Asenapine maleate is considered an atypical or second-generation antipsychotic agent.1,4,6,8,28,74,85
Drug therapy is integral to the management of acute psychotic episodes in patients with schizophrenia and generally is required for long-term stabilization to sustain symptom remission or control and to minimize the risk of relapse.28 Antipsychotic agents are the principal class of drugs used for the management of all phases of schizophrenia.28 Patient response and tolerance to antipsychotic agents are variable, and patients who do not respond to or tolerate one drug may be successfully treated with an agent from a different class or with a different adverse effect profile.28,70,71,72
Asenapine maleate is an antipsychotic agent that is administered sublingually in the acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia.1,2,4,82,88,89,93 Schizophrenia is a major psychotic disorder that frequently has devastating effects on various aspects of the patient's life and carries a high risk of suicide and other life-threatening behaviors.28,68 Manifestations of schizophrenia involve multiple psychologic processes, including perception (e.g., hallucinations), ideation, reality testing (e.g., delusions), emotion (e.g., flatness, inappropriate affect), thought processes (e.g., loose associations), behavior (e.g., catatonia, disorganization), attention, concentration, motivation (e.g., avolition, impaired intention and planning), and judgment.28,68 The principal manifestations of this disorder usually are described in terms of positive and negative (deficit) symptoms and, more recently, disorganized symptoms.28 Positive symptoms include hallucinations, delusions, bizarre behavior, hostility, uncooperativeness, and paranoid ideation, while negative symptoms include restricted range and intensity of emotional expression (affective flattening), reduced thought and speech productivity (alogia), anhedonia, apathy, and decreased initiation of goal-directed behavior (avolition).28 Disorganized symptoms include disorganized speech (thought disorder) and behavior and poor attention.28
The short-term efficacy of sublingual asenapine in the acute management of schizophrenia was evaluated in 4 placebo-controlled and active comparator (haloperidol, olanzapine, or risperidone)-controlled, fixed- or flexible-dose clinical trials of 6 weeks' duration in adults who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia and were experiencing an acute exacerbation of their schizophrenic illness.1,2,4,82,88,89 In 2 of the 4 studies, asenapine was found to be more effective than placebo.1,2,4,82,89 In the third study, asenapine could not be distinguished from placebo; however, the active control (olanzapine) in the trial was found to be superior to placebo.1 In the fourth study, which was flexible dosage in design, neither asenapine nor the active comparator olanzapine demonstrated superior efficacy when compared with placebo.88,89
In the 2 positive studies for asenapine, the main efficacy rating scale was the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), which assesses schizophrenia symptoms and general psychopathology, and the primary endpoint was change from baseline to the end of treatment on the PANSS total score.1,2,4,82 In the first trial, which compared asenapine (5 mg sublingually twice daily) with placebo, asenapine was found to be superior to placebo in improving the PANSS total score.1,2 In the second trial, which compared fixed dosages of asenapine (5 mg or 10 mg sublingually twice daily) with placebo, asenapine was also found to be superior to placebo in improving the PANSS total score; however, the 10-mg twice-daily dosage did not demonstrate an additional therapeutic benefit compared with the 5-mg twice-daily dosage and did not differ substantially from placebo.1,4,82 An examination of population subgroups did not reveal any clear evidence of differential responsiveness to the drug based on age, gender, or race.1
In a longer-term (52-week), double-blind study in adult patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were randomized to receive either sublingual asenapine (5 or 10 mg twice daily) or olanzapine (10-20 mg once daily), asenapine was found to be effective and well tolerated and caused less frequent weight gain but more frequent extrapyramidal symptoms (primarily akathisia) than olanzapine.84 The long-term efficacy of asenapine (5 or 10 mg twice daily based on tolerability) in prevention of relapse in schizophrenia patients was demonstrated in a 26-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that followed 26 weeks of open-label treatment; asenapine was found to be more effective than placebo in prevention of relapse or impending relapse in these patients and was well tolerated over the course of this 52-week trial.1,93
The American Psychiatric Association (APA) considers most atypical antipsychotic agents first-line drugs for the management of the acute phase of schizophrenia (including first psychotic episodes), principally because of the decreased risk of adverse extrapyramidal effects and tardive dyskinesia, with the understanding that the relative advantages, disadvantages, and cost-effectiveness of conventional and atypical antipsychotic agents remain controversial.28 The APA states that, with the possible exception of clozapine for the management of treatment-resistant symptoms, there currently is no definitive evidence that one atypical antipsychotic agent will have superior efficacy compared with another agent in the class, although meaningful differences in response may be observed in individual patients.28 Conventional antipsychotic agents also may be an appropriate first-line option for some patients, including those who have been treated successfully in the past with or who prefer conventional agents.13,28 The choice of an antipsychotic agent should be individualized, considering past response to therapy, current symptomatology, concurrent medical conditions, other medications and treatments, adverse effect profile, and the patient's preference for a specific drug, including route of administration.13,28,70
For additional information on the symptomatic management of schizophrenia, including treatment recommendations and results of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) research program, see Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders under Uses: Psychotic Disorders, in the Phenothiazines General Statement 28:16.08.24.
Asenapine maleate sublingual tablets are used as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy with lithium or valproate for the acute treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder (with or without psychotic features).1,3,5,74,94,99,100 The drug also is used for the maintenance monotherapy of bipolar I disorder.1,5,86 According to DSM-IV criteria, manic episodes are distinct periods lasting 1 week or longer (or less than 1 week if hospitalization is required) of abnormally and persistently elevated, expansive, or irritable mood accompanied by at least 3 (or 4 if the mood is only irritability) of the following 7 symptoms: grandiosity, reduced need for sleep, pressure of speech, flight of ideas, distractability, increased goal-directed activity (either socially, at work or school, or sexually) or psychomotor agitation, and engaging in high-risk behavior (e.g., unrestrained buying sprees, sexual indiscretions, foolish business investments).68
Efficacy of sublingual asenapine monotherapy in the treatment of acute mania has been demonstrated in 2 similarly designed, short-term (i.e., 3 weeks' duration), placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled trials in adults who met the DSM-IV criteria for bipolar I disorder with manic or mixed episodes with or without psychotic features.1,3,4,74,83 The principal rating instrument used for assessing manic symptoms in these trials was the Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS), an 11-item clinician-rated scale traditionally used to assess the degree of manic symptomatology in a range from 0 (no manic features) to 60 (maximum score).1,3,4,31,83 A secondary rating instrument used in these trials was the Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar (CGI-BP) scale.1,3,4,83 In both trials, asenapine was initially administered in a sublingual dosage of 10 mg twice daily and the dosage could then be adjusted to 5 or 10 mg twice daily from day 2 onward based on efficacy and tolerability; 90% of patients remained on the 10-mg twice-daily dosage.1,3,4,83 Asenapine was found to be superior to placebo in the reduction of the Y-MRS total score and the CGI-BP Severity of Illness score (mania) in both studies; improvements in the Y-MRS total score were observed as early as day 2 in these studies.1,3,4,83 An active control arm (olanzapine) was used in addition to placebo controls in both of these studies; however, study design did not allow for direct comparison between asenapine and olanzapine.1,3,4,83 In another short-term (3 weeks' duration), placebo-controlled study that compared 2 fixed dosages of asenapine monotherapy (5 or 10 mg twice daily) with placebo in adults with manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder, both dosages of asenapine were found to be substantially superior to placebo in improving the Y-MRS total score and the CGI-BP Severity of Illness overall score.1,99 An examination of population subgroups did not reveal any clear evidence of differential responsiveness to the drug based on age, gender, or race.1
Following completion of either of the similarly designed, short-term monotherapy efficacy studies, patients with bipolar I disorder experiencing acute manic or mixed episodes were eligible for a 9-week, double-blind extension study evaluating the efficacy and safety of asenapine versus olanzapine.5 In this study, no significant difference in efficacy between asenapine and olanzapine was found and asenapine was well tolerated during the extended treatment.5 Patients completing either of the two 3-week acute efficacy trials and the subsequent 9-week, double-blind extension trial could then enter a longer-term (40-week) extension that was designed to evaluate asenapine therapy over one year of treatment; long-term asenapine therapy (5 or 10 mg twice daily sublingually) was found to be generally well tolerated in this study.86
Efficacy and safety of sublingual asenapine monotherapy in the treatment of acute mania in pediatric patients were established in a short-term (i.e., 3 weeks' duration), placebo-controlled, fixed-dosage trial in 403 pediatric patients 10-17 years of age with bipolar I disorder who were currently experiencing manic or mixed episodes.1,100 Asenapine (2.5, 5, or 10 mg twice daily) was initiated at a dosage of 2.5 mg twice daily in all the patients and titrated up to a target fixed dosage of 5 and then 10 mg twice daily at intervals of 3 days in the patients receiving these higher dosages.1,100 All dosages of asenapine evaluated in this study were found to be superior to placebo in improving the Y-MRS total score and the CGI-BP Severity of Illness overall score from baseline to week 3.1,100
Efficacy of sublingual asenapine as adjunctive therapy in acute mania has been established in a 12-week, placebo-controlled trial with a 3-week primary efficacy endpoint in adults with bipolar I disorder with a manic or mixed episode with or without psychotic features who were partially responsive to lithium or valproate monotherapy after at least 2 weeks of treatment.1 Asenapine was found to be more effective than placebo in the reduction of manic symptoms (as measured by the Y-MRS total score) when given as an adjunctive therapy to either lithium or valproate at week 3 in this study.1
The manufacturer states that if asenapine is used for extended periods in bipolar disorder, the long-term risks and benefits of the drug should be reassessed periodically on an individualized basis.1 (See Dosage and Administration: Dosage.)
For the initial management of less severe manic or mixed episodes in patients with bipolar disorder, current APA recommendations state that monotherapy with lithium, valproate (e.g., valproate sodium, valproic acid, divalproex), or an antipsychotic agent such as olanzapine may be adequate.69 For more severe manic or mixed episodes, combination therapy with an antipsychotic agent and lithium or valproate is recommended as first-line therapy.69 For further information on the management of bipolar disorder, see Uses: Bipolar Disorder, in Lithium Salts 28:28.
Asenapine maleate is commercially available as rapidly dissolving sublingual tablets, since the oral bioavailability of the drug after sublingual administration is much higher than following oral administration (see Description).1,4,6 The tablets are administered sublingually twice daily.1
Patients should be instructed not to remove a sublingual tablet from the blister pack until just prior to administration.1 With dry hands, the blister pack should be pulled out of the case and the colored tab should be peeled back to expose the sublingual tablet; the tablet should not be pushed through the blister pack.1 The tablet should then be gently removed and placed under the tongue and allowed to dissolve completely (this usually takes about 10 seconds).1,6 The blister pack should then be slid back into the case until it clicks.1 Because ingestion of food or water following asenapine administration decreases the drug's exposure, patients should be instructed not to eat or drink for 10 minutes following administration of the sublingual tablets. 1,74 The sublingual tablets should not be split, crushed, chewed, or swallowed.1
Available as asenapine maleate; dosage expressed in terms of asenapine.1,4,81
For the acute management of schizophrenia in adults, the recommended initial and target dosage of asenapine is 5 mg given sublingually twice daily.1 If tolerated, the dosage may be increased to 10 mg twice daily after 1 week.1 In short-term controlled studies, there was no indication of additional clinical benefit with a higher dosage (10 mg sublingually twice daily) of the drug, but the higher dosage clearly was associated with an increase in certain adverse effects.1,82 The manufacturer states that the safety of asenapine dosages exceeding 10 mg twice daily has not been evaluated.1
For the maintenance management of schizophrenia in adults, the recommended target dosage range of asenapine is 5-10 mg given sublingually twice daily.1 Asenapine 5 or 10 mg given twice daily has been shown to be effective and well tolerated for up to 52 weeks in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.1,84,93
The American Psychiatric Association (APA) states that prudent long-term treatment options in patients with schizophrenia with remitted first or multiple episodes include either indefinite maintenance therapy or gradual discontinuance of the antipsychotic agent with close follow-up and a plan to reinstitute treatment upon symptom recurrence.28 Discontinuance of antipsychotic therapy should be considered only after a period of at least 1 year of symptom remission or optimal response while receiving the antipsychotic agent.28 In patients who have had multiple previous psychotic episodes or 2 psychotic episodes within 5 years, indefinite maintenance antipsychotic treatment is recommended.28
As monotherapy for the acute management of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adults, the recommended initial and target asenapine dosage is 5-10 mg given sublingually twice daily.1,3,83 The manufacturer states that the safety of asenapine dosages exceeding 10 mg twice daily has not been evaluated in clinical trials.1
As monotherapy for the maintenance treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adults, the same dosage used during stabilization (5-10 mg twice daily) should be continued.1 Based on clinical response and tolerability in the individual patient, a dosage of 10 mg twice daily can be decreased to 5 mg twice daily.1 The manufacturer states that the safety of asenapine dosages exceeding 10 mg twice daily has not evaluated in clinical trials.1
In short-term monotherapy clinical trials in adults, the initial dosage of asenapine was 10 mg given sublingually twice daily.3,83 On the second and subsequent days of the studies, the dosage could be lowered to 5 mg twice daily based on tolerability; however, less than 10% of patients had their dosage reduced during these trials.3,83 In a 1-year extension study, the mean total daily dosage in the asenapine-treated patients was approximately 16 mg and the total daily modal dosage was 20 mg.86
For the acute management of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in pediatric patients 10-17 years of age, the initial dosage of asenapine is 2.5 mg given sublingually twice daily and the recommended target dosage is 2.5-10 mg given sublingually twice daily.1 Dosage may be adjusted based on individual response and tolerability.1 After 3 days, the dosage may be increased to 5 mg twice daily; after 3 additional days, the dosage may be increased to 10 mg twice daily.1 Because pediatric patients appear to be more sensitive to dystonia with initial dosing, asenapine should be titrated according to the manufacturer's recommended titration schedule.1 (See Pediatric Use under Warnings/Precautions: Specific Populations, in Cautions.) The manufacturer states that the safety of asenapine dosages exceeding 10 mg twice daily has not been evaluated in pediatric patients.1
When administered as adjunctive therapy with lithium or valproate for the acute management of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adults, the recommended initial asenapine dosage is 5 mg given sublingually twice daily.1 The dosage may then be increased to 10 mg sublingually twice daily based on clinical response and tolerability.1 The manufacturer states that the safety of asenapine dosages exceeding 10 mg twice daily has not been evaluated.1
For patients receiving asenapine as either monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy with lithium or valproate, it is generally recommended that patients responding to therapy continue to receive the drug beyond the acute response.1 Asenapine 5 or 10 mg given sublingually twice daily has been shown to be well tolerated for up to 52 weeks in adults with bipolar disorder.86
Dosage adjustment is not routinely required in patients with renal impairment or in geriatric patients.1,7,95 (See Renal Impairment under Warnings/Precautions: Specific Populations, in Cautions and also see Geriatric Use under Warnings/Precautions: Specific Populations, in Cautions.)
Dosage adjustment is not necessary in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.1,7,95 Asenapine is contraindicated in patients with severe hepatic impairment.1,95 (See Hepatic Impairment under Warnings/Precautions: Specific Populations, in Cautions.)
Dosage adjustment is not routinely required based on gender, race, or smoking status.1
Asenapine maleate is contraindicated in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C).1
Asenapine also is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to the drug or any components in the formulation.1,96 Anaphylaxis, angioedema, hypotension, tachycardia, swollen tongue, dyspnea, wheezing, and rash have been reported in patients receiving asenapine.1,96 (See Hypersensitivity Reactions under Warnings/Precautions: Sensitivity Reactions, in Cautions.)
Increased Mortality in Geriatric Patients with Dementia-related Psychosis
Geriatric patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death.1,39,73 Analyses of 17 placebo-controlled trials (modal duration of 10 weeks) revealed a 1.6- to 1.7-fold increase in mortality among geriatric patients who were mainly receiving atypical antipsychotic drugs (i.e., aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone) compared with that observed in patients receiving placebo.1,73 Over the course of a typical 10-week controlled trial, the rate of death in drug-treated patients was about 4.5% compared with a rate of about 2.6% in the placebo group.1,73 Although the causes of death were varied, most of the deaths appeared to be either cardiovascular (e.g., heart failure, sudden death) or infectious (e.g., pneumonia) in nature.1,73 The manufacturer states that asenapine is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis.1 (See Adverse Cerebrovascular Events, including Stroke, in Geriatric Patients with Dementia-related Psychosis and see Dysphagia under Warnings/Precautions: Other Warnings and Precautions, in Cautions and also see Geriatric Use under Warnings/Precautions: Specific Populations, in Cautions.)
Hypersensitivity reactions have been reported in patients treated with asenapine.1,96 From August 2009 to September 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) received 52 reports of type I hypersensitivity reactions associated with asenapine.96 Clinical manifestations reported included anaphylaxis, angioedema, hypotension, tachycardia, swollen tongue, dyspnea, wheezing, and rash.1,96 Some of the cases reported occurrence of more than one hypersensitivity reaction following asenapine administration.96 Several cases reported hypersensitivity reactions (possible angioedema, respiratory distress, and possible anaphylaxis) occurring after the first dose.1,96 In some patients, symptoms resolved after asenapine discontinuance while others required hospitalization or emergency room visits and therapeutic interventions.96 (See Cautions: Contraindications and also see Advice to Patients.)
Other Warnings and Precautions
Adverse Cerebrovascular Events, including Stroke, in Geriatric Patients with Dementia-related Psychosis
An increased incidence of adverse cerebrovascular events (cerebrovascular accidents and transient ischemic attacks), including fatalities, has been observed in geriatric patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with certain atypical antipsychotic agents (aripiprazole, olanzapine, risperidone) in placebo-controlled studies.1,28 The manufacturer states that asenapine is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis.1 (See Increased Mortality in Geriatric Patients with Dementia-related Psychosis under Warnings/Precautions: Warnings and also see Geriatric Use under Warnings/Precautions: Specific Populations, in Cautions.)
Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), a potentially fatal symptom complex characterized by hyperpyrexia, muscle rigidity, delirium, and autonomic instability, has been reported with antipsychotic agents,1 including asenapine.94 If NMS is suspected, antipsychotic therapy should be immediately discontinued and intensive symptomatic treatment and monitoring should be provided.1 (See Advice to Patients.) For additional information on NMS, see Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome under Cautions: Nervous System Effects, in the Phenothiazines General Statement 28:16.08.24.
Because use of antipsychotic agents, including asenapine, may be associated with tardive dyskinesia (a syndrome consisting of potentially irreversible, involuntary, dyskinetic movements),1,84 asenapine should be prescribed in a manner that is most likely to reduce the risk of this syndrome.1 Chronic antipsychotic treatment generally should be reserved for patients who suffer from a chronic illness that is known to respond to antipsychotic agents, and for whom alternative, effective, but potentially less harmful treatments are not available or appropriate.1 In patients who do require chronic treatment, the lowest dosage and the shortest duration of treatment needed to achieve a satisfactory clinical response should be used, and the need for continued treatment should be reassessed periodically.1
The American Psychiatric Association (APA) currently recommends that patients receiving atypical antipsychotic agents be assessed clinically for abnormal involuntary movements every 12 months and that patients considered to be at increased risk for tardive dyskinesia be assessed every 6 months.28 If signs and symptoms of tardive dyskinesia appear in an asenapine-treated patient, asenapine discontinuance should be considered; however, some patients may require continued treatment with the drug despite the presence of the syndrome.1 For additional information on tardive dyskinesia, see Tardive Dyskinesia under Cautions: Nervous System Effects, in the Phenothiazines General Statement 28:16.08.24.
Atypical antipsychotic agents, including asenapine, have caused metabolic changes including hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and body weight gain.1 While all of these drugs produce some metabolic changes, each drug has its own specific risk profile.1 (See Hyperglycemia and Diabetes Mellitus, see Dyslipidemia, and also see Weight Gain under Warnings/Precautions: Other Warnings and Precautions, in Cautions.)
Hyperglycemia and Diabetes Mellitus
Hyperglycemia, sometimes severe and associated with ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar coma, or death, has been reported in patients receiving atypical antipsychotic agents.1,11,12,14,15,16,17,18,20,21,22,23,25,40,41,42,46,65 Hyperglycemia has been reported in patients treated with asenapine.1 In short-term controlled trials in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar mania, approximately 0-5 and 6-16% of asenapine-treated patients experienced shifts from normal to high and from borderline to high fasting glucose concentrations, respectively.1 In a longer-term (one-year), comparator-controlled, double-blind study, the mean increase in fasting glucose concentrations from baseline was 2.4 mg/dL in the asenapine-treated patients.1
Fasting blood glucose testing should be performed before or soon after initiation of antipsychotic therapy and then periodically during long-term therapy.1 (See Advice to Patients.)
For further information on managing the risk of hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus associated with atypical antipsychotic agents, see Hyperglycemia and Diabetes Mellitus under Cautions: Precautions and Contraindications, in Clozapine 28:16.08.04.
Undesirable changes in lipid parameters have been observed in patients treated with some atypical antipsychotic agents.1 Asenapine appears to minimally affect the lipid profile in patients receiving short-term therapy with the drug.1 In short-term, placebo-controlled studies of asenapine in adults with schizophrenia, the proportion of patients with total cholesterol elevations of 240 mg/dL or more at study end point was approximately 8% for asenapine-treated patients compared with 7% for placebo recipients and the proportion of patients with elevations in triglycerides of 200 mg/dL or more at study end point was 13.2% for asenapine-treated patients compared with 10.5% for placebo recipients.1 In short-term, placebo-controlled bipolar mania trials in adults, the proportion of patients with total cholesterol elevations of 240 mg/dL or more at study end point was 7.8% for asenapine-treated patients compared with 7.9% for placebo recipients and the proportion of patients with elevations in triglycerides of 200 mg/dL or more at end point was 13.1% for asenapine-treated patients compared with 8.6% for placebo recipients.1
The manufacturer recommends baseline (i.e., before or soon after initiation of therapy) and periodic follow-up fasting lipid evaluations in patients receiving asenapine therapy.1
Weight gain has been observed with atypical antipsychotic therapy, including asenapine.1,84,93 In short-term schizophrenia studies in adults, mean weight gain of 1.1 kg was reported in patients receiving asenapine compared with no change in weight in those receiving placebo; 4.9% of asenapine-treated patients gained 7% or more of their baseline body weight compared with 1.6% of those receiving placebo.1 In short-term bipolar mania studies in adults, mean weight gain of 1.3 kg was reported in patients receiving asenapine compared with a gain of 0.2 kg in those receiving placebo; 5.5% of patients receiving asenapine gained 7% or more of their baseline body weight compared with 0.4% of those receiving placebo.1
During long-term asenapine therapy (52 weeks) in adults primarily with schizophrenia, mean weight gain in asenapine-treated patients was 0.9 kg.1,84 22% of patients receiving asenapine with a baseline body mass index (BMI) less than 23 gained 7% or more of their baseline body weight compared with 13% of patients with a baseline BMI of 23-27 and 9% of patients with a BMI exceeding 27 at baseline.1,84
In a short-term bipolar mania trial in pediatric patients, mean weight gain of 1.4-1.7 kg was reported in patients receiving asenapine compared with a gain of 0.5 kg in those receiving placebo; 8-12% of asenapine-treated patients gained 7% or more of their baseline body weight compared with 1.1% of those receiving placebo.1
The manufacturer recommends baseline and frequent monitoring of weight in all patients receiving asenapine.1 In pediatric patients, weight gain should be monitored and assessed against that expected for normal growth.1
Orthostatic Hypotension, Syncope, and Other Hemodynamic Effects
Atypical antipsychotic agents can cause orthostatic hypotension and syncope.1 The risk is usually the greatest during initial dosage titration and when dosage is increased.1 In premarketing clinical trials in adults, including long-term trials without comparison with placebo, syncope was reported in 0.6% of patients treated with asenapine.1 In short-term bipolar mania trials in pediatric patients, syncope was reported in 1% of patients receiving asenapine 2.5 or 5 mg twice daily and in no patients receiving asenapine 10 mg twice daily or placebo.1
Orthostatic vital signs should be monitored in patients receiving asenapine who are susceptible to hypotension (e.g., geriatric patients, patients with dehydration or hypovolemia, patients concomitantly receiving antihypertensive therapy), patients with cardiovascular disease (e.g., history of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, or conduction abnormalities), and patients with cerebrovascular disease.1 Asenapine should be used with caution in patients receiving other drugs that can cause hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, or CNS depression (see Drug Interactions).1 In all such patients, consideration should be given to monitoring orthostatic vital signs, and dosage reduction should be considered if hypotension develops.1
Asenapine therapy may cause somnolence, postural hypotension, and motor and sensory instability, which may lead to falls; as a consequence, fractures or other injuries may occur.1 For patients with diseases or conditions or receiving other drugs that could exacerbate these effects, fall risk assessments should be completed when initiating antipsychotic treatment and periodically during long-term therapy.1
Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Agranulocytosis
In clinical trial and/or postmarketing experience, leukopenia and neutropenia have been temporally related to antipsychotic agents, including asenapine.1,78 Agranulocytosis (including fatal cases) also has been reported with other antipsychotic agents.1
Possible risk factors for leukopenia and neutropenia include preexisting low leukocyte count or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) or a history of drug-induced leukopenia and neutropenia.1,78 Patients with a preexisting low leukocyte count or ANC or a history of drug-induced leukopenia or neutropenia should have their complete blood count monitored during the first few months of therapy.1 Discontinuance of asenapine should be considered at the first sign of a clinically important decline in leukocyte count in the absence of other causative factors.1
Patients with clinically important neutropenia should be monitored for fever or other signs or symptoms of infection and promptly treated if such signs and symptoms occur.1 In patients with severe neutropenia (ANC less than 1000/mm3), asenapine should be discontinued and the leukocyte count monitored until recovery occurs.1 Lithium reportedly has been used successfully in the treatment of several cases of leukopenia associated with aripiprazole, clozapine, and some other drugs; however, further clinical experience is needed to confirm these anecdotal findings.78
In adult patients with schizophrenia, asenapine (in sublingual dosages of 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg twice daily) was associated with relatively small increases in the corrected QT (QTc) interval of 2-5 msec compared with placebo in a controlled and dedicated QT study; these increases were slightly lower than those observed in patients receiving quetiapine.1,6,10 None of the asenapine-treated patients in this study experienced a QTc-interval prolongation of 60 msec or greater compared with baseline, nor did any patient experience a QTc interval of 500 msec or greater.1,10 During short-term clinical trials in patients receiving 5 or 10 mg of asenapine sublingually twice daily, post-baseline QT-interval prolongation exceeding 500 msec was reported at similar rates for asenapine and placebo.1 There were no reports of torsades de pointes or any adverse effects associated with delayed ventricular repolarization during these studies.1
The manufacturer states that asenapine should be avoided in patients concurrently receiving other drugs known to prolong the QTc interval (see Drug Interactions: Drugs that Prolong QT Interval).1 The manufacturer also states that asenapine should be avoided in patients with a history of cardiac arrhythmias and in other circumstances that may increase the risk of torsades de pointes and/or sudden death in association with the use of drugs that prolong the QTc interval, including bradycardia, hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia, and presence of congenital prolongation of the QT interval.1
Similar to other antipsychotic agents and drugs with dopamine D2 antagonistic activity, asenapine can cause elevated serum prolactin concentrations, which may persist during chronic use of the drug.1 In premarketing clinical trials in adults, adverse effects related to abnormal prolactin concentrations occurred in 0.4% of asenapine-treated patients compared with none of those receiving placebo.1 In a 3-week clinical trial in pediatric patients with bipolar mania, such adverse effects were reported in 0, 2, or 1% of patients receiving asenapine 2.5, 5, or 10 mg sublingually twice daily compared with 1% of patients receiving placebo.1 Clinical disturbances such as galactorrhea, amenorrhea, gynecomastia, and impotence have been associated with prolactin-elevating drugs.1 In addition, chronic hyperprolactinemia associated with hypogonadism may lead to decreased bone density in both female and male patients.1
If asenapine therapy is considered in a patient with previously detected breast cancer, clinicians should consider that approximately one-third of human breast cancers are prolactin-dependent in vitro.1
Seizures occurred in 0 and 0.3% of adult patients with schizophrenia and bipolar mania receiving asenapine sublingual dosages of 5 and 10 mg twice daily, respectively, in premarketing short-term clinical trials.1 In adult premarketing clinical trials, including long-term trials without comparison to placebo, seizures were reported in 0.3% of patients treated with asenapine.1 There were no reports of seizures in asenapine-treated pediatric patients in a 3-week bipolar mania trial.1
As with other antipsychotic agents, asenapine should be used with caution in patients with a history of seizures or with conditions that may lower the seizure threshold; such conditions may be more prevalent in patients 65 years of age or older.1
Cognitive and Motor Impairment
Somnolence, usually transient with the highest incidence reported during the first week of therapy, has been reported in patients receiving asenapine.1 In short-term, placebo-controlled schizophrenia trials in adults, somnolence was reported in 15 and 13% of patients receiving asenapine sublingual dosages of 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily, respectively, compared with 7% of placebo recipients.1 In short-term, placebo-controlled bipolar mania trials in adults, somnolence was reported in 23% of asenapine-treated patients (5-10 mg sublingually twice daily) compared with 5% of placebo recipients.1 In the 3-week, fixed-dose study, somnolence occurred in fewer patients receiving 5 mg of asenapine sublingually twice daily (20%) compared with those receiving 10 mg of the drug sublingually twice daily (26%).1 Somnolence was reported in 18% of asenapine-treated adults during premarketing clinical trials, including long-term trials without placebo comparison.1 Somnolence led to discontinuance of the drug in 0.6% of patients in short-term, placebo-controlled trials.1 In a 3-week, placebo-controlled bipolar trial in pediatric patients, somnolence (including sedation and hypersomnia) occurred in 46-53% of patients receiving 2.5-10 mg sublingually twice daily.1 (See Drug Interactions: Other CNS Agents and see also Advice to Patients.)
Disruption of the body's ability to reduce core body temperature has been attributed to atypical antipsychotic agents.1 In premarketing, short-term, placebo-controlled trials for schizophrenia and acute bipolar I disorder, the incidence of adverse reactions suggestive of body temperature increases was low (1% or less) and comparable to placebo.1 During premarketing clinical trials with asenapine, including long-term trials without comparison to placebo, up to 1% of asenapine-treated patients experienced adverse effects suggestive of body temperature increases (e.g., pyrexia, feeling hot).1
The manufacturer recommends caution when asenapine is used in patients who will be experiencing conditions that may contribute to an elevation in core body temperature (e.g., strenuous exercise, extreme heat, concomitant use of agents with anticholinergic activity, dehydration).1
Esophageal dysmotility and aspiration have been associated with the use of antipsychotic agents.1 Dysphagia has been reported in patients receiving asenapine.1 Asenapine and other antipsychotic agents should be used with caution in patients at risk for aspiration.1
Pregnancy registry: There is a pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to asenapine during pregnancy.1 For more information, clinicians may contact the National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics at 866-961-2388 or visit [Web].1
Risk summary: Studies have not been conducted with asenapine in pregnant women.1 There are no available human data informing the drug-associated risk.1 Asenapine was not teratogenic in animal reproduction studies with IV administration to rats and rabbits during organogenesis at dosages 0.7 and 0.4 times, respectively, the maximum recommended human dosage (MRHD) of 10 mg sublingually twice daily.1 In a pre- and postnatal study in rats, IV administration of asenapine at dosages up to 0.7 times the MRHD produced increases in post-implantation loss and early pup deaths and decreases in subsequent pup survival and weight gain.1 The background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated populations is unknown.1 In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4 and 15-20%, respectively.1 Pregnant women should be advised of the potential risk to the fetus with asenapine exposure.1
Fetal/neonatal adverse reactions: Neonates exposed to antipsychotic agents during the third trimester of pregnancy are at risk for extrapyramidal and/or withdrawal symptoms following delivery.1,90,91,92 Symptoms reported to date have included agitation, hypertonia, hypotonia, tremor, somnolence, respiratory distress, and feeding disorder.1,90,91,92 The symptoms have varied in severity; some neonates recovered within hours to days without specific treatment, while others have required prolonged hospitalization.1,90,91,92 Neonates should be monitored for extrapyramidal and/or withdrawal symptoms and managed appropriately if symptoms occur.1
It is not known whether asenapine is distributed into milk in humans.1 The drug is distributed into milk in rats.1 The effects of asenapine on breast-fed infants and on milk production also are not known.1 The benefit of asenapine therapy to the woman as well as the benefits of breast-feeding to the infant should be weighed against the potential risk to the infant from exposure to the drug or from the underlying maternal condition.1
Safety and efficacy of asenapine in pediatric patients younger than 10 years of age have not been established.1
Safety and efficacy of asenapine monotherapy for the management of bipolar I disorder in pediatric patients 10-17 years of age have been established in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 3 weeks' duration.1,100 (See Bipolar Disorder under Uses.) In a phase I study, pediatric patients 10-17 years of age appeared to be more sensitive to dystonia when the initial dosage titration schedule was not followed.1 Similar safety findings were reported in a long-term, open-label, uncontrolled safety trial in pediatric patients with bipolar I disorder treated with asenapine monotherapy.1 To reduce the risk of dystonia in pediatric patients, asenapine should be titrated according to the manufacturer's recommended schedule.1 (See Bipolar Disorder under Dosage and Administration: Dosage.) Safety and efficacy of asenapine as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of bipolar disorder have not been established in pediatric patients to date.1
Efficacy of asenapine for the treatment of schizophrenia has not been established in pediatric patients younger than 18 years of age.1,97 In a short-term (i.e., 8 weeks' duration), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adolescents 12-17 years of age with schizophrenia, asenapine did not substantially improve the PANSS total score compared with placebo.1,97 Tolerability of asenapine in this trial generally was similar to that observed in pediatric bipolar and adult bipolar and schizophrenia trials.1,97 In addition, no important safety findings were reported in a 26-week, open-label, uncontrolled safety trial in pediatric patients with schizophrenia treated with asenapine monotherapy.1,97
Pharmacokinetics of asenapine in pediatric patients 10-17 years of age are similar to those observed in adults.1
Clinical trial experience with asenapine in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar mania who are 65 years of age and older is insufficient to determine whether they respond differently from younger adults.1 In premarketing clinical studies, 1.1% of approximately 2250 asenapine-treated patients were 65 years of age and older.1
Asenapine exposure is 30-40% higher in geriatric patients compared with younger adult patients.1 Routine dosage adjustment of asenapine is not necessary based on age alone.1 However, multiple factors that may increase the pharmacodynamic response to asenapine, resulting in poorer tolerance and orthostasis, could be present in geriatric patients, and such patients should be monitored carefully during therapy.1
Geriatric patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with asenapine are at an increased risk of death compared with those treated with placebo.1,39,73 In addition, an increased incidence of adverse cerebrovascular events (cerebrovascular accidents and transient ischemic attacks), including fatalities, has been observed in geriatric patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with certain atypical antipsychotic agents (aripiprazole, olanzapine, risperidone) in placebo-controlled studies.1,28 The manufacturer of asenapine states that the drug is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis (see Increased Mortality in Geriatric Patients with Dementia-related Psychosis under Warnings/Precautions: Warnings, in Cautions and see also Dysphagia under Warnings/Precautions: Other Warnings and Precautions, in Cautions).1 For additional information on the use of antipsychotic agents in the management of dementia-related psychosis, see Geriatric Considerations under Uses: Psychotic Disorders, in the Phenothiazines General Statement 28:16.08.24.
In individuals with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C), asenapine exposures were an average of 7 times higher than the exposures in individuals with normal hepatic function.1,95 Asenapine is therefore contraindicated in patients with severe hepatic impairment.1
Following a single 5-mg sublingual dose of asenapine in individuals with mild (Child-Pugh class A) or moderate (Child-Pugh class B) hepatic impairment, asenapine exposure was not substantially altered compared with that in individuals with normal hepatic function; therefore, dosage adjustment is not required in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.1,95
The exposure of asenapine following a single 5-mg dose was similar in individuals with varying degrees of renal impairment and individuals with normal renal function; therefore, dosage adjustment is not required in renally impaired patients.1,95 The effect of renal impairment on the elimination of the drug's metabolites and the effect of dialysis on the pharmacokinetics of asenapine have not been evaluated.1
Adverse effects occurring in 5% or more of adult patients receiving sublingual asenapine therapy for acute treatment of schizophrenia and at a frequency at least twice that reported with placebo in short-term clinical trials include akathisia (including hyperkinesia),1,6,82,93 oral hypoesthesia,1,6,82 and somnolence (including sedation and hypersomnia).1,2,6,82,93 Akathisia was found to be dose related in these studies.1 The tolerability profile of asenapine in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia in adults was similar to that seen with acute treatment.1,93
Adverse effects occurring in 5% or more of adult patients receiving sublingual asenapine therapy for acute monotherapy of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder and at a frequency at least twice that reported with placebo in short-term clinical trials include somnolence (including sedation and hypersomnia),1,3,5,6,74,83,94 oral hypoesthesia,1 dizziness,1,3,5,6,74,83 extrapyramidal symptoms other than akathisia (e.g., dystonia, blepharospasm, torticollis, dyskinesia, tardive dyskinesia, muscle rigidity, parkinsonism, gait disturbance, masked facies, tremor),1,3,6,83,94 and akathisia.1 The most common adverse effects reported during the adjunctive therapy trial in adults with bipolar 1 disorder were somnolence and oral hypoesthesia.1 The incidence of the most common adverse effects was lower at the 5-mg twice-daily dosage than at the 10-mg twice-daily dosage.1 The tolerability profile of asenapine in the maintenance treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar 1 disorder in adults was similar to that seen with acute treatment.1
Adverse effects occurring in 5% or more of pediatric patients receiving sublingual asenapine therapy for acute monotherapy of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder and at a frequency at least twice that reported with placebo in short-term clinical trials include somnolence (including sedation and hypersomnia),1 dizziness,1 dysgeusia,1 oral hypoesthesia,1 nausea,1 increased appetite,1 fatigue,1 and weight gain.1 Frequency of fatigue was found to be dose related in the pediatric study.1
Asenapine is cleared mainly through direct glucuronidation by uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzyme 1A4 and oxidative metabolism by cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzymes, principally by CYP1A2 and, to a lesser extent, by CYP3A4 and CYP2D6.1,3,6,7
Asenapine is a weak inhibitor of CYP2D6; the drug does not induce CYP1A2 or CYP3A4.1,7
Drugs Affecting or Metabolized by Hepatic Microsomal Enzymes
Clinically important pharmacokinetic interactions are possible when asenapine is used concomitantly with drugs that are both substrates and inhibitors of CYP2D6 (e.g., paroxetine) or that are inhibitors of CYP1A2 (e.g., ciprofloxacin, fluvoxamine).1,7,98 Because of possible increased asenapine exposure with potent CYP1A2 inhibitors, asenapine dosage reduction based on clinical response may be necessary.1 (See Drug Interactions: Ciprofloxacin, Drug Interactions: Fluvoxamine, and Drug Interactions: Paroxetine.)
Potential pharmacologic interaction (possible disruption of body temperature regulation); asenapine should be used with caution in patients concurrently receiving drugs with anticholinergic activity.1 (See Body Temperature Regulation under Warnings/Precautions: Other Warnings and Precautions, in Cautions.)
Drugs that Prolong QT Interval
Potential pharmacologic interaction (additive effect on QT-interval prolongation); concomitant use of asenapine and other drugs known to prolong the corrected QT (QTc) interval, including class Ia antiarrhythmics (e.g., quinidine, procainamide), class III antiarrhythmics (e.g., amiodarone, sotalol), some antipsychotic agents (e.g., chlorpromazine, thioridazine, haloperidol, olanzapine, paliperidone, pimozide, quetiapine, ziprasidone), some antibiotics (e.g., gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin), and tetrabenazine should be avoided.1,10,76,77,79 (See Prolongation of QT Interval under Warnings/Precautions: Other Warnings and Precautions, in Cautions.)
Hypotensive Agents and Drugs causing Bradycardia
Because of its α1-adrenergic blocking activity and potential to cause hypotension, the manufacturer cautions that asenapine may enhance the hypotensive effects of certain antihypertensive agents and other drugs that can cause hypotension.1 Asenapine also has been associated with bradycardia.1 The manufacturer recommends that asenapine be used with caution in patients receiving other drugs that can cause hypotension or bradycardia, and that monitoring of orthostatic vital signs be considered in such patients.1
Monitoring of blood pressure is recommended during concurrent use of hypotensive agents and asenapine.1 If hypotension develops, dosage adjustment of hypotensive agents may be necessary.1 (See Orthostatic Hypotension, Syncope, and Other Hemodynamic Effects under Warnings/Precautions: Other Warnings and Precautions, in Cautions and also see Advice to Patients.)
Potential pharmacologic interaction (additive CNS depressant effects; increased fall risk).1 Asenapine should be used with caution in patients receiving other drugs that can produce CNS or respiratory depression.1
Concomitant administration of carbamazepine, a CYP3A4 inducer, and asenapine slightly decreased both peak plasma concentrations and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of asenapine in healthy individuals.1,7 Asenapine dosage adjustment is not required in patients receiving these drugs concurrently.1,7
Concomitant administration of cimetidine, an inhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2D6, and CYP1A2, and asenapine slightly decreased peak plasma asenapine concentrations and very slightly increased the drug's AUC.1,7 Asenapine dosage adjustment is not necessary in patients concurrently receiving cimetidine.1,7
An acute dystonic reaction was reported in an asenapine-treated patient after ciprofloxacin, a CYP1A2 inhibitor, was initiated.98 Because of the risk of increased asenapine exposure,1,98 a reduced dosage of asenapine based on clinical response may be necessary during concurrent use.1
Concomitant administration of fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, at a dosage of 25 mg twice daily and asenapine slightly increased peak plasma asenapine concentrations and AUCs.1,7 The manufacturer states that the full therapeutic dosage of fluvoxamine would be expected to cause a greater increase in plasma concentrations of asenapine, and that a dosage reduction of asenapine may be necessary based on clinical response during concurrent use.1
Concomitant administration of imipramine, an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4, and asenapine slightly increased peak plasma asenapine concentrations and AUCs.1 Asenapine did not affect plasma concentrations of imipramine's metabolite, desipramine, which is a CYP2D6 substrate.1,7 Asenapine dosage adjustment is not required in patients concurrently receiving imipramine.1
In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, concurrent administration of lithium did not affect the pharmacokinetics of asenapine.1 In addition, pre-dose serum concentrations of lithium collected during an adjunctive therapy study were comparable between patients receiving asenapine and those receiving placebo, indicating that asenapine does not affect serum concentrations of lithium.1 Asenapine dosage adjustment is not required in patients concurrently receiving lithium.1
Concomitant administration of paroxetine, which is both a CYP2D6 substrate and inhibitor, and asenapine resulted in a twofold increase in peak plasma concentrations and exposure of paroxetine.1,7 Concomitant administration of paroxetine and asenapine slightly decreased peak plasma asenapine concentrations and AUCs.1,7 The manufacturer states that asenapine may increase the inhibitory effects of paroxetine on its own metabolism by CYP2D6.1 Paroxetine dosage should be reduced by one-half during concurrent administration of asenapine; asenapine dosage adjustment is not required.1
Pre-dose serum concentrations of valproate collected during an adjunctive therapy study were comparable between patients receiving asenapine and those receiving placebo, indicating that asenapine does not affect plasma concentrations of valproate.1 Concomitant administration of valproate and asenapine slightly increased peak plasma asenapine concentrations and slightly decreased the drug's AUC; asenapine dosage adjustment is not required in patients receiving valproate concurrently.1
In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, smoking had no effect on asenapine exposure in smokers.1 Dosage adjustment of asenapine is therefore not necessary based on smoking status.1
Asenapine is a dibenzo-oxepino pyrrole-derivative antipsychotic agent and has been referred to as an atypical or second-generation antipsychotic agent.1,6,8,28,74 Although the exact mechanism of action of asenapine in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder is unknown, it has been suggested that the efficacy of asenapine in schizophrenia may be mediated through a combination of antagonist activity at central dopamine type 2 (D2) and serotonin type 2 (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT2A]) receptors.1,2,6,7,8,89
Asenapine exhibits high affinity for serotonin 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, 5-HT2C, 5-HT5A, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 receptors; dopamine D1, D2A, D2B, D3, and D4 receptors; α1A-, α2A-, α2B-, and α2C-adrenergic receptors; and histamine H1 receptors (moderate affinity for H2 receptors).1,2,3,6,7,8,9,74,85 Asenapine acts as an antagonist at these receptors in vitro.1,85 Asenapine possesses no appreciable affinity for muscarinic cholinergic receptors;1,2,3,6,7,8,9,74,85 the drug also does not exhibit affinity for β-adrenergic receptors.7
Asenapine is administered sublingually because of the low bioavailability (less than 2%) and extensive first-pass metabolism observed following oral administration.1,4,6,74 Sublingual tablets of the drug are rapidly absorbed in the sublingual, supralingual, and buccal mucosa following sublingual administration,1,3,6,10,74 with peak plasma concentrations occurring within 0.5-1.5 hours.1 The absolute bioavailability of sublingual asenapine (5 mg) is 35%.1,74 Steady-state plasma concentrations are reached within 3 days with twice-daily sublingual administration.1 Asenapine appears to undergo extensive extravascular distribution and is 95% bound to plasma proteins (including albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein).1 The drug is cleared mainly through direct glucuronidation by uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzyme 1A4 and oxidative metabolism by cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzymes, principally by CYP1A2 and, to a lesser extent, by CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 in vitro.1,3,6,7 The mean terminal half-life of the drug is approximately 24 hours.1,74 Following administration of a single radiolabeled dose of asenapine, approximately 50 and 40% of the dose was excreted in urine and feces, respectively.1
Importance of advising patients and caregivers that elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic agents are at an increased risk of death.1,28,39,73 Patients and caregivers also should be informed that asenapine is not approved for treating elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis.1,73
Risk of serious allergic reactions.1,96 Importance of informing patients of the signs and symptoms of such reactions (e.g., difficulty breathing; swelling of the face, tongue, or throat; lightheadedness; itching) and to immediately seek emergency medical attention if they develop any of these signs and symptoms.1,96
Importance of informing patients that application site reactions, primarily in the sublingual area, have been reported with asenapine, including oral ulcers, blisters, peeling/sloughing, and inflammation.1 Patients should be instructed to monitor for such reactions during therapy.1
Because somnolence (i.e., sleepiness, drowsiness) may be associated with asenapine, patients should be cautioned about performing activities requiring mental alertness, such as driving or operating hazardous machinery, while taking asenapine until they gain experience with the drug's effects.1
Importance of informing patients and caregivers about the risk of a rare but life-threatening nervous system problem called neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which can cause high fever, stiff muscles, sweating, fast or irregular heart beat, change in blood pressure, confusion, and kidney damage.1
Importance of informing patients about the risk of metabolic changes (e.g., hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, weight gain), how to recognize symptoms of hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus, and the need for specific monitoring for such changes, including blood glucose, lipids, and weight, during therapy.1
Risk of orthostatic hypotension and syncope (fainting), especially when initiating or reinitiating treatment or increasing the dosage.1 Importance of informing patients about interventions that may help to reduce the occurrence of orthostatic hypotension (e.g., sitting on the edge of the bed for several minutes before attempting to stand in the morning, slowly rising from a seated position).1
Risk of leukopenia/neutropenia.1 Importance of advising patients with a pre-existing low leukocyte count or a history of drug-induced leukopenia/neutropenia that they should have their complete blood cell (CBC) count monitored during asenapine therapy.1
Importance of clinicians informing patients in whom chronic asenapine use is contemplated about the risk of a movement problem called tardive dyskinesia.1,67 Importance of informing patients to report any muscle movements that cannot be stopped to a healthcare professional.67
Importance of informing patients that oral hypoesthesia, oral paresthesia, and/or dysgeusia (abnormal or altered taste) may occur with asenapine therapy and that these effects are not serious and are typically transient (i.e., resolving within 1 hour) following sublingual administration of the drug.1,74,81,88
Importance of informing clinicians of existing or contemplated concomitant therapy, including prescription (see Drug Interactions) and OTC drugs, as well as any concomitant illnesses (e.g., cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, seizures).1
Importance of women informing clinicians if they are or plan to become pregnant or plan to breast-feed.1,92 Importance of clinicians informing patients about the benefits and risks of taking antipsychotics during pregnancy, including that third trimester use of asenapine may cause extrapyramidal and/or withdrawal symptoms in a neonate, and about the pregnancy exposure registry (see Pregnancy under Warnings/Precautions: Specific Populations, in Cautions).1,92 Importance of advising patients not to stop taking asenapine if they become pregnant without consulting their clinician; abruptly discontinuing antipsychotic agents may cause complications.92
Importance of avoiding overheating or dehydration.1
Importance of not removing a sublingual tablet from the blister pack until just before administering a dose; importance of pulling blister pack out of the case with dry hands and then peeling back the colored tab on the pack and gently removing the sublingual tablet.1 The sublingual tablet should then be placed under the tongue and allowed to dissolve completely.1 Importance of not eating or drinking for 10 minutes following administration.1,74 Importance of sliding the blister pack back into the case until it clicks after use.1 (See Dosage and Administration: Administration.)
Importance of informing patients of other important precautionary information.1 (See Cautions.)
Additional Information
Overview® (see Users Guide). For additional information on this drug until a more detailed monograph is developed and published, the manufacturer's labeling should be consulted. It is essential that the manufacturer's labeling be consulted for more detailed information on usual cautions, precautions, contraindications, potential drug interactions, laboratory test interferences, and acute toxicity.
Excipients in commercially available drug preparations may have clinically important effects in some individuals; consult specific product labeling for details.
Please refer to the ASHP Drug Shortages Resource Center for information on shortages of one or more of these preparations.
AHFS® Drug Information. © Copyright, 1959-2024, Selected Revisions November 13, 2017. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc., 4500 East-West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, MD 20814.
1. Allergan USA, Inc. Saphris® (asenapine maleate) sublingual tablets prescribing information. Irvine, CA; 2017 Feb.
2. Potkin SG, Cohen M, Panagides J. Efficacy and tolerability of asenapine in acute schizophrenia: a placebo- and risperidone-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry . 2007; 68:1492-500. [PubMed 17960962]
3. McIntyre RS, Cohen M, Zhao J et al. A 3-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of asenapine in the treatment of acute mania in bipolar mania and mixed states. Bipolar Disord . 2009; 11:673-86. [PubMed 19839993]
4. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting: Saphris® (asenapine) sublingual tablets (NDA 22-117). Rockville, MD; 2009 Jul 30. From FDA website. [Web]
5. McIntyre RS, Cohen M, Zhao J et al. Asenapine versus olanzapine in acute mania: a double-blind extension study. Bipolar Disord . 2009; 11:815-26. [PubMed 19832806]
6. Citrome L. Asenapine for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly approved sublingually absorbed second-generation antipsychotic. Int J Clin Pract . 2009; 63:1762-84. [PubMed 19840150]
7. Weber J, McCormack PL. Asenapine. CNS Drugs . 2009; 23:781-92. [PubMed 19689168]
8. Bishara D, Taylor D. Asenapine monotherapy in the acute treatment of both schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat . 2009; 5:483-90. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 19851515]
9. Bishara D, Taylor D. Upcoming agents for the treatment of schizophrenia: mechanism of action, efficacy and tolerability. Drugs . 2008; 68:2269-92. [PubMed 18973393]
10. Chapel S, Hutmacher MM, Haig G et al. Exposure-response analysis in patients with schizophrenia to assess the effect of asenapine on QTc prolongation. J Clin Pharmacol . 2009; 49:1297-308. [PubMed 19843656]
11. Eli Lilly and Company. Zyprexa® (olanzapine) tablets and Zyprexa® Zydis® (olanzapine) orally disintegrating tablets prescribing information. Indianapolis, IN; 2004 Sep 22.
12. Eli Lilly and Company. Lilly announces FDA notification of class labeling for atypical antipsychotics regarding hyperglycemia and diabetes. Indianapolis, IN; 2003 Sep 17. Press release.
13. Dixon L, Perkins D, Calmes C. Guideline watch (September 2009): practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. American Psychiatric Association. Arlington, VA; 2009 Sep. From the American Psychiatric Association website. [Web]
14. Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Clozaril® (clozapine) prescribing information. East Hanover, NJ; 2003 Dec.
15. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals. Seroquel® (quetiapine fumarate) tablets prescribing information. Wilmington, DE; 2004 Jul.
16. Janssen Pharmaceutica. Risperdal® (risperidone) tablets and oral solution prescribing information. Titusville, NJ; 2003 Oct.
17. Pfizer Inc. Geodon® (ziprasidone) prescribing information. New York, NY; 2004 Aug.
18. Lewis-Hall F. Dear health care professional letter regarding class labeling for atypical antipsychotics and risk of hyperglycemia and diabetes. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2004 Mar 25. From FDA website. [Web]
19. Bess AL, Cunningham SR. Dear health care professional letter regarding class labeling for atypical antipsychotics and risk of hyperglycemia and diabetes. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2004 Apr 1. From the FDA website. [Web]
20. Eisenberg P. Dear health care professional letter regarding safety data on Zyprexa® (olanzapine) - hyperglycemia and diabetes. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2004 Mar 1. From the FDA website. [Web]
21. Macfadden W. Dear health care professional letter regarding class labeling for atypical antipsychotics and risk of hyperglycemia and diabetes. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals; 2004 Apr 22. From the FDA website. [Web]
22. Mahmoud RA. Dear health care professional letter regarding class labeling for atypical antipsychotics and risk of hyperglycemia and diabetes. Titusville, NJ: Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc; 2004. From the FDA website. [Web]
23. Clary CM. Dear health care practitioner letter regarding class labeling for atypical antipsychotics and risk of hyperglycemia and diabetes. New York NY: Pfizer Global Pharmaceuticals; 2004 Aug. From the FDA website. [Web]
24. Cunningham F, Lambert B, Miller DR et al. Antipsychotic induced diabetes in veteran schizophrenic patients. In: Abstracts of the 1st International Conference on Therapeutic Risk Management and 19th International Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology, Philadelphia, PA, 2003 Aug 21-24. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2003; 12(Suppl 1): S154-5.
25. American Diabetes Association; American Psychiatric Association; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; North American Association for the Study of Obesity. Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes. Diabetes Care . 2004; 27:596-601. [PubMed 14747245]
26. Melkersson K, Dahl ML. Adverse metabolic effects associated with atypical antipsychotics. Drugs . 2004; 64:701-23. [PubMed 15025545]
27. Citrome LL, Jaffe AB. Relationship of atypical antipsychotics with development of diabetes mellitus. Ann Pharmacother . 2003; 37:1849-57. [PubMed 14632602]
28. American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, second edition. Am J Psychiatry . 2004; 161(2 Suppl):1-56.
29. Sumiyoshi T, Roy A, Anil AE et al. A comparison of incidence of diabetes mellitus between atypical antipsychotic drugs. J Clin Psychopharmacol . 2004; 24:345-8. [PubMed 15118492]
30. Expert Group. 'Schizophrenia and Diabetes 2003' expert consensus meeting, Dublin, 3-4 October 2003: consensus summary. Br J Psychiatry . 2004; 47(Suppl):S112-4.
31. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE et al. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry . 1978; 133:429-35. [PubMed 728692]
32. Holt RI. Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes: response to consensus statement. Diabetes Care . 2004; 27:2086-7. [PubMed 15277449]
33. Citrome L, Volavka J. Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes: response to consensus statement. Diabetes Care . 2004; 27:2087-8. [PubMed 15277450]
34. Isaac MT, Isaac MB. Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes: response to consensus statement. Diabetes Care . 2004; 27:2088. [PubMed 15277451]
35. Boehm G, Racoosin JA, Laughren TP et al. Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes: response to consensus statement. Diabetes Care . 2004; 27:2088-9. [PubMed 15277452]
36. Barrett EJ. Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes: response to Holt, Citrome and Volevka, Isaac and Isaac, and Boehm et al. Diabetes Care . 2004; 27:2089-90.
37. Fuller MA, Shermock KM, Secic M et al. Comparative study of the development of diabetes mellitus in patients taking risperidone and olanzapine. Pharmacotherapy . 2002; 23:1037-43.
38. Koller EA, Cross JT, Doraiswamy PM et al. Risperidone-associated diabetes mellitus: a pharmacovigilance study. Pharmacotherapy . 2003; 23:735-44. [PubMed 12820816]
39. US Food and Drug Administration. Information for Healthcare Professionals: Conventional antipsychotics. Rockville, MD; 2008 Jun 16. From the FDA website. [Web]
40. Ananth J, Johnson KM, Levander EM et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and myocardial infarction in a patient taking risperidone and lithium carbonate. J Clin Psychiatry . 2004; 65:724. [PubMed 15163265]
41. Torrey EF, Swalwell CI. Fatal olanzapine-induced ketoacidosis. Am J Psychiatry . 2003; 160:2241. [PubMed 14638601]
42. Wehring HJ, Kelly DL, Love RC et al. Deaths from diabetic ketoacidosis after long-term clozapine treatment. Am J Psychiatry . 2003; 160:2241-2. [PubMed 14638600]
43. Koro CE, Fedder DO, L'Italien GJ et al. Assessment of independent effect of olanzapine and risperidone on risk of diabetes among patients with schizophrenia: population based nested case-control study. Br Med J . 2002; 325:243.
44. Citrome LL. Efficacy should drive atypical antipsychotic treatment. Br Med J . 2003; 326:283.
45. Anon. Which atypical antipsychotic for schizophrenia?. Drug Ther Bull . 2004; 42:57-60. [PubMed 15310154]
46. Anon. Atypical antipsychotics and hyperglycaemia. Aust Adv Drug React Bull . 2004; 23:11-2.
47. Sussman N. The implications of weight changes with antipsychotic treatment. J Clin Psychopharmacol . 2003; 23 (Suppl 1):S21-6.
48. Gianfrancesco F, Grogg A, Mahmoud R et al. Differential effects of antipsychotic agents on the risk of development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with mood disorders. Clin Ther . 2003; 25:1150-71. [PubMed 12809963]
49. Bushe C, Leonard B. Association between atypical antipsychotic agents and type 2 diabetes: review of prospective clinical data. Br J Psychiatry Suppl . 2004; 47:S87-93. [PubMed 15056600]
50. Cavazzoni P, Mukhopadhyay N, Carlson C et al. Retrospective analysis of risk factors in patients with treatment-emergent diabetes during clinical trials of antipsychotic medications. Br J Psychiatry Suppl . 2004; 47:s94-101. [PubMed 15056601]
51. Gianfrancesco FD, Grogg AL, Mahmoud RA et al. Differential effects of risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine, and conventional antipsychotics on type 2 diabetes: findings from a large health plan database. J Clin Psychiatry . 2002; 63:920-30. [PubMed 12416602]
52. Etminan M, Streiner DL, Rochon PA. Exploring the association between atypical neuroleptic agents and diabetes mellitus in older adults. Pharmacotherapy . 2003; 23:1411-5. [PubMed 14620387]
53. Leslie DL, Rosenheck RA. Incidence of newly diagnosed diabetes attributable to atypical antipsychotic medications. Am J Psychiatry . 2004; 161:1709-11. [PubMed 15337666]
54. Sernyak MJ, Leslie DL, Alarcon RD et al. Association of diabetes mellitus with use of atypical neuroleptics in the treatment of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry . 2002; 159:561-6. [PubMed 11925293]
55. Geller WK, MacFadden W. Diabetes and atypical neuroleptics. Am J Psychiatry . 2003; 160:388. [PubMed 12562601]
56. Gianfrancesco FD. Diabetes and atypical neuroleptics. Am J Psychiatry . 2003; 160:388-9; author reply 389. [PubMed 12562599]
57. Lamberti JS, Crilly JF, Maharaj K. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus among outpatients with severe mental disorders receiving atypical antipsychotic drugs. J Clin Psychiatry . 2004; 65:702-6. [PubMed 15163259]
58. Lee DW, Fowler RB. Olanzapine/risperidone and diabetes risk. J Clin Psychiatry . 2003; 64:847-8; author reply 848. [PubMed 12934988]
59. Reviewer comments (personal observations).
60. AstraZeneca. Wayne, PA: Personal communication.
61. Eli Lilly and Company. Indianapolis, IN: Personal communication.
62. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. East Hanover, NJ: Personal communication.
63. Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Titusville, NJ: Personal communication.
64. Citrome LL. The increase in risk of diabetes mellitus from exposure to second generation antipsychotic agents. Drugs Today (Barc) . 2004; 40:445-64. [PubMed 15319799]
65. Citrome L, Jaffe A, Levine J et al. Relationship between antipsychotic medication treatment and new cases of diabetes among psychiatric inpatients. Psychiatr Serv . 2004; 55:1006-13. [PubMed 15345760]
66. McIntyre R, Alphs L, Cohen M et al. Long-term double-blind extension studies of asenapine vs. olanzapine in patients with bipolar mania. Schizophren Res . 2008; 98:48-9. Abstract.
67. Food and Drug Administration. Patient information sheet: aripiprazole (marketed as Abilify). 2006 Sep 6. [Web]
68. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV®: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994:273-86.
69. American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder (revision). Am J Psychiatry . 2002; 159(4 Suppl):1-50.
70. Volavka J, Citrome L. Oral antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: heterogeneity in efficacy and tolerability should drive decision-making. Expert Opin Pharmacother . 2009; 10:1917-28. [PubMed 19558339]
71. Lieberman JA. Atypical antipsychotic drugs as a first-line treatment of schizophrenia: a rationale and hypothesis. J Clin Psychiatry . 1996; 57(Suppl 11):68-71. [PubMed 8941173]
72. Lahti AC, Tamminga CA. Recent developments in the neuropharmacology of schizophrenia. Am J Health-Syst Pharm . 1995; 52(Suppl 1):S5-8. [PubMed 7749964]
73. US Food and Drug Administration. Public health advisory: Deaths with antipsychotics in elderly patients with behavioral disturbances. Rockville, MD; 2005 Apr 11. From the FDA website. [Web]
74. McIntyre RS. Pharmacology and efficacy of asenapine for manic and mixed states in adults with bipolar disorder. Expert Rev Neurother . 2010; 10:645-9. [PubMed 20420486]
75. Banerjee S. The use of antipsychotic medication for people with dementia: Time for action; a report for the Minister of State for Care Services. United Kingdom Department of Health. From the website. [Web]
76. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Invega® (paliperidone) extended-release tablets prescribing information. Titusville, NJ; 2009 Jul.
77. Stöllberger C, Huber JO, Finsterer J. Antipsychotic drugs and QT prolongation. Int Clin Psychopharmacol . 2005; 20:243-51. [PubMed 16096514]
78. Qureshi SU, Rubin E. Risperidone- and aripiprazole-induced leukopenia: a case report. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry . 2008; 10:482-3. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 19287562]
79. Lundbeck Inc. Xenazine® (tetrabenazine) tablets prescribing information. Deerfield, IL; 2009 Sep.
80. Meltzer HY, Dritselis A, Yasothan U et al. Asenapine. Nat Rev Drug Discov . 2009; 8:843-4. [PubMed 19876039]
81. Merck. Whitehouse Station, NJ; Personal communication.
82. Kane JM, Cohen M, Zhao J et al. Efficacy and safety of asenapine in a placebo- and haloperidol-controlled trial in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol . 2010; 30:106-15. [PubMed 20520283]
83. McIntyre RS, Cohen M, Zhao J et al. Asenapine in the treatment of acute mania in bipolar I disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Affect Disord . 2010; 122:27-38. [PubMed 20096936]
84. Schoemaker J, Naber D, Vrijland P et al. Long-term assessment of asenapine vs. olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Pharmacopsychiatry . 2010 Mar 4; :[epub ahead of print].
85. Shahid M, Walker GB, Zorn SH et al. Asenapine: a novel psychopharmacologic agent with a unique human receptor signature. J Psychopharmacol . 2009; 23:65-73. [PubMed 18308814]
86. McIntyre RS, Cohen M, Zhao J et al. Asenapine for long-term treatment of bipolar disorder: a double-blind 40-week extension study. J Affect Disord . 2010; 126:358-65. [PubMed 20537396]
87. Mackle M, Snow-Adami L, Zhao J, Szegedi A, Panagides J. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of asenapine in prevention of relapse after long-term treatment of schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2009;19 (suppl 3):S543.
88. Reviewer comments (personal observations) on Asenapine Maleate 28:16.08.04.
89. Citrome L. Asenapine for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly approved sublingually absorbed second-generation antipsychotic. Int J Clin Pract . 2009; 63:1762-84. [PubMed 19840150]
90. Sexson WR, Barak Y. Withdrawal emergent syndrome in an infant associated with maternal haloperidol therapy. J Perinatol . 1989; 9:170-2. [PubMed 2738729]
91. Coppola D, Russo LJ, Kwarta RF Jr. et al. Evaluating the postmarketing experience of risperidone use during pregnancy: pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Drug Saf . 2007; 30:247-64. [PubMed 17343431]
92. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA drug safety communication: Antipsychotic drug labels updated in use during pregnancy and risk of abnormal muscle movements and withdrawal symptoms in newborns. Rockville, MD; 2011 Feb 22. From the FDA website: [Web].
93. Kane JM, Mackle M, Snow-Adami L et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of asenapine for the prevention of relapse of schizophrenia after long-term treatment. J Clin Psychiatry . 2011; 72:349-55. [PubMed 21367356]
94. McIntyre RS. Asenapine: a review of acute and extension phase data in bipolar disorder. CNS Neurosci Ther . 2010; :[epub ahead of print]. [PubMed 20950326]
95. Peeters P, Bockbrader H, Spaans E. et al. Asenapine pharmacokinetics in hepatic and renal impairment. Clin Pharmacokinet . 2011; 50:471-81. [PubMed 21651314]
96. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA drug safety communication: Serious allergic reactions reported with the use of Saphris (asenapine maleate). Rockville, MD; 2011 Sep 1. From the FDA website. [Web]
97. Findling RL, Landbloom RP, Mackle M et al. Safety and Efficacy from an 8 Week Double-Blind Trial and a 26 Week Open-Label Extension of Asenapine in Adolescents with Schizophrenia. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol . 2015; 25:384-96. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 26091193]
98. Ridout KK, Ridout SJ, Pirnie LF et al. Sudden-onset dystonia in a patient taking asenapine: interaction between ciprofloxacin and asenapine metabolism. Am J Psychiatry . 2015; 172:1162-3. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 26575453]
99. Landbloom RL, Mackle M, Wu X et al. Asenapine: efficacy and safety of 5 and 10mg bid in a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults with a manic or mixed episode associated with bipolar I disorder. J Affect Dis . 2016; 190:103-10. [PubMed 26496015]
100. Findling RL, Landbloom RL, Szegedi A et al. Asenapine for the acute treatment of pediatric manic or mixed episode of bipolar I disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry . 2015; 54:1032-41. [PubMed 26598478]