Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF), an antiretroviral agent, is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor that is active against HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV).1,2,3,200
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF) is used in conjunction with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in adults, adolescents, and pediatric patients 2 years of age or older weighing ≥10 kg.1 Tenofovir DF is commercially available as a single-entity preparation and in various fixed-combination preparations that contain 2 or 3 additional antiretrovirals; refer to separate combination product monographs for information related to the specific uses of these products.1,230,231,232,233,235,239,240 Tenofovir DF is commonly used as part of a dual-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone of a fully suppressive antiretroviral regimen; consult guidelines for the most current information on recommended regimens.200,201,202 Selection of an initial antiretroviral regimen should be individualized based on factors such as virologic efficacy, toxicity, pill burden, dosing frequency, drug-drug interaction potential, resistance test results, comorbid conditions, access, and cost.200,201,202
Antiretroviral-naive Adults and Adolescents
Efficacy of tenofovir DF in a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimen in treatment-naïve adults was evaluated in a double-blind, active-controlled study (study 903) in 600 adults (mean age 36 years, 74% male, 64% white, 20% Black, mean baseline CD4+ T-cell count 279 cells/mm3, median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA 77,600 copies/mL).1,40 At 144 weeks, 68% of those receiving a regimen of efavirenz, tenofovir DF, and lamivudine had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL compared with 62% of those receiving a regimen of efavirenz, stavudine, and lamivudine.1 In addition, 62% of those receiving the tenofovir DF regimen had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL compared with 58% in the comparator group.1 The mean increase from baseline CD4+ T-cell count was 263 and 283 cells/mm3, respectively.1
Efficacy of an NNRTI-based regimen that included tenofovir DF (efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF) was evaluated in a randomized, open-label study designed to demonstrate noninferiority of this regimen compared with a regimen of efavirenz, zidovudine, and lamivudine (study 934).1,23 In this study, 511 treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients (mean age 38 years, 86% male, 59% white, 23% Black, median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA level 5.01 log10 copies/mL [range: 3.56-6.54 log10 copies/mL], mean baseline CD4+ T-cell count 245 cells/mm3) were randomized to receive a once-daily regimen of efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF or a regimen of efavirenz once daily with the fixed combination of lamivudine and zidovudine (lamivudine/zidovudine; Combivir®) twice daily.1,23 The primary measure used to assess noninferiority of the regimen of efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF to the regimen of efavirenz and lamivudine/zidovudine was plasma HIV-1 RNA levels at week 48, specifically, the number of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL.1,23 The 487 patients without baseline resistance to efavirenz who underwent randomization and received treatment were the predefined population used for the primary endpoint analysis.23
Through week 48, the regimen of efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF met the criteria for noninferiority to the regimen of efavirenz and lamivudine/zidovudine.23 At week 48, 84 or 80% of adults receiving the efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF regimen and 73 or 70% of adults receiving the efavirenz and lamivudine/zidovudine regimen had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 or 50 copies/mL, respectively.1,23 At week 48, increases in CD4+ T-cell counts were greater in patients receiving the efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF regimen (mean increase of 190 cells/mm3) than in those receiving the efavirenz and lamivudine/zidovudine regimen (mean increase of 158 cells/mm3).1,23 Virologic failure (i.e., individuals who failed to achieve virologic suppression or experienced rebound after achieving virologic suppression) was reported in 2% of those receiving efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF and in 4% of those receiving efavirenz and lamivudine/zidovudine at week 48.1 At 144 weeks, 64% of adults receiving the efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF regimen and 56% of those receiving the efavirenz and lamivudine/zidovudine regimen had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL.30 The mean increase in CD4+ T-cell count from baseline in these groups at 144 weeks was 312 and 271 cells/mm3, respectively.1
Antiretroviral-experienced Adults and Adolescents
In study 907, a placebo-controlled, randomized study in 550 previously treated HIV-infected adults (mean age 42 years, 85% male, 69% white, 17% Black, 12% Hispanic, mean duration of prior treatment 5.4 years, mean baseline CD4+ T-cell count 427 cells/mm3; median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA level 2340 copies/mL), addition of tenofovir DF to the existing antiretroviral regimen resulted in decreases in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and increases in CD4+ T-cell counts.1,8 At 24 weeks, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were <400 copies/mL in 40% of those receiving tenofovir DF compared with 11% of those receiving placebo; in addition, 19% of those receiving tenofovir DF had levels <50 copies/mL compared with 1% of those receiving placebo.1,8 After 24 weeks of blinded study, all patients received open-label tenofovir DF for an additional 24 weeks.1,8 At week 48, 28% of those who received tenofovir DF for the entire duration had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL.4
Efficacy of tenofovir DF in pediatric patients has been evaluated in a randomized study in 92 HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-experienced children 2 to less than 12 years of age (study 352).1,38 Patients had been receiving a suppressive regimen containing stavudine or zidovudine and were randomized to receive tenofovir DF instead of stavudine or zidovudine or to continue their original regimen.1,2,38 At 48 weeks, 89% of patients randomized to receive tenofovir DF and 90% of those who continued their original regimen had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL.8
In a study in 87 antiretroviral-experienced pediatric patients 12 to less than 18 years of age (study 321) with mean baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA level of 4.6 log10 copies/mL and mean baseline CD4+ T-cell count of 374 cells/mm3 (90% harbored HIV-1 with NRTI resistance-associated substitutions at baseline), patients received tenofovir DF or placebo with an optimized background regimen (OBR) for 48 weeks.39 Overall, there was no difference in virologic response between the groups; subgroup analysis suggested that the lack of difference in virologic response may be attributable to imbalances between the treatment arms in baseline virus susceptibility to tenofovir DF and the OBR.1 Although changes in HIV-1 RNA were less than anticipated in this trial, the comparability of the pharmacokinetic and safety data to that observed in adults supports the use of tenofovir DF in pediatric patients 12 years of age or older who weigh at least 35 kg and whose HIV-1 isolate is expected to be sensitive to tenofovir DF.1
Therapeutic options for the treatment and prevention of HIV infection and recommendations concerning the use of antiretrovirals are continuously evolving.200,201,202 Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is recommended for all individuals with HIV regardless of CD4 counts, and should be initiated as soon as possible after diagnosis of HIV and continued indefinitely.200,201,202 The primary goals of ART are to achieve and maintain durable suppression of HIV viral load (as measured by plasma HIV-1 RNA levels) to a level below which drug-resistance mutations cannot emerge (i.e., below detectable limits), restore and preserve immunologic function, reduce HIV-related morbidity and mortality, improve quality of life, and prevent transmission of HIV.200,202 While the most appropriate antiretroviral regimen cannot be defined for each clinical scenario, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents, HHS Panel on Antiretroviral Therapy and Medical Management of Children Living with HIV, and HHS Panel on Treatment of Pregnant Women with HIV Infection and Prevention of Perinatal Transmission, have developed comprehensive guidelines that provide information on selection and use of antiretrovirals for the treatment or prevention of HIV infection.200,201,202 Because of the complexity of managing patients with HIV, it is recommended that clinicians with HIV expertise be consulted when needed.200,201,202
The use of combination antiretroviral regimens that generally include 3 drugs from 2 or more drug classes is currently recommended to achieve viral suppression.200,201 In both treatment-naïve adults and children, an initial antiretroviral regimen generally consists of 2 NRTIs administered in combination with a third active antiretroviral drug from 1 of 3 drug classes: an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI), an NNRTI, or a protease inhibitor (PI) with a pharmacokinetic enhancer (also known as a booster; the 2 drugs used for this purpose are cobicistat and ritonavir).200,201,202 Selection of an initial regimen should be individualized based on factors such as virologic efficacy, toxicity, pill burden, dosing frequency, drug-drug interaction potential, resistance-test results, comorbid conditions, access, and cost.200,201,202 In patients with comorbid infections (e.g., hepatitis B, tuberculosis), antiretroviral regimen selection should also consider the potential for activity against other present infections and timing of initiation relative to other anti-infective regimens.200
Tenofovir DF, an NRTI, is commonly used as part of a dual-NRTI backbone of a fully suppressive antiretroviral regimen.200 In the 2022 HHS adult and adolescent HIV treatment guideline, tenofovir DF is included in various regimens.200 Some of these tenofovir DF-containing regimens are listed among recommended initial regimens for most people with HIV, and include the following: dolutegravir/tenofovir DF/emtricitabine; dolutegravir/tenofovir DF/lamivudine.200 Additional tenofovir DF-containing regimens are listed among recommended initial regimens in certain clinical situations.200 Regimens containing tenofovir DF/emtricitabine or tenofovir DF/lamivudine are recommended in patients co-infected with HBV, as these drugs have activity against both viruses.200
In the 2022 HHS pediatric HIV treatment guideline, tenofovir DF is included in various regimens.201 Tenofovir DF plus lamivudine or emtricitabine is recommended as an alternative dual-NRTI combination for children aged ≥2 to 12 years.201
In the 2022 HHS perinatal HIV treatment guideline, tenofovir DF is included in various regimens.202 Tenofovir DF plus lamivudine or emtricitabine is recommended as one of the preferred dual-NRTI backbones.202 Preferred antiretroviral regimens for initial ART in pregnancy include a preferred dual-NRTI backbone plus one of the following: dolutegravir, raltegravir, atazanavir/ritonavir, or darunavir/ritonavir.202
Preexposure Prophylaxis for Prevention of HIV-1 Infection
Tenofovir DF is used in combination with emtricitabine for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to reduce the risk of sexually acquired HIV-1 infection in at-risk HIV-negative adults and adolescents; refer to the fixed-combination product monograph for detailed information on this use.230,1001
In the 2021 CDC HIV PrEP guideline, several PrEP regimens are recommended based on an individual patient's characteristics to reflect the populations evaluated in pivotal clinical studies.1001 Options for PrEP include oral emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in sexually active adults and adolescents and men and women who inject drugs, oral emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in men and transgender women who have sex with men, and intramuscular cabotegravir in adults and adolescents.1001
Postexposure Prophylaxis following Occupational Exposure to HIV
Tenofovir DF is used in conjunction with other antiretrovirals for postexposure prophylaxis of HIV infection following occupational exposure (PEP) in health-care personnel and other individuals exposed via percutaneous injury (e.g., needlestick, cut with sharp object) or mucous membrane or nonintact skin (e.g., chapped, abraded, dermatitis) contact with blood, tissue, or other body fluids that might contain HIV.199
The US Public Health Service (USPHS) states that the preferred regimen for PEP following an occupational exposure to HIV is a 3-drug regimen of raltegravir used in conjunction with emtricitabine and tenofovir DF (may be administered as the fixed combination emtricitabine/tenofovir DF; Truvada®).199 These experts recommend several alternative regimens that include an INSTI, NNRTI, or PI and 2 NRTIs (dual NRTIs).199 The preferred dual NRTI option for use in PEP regimens is emtricitabine and tenofovir DF (may be administered as the fixed combination emtricitabine/tenofovir DF; Truvada®); alternative dual NRTIs are tenofovir DF and lamivudine, lamivudine and zidovudine (may be administered as the fixed combination lamivudine/zidovudine; Combivir®), or zidovudine and emtricitabine.199 Because management of occupational exposures to HIV is complex and evolving, consultation with an infectious disease specialist, clinician with expertise in administration of antiretroviral agents, and/or the National Clinicians' Postexposure Prophylaxis Hotline (PEPline at 888-448-4911) is recommended whenever possible.199 However, initiation of PEP should not be delayed while waiting for expert consultation.199
Postexposure Prophylaxis following Nonoccupational Exposure to HIV
Tenofovir DF is used in conjunction with other antiretrovirals for postexposure prophylaxis of HIV infection following nonoccupational exposure (nPEP) in individuals exposed to blood, genital secretions, or other potentially infectious body fluids that might contain HIV when that exposure represents a substantial risk for HIV transmission.198
When nPEP is indicated following a nonoccupational exposure to HIV, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that the preferred regimen in adults and adolescents 13 years of age or older with normal renal function is either raltegravir or dolutegravir used in conjunction with emtricitabine and tenofovir DF (administered as the fixed combination emtricitabine/tenofovir DF; Truvada®).198 The alternative nPEP regimen recommended in these patients is ritonavir-boosted darunavir used in conjunction with emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (Truvada®).198
Consultation with an infectious disease specialist, clinician with expertise in administration of antiretroviral agents, and/or the National Clinicians' Postexposure Prophylaxis Hotline (PEPline at 888-448-4911) is recommended if nPEP is indicated in certain exposed individuals (e.g., pregnant women, children, those with medical conditions such as renal impairment) or if an antiretroviral regimen not included in the CDC guidelines is being considered, the source virus is known or likely to be resistant to antiretrovirals, or the healthcare provider is inexperienced in prescribing antiretrovirals.198 However, initiation of nPEP should not be delayed while waiting for expert consultation.198
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
Tenofovir DF is used for the treatment of chronic HBV infection in adults and pediatric patients ≥2 years of age weighing ≥10 kg.1 Tenofovir DF is a preferred initial treatment option when chronic HBV treatment is indicated; choice of antiviral medication should be individualized based on patient characteristics and comorbidities, treatment tolerability, and cost.97
Efficacy of tenofovir DF for treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic HBV infection was evaluated in a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study (study 0103) in mainly nucleoside-naïve adults with compensated liver function (mean baseline serum HBV DNA level 8.7 log10 copies/mL, mean serum ALT 147 IU/mL, mean baseline total Knodell Histology Activity Index [HAI] score 8.4).1,26 Patients received tenofovir DF 300 mg once daily or adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg once daily.1,26 Sixty-nine percent of patients in the study were male, 36% were Asian and 52% were Caucasian, 16% had received prior treatment with interferon alfa, and less than 5% had received treatment with a nucleoside.1 After 48 weeks of treatment, all patients were eligible to receive open-label tenofovir DF with no interruption in treatment.1
At 48 weeks, 67% of patients receiving tenofovir DF had serum HBV DNA levels <400 copies/mL and histologic improvement (defined as a reduction of at least 2 points in the Knodell necroinflammatory score with no concurrent worsening of the Knodell fibrosis score) compared with 12% of those receiving adefovir.1,26 HBeAg seroconversion occurred in about 20 or 16% of those receiving tenofovir DF or adefovir, respectively; loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) occurred in 3 or 0% of those who received tenofovir DF or adefovir, respectively.1
Through 384 weeks, 49% of patients originally randomized to tenofovir DF who subsequently received open-label tenofovir DF had HBV DNA levels <400 copies/mL, 42% had ALT normalization, 20% had HBeAg loss, and 13% had HBeAg seroconversion.1 In patients originally randomized to adefovir who subsequently received open-label tenofovir DF, 56% had HBV DNA levels <400 copies/mL, 50% had ALT normalization, 28% had HBeAg loss, and 19% had HBeAg seroconversion through 384 weeks.1 Rates of HBsAg loss and seroconversion were 11 and 8%, respectively, at week 384 in those initially randomized to tenofovir DF and 12 and 10%, respectively, in those initially randomized to adefovir.1
Liver biopsies were obtained at baseline, 48 weeks, and 240 weeks from 328 patients in studies 102 (HBeAg-negative adults) and 103 (HBeAg-positive adults) who received continuing open-label treatment with tenofovir DF.1 The observed histological response rates in these patients were 80 and 88% at week 48 and 240, respectively.1 In patients with cirrhosis at baseline, 97 and 99% had improvement or no change in fibrosis score at week 48 and 240, respectively; 29 and 72% experienced regression of cirrhosis by week 48 and 240, respectively.1
A total of 203 patients from studies 102 and 103 continued to receive open-label tenofovir DF for up to 10 years; at 10 years, tenofovir DF maintained tolerability and efficacy without development of resistance.45
Efficacy of tenofovir DF for treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection was evaluated in a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study (study 0102) in adults with compensated liver function (mean baseline serum HBV DNA level 6.9 log10 copies/mL, mean serum ALT 140 IU/mL, mean baseline total Knodell Histology Activity Index [HAI] score 7.8).1,26 Patients received tenofovir DF 300 mg once daily or adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg once daily for 48 weeks.1,26 Seventy-seven percent of patients in the study were male, 25% were Asian and 65% were Caucasian, 17% had received prior treatment with interferon alfa, and 18% had received treatment with a nucleoside (16% had received lamivudine).1 After 48 weeks of treatment, all patients were eligible to receive open-label tenofovir DF with no interruption in treatment.1
At 48 weeks, 71% of patients receiving tenofovir DF had serum HBV DNA levels <400 copies/mL and histologic improvement (defined as a reduction of at least 2 points in the Knodell necroinflammatory score with no concurrent worsening of the Knodell fibrosis score) compared with 49% of those receiving adefovir.1,26
At 384 weeks, 73% of patients originally randomized to tenofovir DF who subsequently received open-label tenofovir DF had HBV DNA levels <400 copies/mL and 63% had ALT normalization.1 In patients originally randomized to adefovir who subsequently received open-label tenofovir DF, 80% had HBV DNA levels <400 copies/mL and 70% had ALT normalization at 384 weeks.1 HBsAg loss and seroconversion rates were approximately 1% in both treatment groups at week 384.
Lamivudine-resistant Chronic HBV
Efficacy of tenofovir DF for treatment of chronic HBV infection in adults with persistent viremia and genotypic evidence of lamivudine resistance was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial.1 43 Of the 141 adults randomized to receive tenofovir DF, mean age was 47 years, 74% were male, 59% were white, 37% were Asian, and mean baseline plasma HBV DNA was 6.4 log10 copies/mL.1 At baseline, 54% were HBeAg-negative, 46% were HBeAg-positive, and 56% had abnormal ALT.1 At 96 weeks, 89% of patients receiving tenofovir DF had HBV DNA levels less than 400 copies/mL, which was similar to comparator groups; 62% of patients with abnormal ALT at baseline experienced normalization.1 Of the 65 patients who were HBeAg-positive at baseline, 15% experienced HbeAg loss and 11% developed antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) through week 96.1 Efficacy of tenofovir DF was maintained for up to 240 weeks.44
Across the combined chronic HBV treatment trials, there were insufficient data to establish efficacy in patents with adefovir resistance-associated substitutions.1
Efficacy of tenofovir DF for treatment of chronic HBV infection in adults with decompensated liver disease was evaluated in a small, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial (study 0108).1,41 The primary objective of the study was to assess safety; efficacy outcomes were examined as secondary endpoints.41 A total of 45 patients were assigned to the tenofovir DF treatment arm.1,41 At baseline, 69% of patients were HBeAg-negative and 31% were HBeAg-positive; patients had a mean Child-Pugh score of 7, mean Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of 12, mean HBV DNA level of 5.8 log10 copies/mL, and mean serum ALT concentration of 61 IU/mL.1
At 48 weeks, 70% of patients receiving tenofovir DF had HBV DNA levels <400 copies/mL and 46% had ALT normalization.1 The study was not designed to evaluate treatment effect on clinical end points such as progression of liver disease, need for liver transplantation, or death.1
Efficacy of tenofovir DF for the treatment of chronic HBV in patients 12 to <18 years of age was evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial (study 115).1,42 In the trial, 106 patients received treatment with tenofovir DF or placebo for 72 weeks.1,42 Most patients (91%) were HBeAg-positive at baseline.1 At trial entry, patients had a mean HBV DNA level of 8.1 log10 copies/mL and mean ALT of 101 IU/L.1 At week 72, 88% of patients receiving tenofovir DF and 0% of patients receiving placebo had HBV DNA <400 copies/mL.1 Among subjects with abnormal ALT at baseline, normalization of ALT was achieved in 74% of tenofovir DF-treated patients and 31% of patients who received placebo.1,42
Efficacy of tenofovir DF for the treatment of chronic HBV in patients 2 to <12 years of age was evaluated in a placebo-controlled trial (study 144).32 Most of the 89 patients enrolled in the trial were HBeAg-positive at baseline (96%).1 Patients received tenofovir DF or placebo for 48 weeks.1 At baseline, patients had a mean HBV DNA level of 8.1 log10 copies/mL and mean ALT of 123 IU/L.1 At week 48, 77% of patients receiving tenofovir DF and 7% of patients receiving placebo had HBV DNA <400 copies/mL.1 Normalization of ALT was achieved in 66% of tenofovir DF-treated patients and 15% of patients who received placebo.1 The proportion of patients achieving HBeAg loss or seroconversion was similar across treatment groups.1
The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends antiviral therapy for adults with immune-active chronic HBV to decrease the risk of liver-related complications.97 Immune-active chronic HBV is characterized by an elevation of ALT ≥2 times the upper limit of normal or evidence of significant histologic disease plus elevated HBV DNA (>2000 IU/mL if HBeAg negative or >20,000 IU/mL if HBeAg positive).97 Recommended initial antiviral options for adults with immune-active chronic HBV include peginterferon alfa-2a, entecavir, tenofovir DF, and tenofovir alafenamide.97 Selection of a specific antiviral medication should be individualized based on patient characteristics and comorbidities, treatment tolerability, and cost; consult the AASLD guideline for more details.97 Antiviral therapy is also recommended for HBeAg-positive children 2 years of age and older with both elevated ALT and measurable HBV DNA levels; the goal of therapy is to achieve sustained HBeAg seroconversion.97 Preferred initial treatment options for pediatric patients include interferon alfa-2b, entecavir, and tenofovir DF.97
Single-entity tenofovir DF is commercially available as tablets or oral powder.1
Tenofovir DF tablet is administered orally once daily without regard to meals.1
Tenofovir DF oral powder is administered once daily.1 Measure the appropriate dosage of the oral powder using only the scoop provided by the manufacturer.1 One level scoop delivers 1 g of powder, which contains 40 mg of tenofovir DF.1 Mix the required number of scoops of the powder with 2-4 ounces of soft food that can be swallowed without chewing (e.g., applesauce, baby food, yogurt), and ingest the entire mixture immediately to avoid a bitter taste.1 Do not administer the oral powder in a liquid since the powder may float to the top of the liquid, even after stirring.1
Store tenofovir DF oral power and tablets at 25ºC (excursions permitted to 15-30ºC).1 Dispense in the original container, and keep the container tightly closed.1
Although tenofovir DF is a prodrug that requires metabolism for activation, dosage of the drug is expressed in terms of the prodrug diester (i.e., tenofovir DF).1
Dosage of tenofovir DF oral powder containing 40 mg/g is expressed as the number of scoops of powder.1
For the treatment of HIV-1 infection, the recommended dosage of tenofovir DF oral tablet in adults weighing ≥35 kg is 300 mg once daily.1 The dosage of tenofovir DF oral tablet in adults weighing <35 kg is based on weight (see Table 1); monitor weight periodically and adjust dosage accordingly.1 In adults who are unable to swallow tablets, the recommended dosage of tenofovir DF oral powder is 8 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 300 mg) once daily with food (see Table 2); monitor weight periodically and adjust dosage accordingly.1
Weight (kg) | Dosage (as Tablets) Once Daily |
---|---|
17 to less than 22 | 150 mg |
22 to less than 28 | 200 mg |
28 to less than 35 | 250 mg |
35 or more | 300 mg |
Weight (kg) | Dosage (as Oral Powder) Once Daily (40 mg of Tenofovir DF per Scoop) |
---|---|
10 to less than 12 | 80 mg (2 scoops) |
12 to less than 14 | 100 mg (2.5 scoops) |
14 to less than 17 | 120 mg (3 scoops) |
17 to less than 19 | 140 mg (3.5 scoops) |
19 to less than 22 | 160 mg (4 scoops) |
22 to less than 24 | 180 mg (4.5 scoops) |
24 to less than 27 | 200 mg (5 scoops) |
27 to less than 29 | 220 mg (5.5 scoops) |
29 to less than 32 | 240 mg (6 scoops) |
32 to less than 34 | 260 mg (6.5 scoops) |
34 to less than 35 | 280 mg (7 scoops) |
35 or more | 300 mg (7.5 scoops) |
Preexposure Prophylaxis for Prevention of HIV Infection
The fixed-dose combination containing emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (Truvada®) is used for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for prevention of HIV-1 infection.230 For PreP, the usual dosage of tenofovir DF is 300 mg once daily in conjunction with other antiretrovirals; see the full prescribing information for specific dosage of emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (Truvada®). 230
Postexposure Prophylaxis following Occupational Exposure to HIV
For postexposure prophylaxis of HIV infection following occupational exposure (PEP), the usual dosage of tenofovir DF is 300 mg once daily in conjunction with other antiretrovirals.199 Tenofovir DF usually is used with emtricitabine or lamivudine in conjunction with a recommended HIV INSTI, HIV NNRTI, or HIV PI.199 The preferred dual NRTI backbone option for use in PEP regimens is emtricitabine and tenofovir DF, commonly administered as the fixed-dose combination of emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (Truvada®).199 See the full prescribing information for specific dosage of emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (Truvada®).230
Postexposure Prophylaxis following Nonoccupational Exposure to HIV
For postexposure prophylaxis of HIV infection following nonoccupational exposure (nPEP), the usual dosage of tenofovir DF is 300 mg once daily in conjunction with other antiretrovirals.198 Tenofovir DF usually is used in conjunction with emtricitabine and a recommended or alternative INSTI, PI, or NNRTI.198 The preferred dual NRTI backbone option for use in nPEP regimens is emtricitabine and tenofovir DF, commonly administered as the fixed-dose combination of emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (Truvada®).198 See the full prescribing information for specific dosage of emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (Truvada®).230
Treatment of Chronic HBV Infection
For the treatment of HBV infection, the recommended dosage of tenofovir DF oral tablet in adults weighing ≥35 kg is 300 mg once daily.1 The dosage of tenofovir DF oral tablet in adults weighing <35 kg is based on weight (see Table 1); monitor weight periodically and adjust dosage accordingly.1
In adults who are unable to swallow tablets, the recommended dosage of tenofovir DF oral powder is 8 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 300 mg) once daily with food (see Table 2); monitor weight periodically and adjust dosage accordingly.1
The optimum duration of tenofovir DF therapy in patients with chronic HBV infection is not known.1
For the treatment of HIV infection in pediatric patients ≥2 years of age weighing ≥35 kg, the recommended dosage of tenofovir DF oral tablet is 300 mg once daily.1
In pediatric patients ≥2 years of age weighing ≥17 kg who are able to swallow intact tablets, the recommended dosage of tenofovir DF oral tablet is 8 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 300 mg) once daily (see Table 1).1 Monitor weight periodically and adjust dosage accordingly.1
In pediatric patients ≥2 years of age weighing ≥10 kg who are unable to swallow tablets, the recommended dosage of tenofovir DF oral powder is 8 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 300 mg) once daily (see Table 2).1 Monitor weight periodically and adjust dosage accordingly.1
Preexposure Prophylaxis for Prevention of HIV Infection
The fixed-dose combination containing emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (Truvada®) is used for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for prevention of HIV infection in adolescents weighing ≥35 kg.230 For PreP, the usual dosage of tenofovir DF is 300 mg once daily in conjunction with other antiretrovirals; see the full prescribing information for specific dosage of emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (Truvada®).230
For the treatment of chronic HBV infection in pediatric patients ≥2 years of age weighing ≥35 kg, the recommended dosage of tenofovir DF oral tablet is 300 mg once daily.1
In pediatric patients ≥2 years of age weighing ≥17 kg but less than 35 kg who are able to swallow intact tablets, the recommended dosage of tenofovir DF oral tablet is 8 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 300 mg) once daily (see Table 1).26 Monitor weight periodically and adjust dosage accordingly.1
In pediatric patients ≥2 years of age weighing ≥10 kg who are unable to swallow tablets, the recommended dosage of tenofovir DF oral powder is 8 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 300 mg) once daily (see Table 2).1 Monitor weight periodically and adjust dosage accordingly.1 The optimum duration of tenofovir DF therapy in patients with chronic HBV infection is not known.1
The manufacturer makes no specific dosage recommendations for patients with hepatic impairment.1
Dosage adjustments are not necessary for patients with mild renal impairment (creatinine clearance 50-80 mL/minute).1 Administration of tenofovir DF to patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <50 mL/minute) resulted in significant increase in drug exposures.1 The recommended dosage interval adjustments in adults with creatinine clearance <50 mL/minute are outlined in Table 3.1
Creatinine Clearance (mL/minute) | Dosage |
---|---|
30-49 | 300 mg once every 48 hours |
10-29 | 300 mg once every 72-96 hours |
Hemodialysis patients | 300 mg once every 7 days or after a total of approximately 12 hours of hemodialysis (assuming 3 hemodialysis sessions/week each lasting approximately 4 hours); give dose after hemodialysis |
No data are available to make dosage recommendations in adults with creatinine clearance <10 mL/minute who are not on hemodialysis.1
No data are available to make dosage recommendations for pediatric patients with renal impairment.1
The manufacturer makes no specific dosage recommendations for geriatric patients.1 Select dosage with caution because of age-related decreases in hepatic, renal, and/or cardiac function and concomitant disease and drug therapy.1
Severe Acute Exacerbations of Hepatitis B Virus Infection
A boxed warning regarding the risk of severe acute exacerbation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is included in the prescribing information of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF).1 Test all patients for the presence of chronic HBV before or when initiating tenofovir DF.1
Severe acute exacerbations of HBV infection may occur following discontinuance of HBV treatment, including tenofovir DF.1 Closely monitor hepatic function with clinical and laboratory follow-up for at least several months after tenofovir DF is discontinued.1 If appropriate, resumption of HBV treatment may be warranted, especially in patients with cirrhosis or advanced liver disease, since posttreatment exacerbation of HBV infection may lead to hepatic decompensation and liver failure.1
New Onset or Worsening Renal Impairment
Renal impairment, including cases of acute renal failure and Fanconi syndrome (renal tubular injury with severe hypophosphatemia), has been reported in patients receiving tenofovir DF.1 Assess serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose, and urine protein on a clinically appropriate schedule in all patients prior to or when initiating tenofovir DF, and during treatment with the drug.1 In patients with chronic kidney disease, also assess serum phosphorus.1
In patients with creatinine clearance <50 mL/min, adjust dosing interval of tenofovir DF and closely monitor renal function.1 Since no safety or efficacy data are available in patients with renal impairment who received tenofovir DF using the dosing guidelines outlined in the prescribing information, assess the potential benefit of tenofovir DF therapy against the potential risk of renal toxicity.1
Avoid use of tenofovir DF in patients who are receiving or have recently received nephrotoxic drugs (e.g., high-dose or multiple nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents [NSAIAs]).1 Acute renal failure has been reported after initiation of high-dose or multiple NSAIAs in HIV-infected patients with risk factors for renal dysfunction who appeared stable while receiving tenofovir DF.1 Some cases required hospitalization and renal replacement therapy.1 Consider alternatives to NSAIAs in patients at risk for renal dysfunction.1 If manifestations of proximal renal tubulopathy are present in patients at risk for renal dysfunction (i.e., persistent or worsening bone pain, pain in extremities, fractures, and/or muscular pain or weakness), promptly evaluate renal function.1
Individuals with HBV and HIV-1 Coinfection
Prior to initiating tenofovir DF for treatment of HIV-1 infection, test the patient for chronic HBV.1 Prior to initiation of tenofovir DF for treatment of chronic HBV infection, offer HIV-1 testing in all patients.1
Due to the risk of development of HIV-1 resistance, only use tenofovir DF in patients with HBV and HIV-1 coinfection as part of an appropriate antiretroviral combination regimen.1
Lactic Acidosis and Severe Hepatomegaly with Steatosis
Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis, including fatalities, have been reported in patients receiving nucleoside analogs, including tenofovir DF, alone or in conjunction with other antiretroviral agents.1
Suspend tenofovir DF in any patient with clinical or laboratory findings suggestive of lactic acidosis or pronounced hepatotoxicity (which may include hepatomegaly and steatosis even in the absence of marked increases in serum aminotransferase concentrations).1
Bone Loss and Mineralization Defects
In clinical studies of patients infected with HIV-1, tenofovir was associated with slightly greater decreases in bone mineral density (BMD) and increases in biochemical markers of bone metabolism, suggesting increased bone turnover in comparison with other antiretroviral agents.1 Increased serum parathyroid hormone and 1,25 vitamin D levels were also reported in HIV-infected adults receiving tenofovir DF.1
In clinical studies in pediatric patients infected with HIV-1, effects on bone in patients 2 to <18 years of age were similar to those observed in adults, suggesting increased bone turnover.1 Similar trends were observed in HBV-infected pediatric patients 2 to <18 years of age.1 In all pediatric studies, normal skeletal growth appeared to be unaffected for the duration of the study.1 The clinical importance of tenofovir DF-associated changes in BMD and biochemical markers on long-term bone health and fracture risk in adults and pediatric patients are unknown.1 The long-term effect of lower spine and total body BMD on skeletal growth in pediatric patients, especially the effects of long-duration exposure in younger children, is unknown.1
Consider BMD monitoring for adult and pediatric patients who have a history of pathologic bone fracture or other risk factors for osteoporosis or bone loss.1 Although the effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation was not studied, such supplementation may be beneficial.1 If bone abnormalities are suspected, obtain appropriate consultation.1
Osteomalacia associated with proximal renal tubulopathy, which may contribute to fractures, has been reported in patients receiving tenofovir DF; arthralgias and muscle pain or weakness have also been reported in patients with proximal renal tubulopathy.1 Hypophosphatemia and osteomalacia secondary to proximal renal tubulopathy should be considered in patients at risk of renal dysfunction who present with persistent or worsening bone or muscle symptoms while receiving products containing tenofovir DF.1
Immune Reconstitution Syndrome
Immune reconstitution syndrome has been reported in patients with HIV-1 treated with combination antiretroviral therapy, including tenofovir DF.1 During the initial phase of treatment, patients infected with HIV-1 whose immune systems respond to antiretroviral therapy may develop an inflammatory response to indolent or residual opportunistic infections (e.g., Mycobacterium avium complex [MAC], M. tuberculosis , cytomegalovirus [CMV], Pneumocystis jirovecii [formerly P. carinii ]); such response may necessitate further evaluation and treatment.1
Autoimmune disorders (e.g., Graves' disease, polymyositis, Guillain-Barré syndrome) have also been reported to occur in the setting of immune reconstitution; however, the time to onset is more variable and can occur many months after initiation of antiretroviral therapy.1
Risk of Adverse Reactions Due to Drug Interactions
Concomitant use of tenofovir and certain drugs may result in known or potentially significant drug interactions, some of which may lead to possible clinically important adverse reactions from greater exposures of concomitant drugs.1 Consult the prescribing information for steps to prevent or manage possible and known significant drug interactions.1 Consider the potential for drug interactions before and during therapy with tenofovir, review concomitant medications during therapy, and monitor for adverse reactions associated with concomitant drugs.1
The Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry (APR) monitors pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to tenofovir DF during pregnancy.1 Clinicians are encouraged to register patients in the APR by calling 1-800-258-4263 or visiting [Web].1
Based on prospective data from the APR, the prevalence of birth defects in live births was 2.3% and 2.1% following first and second/third trimester exposure, respectively, to tenofovir DF-containing regimens.1 The overall risk of birth defects with first-trimester exposure for tenofovir DF was not markedly different compared to the background rate for major birth defects of 2.7% in the United States reference population of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP).1 Limitations of using an external comparator (the MACDP) include differences in populations and methodology, and confounding due to the underlying disease.1 The rate of miscarriage is not reported in the APR.1 Tenofovir crosses the human placenta.32
In published studies that included HBV-infected pregnant women treated with tenofovir DF, an increased risk of adverse pregnancy-related outcomes was not observed with use of tenofovir DF during the third trimester.1 Two stillbirths were identified, and there was 1 major birth defect (talipes) and 1 occurrence of multiple congenital abnormalities (not further specified) in infants exposed to tenofovir DF.1 No clinically relevant drug-related safety findings were found in infants exposed to tenofovir DF during late gestation.1
Animal reproduction studies did not find any adverse developmental effects when tenofovir DF was administered at doses ≥14 (tenofovir DF) and exposures 2.7 (tenofovir) times the recommended daily dose of tenofovir DF in humans.1
Tenofovir is distributed into human milk in low concentrations.1,34 In a study of breast-feeding women (not infected with HIV) who were on a tenofovir-containing regimen started between 1-24 weeks postpartum, tenofovir was undetectable in the plasma of most infants after 7 days of treatment in mothers.1 No serious adverse events were reported in mothers or infants.1
It is not known whether tenofovir DF affects human milk production or has effects on the breast-fed infant.1
If using tenofovir DF for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, women should not breast-feed infants due to the potential for the following: HIV transmission in HIV-negative infants, development of viral resistance in HIV-positive infants, and adverse reactions in the breast-fed infant similar to those observed in adults.1
If using tenofovir DF for the treatment of HBV infection, consider the developmental and health benefits of breast-feeding and the importance of tenofovir DF to the mother along with the potential adverse effects on the breast-fed infant from the drug or from the underlying maternal condition.1
Safety and efficacy of tenofovir DF for treatment of HIV-1 infection in pediatric patients 2 to <18 years of age are supported by data from 2 randomized controlled trials.1 Peak plasma concentrations and AUC of tenofovir in HIV-1-infected pediatric patients 2 to <18 years of age receiving 8 mg/kg of tenofovir DF (up to 300 mg) once daily as oral powder or receiving 300 mg once daily as tablets were similar to peak plasma concentrations and AUC reported in adults receiving 300 mg once daily.1 Safety and efficacy of tenofovir DF for treatment of HIV-1 infection have not been established in children <2 years of age weighing <10 kg.1
In HBV-infected pediatric patients 12 to <18 years of age receiving tenofovir DF 300 mg once daily as tablets, and pediatric patients 2 to <12 years of age receiving 8 mg/kg of tenofovir DF (up to 300 mg) once daily as tablets or oral powder, tenofovir exposures were similar to those reported in HIV-1-infected adults receiving identical doses.1
Safety and efficacy of tenofovir DF for treatment of chronic HBV infection have not been established in children <2 years of age weighing <10 kg.1
Clinical studies did not include sufficient numbers of patients ≥65 years of age to determine whether they respond differently to tenofovir DF than younger adults.1 Select dosage in geriatric patients with caution because of the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, and/or cardiac function and of concomitant disease or drug therapy.1 Pharmacokinetic studies have not been conducted in patients ≥65 years of age.1
The pharmacokinetics of tenofovir are not substantially altered in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment compared with those with normal hepatic function.1
Tenofovir is principally eliminated by the kidney.1 Moderate or severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <50 mL/minute or end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis) results in increased tenofovir plasma concentrations and AUC, and dosage interval adjustments are necessary in such patients.1
The most common adverse effects (incidence ≥10%; grades 2-4) in HIV-infected patients receiving tenofovir DF are rash, diarrhea, headache, pain, depression, asthenia, and nausea.1
The most common adverse effect (all grades) in HBV-infected patients with compensated liver disease was nausea (9%).1
The most common adverse effects (incidence ≥10%; all grades) in HBV-infected patients with decompensated liver disease were abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, insomnia, dizziness, and pyrexia.1
Adverse reactions in pediatric patients were consistent with those observed in adults.1
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF) is a substrate of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transport system and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP).1 Tenofovir and its prodrug (tenofovir DF) are not substrates of cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzymes; in vitro studies indicate tenofovir does not inhibit CYP isoenzymes 3A4, 2D6, 2C9, or 2E1, but may have a slight inhibitory effect on CYP1A.1
The following drug interactions are based on studies using tenofovir DF; refer to the full prescribing information for further details.1 Additional drug interactions may exist for fixed-combinations containing emtricitabine and tenofovir DF (Truvada®); doravirine, lamivudine, and tenofovir DF (Delstrigo®); efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF (Atripla®); emtricitabine, rilpivirine, and tenofovir DF (Complera®); elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir DF (Stribild®); and efavirenz, lamivudine, and tenofovir (Symfi® and Symfi Lo®).230,231,232,233,235,239,240 When a fixed combination is used, interactions associated with each drug in the fixed combination should be considered.230,231,232,233,235,239,240 See the full prescribing information for drug interactions of each combination product.230,231,232,233,235,239,240
Drugs Affecting or Metabolized by Hepatic Microsomal Enzymes
Pharmacokinetic interactions between tenofovir and drugs that are inhibitors or substrates of hepatic microsomal enzymes are unlikely.1
Drugs Affecting P-glycoprotein Transport
Pharmacokinetic interactions are possible with inhibitors of P-gp.1 Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and inhibitors of P-gp may increase absorption of tenofovir DF, resulting in increased plasma concentrations of the drug.1
Drugs Affecting Breast Cancer Resistance Protein
Pharmacokinetic interactions are possible with inhibitors of BCRP.1 Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and inhibitors of BCRP may increase absorption of tenofovir DF, resulting in increased plasma concentrations of the drug.1
Nephrotoxic Drugs or Drugs Eliminated by Renal Excretion
Concomitant use of tenofovir DF with drugs that reduce renal function or compete for active renal tubular secretion (i.e., acyclovir, aminoglycosides [e.g., gentamicin], cidofovir, ganciclovir, valacyclovir, valganciclovir, high-dose or multiple nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents [NSAIAs]) may increase concentrations of tenofovir and other drugs that are renally eliminated, which may increase the risk of adverse effects.1
Concomitant use of adefovir dipivoxil and tenofovir DF may result in increased plasma concentrations of tenofovir and/or adefovir.200
Do not use tenofovir DF and adefovir dipivoxil concomitantly.1
HIV Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs)
No in vitro evidence of antagonistic antiretroviral effects was observed between tenofovir and NNRTIs (efavirenz, nevirapine).1
Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and efavirenz does not result in clinically important drug interactions.1
HIV Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs)
No in vitro evidence of antagonistic antiretroviral effects was observed between tenofovir and NRTIs (abacavir, didanosine, lamivudine, zidovudine).1
Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and abacavir does not have a clinically important effect on the pharmacokinetics of abacavir.1
Concomitant use of didanosine enteric-coated (delayed-release) capsules and tenofovir DF results in substantially increased didanosine plasma concentrations.1 When didanosine 250 mg enteric-coated capsules were used concomitantly with tenofovir DF and a light meal (373 kcal, 8.2 g fat), peak plasma concentrations of didanosine were decreased 20% and didanosine AUC was similar to that reported when the 400-mg didanosine enteric-coated capsules are used alone in the fasted state.1
If didanosine delayed-release capsules and tenofovir DF are used concomitantly, reduce dosage of didanosine and monitor closely for didanosine-associated adverse effects.1 Higher concentrations of didanosine could lead to didanosine-associated adverse effects (e.g., pancreatitis, neuropathy); discontinue didanosine if such adverse effects occur.1 Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and didanosine 400 mg has also resulted in suppression of CD4+ cell counts.1
If didanosine delayed-release capsules are used concomitantly with tenofovir DF, reduce didanosine dosage to 250 mg once daily in patients weighing ≥60 kg or to 200 mg once daily in those weighing <60 kg.1 Patients may take didanosine delayed-release capsules and tenofovir DF at the same time with a light meal (no more than 400 kcal, no more than 20% fat) or in the fasted state.1
Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and didanosine buffered tablets does not have a clinically important effect on the pharmacokinetics of didanosine buffered tablets.1
Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and emtricitabine does not have a clinically important effect on the pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine.1
Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and lamivudine does not have a clinically important effect on the pharmacokinetics of lamivudine.1
No in vitro evidence of antagonistic antiretroviral effects between tenofovir DF and HIV PIs (amprenavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir).1
Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and atazanavir results in decreased atazanavir plasma concentrations.1
If using concomitantly with tenofovir DF, administer atazanavir 300 mg with ritonavir 100 mg.1
Monitor patients receiving tenofovir DF concomitantly with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir for tenofovir-associated adverse reactions; discontinue tenofovir DF if tenofovir-associated adverse effects occur.1
Monitor patients receiving tenofovir DF concomitantly with ritonavir-boosted darunavir for tenofovir-associated adverse reactions; discontinue tenofovir DF if tenofovir-associated adverse effects occur.1
Coadministration of tenofovir DF and the fixed combination of lopinavir and ritonavir (lopinavir/ritonavir) resulted in increased tenofovir AUC; no change in lopinavir plasma concentrations and AUC was observed.1
Monitor patients receiving tenofovir DF concomitantly with lopinavir/ritonavir for tenofovir-associated adverse reactions; discontinue tenofovir DF if such effects occur.1
No clinically important pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between nelfinavir and tenofovir DF.1
Pharmacokinetic interaction between tenofovir DF and ritonavir-boosted tipranavir results in decreased concentrations of both tenofovir DF and tipranavir; tenofovir AUC increased by 2% and tipranavir AUC decreased by 9%.1
No clinically important pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between entecavir and tenofovir DF.1
No clinically important pharmacokinetic interaction between oral contraceptives and tenofovir DF.1
Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and sofosbuvir does not have a clinically important effect on the pharmacokinetics of either drug.1
Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and the fixed combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir) may result in increased plasma concentrations of tenofovir.1
If an antiretroviral regimen containing tenofovir DF is used concomitantly with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, monitor the patient for tenofovir-associated adverse effects.1
Sofosbuvir, Velpatasvir, and Voxilaprevir
Concomitant use of tenofovir DF and the fixed combination of sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and voxilaprevir (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir) may result in increased plasma concentrations of tenofovir.1
Concomitant use of the fixed combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir) and tenofovir DF results in increased tenofovir exposure.1
Monitor patients receiving tenofovir DF concomitantly with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without an HIV-1 PI/ritonavir or an HIV-1 PI/cobicistat combination, for tenofovir DF-associated adverse effects.1 In patients receiving tenofovir DF concomitantly with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and an HIV-1 PI/ritonavir or an HIV-1 PI/cobicistat combination, consider an alternative hepatitis C virus (HCV) or antiretroviral therapy.1 Safety of increased tenofovir concentrations in this setting has not been established.1 If coadministration is necessary, monitor for tenofovir DF-associated adverse effects.1
Opiates and Opiate Partial Agonists
No clinically important pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between methadone and tenofovir DF.1
No clinically important pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between ribavirin and tenofovir DF.1
Pharmacokinetic interaction is unlikely.1
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF), a synthetic antiretroviral agent, is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor.1,2,3 Tenofovir DF is a prodrug and is inactive until it undergoes diester hydrolysis in vivo to tenofovir and is subsequently metabolized to the active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate.1,2,3 After conversion to the pharmacologically active metabolite, tenofovir inhibits replication of retroviruses, including HIV type 1 (HIV-1), by interfering with viral RNA-directed DNA polymerase (reverse transcriptase).1,2,3 In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that tenofovir is active against HIV-1 and hepatitis B virus (HBV); the drug also has some activity against HIV-2.1
Like HIV nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), the antiviral activity of tenofovir depends on intracellular conversion to an active metabolite;1 however, tenofovir is a nucleotide containing a phosphonate group and the steps and enzymes involved in enzymatic conversion to the active metabolite differ from those involved in the conversion of NRTIs.3 Tenofovir is phosphorylated by cellular nucleotide kinases to tenofovir diphosphate; tenofovir diphosphate is a structural analog of deoxyadenosine-5'-triphosphate, the usual substrate for viral RNA-directed DNA polymerase.1,3 Although other mechanisms may be involved in the antiretroviral activities of the drug, tenofovir diphosphate appears to compete with deoxyadenosine-5'-triphosphate for viral RNA-directed DNA polymerase and for incorporation into viral DNA.1 Following incorporation of tenofovir diphosphate into the viral DNA chain, DNA synthesis is prematurely terminated because the absence of the 3'-hydroxy group on the drug prevents further 5' to 3' phosphodiester linkages.1
Tenofovir diphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA α- and β-polymerases and mitochondrial DNA γ-polymerase.1,4 In vitro studies using human hepatoblastoma cells, skeletal muscle cells, or renal proximal tubule epithelial cells indicate that tenofovir has only a low potential to induce mitochondrial toxicity.4
HIV-1 strains with reduced susceptibility to tenofovir DF can be produced in vitro and strains with reduced susceptibility to tenofovir have emerged during therapy with the drug.1 Resistant strains have contained a K65R substitution in reverse transcriptase.1 HIV-1 with a K70E substitution that results in low-level reduced susceptibility to tenofovir also have been selected in vitro and identified in clinical isolates.1
Cross-resistance occurs between tenofovir and some NRTIs.1 The K65R and K70E substitutions selected by tenofovir also are selected in some patients treated with abacavir or didanosine; isolates with such substitutions may show reduced susceptibility to emtricitabine and lamivudine.1 Therefore, presence of the K65R or K70E substitution may result in cross-resistance between tenofovir and NRTIs.1 In vitro studies indicate that HIV isolates with multiple substitutions associated with zidovudine resistance have reduced susceptibility to tenofovir.1 Cross-resistance between tenofovir and HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) or HIV nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) is unlikely.
Tenofovir inhibits HBV replication through competitive inhibition of viral reverse transcriptase.1 Although treatment-emergent amino acid substitutions have been reported in patients with HBV infection who received at least 24 weeks of tenofovir DF monotherapy and remained viremic, no specific substitutions occurred at a sufficient frequency to be associated with tenofovir resistance (genotypic and phenotypic analysis).1 Tenofovir may be active against some HBV strains that are resistant to adefovir and/or lamivudine.1,26,29 However, cross-resistance occurs among the HBV nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors and some adefovir-, entecavir-, lamivudine-, or telbivudine-resistant HBV may have reduced susceptibility to tenofovir.1
When a 300-mg tenofovir DF tablet is administered with a high-fat meal, plasma tenofovir concentrations and AUC are increased;1,2 pharmacokinetics are not appreciably affected by administration with a light meal.1
The pharmacokinetics of tenofovir DF in healthy individuals is similar to that in individuals with HIV-1 infection.1 Following oral administration of tenofovir DF in fasting HIV-infected individuals, oral bioavailability of tenofovir is approximately 25% and peak plasma concentrations are attained in about 1 hour.1 Pharmacokinetics are dose proportional over a tenofovir DF dosage range of 75-600 mg and are not affected by repeated dosing.1 In a single-dose study in nonfasting individuals, mean peak plasma concentrations of tenofovir were 26% lower when tenofovir DF was administered as an oral powder compared with administration as tablets; however, the mean AUC of tenofovir was similar with both preparations.1 Food delays the time to peak plasma concentrations by approximately 1 hour.1 Administration of 300 mg of tenofovir DF (as tablets) following a high-fat meal (approximately 700-1000 kcal containing 40-50% fat) increases oral bioavailability resulting in a 14% increase in peak plasma concentrations and 40% increase in AUC.1 Administration of tenofovir DF with a light meal does not have a clinically important effect on the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir compared to administration in the fasting state.1
In vitro, tenofovir is less than 0.7 or 7.2% bound to plasma or serum proteins, respectively, over the concentration range of 0.01-25 mcg/mL.1 Following oral administration of tenofovir DF, there is some evidence that tenofovir is distributed into semen35 and vaginal tissue and cervicovaginal fluid in low concentrations.30,31,32,36 Very low concentrations may be distributed into saliva.33 Tenofovir DF requires initial diester hydrolysis for conversion to tenofovir and subsequent phosphorylation by cellular enzymes to form the active tenofovir diphosphate.1 Tenofovir and its prodrug are not substrates of cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzymes.1 Tenofovir is eliminated principally by the kidneys via glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion.1 Following multiple oral doses, approximately 32% of a dose is eliminated in urine over 24 hours.1 Tenofovir is removed by hemodialysis; following a 300-mg dose of tenofovir DF, a 4-hour hemodialysis session removes approximately 10% of the dose.1 Following a single oral dose, the terminal elimination half-life of tenofovir is approximately 17 hours.1 Clinical studies did not include sufficient numbers from racial and ethnic groups other than white patients to adequately determine potential pharmacokinetic differences among these populations.1 Pharmacokinetics of tenofovir DF are similar in male and female patients.1
Additional Information
The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. represents that the information provided in the accompanying monograph was formulated with a reasonable standard of care, and in conformity with professional standards in the field. Readers are advised that decisions regarding use of drugs are complex medical decisions requiring the independent, informed decision of an appropriate health care professional, and that the information contained in the monograph is provided for informational purposes only. The manufacturer's labeling should be consulted for more detailed information. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. does not endorse or recommend the use of any drug. The information contained in the monograph is not a substitute for medical care.
Excipients in commercially available drug preparations may have clinically important effects in some individuals; consult specific product labeling for details.
Please refer to the ASHP Drug Shortages Resource Center for information on shortages of one or more of these preparations.
Routes | Dosage Forms | Strengths | Brand Names | Manufacturer |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oral | Powder | 40 mg per g | ||
Tablets, film-coated | 150 mg* | Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablets | ||
Viread® | Gilead | |||
200 mg* | Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablets | |||
Viread® | Gilead | |||
250 mg* | Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablets | |||
Viread® | Gilead | |||
300 mg* | Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablets | |||
Viread® | Gilead |
* available from one or more manufacturer, distributor, and/or repackager by generic (nonproprietary) name
Only references cited for selected revisions after 1984 are available electronically.
1. Gilead Sciences. Viread® (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) tablets and powder for oral use prescribing information. Foster City, CA; 2019 Apr. [Web]
2. Squires KE. Phase I/II trial of the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antiretroviral activity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2001; 45:2733-9. [PubMed 11557462]
3. Srinivas RV, Kim C et al. Anti-human immunodeficiency virus activity and cellular metabolism of a potential prodrug of the acyclic nucleoside phosphonate 9- R -(2-phosphonomethoxypropyl)adenine (PMPA), Bis(isopropyloxymethylcarbonyl)PMPA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1998; 42:612-7. [PubMed 9517941]
4. Birkus G, Hitchcock MJ, Cihlar T. Assessment of mitochondrial toxicity in human cells treated with tenofovir: comparison with other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2002; 46:716-23. [PubMed 11850253]
8. Squires K, Pierone G, Berger D et al. Tenofovir DF: a 48-week final analysis from a phase III randomized, double blind placebo controlled study in antiretroviral experienced patients. Poster presented at the 9th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Seattle, WA: 2002 Feb 24-28. Poster No. 413-W.
23. Gallant JE, DeJesus E, Arribas JR et al. Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N Engl J Med . 2006; 354:251-60. [PubMed 16421366]
26. Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis. N Engl J Med . 2008; 359:2442-55. [PubMed 19052126]
29. Delaney WE, Ray AS, Yang H et al. Intracellular metabolism and in vitro activity of tenofovir against hepatitis B virus. Antimicro Agents Chemother . 2006; 50:2471-7.
30. Dumond JB, Yeh RF, Patterson KB et al. Antiretroviral drug exposure in the female genital tract: implications for oral pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis. AIDS . 2007; 21:1899-907. [PubMed 17721097]
31. Karim SS, Kashuba AD, Werner L et al. Drug concentrations after topical and oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis: implications for HIV prevention in women. Lancet . 2011; 378:279-81. [PubMed 21763939]
32. Yeh RF, Rezk NL, Kashuba AD et al. Genital tract, cord blood, and amniotic fluid exposures of seven antiretroviral drugs during and after pregnancy in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected women. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2009; 53:2367-74. [PubMed 19307360]
33. de Lastours V, Fonsart J, Burlacu R et al. Concentrations of tenofovir and emtricitabine in saliva: implications for preexposure prophylaxis of oral HIV acquisition. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2011; 55:4905-7. [PubMed 21788466]
34. Benaboud S, Pruvost A, Coffie PA et al. Concentrations of tenofovir and emtricitabine in breast milk of HIV-1-infected women in Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire, in the ANRS 12109 TEmAA Study, Step 2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2011; 55:1315-7. [PubMed 21173182]
35. Ghosn J, Chaix ML, Peytavin G et al. Penetration of enfuvirtide, tenofovir, efavirenz, and protease inhibitors in the genital tract of HIV-1-infected men. AIDS . 2004; 18:1958-61. [PubMed 15353984]
36. Patterson KB, Prince HA, Kraft E et al. Penetration of tenofovir and emtricitabine in mucosal tissues: implications for prevention of HIV-1 transmission. Sci Transl Med . 2011; 3:112re4. [PubMed 22158861]
38. Saez-Llorens X, Castaño E, Rathore M, et al. A randomized, open-label study of the safety and efficacy of switching stavudine or zidovudine to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HIV-1-infected children with virologic suppression. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015;34(4):376-382.
39. Della Negra M, de Carvalho AP, de Aquino MZ, et al. A randomized study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected adolescents. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012;31(5):469-473.
40. Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak AL, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292(2):191-201.
41. Liaw YF, Sheen IS, Lee CM, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine/TDF, and entecavir in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B liver disease. Hepatology. 2011;53(1):62-72.
42. Murray KF, Szenborn L, Wysocki J, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in adolescents with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2012;56(6):2018-2026.
43. Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, et al. Randomized comparison of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(4):980-988.
44. Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs. emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF in lamivudine resistant hepatitis B: A 5-year randomised study. J Hepatol. 2017;66(1):11-18.
45. Marcellin P, Wong DK, Sievert W, et al. Ten-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Liver Int. 2019;39(10):1868-1875.
97. Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018;67(4):1560-1599.
198. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated guidelines for antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV - United States, 2016. From CDC.gov website. [Web]
199. Kuhar DT, Henderson DK, Struble KA et al. Updated US Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to human immunodeficiency virus and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol . 2013; 34:875-92. [PubMed 23917901]
200. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents, US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents (September 21, 2022). Updates may be available at HIV.gov website. [Web]
201. Panel on Antiretroviral Therapy and Medical Management of HIV-infected Children, US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in pediatric HIV infection (April 11, 2022). Updates may be available at HIV.gov website. [Web]
202. Panel on Treatment of HIV-Infected Pregnant Women and Prevention of Perinatal Transmission, US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Recommendations for the use of antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy and interventions to reduce perinatal HIV transmission in the United States (December 30, 2021). Updates may be available at HIV.gov website. [Web]
230. Gilead Sciences. Truvada® (emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) tablets prescribing information. Foster City, CA; 2020 Jun. [Web]
231. Merck Sharp & Dohme. Delstrigo® (doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) tablets prescribing information. Rahway, NJ; 2022 Jun. [Web]
232. Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences. Atripla® (efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) tablets prescribing information. Foster City, CA; 2021 Dec. [Web]
233. Gilead Sciences. Complera® (emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) tablets prescribing information. Foster City, CA; 2019 Nov. [Web]
235. Gilead Sciences. Stribild® (elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) tablets prescribing information. Foster City, CA; 2021 Sept. [Web]
239. Mylan Specialty LP. Symfi® (efavirenz/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) tablets prescribing information. Morgantown, WV; 2019 Oct. [Web]
240. Mylan Specialty LP. Symfi Lo® (efavirenz/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) tablets prescribing information. Morgantown, WV; 2019 Oct. [Web]
1001. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States - 2021 update: a clinical practice guideline. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed August 15, 2022. [Web]