 has an aggressive course if the gene is germline or mutated.21
del(17p)/TP53 Mutation. As noted earlier, the finding of del(17p) by FISH is associated with a poor OS. Furthermore, this finding has been associated with a short time to initial therapy, short progression-free survival (PFS) and chemotherapy resistance.22-24 The incidence of del(17p) and TP53 mutation increases in relapsed/refractory disease, and reassessment of the tumor is appropriate if therapy is being considered. TP53 mutations also independently predict adverse outcome in CLL, including short time to initial therapy, PFS, OS, and chemotherapy resistance.25-28 New therapies approved for treatment of SLL/CLL, namely idelalisib and ibrutinib, both B-cell pathway inhibitors, have demonstrated activity in the treatment of cases with del(17p) and TP53 mutation.29,30 Additional agents (including venetoclax) have been identified that are active in patients with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations. Therefore, obtaining this information is essential for treatment selection.
del(11q)/ATM Mutation. Cases of SLL/CLL with del(11q) have a poor prognosis and are associated with extensive peripheral, abdominal, and mediastinal adenopathy.31 Cases with del(11q) are more likely to be associated with germline IGHV. The del(11q) almost invariably involves deletion of the ATM gene, and mutation of ATM also has been associated with poor outcome.32 Cases with del(11q) are relatively resistant to treatment with fludarabine.23 In the LRF CLL4 trial, the addition of cyclophosphamide to fludarabine significantly increased OS compared with fludarabine alone (47% vs. 18.5% at 2 years).33 Furthermore, the addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide significantly enhanced overall response rate, PFS, and OS in del(11q) patients in the CLL8 trial.26 As with del(17p), the incidence of del(11q) increases in patients with relapsed/refractory disease and must be evaluated before planning a course of therapy.
Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS). Clinical outcome in CLL/SLL is influenced by patient fitness. A measure of fitness that has been adopted in the management of patients with CLL/SLL is the CIRS score.34 Several studies used a CIRS score cutoff of >6 to indicate lack of fitness for aggressive chemoimmunotherapy. This scale is used for the selection of therapy.
Definition: Determination by DNA sequencing whether the IGHV is germline (unfavorable) or mutated (favorable)
Clinical significance: Tumors with mutated IGHV are post germinal center and have a favorable outcome.
Definition: Identification of del(17p) by FISH
Clinical significance: Long-term outcome is generally worse in patients with del(17p); however, it is not adequate as a sole basis for treatment. Associated with resistance to genotoxic therapy.
Definition: Identification of TP53 mutation by DNA sequencing
Clinical significance: Long-term outcome is generally worse in patients with TP53 mutation; however, it is not adequate as a sole basis for treatment.
Definition: Identification of del(11q) by FISH (ATM deletion)
Clinical significance: Associated with inferior outcome; outcome improved by addition of an alkylator to therapy
Definition: Fit (≤6) or unfit (>6)
Clinical significance: Contributes to choice of therapy
Several factors are emerging that have prognostic value in patients with CLL/SLL.
Complex Karyotypes. Complex karyotypes, defined as karyotypes with three or more structural abnormalities, are associated with an adverse outcome in SLL/CLL35-38; this complexity is not captured by conventional FISH assays. The value of this prognostic marker is limited by the difficulty in obtaining metaphases with conventional techniques. Stimulated karyotypes with CpG oligonucleotides dramatically increase the yield of conventional cytogenetics in SLL/CLL.39 The importance of complex karyotype recently re-emerged, as it was found to be an important predictor of treatment failure in patients treated with ibrutinib and is independent of TP53 mutation or del(17p).40 In patients with relapsed/refractory CLL, CpG-stimulated karyotype may be an important factor for treatment selection in the future.
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD). Prospective studies have shown that assessment of MRD by multiparameter flow cytometry predicts durability of response, PFS, and OS following treatment with chemoimmunotherapy such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab and bendamustine/rituximab. However, its clinical applicability is limited by the lack of standardized evaluation and lack of therapies specifically for patients with MRD after chemoimmunotherapy. Furthermore, the prognostic value of MRD has not been evaluated extensively with the emerging novel agents, such as phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and BH3-mimetics.
CLL-IPI. An international collaboration led by the German CLL Study Group developed a new prognostic index that has excellent discrimination of PFS and OS for patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy. The model was validated in a large independent dataset from the Mayo Clinic. In addition to clinical stage, the index includes several factors known to have an important impact on outcome in patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy: IGHV status, del(17p)/TP53 mutation status, and β2-microglobulin. These factors are weighted based on the hazard ratios from the statistical model. However, this index has not been applied prospectively, and its value in the current era of novel agents has not been evaluated.
Definition: Conventional or CpG-stimulated karyotype with three or more abnormalities
Clinical significance: Predicts clinical resistance to ibrutinib
Definition:MRD negative is defined as inability to detect CLL-like cells with a sensitivity of 1 in 10-4 by multiparameter flow cytometry
Clinical significance: Predicts PFS and OS in patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy
Definition: 10-point scoring system:TP53 mutation or del(17p), 4 points; IGHV germline status, 2 points, β2-microglobulin >3.5 mg/dL, 2 points; Binet B/C or Rai I-IV, 1 point; age >65, 1 point
Low risk: 0-1 points; 5-y survival 93%Intermediate risk: 2-3 points; 5-y survival 79%High risk: 4-6 points; 5-y survival 64%Very high risk: 7-10 points; 5-y survival 23%
Clinical significance: Modified staging system with superior predictive power compared with Rai/Binet staging system for chemoimmunotherapy
Risk Assesment Models
Risk assessment models and prognostic tools play an important role in cancer medicine because they provide a mechanism to integrate disparate data elements into a process that leads to decreased prognostic heterogeneity. Such processes are useful for (1) identifying and characterizing important prognostic factors, (2) improving prognostic predictions for individual patients, and (3) designing, conducting, and analyzing clinical trials.41 The most common type of prognostic tool is a prognostic calculator that provides time-specific outcome (e.g., 5-year OS) probability predictions for individual patients based on their demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics. The prognostic nomogram developed by Yang et al42 is an example of a risk calculator. Another type of prognostic tool is a prognostic classifier that places patients into ordered prognostic risk classes (either directly or based on cutoffs for individual probability estimates). The remaining tools referenced in this chapter (e.g., IPI, MIPI, FLIPI, and CLL-IPI) are prognostic classifiers. The AJCC Precision Medicine Core (PMC) developed and published criteria for critical evaluation of prognostic calculators,43 which are presented and discussed in Chapter 4. The prognostic nomogram developed by Yang et al42 meets all but one of the AJCC PMC criteria because it lacks discussion of how missing data were treated.
Stage | Stage description |
---|---|
Limited stage | |
I | Involvement of a single lymphatic site (i.e., nodal region, Waldeyer's ring, thymus, or spleen) |
IE | Single extralymphatic site in the absence of nodal involvement (rare in HL) |
II | Involvement of two or more lymph node regions on the same side of the diaphragm |
IIE | Contiguous extralymphatic extension from a nodal site with or without involvement of other lymph node regions on the same side of the diaphragm |
II bulky* | Stage II with disease bulk** |
Advanced stage | |
III | Involvement of lymph node regions on both sides of the diaphragm; nodes above the diaphragm with spleen involvement |
IV | Diffuse or disseminated involvement of one or more extralymphatic organs, with or without associated lymph node involvement or noncontiguous extralymphatic organ involvement in conjunction with nodal Stage II disease or any extralymphatic organ involvement in nodal Stage III disease Stage IV includes any involvement of the CSF, bone marrow, liver, or multiple lung lesions (other than by direct extension in IIE disease). |
*Stage II bulky may be considered either early- or advanced-stage disease based on lymphoma histology and prognostic factors (see discussion of HL prognostic factors).
**The definition of disease bulk varies according to the lymphoma histology. In the Lugano classification,4 bulk in HL is defined as a mass greater than one third of the thoracic diameter on CT of the chest or a mass greater than 10 cm. For NHL, the recommended definitions of bulk vary by lymphoma histology. In follicular lymphoma, 6 cm has been suggested based on the FLIPI-2 and its validation.10,11 In DLBCL, cutoffs ranging from 5 to 10 cm have been used, although 10 cm is recommended.12
HL uses an A or B designation with stage group. A/B is no longer used in NHL.