Piroxicam is a prototypical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAIA) that also exhibits analgesic and antipyretic activity.
Piroxicam is used for anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects in the symptomatic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and other inflammatory conditions.1,2,38,40
The potential benefits and risks of piroxicam therapy as well as alternative therapies should be considered prior to initiating piroxicam therapy.1 The lowest possible effective dosage and shortest duration of therapy consistent with treatment goals of the patient should be employed.1
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis
Piroxicam is used in the symptomatic treatment of acute and chronic rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.1
When used in the symptomatic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, piroxicam has relieved pain and stiffness and has increased range of motion and functional activity.2,3,15 Anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of piroxicam usually are observed during initial treatment of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis with a progressive increase in response occurring over 8-12 weeks.1 Piroxicam appears to be only palliative in these conditions and has not been shown to permanently arrest or reverse the underlying disease process.2,27 Most clinical studies have shown that the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of usual dosages of piroxicam in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis are at least equal to those of usual dosages of salicylates,1,15,18 ibuprofen,19,23 indomethacin,20,23 or naproxen.21 In controlled clinical trials of 12-weeks' duration, 20 mg of piroxicam daily was as effective as 3-4.2 g of aspirin daily in patients with rheumatoid arthritis18 or 2.6-3.9 g of aspirin daily in patients with osteoarthritis.15
Patient response to oral NSAIAs is variable; patients who do not respond to or cannot tolerate one NSAIA might be successfully treated with a different agent.17 However, NSAIAs are generally contraindicated in patients in whom sensitivity reactions (e.g., urticaria, bronchospasm, severe rhinitis) are precipitated by aspirin or other NSAIAs.16,57,58,59,60,61,62 (See Cautions: Precautions and Contraindications.)
In the management of rheumatoid arthritis in adults, NSAIAs may be useful for initial symptomatic treatment; however, NSAIAs do not alter the course of the disease or prevent joint destruction.16,68 Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (e.g., abatacept, hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, methotrexate, rituximab, sulfasalazine, tocilizumab, tofacitinib, tumor necrosis factor [TNF; TNF-α] blocking agents) have the potential to reduce or prevent joint damage, preserve joint integrity and function, and reduce total health care costs, and all patients with rheumatoid arthritis are candidates for DMARD therapy.16 DMARDs should be initiated early in the disease course and should not be delayed beyond 3 months in patients with active disease (i.e., ongoing joint pain, substantial morning stiffness, fatigue, active synovitis, persistent elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] or C-reactive protein [CRP], radiographic evidence of joint damage) despite an adequate regimen of NSAIAs.16 NSAIA therapy may be continued in conjunction with DMARD therapy or, depending on patient response, may be discontinued.16,68 (For further information on the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, see Uses: Rheumatoid Arthritis, in Methotrexate 10:00.)
Piroxicam has been effective at higher than usual dosages (i.e., 40 mg daily) for the symptomatic relief of acute gouty arthritis.2,38 In one study in patients with gouty arthritis, analgesic effects reportedly occurred within 2-4 hours after the initial dose of piroxicam, and relief from pain and swelling was complete after 5 days of therapy with the drug.2,38
Piroxicam has been used for symptomatic relief of ankylosing spondylitis.2,40 The drug appears to be as effective as phenylbutazone (no longer commercially available in the US)5 or indomethacin for the management of this condition, but is generally better tolerated.40
Piroxicam has also been used for symptomatic treatment of acute musculoskeletal disorders.2,3 The drug appears to be as effective as phenylbutazone (no longer commercially available in the US),2,3 but may be less effective than indomethacin for the management of these conditions.3
Piroxicam has been used for symptomatic relief of postoperative2 or postpartum pain.2,3 For the relief of episiotomy pain, piroxicam appears to be as effective as aspirin.2,3
Piroxicam has also been used for symptomatic relief of dysmenorrhea.41 In patients with severe dysmenorrhea, piroxicam decreased severity of cramps and supplemental analgesic (e.g., acetaminophen) requirements.41
Results from a large, prospective, population-based cohort study in geriatric individuals indicate a lower prevalence of Alzheimer's disease among patients who received an NSAIA for 2 years or longer.103,104 Similar findings have been reported from some other, but not all, observational studies.103,104,105,106,107,108
The potential benefits and risks of piroxicam therapy as well as alternative therapies should be considered prior to initiating piroxicam therapy.1
Piroxicam is administered orally.1 The drug is usually administered as a single daily dose but may be administered in divided doses daily.1
The lowest possible effective dosage and shortest duration of therapy consistent with treatment goals of the patient should be employed.1 Dosage of piroxicam must be adjusted carefully according to individual requirements and response, using the lowest possible effective dosage.1
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis
For the symptomatic treatment of acute or chronic rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, the usual initial adult dosage of piroxicam is 20 mg daily.1 For maintenance therapy, 20 mg daily is usually adequate.1,2 Piroxicam dosages of 30 or 40 mg daily may be required in some patients;2 however, dosages higher than 20 mg daily have been associated with increased frequency of adverse GI effects.1,2,3 Although symptomatic relief usually begins early in therapy with piroxicam, a progressive increase in response may occur over several weeks since the drug has a long half-life and generally does not achieve steady-state plasma concentrations for 7-12 days after initiation of therapy or adjustment of dosage.1 Therapeutic efficacy of the drug should not be assessed for at least 2 weeks after initiation of therapy1 or adjustment of dosage.
Dosage in Renal and Hepatic Impairment
Based on results of pharmacokinetic studies, the manufacturer states that dosage adjustment of piroxicam may not be necessary in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment.1 However, pharmacokinetics of the drug have not been studied in patients with severe renal insufficiency or those undergoing hemodialysis.1
The pharmacokinetics of piroxicam in individuals with hepatic disease have not been determined; however, because of the substantial hepatic metabolism of the drug, the manufacturer suggests that reduced dosage may be required in patients with hepatic impairment.1
Pharmacogenomic Dosage Considerations
The manufacturer states that reduction of piroxicam dosage should be considered in patients who are known or suspected cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme 2C9 (CYP2C9) poor metabolizers, based on genotype or experience with other drugs that are CYP2C9 substrates.1201
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines state that use of piroxicam should be avoided in patients who are CYP2C9 poor metabolizers or are intermediate metabolizers with a diplotype functional activity score (AS) of 1.520 An alternative agent that is not metabolized by CYP2C9 or is not substantially affected by CYP2C9 genetic variants in vivo should be selected; alternatively, an NSAIA that is metabolized by CYP2C9 but has a shorter half-life could be considered.520 Intermediate metabolizers with an AS of 1.5 may receive piroxicam dosages recommended for normal metabolizers.520 (See Precautions and Contraindications under Cautions.)
Adverse reactions to piroxicam mainly involve the GI tract.2
Edema has been reported in 1-10% of piroxicam-treated patients.1 Congestive heart failure, hypertension, syncope, and tachycardia have been reported occasionally in patients receiving piroxicam, and arrhythmia, exacerbation of angina, hypotension, myocardial infarction, palpitations, and vasculitis have been reported rarely.1
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIAs), including selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors and prototypical NSAIAs, increase the risk of serious adverse cardiovascular thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction and stroke (which can be fatal), in patients with or without cardiovascular disease or risk factors for cardiovascular disease.500,502,508 Use of NSAIAs also is associated with an increased risk of heart failure.500,508
The association between cardiovascular complications and use of NSAIAs is an area of ongoing concern and study.112,119,500 Findings of an FDA review of published observational studies of NSAIAs, a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data from randomized controlled trials of these drugs, and other published information500,501,502 indicate that NSAIAs may increase the risk of serious adverse cardiovascular thrombotic events by 10-50% or more, depending on the drugs and dosages studied.500 Available data suggest that the increase in risk may occur early (within the first weeks) following initiation of therapy and may increase with higher dosages and longer durations of use.500,502,505,506,508 Although the relative increase in cardiovascular risk appears to be similar in patients with or without known underlying cardiovascular disease or risk factors for cardiovascular disease, the absolute incidence of serious NSAIA-associated cardiovascular thrombotic events is higher in those with cardiovascular disease or risk factors for cardiovascular disease because of their elevated baseline risk.500,502,506,508
Results from observational studies utilizing Danish national registry data indicated that patients receiving NSAIAs following a myocardial infarction were at increased risk of reinfarction, cardiovascular-related death, and all-cause mortality beginning in the first week of treatment.505,508 Patients who received NSAIAs following myocardial infarction had a higher 1-year mortality rate compared with those who did not receive NSAIAs (20 versus 12 deaths per 100 person-years).500,508,511 Although the absolute mortality rate declined somewhat after the first year following the myocardial infarction, the increased relative risk of death in patients who received NSAIAs persisted over at least the next 4 years of follow-up.508,511
In 2 large controlled clinical trials of a selective COX-2 inhibitor for the management of pain in the first 10-14 days following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, the incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke was increased.508 Therefore, NSAIAs are contraindicated in the setting of CABG surgery.508
Findings from some systematic reviews of controlled observational studies and meta-analyses of data from randomized studies of NSAIAs suggest that naproxen may be associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular thrombotic events compared with other NSAIAs.115,116,117,119,500,501,502,503,506 However, limitations of these observational studies and the indirect comparisons used to assess cardiovascular risk of the prototypical NSAIAs (e.g., variability in patients' risk factors, comorbid conditions, concomitant drug therapy, drug interactions, dosage, and duration of therapy) affect the validity of the comparisons; in addition, these studies were not designed to demonstrate superior safety of one NSAIA compared with another.500 Therefore, FDA states that definitive conclusions regarding relative risks of NSAIAs are not possible at this time.500 (See Cautions: Cardiovascular Effects, in Celecoxib 28:08.04.08.)
Data from observational studies also indicate that use of NSAIAs in patients with heart failure is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.500,504,507,508 Results from a retrospective study utilizing Danish national registry data indicated that use of selective COX-2 inhibitors or prototypical NSAIAs in patients with chronic heart failure was associated with a dose-dependent increase in the risk of death and an increased risk of hospitalization for myocardial infarction or heart failure.500,504,508 In addition, findings from a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data from randomized controlled trials of NSAIAs indicated that use of selective COX-2 inhibitors or prototypical NSAIAs was associated with an approximate twofold increase in the risk of hospitalization for heart failure.500,501,508 Fluid retention and edema also have been observed in some patients receiving NSAIAs.508
There is no consistent evidence that use of low-dose aspirin mitigates the increased risk of serious cardiovascular events associated with NSAIAs.1,502,508
Adverse GI effects reported in approximately 1-10% of patients receiving piroxicam include anorexia, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, dyspepsia, flatulence, gross bleeding/perforation, heartburn, nausea, gastric and duodenal ulcers, and vomiting.1 Other adverse GI effects occurring occasionally in patients receiving piroxicam include dry mouth, esophagitis, gastritis, glossitis, hematemesis, melena, rectal bleeding, and stomatitis.1 Eructation and pancreatitis have been reported rarely in patients receiving the drug.1
Some reports have suggested that the incidence of piroxicam-induced peptic ulceration and GI bleeding may be higher with usual dosages51,52,53,54 (particularly in geriatric patients)52,53,54 and higher than that associated with other currently available NSAIAs;56 however, these suggestions have not been clearly substantiated, and there are recognized methodologic problems associated with the data on which they are based.56,64 An analysis by FDA of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports, adjusted for the heterogeneity of underlying reporting rates, suggested that although the rate was highest for piroxicam compared with other NSAIAs, large and clinically important differences in the rates of upper GI bleeding, ulcer, and perforation between piroxicam and other NSAIAs probably do not exist; however, the possibility that piroxicam may be more ulcerogenic could not be ruled out by this analysis.64 Further evaluation is needed.56 In general, usual dosages of piroxicam reportedly produce fewer adverse GI effects than usual anti-inflammatory dosages of aspirin.1,3,14 In one study, GI bleeding as determined by fecal blood loss was less in patients receiving 20 mg of piroxicam daily than in those receiving 3.9 g of aspirin daily for 4 days.1,24 In addition, GI mucosal changes were not observed during gastroscopic examination in patients receiving piroxicam; however, mucosal lesions were seen in aspirin-treated patients.1,24
Serious adverse GI effects (e.g., bleeding, inflammation, ulceration, perforation) can occur at any time in patients receiving NSAIA therapy, and such effects may not be preceded by warning signs or symptoms.1,65,66,71 Only 1 in 5 patients who develop a serious upper GI adverse event while receiving NSAIA therapy is symptomatic.1 Therefore, clinicians should remain alert to the possible development of serious GI effects (e.g., bleeding, ulceration) in any patient receiving NSAIA therapy, and such patients should be followed chronically for the development of manifestations of such effects and advised of the importance of this follow-up.1,65,66 In addition, patients should be advised about the signs and symptoms of serious NSAIA-induced GI toxicity and what action to take if they occur.1,65,66 If signs and symptoms of a serious GI event develop, additional evaluation and treatment should be initiated promptly; the NSAIA should be discontinued until appropriate diagnostic studies have ruled out a serious GI event.1
Results of studies to date are inconclusive concerning the relative risk of various prototypical NSAIAs in causing serious GI effects.65,66 In patients receiving NSAIAs and observed in clinical studies of several months' to 2 years' duration, symptomatic upper GI ulcers, gross bleeding, or perforation appeared to occur in approximately 1% of patients treated for 3-6 months and in about 2-4% of those treated for 1 year.1,65,66 Longer duration of therapy with an NSAIA increases the likelihood of a serious GI event.1 However, short-term therapy is not without risk.1 High dosages of any NSAIA probably are associated with increased risk of such effects, although controlled studies documenting this probable association are lacking for most NSAIAs.65,66 Therefore, whenever use of relatively high dosages (within the recommended dosage range) is considered, sufficient benefit to offset the potential increased risk of GI toxicity should be anticipated.65,66
Studies have shown that patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease and/or GI bleeding who are receiving NSAIAs have a substantially higher risk of developing GI bleeding than patients without these risk factors.94,102 In addition to a history of ulcer disease, pharmacoepidemiologic studies have identified several comorbid conditions and concomitant therapies that may increase the risk for GI bleeding, including concomitant use of oral corticosteroids or anticoagulants, longer duration of NSAIA therapy, smoking, alcoholism, older age, and poor general health status.94,102,109 Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are more likely to experience serious GI complications from NSAIA therapy than are patients with osteoarthritis.16,94,102 In addition, geriatric or debilitated patients appear to tolerate GI ulceration and bleeding less well than other individuals, and most spontaneous reports of fatal GI effects have been in such patients.96
For patients at high risk for complications from NSAIA-induced GI ulceration (e.g., bleeding, perforation), concomitant use of misoprostol can be considered for preventive therapy.16,47,68,94,102 (See Misoprostol 56:28.28.) Alternatively, some clinicians suggest that concomitant use of a proton-pump inhibitor (e.g., omeprazole) may be used concomitantly to decrease the incidence of serious GI toxicity associated with NSAIA therapy.16,68,94 In one study, therapy with high dosages of famotidine (40 mg twice daily) was more effective than placebo in preventing peptic ulcers in NSAIA-treated patients; however, the effect of the drug was modest.94 In addition, efficacy of usual dosages of H2-receptor antagonists for the prevention of NSAIA-induced gastric and duodenal ulcers has not been established.94 Therefore, most clinicians do not recommend use of H2-receptor antagonists for the prevention of NSAIA-associated ulcers.16,94 Another approach in high-risk patients who would benefit from NSAIA therapy is use of an NSAIA that is a selective inhibitor of COX-2 (e.g., celecoxib), since these agents are associated with a lower incidence of serious GI bleeding than are prototypical NSAIAs.16 However, while celecoxib (200 mg twice daily) was comparably effective to diclofenac sodium (75 mg twice daily) plus omeprazole (20 mg daily) in preventing recurrent ulcer bleeding (recurrent ulcer bleeding probabilities of 4.9 versus 6.4%, respectively, during the 6-month study) in H. pylori -negative arthritis (principally osteoarthritis) patients with a recent history of ulcer bleeding, the protective efficacy was unexpectedly low for both regimens and it appeared that neither could completely protect patients at high risk.110,111 Additional study is necessary to elucidate optimal therapy for preventing GI complications associated with NSAIA therapy in high-risk patients.110,111
Anemia and increased bleeding time has been reported in 1-10% of patients receiving piroxicam.1 Other adverse hematologic effects occurring occasionally in patients receiving piroxicam include ecchymosis, eosinophilia, epistaxis, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia.1 Agranulocytosis, hemolytic anemia, aplastic anemia, lymphadenopathy, and pancytopenia have been reported rarely in patients receiving the drug.1
Piroxicam inhibits platelet aggregation and may prolong bleeding time.1 Patients who may be adversely affected by a prolongation of bleeding time should be carefully observed during piroxicam therapy.1 One patient developed cutaneous (severe ecchymoses) and occult GI bleeding following 2 months of piroxicam therapy; bleeding subsided following discontinuance of the drug and it was suggested that the hemostatic abnormality may have resulted from a drug-induced increase in antithrombin III activity.44
Abnormal renal function has been reported in 1-10% of patients receiving piroxicam.1 Other adverse renal effects reported occasionally in patients receiving piroxicam include cystitis, dysuria, hematuria, hyperkalemia, interstitial nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, oliguria/polyuria, proteinuria, and renal failure.1 Acute nephrotoxicity, manifested as severe azotemia with hyperkalemia or as acute interstitial nephritis with immune complex glomerulonephritis, has occurred rarely in patients receiving piroxicam;25 in one patient, azotemia resolved following discontinuance of the drug.25 As with other NSAIAs, long-term piroxicam therapy has resulted in renal papillary necrosis and other renal medullary changes.1
Adverse nervous system effects reportedly occurring in 1-10% of patients receiving piroxicam include dizziness and headache.1 Anxiety, asthenia, confusion, depression, dream abnormalities, drowsiness, insomnia, malaise, nervousness, paresthesia, somnolence, tremors, and vertigo occur occasionally in patients receiving piroxicam.1 Other adverse effects reported rarely include akathisia, seizures, coma, hallucinations, meningitis, and mood alterations.1
Tinnitus has been reported to occur in 1-10% of patients receiving piroxicam.1 Blurred vision has been reported occasionally and conjunctivitis, hearing impairment, and swollen eyes have been reported rarely in patients receiving piroxicam.1
Elevated liver function test results have been reported in 1-10% of patients receiving piroxicam.1 Hepatitis and jaundice have been reported occasionally and liver failure and pain due to colic have been reported rarely.1 Studies of piroxicam in patients with impaired liver function have not been performed to date.1
Borderline elevations of one or more liver function test results may occur in up to 15% of patients treated with NSAIAs;1 notable (approximately 3 or more times the upper limit of normal) elevations of serum ALT (SGPT) or AST (SGOT) concentration have occurred in approximately 1% of patients receiving NSAIAs in controlled clinical studies.1 These abnormalities may progress, may remain essentially unchanged, or may be transient with continued therapy.1 Piroxicam should be discontinued if signs or symptoms of a severe hepatic reaction occur.1 (See Cautions: Precautions and Contraindications.)
Dermatologic and Sensitivity Reactions
Adverse dermatologic effects including pruritus and rash have occurred in 1-10% of patients receiving piroxicam.1 Alopecia, bruising, desquamation, erythema, petechial rash, photosensitivity, purpura, and sweating have been reported occasionally.1 Other adverse effects reported rarely include angioedema, anaphylactic reactions, toxic epidermal necrosis, erythema multiforme, exfoliative dermatitis, onycholysis, positive ANA, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, urticaria, and vesiculobullous reaction.1 Signs and symptoms suggestive of serum sickness (i.e., arthralgias, pruritus, fever, rash, including vesiculobullous reactions and exfoliative dermatitis) have occurred in patients receiving piroxicam.1 Pemphigus vulgaris, which was fatal, has been reported in at least one patient receiving piroxicam; however, a causal relationship to the drug has not been established.45
Fever, infection, sepsis, weight changes, asthma, and dyspnea have been reported occasionally in piroxicam-treated patients.1 Appetite changes, death, flu-like syndrome, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, pneumonia, and respiratory depression have been reported rarely in patients receiving the drug.1
Precautions and Contraindications
Patients should be advised that piroxicam, like other NSAIAs, is not free of potential adverse effects, including some that can cause discomfort, and that more serious effects (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke, GI bleeding), which may require hospitalization and may even be fatal, also can occur.1,65,66,500,508 Patients also should be informed that, while NSAIAs may be commonly employed for conditions that are less serious, NSAIA therapy often is considered essential for the management of some diseases, and the drugs have a major role in the management of pain.65,66 Clinicians may wish to discuss with their patients the potential risks and likely benefits of NSAIA therapy, particularly when consideration is being given to use of these drugs in less serious conditions for which therapy without an NSAIA may represent an acceptable alternative to both the patient and clinician.65,66
Patients should be advised to read the medication guide for NSAIAs that is provided to the patient each time the drug is dispensed.1
NSAIAs may increase the risk of serious adverse cardiovascular thrombotic events.1,115,116,117,119,500,502,508 (See Cautions: Cardiovascular Effects.) To minimize the potential risk of adverse cardiovascular events, the lowest effective dosage and shortest possible duration of therapy should be employed.1,500,508 Some clinicians suggest that it may be prudent to avoid use of NSAIAs whenever possible in patients with cardiovascular disease.505,511,512,516 Patients receiving NSAIAs (including those without previous symptoms of cardiovascular disease) should be monitored for the possible development of cardiovascular events throughout therapy.1,500,508 Patients should be informed about the signs and symptoms of serious cardiovascular toxicity (chest pain, dyspnea, weakness, slurring of speech) and instructed to seek immediate medical attention if such toxicity occurs.1,500,508 Piroxicam should be avoided in patients with recent myocardial infarction unless the benefits of therapy are expected to outweigh the risk of recurrent cardiovascular thrombotic events; if piroxicam is used in such patients, the patient should be monitored for cardiac ischemia.508
There is no consistent evidence that concomitant use of low-dose aspirin mitigates the increased risk of serious cardiovascular events associated with NSAIAs.1,112,502,508 Concomitant use of aspirin and an NSAIA increases the risk for serious GI events.1 Because of the potential for increased adverse effects, patients receiving piroxicam should be advised not to take aspirin.1
Use of NSAIAs, including piroxicam, can result in the onset of hypertension or worsening of preexisting hypertension; either of these occurrences may contribute to the increased incidence of cardiovascular events.1 Patients receiving NSAIAs may have an impaired response to diuretics (i.e., thiazide or loop diuretics), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, or β-adrenergic blocking agents.1,508 NSAIAs, including piroxicam, should be used with caution in patients with hypertension.1 Blood pressure should be monitored closely during initiation of piroxicam therapy and throughout therapy.1
Because NSAIAs increase morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure, the manufacturer states that piroxicam should be avoided in patients with severe heart failure unless the benefits of therapy are expected to outweigh the risk of worsening heart failure; if piroxicam is used in such patients, the patient should be monitored for worsening heart failure.508 Some experts state that use of NSAIAs should be avoided whenever possible in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and current or prior symptoms of heart failure.507 Patients receiving NSAIAs should be advised to inform their clinician if they experience symptoms of heart failure, including dyspnea, unexplained weight gain, and edema.508 Use of NSAIAs may diminish the cardiovascular effects of certain drugs used to treat heart failure and edema (e.g., diuretics, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists).508 (See Drug Interactions.)
The risk of potentially serious adverse GI effects should be considered in patients receiving piroxicam, particularly in patients receiving chronic therapy with the drug. (See Cautions: GI Effects.) Administration of higher than recommended dosages (i.e., more than 20 mg daily) of piroxicam in clinical trials has been associated with increased frequency of GI irritation and ulceration.27 Piroxicam should be used with caution and under close supervision in patients with a history of upper GI disease.1,83 Since peptic ulceration and/or GI bleeding have been reported in patients receiving the drug, patients should be advised to promptly report signs or symptoms of GI ulceration or bleeding to their clinician.1
Piroxicam should be used with extreme caution and under close supervision in patients with a history of GI bleeding or peptic ulceration,1 and such patients should receive an appropriate ulcer preventive regimen.47,67,80,81,84,94,102 All patients considered at increased risk of potentially serious adverse GI effects (e.g., geriatric patients, those receiving high therapeutic dosages of NSAIAs, those with a history of peptic ulcer disease, those receiving anticoagulants or corticosteroids concomitantly) should be monitored closely for signs of ulcer perforation or GI bleeding.1,84 To minimize the potential risk of adverse GI effects, the lowest effective dosage and shortest possible duration of therapy should be employed.1 For patients who are at high risk, therapy other than an NSAIA should be considered.1
Piroxicam should be used with caution in patients who may be adversely affected by a prolongation of bleeding time (e.g., patients receiving anticoagulant therapy), since the drug inhibits platelet function.1 If signs and/or symptoms of anemia occur during therapy with piroxicam, hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit should be determined.1
Patients who experience signs and/or symptoms suggestive of liver dysfunction or an abnormal liver function test result while receiving piroxicam should be evaluated for evidence of the development of a more severe hepatic reaction.1 Severe reactions, including jaundice and fatal fulminant hepatitis, liver necrosis, and hepatic failure (sometimes fatal), have occurred in patients receiving NSAIAs.1 Although such reactions are rare, piroxicam should be discontinued if abnormal liver function test results persist or worsen, if clinical signs and symptoms consistent with liver disease develop, or if systemic manifestations occur (e.g., eosinophilia, rash).1 (See Cautions: Hepatic Effects.)
Piroxicam is not a substitute for corticosteroid therapy.1 Use of corticosteroids during NSAIA therapy may increase the risk of GI ulceration and the drugs should be used concomitantly with caution.82,86 If corticosteroid dosage is decreased during piroxicam therapy, it should be done gradually, and patients should be observed for adverse effects including adrenocortical insufficiency or symptomatic exacerbation of the inflammatory condition being treated.1
Because NSAIAs have caused adverse ocular effects, patients who experience visual disturbances during piroxicam therapy should have an ophthalmologic examination.1
The possibility that the antipyretic effects of piroxicam may mask the usual signs and symptoms of infection should be considered.31,32,36
Renal toxicity has been observed in patients in whom renal prostaglandins have a compensatory role in maintaining renal perfusion.1 Administration of an NSAIA to such patients may cause a dose-dependent reduction in prostaglandin formation and thereby precipitate overt renal decompensation.1,31,48,49,50,65 Patients at greatest risk of this reaction are those with impaired renal function, heart failure, or hepatic dysfunction,1,31,48,65 those with extracellular fluid depletion (e.g., patients receiving diuretics);1,31,48,65 those taking an ACE inhibitor1 or angiotensin II receptor antagonist114 concomitantly; and geriatric patients.1,48,65 Patients should be advised to consult their clinician promptly if unexplained weight gain or edema occurs.1 Recovery of renal function to pretreatment levels usually occurs following discontinuance of NSAIA therapy.1 Some clinicians recommend that renal function be monitored periodically in patients receiving long-term NSAIA therapy.50
Piroxicam has not been evaluated in patients with severe renal impairment, and the manufacturer states that use of piroxicam is not recommended in patients with advanced renal disease.1 If piroxicam is used in patients with severe renal impairment, close monitoring of renal function is recommended.1
Anaphylactoid reactions have been reported in patients receiving piroxicam.1 Patients receiving piroxicam should be informed of the signs and symptoms of an anaphylactoid reaction (e.g., difficulty breathing, swelling of the face or throat) and advised to seek immediate medical attention if an anaphylactoid reaction develops.1
Serious skin reactions (e.g., exfoliative dermatitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis) can occur in patients receiving piroxicam.1 These serious skin reactions may occur without warning; patients should be advised to consult their clinician if skin rash and blisters, fever, or other signs of hypersensitivity reaction (e.g., pruritus) occur.1 Piroxicam should be discontinued at the first appearance of rash or any other sign of hypersensitivity.1
Multi-organ hypersensitivity (also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms [DRESS]), a potentially fatal or life-threatening syndrome, has been reported in patients receiving NSAIAs.1202 The clinical presentation is variable, but typically includes eosinophilia, fever, rash, lymphadenopathy, and/or facial swelling, possibly associated with other organ system involvement such as hepatitis, nephritis, hematologic abnormalities, myocarditis, or myositis.1202 Symptoms may resemble those of an acute viral infection.1202 Early manifestations of hypersensitivity, such as fever or lymphadenopathy, may be present in the absence of rash.1202 If such signs or symptoms develop, the NSAIA should be discontinued and the patient evaluated immediately.1202
In patients with the cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme 2C9 (CYP2C9) poor metabolizer phenotype, metabolism of piroxicam may be decreased substantially; half-life of piroxicam is prolonged and higher plasma concentrations of the drug may increase the likelihood and/or severity of adverse effects.520 Metabolism of piroxicam may be moderately reduced in CYP2C9 intermediate metabolizers with a diplotype functional activity score (AS) of 1 and mildly reduced in those with an AS of 1.5.520 Higher plasma concentrations of the drug in intermediate metabolizers with an AS of 1 may increase the likelihood of adverse effects.520 The presence of other factors affecting clearance of the drug (e.g., hepatic impairment, advanced age) also may increase the risk of adverse effects in intermediate metabolizers.520 The long half-life of piroxicam enhances the risks associated with use of the drug in patients with reduced CYP2C9 metabolism.520 (See Pharmacogenomic Dosage Considerations under Dosage and Administration and also see Elimination under Pharmacokinetics.) The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline (CPIC) for CYP2C9 and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs should be consulted for additional information on interpretation of CYP2C9 genotype testing.520
Patients receiving long-term NSAIA therapy should have a complete blood cell count and chemistry profile performed periodically.1
The manufacturers state that piroxicam is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to the drug.1 In addition, NSAIAs, including piroxicam, generally are contraindicated in patients in whom asthma, urticaria, or other sensitivity reactions are precipitated by aspirin or other NSAIAs, since there is potential for cross-sensitivity between NSAIAs and aspirin, and severe, often fatal, anaphylactic reactions may occur in such patients.1 Although NSAIAs generally are contraindicated in these patients, the drugs have occasionally been used in NSAIA-sensitive patients who have undergone desensitization.59,60,61,62,63 Because patients with asthma may have aspirin-sensitivity asthma, piroxicam should be used with caution in patients with asthma.1 In patients with asthma, aspirin sensitivity is manifested principally as bronchospasm and usually is associated with nasal polyps; the association of aspirin sensitivity, asthma, and nasal polyps is known as the aspirin triad.1 For a further discussion of cross-sensitivity of NSAIAs, see Cautions: Sensitivity Reactions, in the Salicylates General Statement 28:08.04.24.
Piroxicam is contraindicated in the setting of CABG surgery.508
Although some clinicians have used piroxicam in children for symptomatic relief of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis,3 safety and efficacy of the drug in children have not been established.1
Piroxicam should be used with caution in geriatric individuals 65 years of age or older.1 Geriatric individuals appear to tolerate GI ulceration and bleeding less well than other individuals, and many of the spontaneous reports of fatal adverse GI effects in patients receiving NSAIAs involve geriatric individuals.96 Use of the lowest effective dosage for the shortest possible duration should be considered in geriatric patients.1
There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of piroxicam in pregnant women.1201
Use of NSAIAs during pregnancy at about 30 weeks of gestation or later can cause premature closure of the fetal ductus arteriosus, and use at about 20 weeks of gestation or later has been associated with fetal renal dysfunction resulting in oligohydramnios and, in some cases, neonatal renal impairment.1200,1202 Because of these risks, use of NSAIAs should be avoided in pregnant women at about 30 weeks of gestation or later; if NSAIA therapy is necessary between about 20 and 30 weeks of gestation, the lowest effective dosage and shortest possible duration of treatment should be used.1200,1202 Monitoring of amniotic fluid volume via ultrasound examination should be considered if the duration of NSAIA treatment exceeds 48 hours; if oligohydramnios occurs, the drug should be discontinued and follow-up instituted according to clinical practice.1200,1202 Pregnant women should be advised to avoid use of NSAIAs beginning at 20 weeks' gestation unless otherwise advised by a clinician; they should be informed that NSAIAs should be avoided beginning at 30 weeks' gestation because of the risk of premature closure of the fetal ductus arteriosus and that monitoring for oligohydramnios may be necessary if NSAIA therapy is required for longer than 48 hours' duration between about 20 and 30 weeks of gestation.1200,1202
Known effects of NSAIAs on the human fetus during the third trimester of pregnancy include prenatal constriction of the ductus arteriosus, tricuspid incompetence, and pulmonary hypertension; nonclosure of the ductus arteriosus during the postnatal period (which may be resistant to medical management); and myocardial degenerative changes, platelet dysfunction with resultant bleeding, intracranial bleeding, renal dysfunction or renal failure, renal injury or dysgenesis potentially resulting in prolonged or permanent renal failure, oligohydramnios, GI bleeding or perforation, and increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis.1202
Fetal renal dysfunction resulting in oligohydramnios and, in some cases, neonatal renal impairment has been observed, on average, following days to weeks of maternal NSAIA use, although oligohydramnios has been observed infrequently as early as 48 hours after initiation of NSAIA therapy.1200,1202 Oligohydramnios is often, but not always, reversible (generally within 3-6 days) following discontinuance of NSAIA therapy.1200,1202 Complications of prolonged oligohydramnios may include limb contracture and delayed lung maturation.1200,1202 A limited number of case reports have described maternal NSAIA use and neonatal renal dysfunction, in some cases irreversible, without oligohydramnios.1200,1202 Some cases of neonatal renal dysfunction have required treatment with invasive procedures such as exchange transfusion or dialysis.1200,1202 Deaths associated with neonatal renal failure have been reported.1200 Methodologic limitations of these postmarketing studies and case reports include lack of a control group; limited information regarding dosage, duration, and timing of drug exposure; and concomitant use of other drugs.1202 These limitations preclude establishing a reliable estimate of the risk of adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes with maternal NSAIA use.1202 Available data on neonatal outcomes generally involved preterm infants, and the extent to which certain reported risks can be generalized to full-term infants is uncertain.1202
Animal data indicate that prostaglandins have an important role in endometrial vascular permeability, blastocyst implantation, and decidualization.1201 In animal studies, inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis, such as piroxicam, were associated with increased pre- and post-implantation losses.1201 Prostaglandins also have an important role in fetal kidney development.1202 In animal studies, inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis impaired kidney development at clinically relevant doses.1202
Animal reproduction studies in rats and rabbits receiving piroxicam revealed no evidence of teratogenicity at exposures up to 5 and 10 times, respectively, the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD).1201 In rats, fetotoxicity (postimplantation loss) was observed at exposure levels of twice the MRHD, and delayed parturition and an increased incidence of stillbirth were observed at doses equivalent to the MRHD.1201
Data are lacking on the effects of piroxicam during labor or delivery.1201 In animal studies, NSAIAs, including piroxicam, inhibited prostaglandin synthesis, delay parturition, and increased the incidence of stillbirth.1201
Use of NSAIAs, including piroxicam, may delay or prevent ovarian follicular rupture, which has been associated with reversible infertility in some women.1201 Reversible delays in ovulation have been observed in limited studies in women receiving NSAIAs, and animal studies indicate that inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis can disrupt prostaglandin-mediated follicular rupture required for ovulation.1201 Therefore, withdrawal of NSAIAs should be considered in women who are experiencing difficulty conceiving or are undergoing evaluation of infertility.1201
Limited data indicate that piroxicam is distributed into milk at concentrations of approximately 1-3% of the maternal concentration.43,95,1201 No accumulation of the drug in milk relative to maternal plasma was observed.1201 The manufacturer states that the developmental and health benefits of breast-feeding should be considered along with the mother's clinical need for piroxicam and any potential adverse effects on the breast-fed infant from the drug or from the underlying maternal condition.1201
Because piroxicam is highly protein bound, it theoretically could be displaced from binding sites by, or it could displace from binding sites, other protein-bound drugs such as oral anticoagulants, salicylates, and sulfonylureas.1 Patients receiving any drugs that are highly protein bound should be closely monitored for a change in dosage requirements if piroxicam is administered concomitantly.1
Anticoagulants and Thrombolytic Agents
The effects of warfarin and NSAIAs on GI bleeding are synergistic.1 Concomitant use of piroxicam and warfarin is associated with a higher risk of GI bleeding compared with use of either agent alone.1
Concomitant administration of piroxicam and acenocoumarol (not commercially available in the US) has resulted in potentiation of acenocoumarol's anticoagulant effect as determined by slightly prolonged prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times.37,97
Because piroxicam may cause GI bleeding, inhibit platelet aggregation,1 and/or potentiate anticoagulant effects,37 the drug should be used with caution in patients receiving any anticoagulant (e.g., warfarin)1,37,97 or thrombolytic agent (e.g., streptokinase).26 If piroxicam is indicated in patients receiving oral anticoagulants, prothrombin time should be monitored closely and oral anticoagulant dosage should be adjusted accordingly, and patients should be observed for adverse effects.1,97
Because reduced cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme 2C9 (CYP2C9) function is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding or supratherapeutic international normalized ratios (INRs) in patients receiving concomitant therapy with warfarin (a CYP2C9 substrate) and NSAIAs, some experts state that concomitant use of warfarin and NSAIAs should be avoided in patients who are CYP2C9 intermediate or poor metabolizers.520
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents
Concomitant use of aspirin and an NSAIA increases the risk for serious GI events.1 Because of the potential for increased adverse effects, patients receiving piroxicam should be advised not to take aspirin.1 There is no consistent evidence that use of low-dose aspirin mitigates the increased risk of serious cardiovascular events associated with NSAIAs.112,502,508
The manufacturers state that plasma piroxicam concentrations are decreased by about 20% when 20 mg of piroxicam daily is administered concomitantly with 3.9 g of aspirin daily.1
Concomitant use of piroxicam and antacids does not appear to affect plasma piroxicam concentrations.1,13 In one study following concomitant administration of piroxicam and antacid tablets containing aluminum hydroxide alone or combined with magnesium hydroxide for 5 days, substantial differences in mean plasma piroxicam concentrations were not observed during or after concomitant antacid administration.13
Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists
Concomitant use of NSAIAs with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists may reduce the blood pressure response to the antihypertensive agent.1,101,118
There is evidence from clinical studies and postmarketing reports that concomitant use of piroxicam can reduce the natriuretic effects of furosemide or thiazide diuretics.1,98 This effect may be related to inhibition of renal prostaglandin synthesis.1,98 Concomitant use of piroxicam and diuretics may increase the risk of renal failure.1,98 (See Cautions: Precautions and Contraindications.)
Like other NSAIAs, piroxicam has been reported to increase serum lithium concentrations1,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79 and may reduce renal clearance of lithium.29,72,73,74,75,76 The mechanism involved in the reduction of lithium clearance by NSAIAs is not known, but has been attributed to inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis, which may interfere with the renal elimination of lithium.72,74 In addition, piroxicam-induced inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis may inhibit renal sodium excretion, which may result in increased lithium reabsorption from the renal tubule.72 When piroxicam therapy is initiated in patients receiving lithium or when dosage of piroxicam is adjusted or the drug is discontinued in these patients, plasma lithium concentrations should be monitored1,72,73,76,77,79 and the patient should be observed for signs and symptoms of lithium intoxication.29,72,73,76
NSAIAs and methotrexate should be used concomitantly with caution.1 Like other NSAIAs, piroxicam has been reported to decrease the renal clearance of methotrexate and may lead to increased serum methotrexate concentrations and potential toxicity when used concomitantly,1,100 particularly with high methotrexate dosage.99,100 (See Drug Interactions: Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents, in Methotrexate 10:00.)
Concomitant use of piroxicam and pemetrexed may increase the risk of pemetrexed-associated myelosuppression, renal toxicity, and GI toxicity.1201 Administration of NSAIAs with short elimination half-lives (e.g., diclofenac, indomethacin) should be avoided beginning 2 days before and continuing through 2 days after pemetrexed administration.1201 In the absence of data regarding potential interactions between pemetrexed and NSAIAs with longer half-lives (e.g., meloxicam, nabumetone), administration of NSAIAs with longer half-lives should be interrupted beginning at least 5 days before and continuing through 2 days after pemetrexed administration.1201 Patients with renal impairment with a creatinine clearance of 45-79 mL/minute should be monitored for myelosuppression, renal toxicity, and GI toxicity if they receive concomitant piroxicam and pemetrexed therapy.1201
Limited information is available on the acute toxicity of piroxicam.1
Overdosage of NSAIAs can cause lethargy, drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, and epigastric pain; these manifestations generally are reversible with supportive care.1 GI bleeding also has been reported.1 Rarely, hypertension, acute renal failure, respiratory depression, and coma may occur.1 Anaphylactoid reactions have been reported with therapeutic use of NSAIAs and may occur following an overdosage.1
Acute ingestion of 100 mg of piroxicam along with 2 laxative tablets each containing 194 mg of phenolphthalein (preparations containing phenolphthalein are no longer commercially available in the US), 16 mg of methylene blue, 16 mg of acacia, and 1.6 mg of magnesium stearate in a 2-year-old child resulted in vomiting, irritability, acidosis, and dehydration within 2 hours after ingestion and progressed to diarrhea with overt GI bleeding, hyponatremia and hypocalcemia, mental confusion, and a generalized seizure.46 Subsequently, hematologic (manifested as peripheral pancytopenia, bone marrow aplasia, and coagulopathy), hepatic, and renal toxicity developed; the child's course also was complicated by the development of infection.46 Manifestations of piroxicam overdosage and toxicity resolved over 3-4 weeks in this patient following supportive and symptomatic treatment that included correction of fluid and electrolyte balance and administration of fresh frozen plasma and vitamin K.46
If acute overdosage of piroxicam occurs, general supportive and symptomatic treatment should be initiated.1 Emesis and/or administration of activated charcoal (60-100 g in adults or 1-2 g/kg in children) and/or an osmotic cathartic may be indicated.1 If the patient is comatose, having seizures, or lacks the gag reflex, gastric lavage may be performed if an endotracheal tube with cuff inflated is in place to prevent aspiration of gastric contents.33 Studies in dogs indicate that use of multiple doses of activated charcoal can reduce the half-life of piroxicam by more than 50% and reduce systemic bioavailability by as much as 37% when given as late as 6 hours after ingestion of piroxicam.1 Although there are no studies to date, forced diuresis, alkalinization of urine, hemoperfusion, or hemodialysis is probably not useful in enhancing elimination of piroxicam since the drug is highly protein bound.1,5,36
Piroxicam has pharmacologic actions similar to those of other prototypical NSAIAs.2,4 The drug exhibits anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic activity.1,2,4 The exact mechanisms have not been clearly established, but many of the actions appear to be associated principally with the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis.1,2,3 Piroxicam inhibits the synthesis of prostaglandins in body tissues by inhibiting cyclooxygenase;2,3 at least 2 isoenzymes, cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and -2 (COX-2) (also referred to as prostaglandin G/H synthase-1 [PGHS-1] and -2 [PGHS-2], respectively), have been identified that catalyze the formation of prostaglandins in the arachidonic acid pathway.88,89,90,91,92,93 Piroxicam, like other prototypical NSAIAs, inhibits both COX-1 and COX-2.88,89,90,91,92,93 Although the exact mechanisms have not been clearly established, NSAIAs appear to exert anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic activity principally through inhibition of the COX-2 isoenzyme; COX-1 inhibition presumably is responsible for the drugs' unwanted effects on GI mucosa and platelet aggregation.88,89,90,91,92,93
Anti-inflammatory, Analgesic, and Antipyretic Effects
The anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic effects of piroxicam and other NSAIAs, including selective inhibitors of COX-2 (e.g., celecoxib, rofecoxib), appear to result from inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis.6,88,89,90,91,92 While the precise mechanism of the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of NSAIAs continues to be investigated, these effects appear to be mediated principally through inhibition of the COX-2 isoenzyme at sites of inflammation with subsequent reduction in the synthesis of certain prostaglandins from their arachidonic acid precursors.88,89,90,91,92,93
In vitro, piroxicam has also been shown to inhibit superoxide formation which may contribute to its anti-inflammatory effect.27,42 On a weight basis, piroxicam has at least 200 or 30 times the anti-inflammatory activity of aspirin or indomethacin, respectively, as determined by inhibition of ultraviolet light-induced erythema in animals.2,4 On a weight basis, piroxicam is as potent as indomethacin and more potent than phenylbutazone, naproxen, ibuprofen, sulindac, tolmetin, or aspirin as determined by inhibition of carrageenan-induced paw edema in rats.2 In adjuvant-induced polyarthritis in rats, the anti-inflammatory activity of piroxicam is about 15 times that of phenylbutazone on a weight basis.2
In animal studies, the analgesic activity of piroxicam on a weight basis was slightly less than that of indomethacin but was greater than that of naproxen, fenoprofen, tolmetin, phenylbutazone, or aspirin.2
Although the mechanism of the antipyretic effect of NSAIAs is not known, it has been suggested that suppression of prostaglandin synthesis in the CNS (probably in the hypothalamus) may be involved.7,11 In rats, the antipyretic activity of 10 mg/kg of piroxicam was similar to that of 56 mg/kg of aspirin.8
Piroxicam has been reported to adversely affect renal function.1,25,47 (See Cautions: Renal Effects.) Although the exact mechanism of adverse renal effects of NSAIAs has not been determined, it may be related to inhibition of renal prostaglandin synthesis.1,7,50
In one study, piroxicam was reported to reduce serum uric acid concentration;3 however, in another study, the drug had equivocal effects on serum uric acid concentration with some patients showing increased and others showing decreased concentrations during and/or following therapy with the drug.38
Piroxicam can cause GI mucosal damage which may result in ulceration and/or bleeding.1,5,51,52,53,54,55,56,69,71 (See Cautions: GI Effects.) These gastric effects have been attributed to inhibition of the synthesis of prostaglandins produced by COX-1.88,89,90,91,92,93,94 Other factors possibly involved in NSAIA-induced gastropathy include local irritation, promotion of acid back-diffusion into gastric mucosa, uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation, and enterohepatic recirculation of the drugs.90,94
Epidemiologic and laboratory studies suggest that NSAIAs may reduce the risk of colon cancer.92 Although the exact mechanism by which NSAIAs may inhibit colon carcinogenesis remains to be determined, it has been suggested that inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis may be involved.92
Piroxicam may inhibit platelet aggregation and prolong bleeding time.1 Like aspirin and other prototypical NSAIAs, the effects of piroxicam on platelets appear to be associated with inhibition of the synthesis of prostaglandins produced by COX-1.1,7,92 In vitro, piroxicam reportedly inhibits collagen-induced platelet aggregation.2,3 In healthy individuals, administration of 10, 20, or 40 mg of piroxicam daily for 2 weeks resulted in substantial inhibition of platelet aggregation 24 hours after the first dose of 20 or 40 mg but only after 14 days of therapy with 10 mg.39 For each dosage regimen, inhibition of platelet aggregation was observed for up to 2 weeks following discontinuance of the drug.39
Pharmacokinetic studies to date have not revealed race-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of piroxicam.1 The pharmacokinetics of piroxicam have not been studied in pediatric patients.1 Studies in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment have not revealed pharmacokinetic differences that would require dosage adjustment of piroxicam; however, studies have not been conducted in patients with severe renal insufficiency or in those undergoing hemodialysis.1 The pharmacokinetics of piroxicam in individuals with hepatic disease have not been determined.1
Piroxicam is well absorbed following oral administration.1,3 Food decreases the rate but not the extent of absorption of piroxicam.2,12,28 Absorption of piroxicam does not appear to be affected by concomitant administration of antacids.3,13,28
Following oral administration of a single 20-mg dose of piroxicam, the drug appears in plasma within 15-30 minutes27,28 and peak plasma concentrations of approximately 1.5-2 mcg/mL usually are reached within 3-5 hours.1 In one study, the presence of a secondary peak in plasma piroxicam concentrations was reported, suggesting that piroxicam may undergo enterohepatic circulation.13 Peak plasma concentrations of 3-8 mcg/mL are reached following multiple-dose administration of 20 mg daily.1 Relatively stable plasma concentrations of piroxicam are maintained during the day following administration of single daily doses.1 Following repeated daily administration of piroxicam, substantial drug accumulation occurs.1 Steady-state plasma concentrations of piroxicam are usually reached within 7-12 days.1 In patients with prolonged plasma half-lives (greater than 50 hours) of piroxicam, higher peak plasma concentrations of the drug have been observed with steady-state plasma concentrations being reached in 2-3 weeks.1,36 Plasma concentrations of piroxicam required for analgesic effect are approximately 2 mcg/mL.14 Optimum anti-inflammatory activity of piroxicam reportedly occurs at plasma concentrations of at least 5 mcg/mL.14
At plasma concentrations of 5-30 mcg/mL, 99.3% of piroxicam is bound to plasma proteins in vitro.3,13 In healthy individuals, piroxicam reportedly has an apparent volume of distribution of 0.12-0.14 L/kg.12
Piroxicam is distributed into synovial fluid in concentrations about 40% of simultaneous plasma concentrations;3 however, substantial interindividual variation has been observed.2 In addition, there is some evidence that piroxicam accumulates slowly in cartilage.2,5
Following oral administration, piroxicam is distributed into milk in concentrations approximately 1-3% of concurrent maternal plasma concentrations.1,43,95 Piroxicam does not appear to accumulate in milk.1
The plasma half-life of piroxicam has been reported to range from 14-158 hours in healthy adults.2,13 The manufacturer states that the half-life of piroxicam averages 50 hours.1
Piroxicam appears to be extensively metabolized.2 The drug is metabolized principally by cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme 2C9 (CYP2C9)-mediated hydroxylation at the 5-position of the pyridinyl side chain followed by conjugation with glucuronic acid.1,1201 At steady-state, about 50% of a dose of piroxicam is metabolized via hydroxylation and glucuronide conjugation of the hydroxy metabolite.28 Although the rate of formation of the hydroxy metabolite is slow, the metabolite appears to be excreted and/or conjugated rapidly since only trace amounts appear in plasma.28 Cyclodehydration and a sequence of reactions involving hydrolysis of the amide linkage, decarboxylation, ring contraction, and N -demethylation have been shown to occur in animals;1,28 however, these appear to be minor metabolic pathways in humans.28 The metabolites of piroxicam reportedly do not inhibit prostaglandin synthesis27,28 and have little or no anti-inflammatory activity.28
In patients with the CYP2C9 poor metabolizer phenotype, metabolic clearance of piroxicam may be decreased substantially and plasma concentrations may be increased.520 (See Precautions and Contraindications under Cautions.) Metabolism may be moderately or mildly decreased in patients with the CYP2C9 intermediate metabolizer phenotype with a diplotype activity score of 1 or 1.5, respectively.520 Limited data indicate that piroxicam concentrations following a single oral dose are 1.7-fold higher in individuals with the heterozygous *1/*2 or *1/*3 diplotype and 5.3-fold higher in individuals with the homozygous *3/*3 diplotype, compared with normal metabolizers.1201 The mean elimination half-life was increased 1.7-fold in those with the *1/*3 diplotype and 8.8-fold in those with the 3/*3 diplotype.1201
Piroxicam and its metabolites are excreted principally in urine and feces;1 urinary excretion of the drug is about twice the fecal excretion.1 Piroxicam is excreted principally as metabolites and less than 5% of an administered dose is excreted unchanged in urine and feces.1,28
Piroxicam, an oxicam derivative, is a prototypical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAIA).1,2,3,4 Piroxicam is structurally unrelated to other NSAIAs.2,3,5 The drug is acidic because of the presence of a 4-hydroxy enolic acid substituent.1 Piroxicam occurs as a white, crystalline solid and is sparingly soluble in water and slightly soluble in alcohol and in alkaline aqueous solution. Piroxicam has a pKa of 5.1 in aqueous solution.1,36
Piroxicam capsules should be stored in tight, light-resistant containers34,35 at a temperature less than 30°C.34,36 When stored under recommended conditions, piroxicam capsules are stable for 36 months after the date of manufacture.27
Additional Information
The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. represents that the information provided in the accompanying monograph was formulated with a reasonable standard of care, and in conformity with professional standards in the field. Readers are advised that decisions regarding use of drugs are complex medical decisions requiring the independent, informed decision of an appropriate health care professional, and that the information contained in the monograph is provided for informational purposes only. The manufacturer's labeling should be consulted for more detailed information. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. does not endorse or recommend the use of any drug. The information contained in the monograph is not a substitute for medical care.
Excipients in commercially available drug preparations may have clinically important effects in some individuals; consult specific product labeling for details.
Please refer to the ASHP Drug Shortages Resource Center for information on shortages of one or more of these preparations.
Routes | Dosage Forms | Strengths | Brand Names | Manufacturer |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oral | Capsules | 10 mg* | ||
20 mg* | Feldene® | Pfizer |
* available from one or more manufacturer, distributor, and/or repackager by generic (nonproprietary) name
1. Pfizer Laboratories. Feldene® (piroxicam) capsules prescribing information. New York, NY; 2006 Mar.
2. Dahl SL, Ward JR. Pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects of piroxicam, a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent. Pharmacotherapy . 1982; 2:80-9. [PubMed 6765393]
3. Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speight TM et al. Piroxicam: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs . 1981; 22:165-87. [PubMed 7021122]
4. Wiseman EH. Pharmacologic studies with a new class of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents-the oxicams-with special reference to piroxicam (Feldene®). Am J Med . 1982; 72(2A):2-8.
5. Conner CS. Piroxicam. Drugdex . 1983; (Mar):1-36.
6. Simon LS, Mills JA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med . 1980; 302:1179-85. [PubMed 6988717]
7. Flower RJ, Moncada S, Vane JR. Drug therapy of inflammation: analgesic-antipyretics and antiinflammatory agents; drugs employed in the treatment of gout. In: Gilman AG, Goodman L, Gilman A, eds. Goodman and Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 6th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company; 1980:682-93.
8. Wiseman EH. Review of preclinical studies with piroxicam: pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology. In: O'Brien WM, Wiseman EH, eds. Royal Society of Medicine International Congress and Symposium Series. Number 1. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1978:11-23.
9. Ferreira SH, Lorenzetti BB, Correa FMA. Central and peripheral antianalgesic action of aspirin-like drugs. Eur J Pharmacol . 1978; 53:39-48. [PubMed 310771]
10. Atkinson DC, Collier HOJ. Salicylates: molecular mechanism of therapeutic action. Adv Pharmacol Chemother . 1980; 17:233-88. [PubMed 7004141]
11. Bernheim HA, Block LH, Atkins E. Fever: pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and purpose. Ann Intern Med . 1979; 91:261-70. [PubMed 223485]
12. Ishizaki T, Nomura T, Abe T. Pharmacokinetics of piroxicam, a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, under fasting and postprandial states in man. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm . 1979; 7:369-81. [PubMed 512843]
13. Hobbs DC, Twomey TM. Piroxicam pharmacokinetics in man: aspirin and antacid interaction studies. J Clin Pharmacol . 1979; 19:270-81. [PubMed 89124]
14. Pitts NE. Efficacy and safety of piroxicam. Am J Med . 1982; 72(2A):77-87.
15. Abruzzo JL, Gordon GV, Meyers AR. Double-blind study comparing piroxicam and aspirin in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Am J Med . 1982; 72(2A):45-9.
16. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Rheumatoid Arthritis Guidelines. Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis; 2002 update. Arthritis Rheum . 2002; 46:328-46. [PubMed 11840435]
17. Willkens RF. The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. JAMA . 1978; 240:1632-5. [PubMed 691156]
18. Willkens RF, Ward JR, Louie JS et al. Double-blind study comparing piroxicam and aspirin in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med . 1982; 72(2A):23-6.
19. Turner R, April PA, Robbins DL. Double-blind multicenter study comparing piroxicam and ibuprofen in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med . 1982; 72(2A):34-8.
20. Davies J, Dixon AS. Efficacy and safety of piroxicam compared with indomethacin in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med . 1982; 72(2A):27-30.
21. Sydnes OA. Double-blind comparison of piroxicam and naproxen in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med . 1982; 72(2A):31-3.
22. Hart FD. Rheumatic disorders. In: Avery GS, ed. Drug treatment: principles and practice of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2nd ed. New York: ADIS Press; 1980:861-2.
23. Huskisson EC. European experience with piroxicam. Am J Med . 1982; 72(2A):70-6.
24. Pitts NE, Proctor RR. Summary: efficacy and safety of piroxicam. In O'Brien WM, Wiseman EH, eds. Royal Society of Medicine International Congress and Symposium Series. Number 1. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1978:97-108.
25. Mitnick PD, Klein WJ. Piroxicam-induced renal disease. Arch Intern Med . 1984; 144:63-4. [PubMed 6691775]
26. Hoechst-Roussel. Streptase® prescribing information. Somerville, NJ; 1980 Aug.
27. Pfizer. Feldene® (piroxicam): the first one-a-day agent for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. New York. 1983 Mar.
28. Wiseman EH, Hobbs DC. Review of pharmacokinetic studies with piroxicam. Am J Med . 1982; 72(2A):9-17. [PubMed 6800256]
29. Reimann IW, Frolich JC. Effects of diclofenac on lithium kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther . 1981; 30:348-52. [PubMed 7273598]
30. Rae SA, Williams IA, English J et al. Alteration of plasma prednisolone levels by indomethacin and naproxen. Br J Clin Pharmacol . 1982; 14:459-61. [PubMed 7126420]
31. Merck, Sharp & Dohme. Indocin®, Indocin® SR prescribing information. West Point, PA. 1985 Oct.
32. Syntex. Naprosyn® prescribing information. Palo Alto, CA. 1983 Apr.
33. Gosselin RE, Hodge HC, Smith RP et al. Clinical toxicology of commercial products. Acute poisoning. 5th ed. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co; 1984:I-10.
34. USP DI. Vol. 1: 1984 Drug information for the health care provider. Rockville, MD: The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc; 1983:896-7.
35. The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc. Piroxicam. Pharmacopeial Forum . 1984; 10:4058-9.
36. D'Ambrosio GG (Pfizer Laboratories, New York): Personal communication; 1984 Mar 29, Apr 11.
37. Jacotot B. Interaction of piroxicam with oral anticoagulants. Proceedings of the IXth European Congress of Rheumatology; 1979 September 4; Wiesbaden. New York: Academy Professional Information Services; 1980:46-8.
38. Widmark PH. Piroxicam: its safety and efficacy in the treatment of acute gout. Am J Med . 1982; 72(2A):63-5. [PubMed 7058825]
39. Weintraub M, Case K, Kroening B et al. Effects of piroxicam on platelet aggregation. Clin Pharmacol Ther . 1978; 23:134-5.
40. Pomberg O. Comparison of piroxicam with indomethacin in ankylosing spondylitis: a double-blind crossover trial. Am J Med . 1982; 72(2A):58-62. [PubMed 7058824]
41. Cash HC, Humpston D, Kasap HS. Feldene in the symptomatic treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea. Practitioner . 1982; 226:1338-41. [PubMed 7050953]
42. Abramson S, Edelson H, Kaplan H et al. The neutrophil in rheumatoid arthritis: its role and the inhibition of its activation by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Semin Arthritis Rheum . 1983; 13(Suppl 1):148-52. [PubMed 6312608]
43. Ostensen M. Piroxicam in human breast milk. Eur J Clin Pharmacol . 1983; 25:829-30. [PubMed 6662182]
44. Stefanini M, Claustro LZ, Mulkey P. Bleeding tendency possibly related to increased plasma antithrombin III activity in patient treated with piroxicam. South Med J . 1984; 77:633-4. [PubMed 6609435]
45. Martin RL, McSweeney GW, Schneider J. Fatal pemphigus vulgaris in a patient taking piroxicam. N Engl J Med . 1983; 309:795-6. [PubMed 6888461]
46. MacDougall LG, Taylor-Smith A, Rothberg AD et al. Piroxicam poisoning in a 2-year-old child. South Afr Med J . 1984; 66:31-3.
47. Lanza Fl, and the Ad Hoc Committee on Practice Parameters of the American College of Gastroenterology. A guideline for the treatment and prevention of NSAID-induced ulcers. Am J Gastroenterol . 1998; 93:2037-46. [PubMed 9820370]
48. The Upjohn Company. Motrin® prescribing information. Kalamazoo, MI; 1985 Jul.
49. Clive DM, Stoff JS. Renal syndromes associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. N Engl J Med . 1984; 310:563-72. [PubMed 6363936]
50. Adams DH, Michael J, Bacon PA et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and renal failure. Lancet . 1986; 1:57-9. [PubMed 2867313]
51. Fok KH, George PJM, Vicary FR. Peptic ulcers induced by piroxicam. BMJ . 1985; 290:117. [PubMed 3917708]
52. Morgan AG. Peptic ulcers induced by piroxicam. BMJ . 1985; 290:564. [PubMed 3918675]
53. Emery P, Grahame R. Peptic ulcers induced by piroxicam. BMJ . 1985; 290:564. [PubMed 3918675]
54. Emery P, Grahame R. Gastrointestinal blood loss and piroxicam. Lancet . 1982; 1:1302-3. [PubMed 6123039]
55. Laake K, Kjeldaas L, Borchgrevink CF. Side-effects of piroxicam (Feldene): a one-year material of 103 reports from Norway. Acta Med Scand . 1984; 215:81-3. [PubMed 6695566]
56. Paulus HE. FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting: postmarketing surveillance of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Arthritis Rheum . 1985; 28:1168-9. [PubMed 4052129]
57. Settipane GA. Adverse reactions to aspirin and other drugs. Arch Intern Med . 1981; 141:328-32. [PubMed 7008734]
58. Weinberger M. Analgesic sensitivity in children with asthma. Pediatrics . 1978; 62(Suppl):910-5. [PubMed 103067]
59. Settipane GA. Aspirin and allergic diseases: a review. Am J Med . 1983; 74(Suppl):102-9. [PubMed 6344621]
60. VanArsdel PP Jr. Aspirin idiosyncracy and tolerance. J Allergy Clin Immunol . 1984; 73:431-3. [PubMed 6423718]
61. Stevenson DD. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of adverse reactions to aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Allergy Clin Immunol . 1984; 74(4 Part 2):617-22. [PubMed 6436354]
62. Stevenson DD, Mathison DA. Aspirin sensitivity in asthmatics: when may this drug be safe? Postgrad Med . 1985; 78:111-3,116-9. (IDIS 205854)
63. Pleskow WW, Stevenson DD, Mathison DA et al. Aspirin desensitization in aspirin-sensitive asthmatic patients: clinical manifestations and characterization of the refractory period. J Allergy Clin Immunol . 1982; 69(1 Part 1):11-9. [PubMed 7054250]
64. Rossi AC, Hsu JP, Faich GA. Ulcerogenicity of piroxicam: an analysis of spontaneously reported data. BMJ . 1987; 294:147-50. [PubMed 3109543]
65. Palmer JF. Letter sent to Wolleben J, of Pfizer Pharmaceutical regarding labeling revisions about gastrointestinal adverse reactions to Feldene® (piroxicam). Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration, Division of Oncology and Radiopharmaceutical Drug Products. 1988 Sep.
66. Anon. Labeling revisions for NSAIDs. FDA Drug Bull . 1989; 19:3-4.
67. Searle. Cytotec® (misoprostol) prescribing information. Skokie, IL; 1989 Jan.
68. Anon. Drugs for rheumatoid arthritis. Med Lett Drugs Ther . 2000; 42:57-64. [PubMed 10887424]
69. Saw KC, Quick CRG, Higgins AF. Ileocaecal perforation and bleeding are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) responsible? J R Soc Med . 1990; 83:114-5.
70. Stubb S, Reitamo S. Fixed drug eruption caused by piroxicam. J Am Acad Dermatol . 1990; 22:1111-2. [PubMed 2142495]
71. Soll AH, Weinstein WM, Kurata J et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and peptic ulcer disease. Ann Intern Med . 1991; 114:307-19. [PubMed 1987878]
72. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug interactions: Lithium. In: Hansten PD, Horn JR. Drug interactions and updates. Vancouver, WA: Applied Therapeutics, Inc; 1993:609-10.
73. Lithium/NSAIDs. In: Tatro DS, Olin BR, Hebel SK eds. Drug interaction facts. St. Louis: JB Lippincott Co; 1993(April):463.
74. Miller LG, Bowman RC, Bakht F. Sparing effect of sulindac on lithium levels. J Fam Prac . 1989; 28:592-3.
75. Stein G, Robertson M, Nadarajah J. Toxic interactions between lithium and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Psych Med . 1988; 18:535-43.
76. Khan IH. Lithium and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. BMJ . 1991; 302:1537-8. [PubMed 1855032]
77. Kerry RJ, Owen G, Michaelson S. Possible toxic interaction between lithium and piroxicam. Lancet . 1983; 1:418-9. [PubMed 6130411]
78. Harrison TM, Davies DW, Norris CM. Lithium carbonate and piroxicam. Br J Psychiatry . 1986; 149:124-5. [PubMed 3096415]
79. Nadarajah J, Stein GS. Piroxicam induced lithium toxicity. Ann Rheum Dis . 1985; 44:502. [PubMed 4026412]
80. Ciba Geigy, Ardsley, NY: Personal communication on diclofenac 28:08.04.
81. Reviewers' comments (personal observations) on diclofenac 28:08.04.
82. Corticosteroid interactions: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In: Hansten PD, Horn JR. Drug interactions and updates. Vancouver, WA: Applied Therapeutics, Inc; 1993:562.
83. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Jick H. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation associated with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Lancet . 1994; 343:769-72. [PubMed 7907735]
84. Hollander D. Gastrointestinal complications of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: prophylactic and therapeutic strategies. Am J Med . 1994; 96:274-81. [PubMed 8154516]
85. Schubert TT, Bologna SD, Yawer N et al. Ulcer risk factors: interaction between Helicobacter pylori infection, nonsteroidal use, and age. Am J Med . 1993; 94:413-7. [PubMed 8475935]
86. Piper JM, Ray WA, Daugherty JR et al. Corticosteroid use and peptic ulcer disease: role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ann Intern Med . 1991; 114:735-40. [PubMed 2012355]
87. Bateman DN, Kennedy JG. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and elderly patients: the medicine may be worse than the disease. BMJ . 1995; 310:817-8. [PubMed 7711609]
88. Hawkey CJ. COX-2 inhibitors. Lancet . 1999; 353:307-14. [PubMed 9929039]
89. Kurumbail RG, Stevens AM, Gierse JK et al. Structural basis for selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by anti-inflammatory agents. Nature . 1996; 384:644-8. [PubMed 8967954]
90. Riendeau D, Charleson S, Cromlish W et al. Comparison of the cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitory properties of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective COX-2 inhibitors, using sensitive microsomal and platelet assays. Can J Physiol Pharmacol . 1997; 75:1088-95. [PubMed 9365818]
91. DeWitt DL, Bhattacharyya D, Lecomte M et al. The differential susceptibility of prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthases-1 and -2 to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: aspirin derivatives as selective inhibitors. Med Chem Res . 1995; 5:325-43.
92. Cryer B, Dubois A. The advent of highly selective inhibitors of syclooxygenasea review. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediators . 1998; 56:341-61. [PubMed 9990677]
93. Simon LS. Role and regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 during inflammation. Am J Med . 1999; 106(Suppl 5B):37-42S.
94. Wolfe MM, Lichtenstein DR, Singh G. Gastrointestinal toxicity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med . 1999; 340:1888-99. [PubMed 10369853]
95. Briggs GG, Freeman RK, Yaffe SJ. Drugs in Pregnancy and lactation. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1998:875-6.
96. Mylan. Meclofenamate sodium capsules prescribing information. Morgantown, WV; 1998 Jun.
97. Piroxicam (Feldene) interactions: warfarin (Coumadin). In: Hansten PD, Horn JR. Drug interactions and updates. Vancouver, WA: Applied Therapeutics, Inc; 1997:440-1.
98. Furosemide (Lasix) interactions: Indomethacin (Indocin). In: Hansten PD, Horn JR. Drug interactions and updates. Vancouver, WA: Applied Therapeutics, Inc; 1997:308-9.
99. Tracy TS, Worster T, Bradley JD et al. Methotrexate disposition following concomitant administration of ketoprofen, piroxicam, and flurbiprofen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Clin Pharmac . 1994; 37:453-6.
100. Kremer JM and Hamilton RA. The effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on methotrexate (MTX) pharmacokinetics: impairment of renal clearance of MTX at weekly maintenance doses but not at 7.5 mg. J Rheumatol . 1995; 22:2072-7. [PubMed 8596147]
101. Aspirin interactions: Captopril (Capoten). In: Hansten PD, Horn JR. Drug interactions and updates. Vancouver, WA: Applied Therapeutics, Inc; 1997:62-3.
102. Singh G, Triadafilopoulos G. Epidemiology of NSAID induced gastrointestinal complications. J Rheumatol . 1999; 26(suppl 56):18-24.
103. in't Veld BA, Ruitenberg A, Hofman A et al. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the risk of Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med . 2001; 345:1515-21. [PubMed 11794217]
104. Breitner JCS, Zandi PP. Do nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs reduce the risk of Alzheimer's disease? N Engl J Med . 2001; 345:1567-8. Editorial.
105. McGeer PL, Schulzer M, McGeer EG. Arthritis and anti-inflammatory agents as possible protective factors for Alzheimer's disease: a review of 17 epidemiologic studies. Neurology . 1996; 47:425-32. [PubMed 8757015]
106. Beard CM, Waring SC, O'sBrien PC et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and Alzheimer's disease: a case-control study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1980 through 1984. Mayo Clin Proc . 1998; 73:951-5. [PubMed 9787743]
107. in't Veld BA, Launer LJ, Hoes AW et al. NSAIDs and incident Alzheimer's disease: the Rotterdam Study. Neurobiol Aging . 1998; 19:607-11. [PubMed 10192221]
108. Stewart WF, Kawas C, Corrada M et al. Risk of Alzheimer's disease and duration of NSAID use. Neurology . 1997; 48:626-32. [PubMed 9065537]
109. Pharmacia. Daypro® (oxaprozin) caplets prescribing information. Chicago, IL; 2002 May.
110. Chan FKL, Hung LCT, Suen BY et al. Celecoxib versus diclofenac and omeprazole in reducing the risk of recurrent ulcer bleeding in patients with arthritis. N Engl J Med . 2002; 347:2104-10. [PubMed 12501222]
111. Graham DY. NSAIDs, Helicobacter pylori , and Pandora's box. N Engl J Med . 2002; 347:2162-4. [PubMed 12501230]
112. Food and Drug Administration. Analysis and recommendations for agency action regarding non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cardiovascular risk. 2005 Apr 6.
113. Cush JJ. The safety of COX-2 inhibitors: deliberations from the February 16-18, 2005, FDA meeting. From the American College of Rheumatology website ([Web]). Accessed 2005 Oct 12.
114. Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Diovan® (valsartan) capsules prescribing information (dated 1997 Apr). In: Physicians' desk reference. 53rd ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Company Inc; 1999:2013-5.
115. McGettigan P, Henry D. Cardiovascular risk and inhibition of cyclooxygenase: a systematic review of observational studies of selective and nonselective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase 2. JAMA . 2006; 296: 1633-44. [PubMed 16968831]
116. Kearney PM, Baigent C, Godwin J et al. Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ . 2006; 332: 1302-5. [PubMed 16740558]
117. Graham DJ. COX-2 inhibitors, other NSAIDs, and cardiovascular risk; the seduction of common sense. JAMA . 2006; 296:1653-6. [PubMed 16968830]
118. Merck & Co. Clinoril® (sulindac) tablets prescribing information. Whitehouse Station, NJ; 2006 Feb.
119. Chou R, Helfand M, Peterson K et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of analgesics for osteoarthritis. Comparative effectiveness review no. 4. (Prepared by the Oregon evidence-based practice center under contract no. 290-02-0024.) . Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2006 Sep. Available at: [Web].
500. Food and Drug Administration. Drug safety communication: FDA strengthens warning that non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can cause heart attacks or strokes. Silver Spring, MD; 2015 Jul 9. From the FDA web site. Accessed 2016 Mar 22. [Web]
501. Coxib and traditional NSAID Trialists' (CNT) Collaboration, Bhala N, Emberson J et al. Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet . 2013; 382:769-79. [PubMed 23726390]
502. Food and Drug Administration. FDA briefing document: Joint meeting of the arthritis advisory committee and the drug safety and risk management advisory committee, February 10-11, 2014. From FDA web site [Web]
503. Trelle S, Reichenbach S, Wandel S et al. Cardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: network meta-analysis. BMJ . 2011; 342:c7086. [PubMed 21224324]
504. Gislason GH, Rasmussen JN, Abildstrom SZ et al. Increased mortality and cardiovascular morbidity associated with use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in chronic heart failure. Arch Intern Med . 2009; 169:141-9. [PubMed 19171810]
505. Schjerning Olsen AM, Fosbøl EL, Lindhardsen J et al. Duration of treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and impact on risk of death and recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with prior myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study. Circulation . 2011; 123:2226-35. [PubMed 21555710]
506. McGettigan P, Henry D. Cardiovascular risk with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: systematic review of population-based controlled observational studies. PLoS Med . 2011; 8:e1001098. [PubMed 21980265]
507. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2013; 62:e147-239. [PubMed 23747642]
508. Pfizer. Feldene® (piroxicam) capsules prescribing information. New York, NY; 2016 May.
511. Olsen AM, Fosbøl EL, Lindhardsen J et al. Long-term cardiovascular risk of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use according to time passed after first-time myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study. Circulation . 2012; 126:1955-63. [PubMed 22965337]
512. Olsen AM, Fosbøl EL, Lindhardsen J et al. Cause-specific cardiovascular risk associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among myocardial infarction patients--a nationwide study. PLoS One . 2013; 8:e54309.
516. Bavry AA, Khaliq A, Gong Y et al. Harmful effects of NSAIDs among patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease. Am J Med . 2011; 124:614-20. [PubMed 21596367]
520. Theken KN, Lee CR, Gong L et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline (CPIC) for CYP2C9 and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther . 2020; 108:191-200. [PubMed 32189324]
1200. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA drug safety communication: FDA recommends avoiding use of NSAIDs in pregnancy at 20 weeks or later because they can result in low amniotic fluid. 2020 Oct 15. From the FDA website. [Web]
1201. Pfizer. Feldene® (piroxicam) capsules prescribing information. New York, NY; 2019 May.
1202. Actavis Pharma. Sulindac tablets prescribing information. Parsippany, NJ; 2020 Oct.