AUTHORS: Leah Saylor, DO and Nima R. Patel, MD, MS
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a broad term for variations in normal menses. Normal duration of menstrual flow is 5 days, with normal menstrual cycles lasting 21 to 35 days. Heavy menstrual bleeding with normal cycles, historically called menorrhagia, is a large volume of menstrual blood loss quantified as >80 ml per cycle. Bleeding also may be prolonged, intermenstrual, frequent, and irregular. This language replaces prior terms such as metrorrhagia (bleeding between cycles); polymenorrhea (menses <21 days apart); and oligomenorrhea (menses >35 days apart).1-3
The PALM-COEIN classification of AUB was adopted in 2011 to standardize terminology and reflect etiology: Polyp, Adenomyosis, Leiomyoma, Malignancy and hyperplasia, Coagulopathy, Ovulatory dysfunction, Endometrial, Iatrogenic, and Not yet classified. The PALM-COEIN terminology is used to classify the etiology of the bleeding; for instance, AUB-P would refer to AUB due to polyps.1-4
Dysfunctional uterine bleeding
|
AUB occurs in 10% to 15% of reproductive-age patients, 5% of emergency room visits in nonpregnant patients, 30% of office visits, and 70% of gynecologic consults.2,3
Age, age at menarche or menopause, menstrual bleeding patterns, severity of bleeding, pain, underlying medical conditions, surgical history, medications, family history, hirsutism, acne, symptoms of thyroid dysfunction or other endocrinopathies1-4
In addition to the PALM-COEIN classification, it is also important to consider etiologies as listed earlier, including urinary and GI tract sources.
Differential diagnosis of AUB can be further narrowed by age.
First-line therapy for acute AUB without known bleeding disorders is hormonal management, such as oral progestins, high-dose combined oral contraceptive pills, IV estrogen, tranexamic acid. Blood transfusion as indicated. Surgical management includes dilation and curettage, endometrial ablation (Fig. E1), uterine artery embolization, or hysterectomy (Table 1).1-4 A comparison of effective reduction of blood loss with each treatment modality is summarized in Table 2.
TABLE 2 Reduction of Menstrual Blood Loss With Treatment
Agent Used | Decrease in Menstrual Blood Loss (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|
EACA | 47 | ||
AMCA | 44-54 | ||
NSAID | 21-50 | ||
Oral contraceptives | 52 | ||
Levonorgestrel IUD at 3, 6, and 12 mo | 82, 88, 96 | ||
Endometrial ablation | Up to 100; 68%-78% of patients achieve normal menses | ||
Hysterectomy | 100 |
AMCA, Tranexamic acid; EACA, Ε-aminocaproic acid; IUD, intrauterine device; NSAID, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug.
From Gershenson DM et al: Comprehensive gynecology, ed 8, Philadelphia, 2022, Elsevier.
TABLE 1 Pros and Cons of Different Hysterectomy Methods
Pros | Cons | |
---|---|---|
Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) | Cervix is removed; therefore no further need for smears and no further risk of cervical malignancy (thus particularly suitable for those with a history of abnormal cytology) Good access to ovaries | Increased surgical morbidity |
Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy | Fewer complications than TAH (↓bleeding, ↓infection, ↓bladder injury, ↓ureteric damage) Good access to ovaries | Risk of cervical cancer remains as before |
Vaginal hysterectomy | May be lower incidence of bladder and bowel injury in straightforward cases (compared with abdominal hysterectomy) No painful abdominal wound | Limited ovarian access Contraindicated with: |
From Magowan BA: Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (Menorrhagia) (Patient Information)
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (Related Key Topic)