Dapsone, a synthetic sulfone, is an antimycobacterial and antiprotozoal agent.116
Dapsone is used in conjunction with other anti-infectives in multidrug therapy (MDT) for treatment of multibacillary and paucibacillary leprosy (Hansen's disease).105,116,216,218
Dapsone was used alone for treatment of leprosy until the early 1980s; however, because the drug is slow acting and only weakly bactericidal against Mycobacterium leprae , prolonged or life-long dapsone monotherapy was necessary and led to poor patient compliance and emergence of dapsone-resistant strains.217 The World Health Organization (WHO) and US National Hansen's Disease Program (NHDP) recommend that MDT regimens that also include rifampin be used for the treatment of all forms of leprosy.216,217,218 MDT can rapidly kill M. leprae , render patients noninfectious after only a few days of treatment, delay or prevent emergence of resistant M. leprae , and reduce the risk of relapse after treatment is discontinued.105,216 MDT does not enhance the rate of clearance of dead M. leprae from the body;217 such clearance may take years216 and depends largely on the individual's immune response, which may be defective in leprosy patients.217 Reactive episodes reported in leprosy patients receiving treatment appear to be due to destruction of the bacilli and immune responses to released bacterial antigens.216,217 (See Cautions: Leprosy Reactional States.) MDT regimens recommended by NHDP for US patients differ from those recommended by WHO.216,217
For treatment of multibacillary leprosy (i.e., 6 or more lesions or skin smear positive) in adults, WHO recommends a 12-month MDT regimen of dapsone (once daily), rifampin (once monthly), and clofazimine (once daily and once monthly).217,218 For treatment of paucibacillary leprosy (i.e., 1-5 lesions) in adults, WHO recommends a 6-month MDT regimen of dapsone (once daily) and rifampin (once monthly).217,218 Because of reports of relapse of leprosy in patients who were treated with dapsone monotherapy (burnt-out cases), WHO states that patients who previously received only dapsone should be retreated with a currently recommended MDT regimen, even if the disease appears bacteriologically and clinically inactive.217 Since 1995, WHO has provided MDT regimens at no cost for treatment of leprosy.217 Although there are some countries where leprosy is still highly endemic, most countries where leprosy was previously highly endemic have achieved elimination of the disease at the national level and are intensifying efforts at regional and district levels.217
For US patients, NHDP recommends more prolonged treatment.216 NHDP recommends that adults with multibacillary leprosy (i.e., those who are skin smear positive and/or have a biopsy indicating more advanced disease) receive a 24-month MDT regimen of dapsone (once daily), rifampin (once daily), and clofazimine (once daily), and that adults with paucibacillary leprosy (i.e., those who are skin smear negative without evidence of more advanced disease on biopsy) receive a 12-month MDT regimen of dapsone (once daily) and rifampin (once daily).216 Clofazimine is no longer commercially available in the US, but may be obtained from NHDP under an investigational new drug (IND) protocol for treatment of leprosy.216 (See Clofazimine 8:16.92.) NHDP can provide MDT regimens at no cost for treatment of US leprosy patients.216 Data indicate that leprosy is rare in the US (total of approximately 6500 living patients, about 3300 requiring active medical management), although about 150-200 new cases are reported each year.216
Treatment of leprosy is complicated and should be undertaken in consultation with a specialist familiar with the disease.105,116 In the US, clinicians should contact NHDP at 800-642-2477 on weekdays from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time or via email at nhdped@hrsa.gov for assistance with diagnosis or treatment of leprosy or assistance obtaining clofazimine for treatment of leprosy.216
Dapsone is used for treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis.116,211 A gluten-free diet is recommended for all patients with dermatitis herpetiformis, and strict adherence to such a diet can result in slow resolution of skin lesions (may take months to years) and improvement in GI symptoms.211 Dapsone is used as an adjunct to a gluten-free diet;211 in responsive patients, initiation of the drug usually results in a prompt decrease in pruritus and resolution of dermatitis herpetiformis skin lesions.116,211 Dapsone alone has no effect on the GI component of dermatitis herpetiformis.116,211 After several months when skin manifestations have responded to dapsone, some patients who adhere to a strict gluten-free diet may be able to decrease dosage or discontinue the drug; dapsone may then be reinitiated for brief periods as needed to control flares.211
Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia
Dapsone is used as an alternative for treatment of Pneumocystis jirovecii (formerly Pneumocystis carinii ) pneumonia (PCP) and prevention of P. jirovecii infections.134,155,156 Dapsone is designated an orphan drug by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment and prevention of PCP.185
Treatment of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia
Dapsone is used in conjunction with trimethoprim as an alternative for treatment of mild to moderate PCP, including mild to moderate PCP in adults, adolescents, and children with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.110,134,153,155,156,161,174
Co-trimoxazole is the drug of choice for treatment of mild, moderate, or severe PCP, including PCP in HIV-infected adults, adolescents, and children.134,155,156
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) state that alternative regimens for treatment of mild to moderate PCP in HIV-infected adults and adolescents are dapsone in conjunction with trimethoprim, primaquine in conjunction with clindamycin, or atovaquone alone.155 These experts state that dapsone in conjunction with trimethoprim may be as effective as co-trimoxazole for treatment of mild to moderate PCP and has fewer adverse effects, but is less convenient because of higher pill burden.155 Although efficacy and safety data are limited regarding use of dapsone in conjunction with trimethoprim for treatment of PCP in children,156 some clinicians also recommend the regimen as an alternative for treatment of mild to moderate PCP in children when co-trimoxazole cannot be used.134 The dapsone and trimethoprim regimen is not included in CDC, NIH, IDSA, and AAP recommendations for treatment of severe PCP.134,155,156
There is evidence that a combination regimen of dapsone (100 mg once daily) and trimethoprim (20 mg/kg daily in 4 divided doses) given for 21 days is effective for treatment of initial episodes of mild to moderate PCP in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS),110,153,161,176 achieving a clinical response in 93% of patients in one study.161 Most patients exhibited clinical improvement within 6 days, and the regimen generally was well tolerated.110,161 Dapsone alone appears to be less effective than co-trimoxazole or the combination regimen of dapsone and trimethoprim for treatment of initial episodes of PCP in patients with AIDS.111,145,153,161,162
Prevention of Pneumocystis jirovecii Infections
Dapsone is used alone or in conjunction with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin) as an alternative for prevention of P. jirovecii infections in HIV-infected adults, adolescents, and children who cannot tolerate co-trimoxazole.134,148,150,153,154,155,156,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,177,178,179,180,184
Prevention of Initial Episode (Primary Prophylaxis)
CDC, NIH, and IDSA recommend that primary prophylaxis to prevent initial episodes of PCP be initiated in HIV-infected adults and adolescents with CD4+ T-cell counts less than 200/mm3 or a history of oropharyngeal candidiasis.155 These experts state that primary PCP prophylaxis should be considered in HIV-infected adults and adolescents with CD4+ T-cell percentages less than 14% or a history of an AIDS-defining illness who would not otherwise qualify for prophylaxis and also should be considered in those with CD4+ T-cell counts greater than 200 but less than 250/mm3 if frequent monitoring of CD4+ T-cell counts (e.g., every 3 months) is not possible.155
CDC, NIH, and IDSA state that primary PCP prophylaxis should be discontinued in HIV-infected adults and adolescents who have responded to antiretroviral therapy and have CD4+ T-cell counts that have remained greater than 200/mm3 for longer than 3 months.155 Discontinuance of primary PCP prophylaxis is recommended in these individuals since it appears to add little benefit in terms of disease prevention (PCP, toxoplasmosis, bacterial infections) and discontinuance reduces the medication burden, cost, and potential for drug toxicity, drug interactions, and selection of drug-resistant pathogens.155 Primary PCP prophylaxis should be reinitiated if CD4+ T-cell counts decrease to less than 200/mm3.155
Co-trimoxazole is the drug of choice for primary PCP prophylaxis in HIV-infected adults and adolescents.155 CDC, NIH, and IDSA recommend that co-trimoxazole prophylaxis be continued, if clinically feasible, in individuals who experience adverse reactions to the drug that are not life-threatening; however, co-trimoxazole prophylaxis should be permanently discontinued and an alternative used in those with life-threatening adverse reactions to the drug.155
Alternative regimens recommended by CDC, NIH, and IDSA for primary PCP prophylaxis in HIV-infected adults and adolescents who cannot tolerate co-trimoxazole are dapsone alone, dapsone in conjunction with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin), aerosolized pentamidine, atovaquone alone, or atovaquone in conjunction with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin).155 In HIV-infected adults or adolescents who cannot tolerate co-trimoxazole and are seropositive for Toxoplasma gondii , dapsone with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin), atovaquone alone, or atovaquone with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin) would provide prophylaxis against both PCP and toxoplasmosis.155
Prevention of Recurrence (Secondary Prophylaxis)
CDC, NIH, and IDSA recommend that HIV-infected adults and adolescents who have a history of PCP receive long-term suppressive or chronic maintenance therapy (secondary prophylaxis) to prevent recurrence.155
Secondary PCP prophylaxis generally is administered for life, unless immune recovery occurs as a result of antiretroviral therapy.155 CDC, NIH, and IDSA state that secondary PCP prophylaxis generally can be discontinued in HIV-infected adults and adolescents who have responded to antiretroviral therapy and have CD4+ T-cell counts that have remained greater than 200/mm3 for longer than 3 months, but should be reinitiated if CD4+ T-cell counts decrease to less than 200/mm3.155 In addition, these experts state that it may be prudent to continue secondary PCP prophylaxis for life (regardless of CD4+ T-cell count) if PCP occurred or recurred when CD4+ T-cell counts were greater than 200/mm3.155
Co-trimoxazole is the drug of choice for secondary PCP prophylaxis in HIV-infected adults and adolescents.155 CDC, NIH, and IDSA recommend that co-trimoxazole prophylaxis be continued, if clinically feasible, in individuals who experience adverse reactions to the drug that are not life-threatening; however, co-trimoxazole prophylaxis should be permanently discontinued and an alternative used in those with life-threatening adverse reactions to the drug.155
Alternative regimens recommended by CDC, NIH, and IDSA for secondary PCP prophylaxis in HIV-infected adults and adolescents who cannot tolerate co-trimoxazole are the same as those recommended for primary prophylaxis and include dapsone alone, dapsone in conjunction with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin), aerosolized pentamidine, atovaquone alone, or atovaquone in conjunction with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin).155 In HIV-infected adults or adolescents who cannot tolerate co-trimoxazole and are seropositive for T. gondii , dapsone with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin), atovaquone alone, or atovaquone with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin) would provide prophylaxis against both PCP and toxoplasmosis.155
Primary and Secondary Prophylaxis in Children
CDC, NIH, IDSA, and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommend that primary prophylaxis to prevent initial episodes of PCP be initiated in HIV-infected children 1 to less than 6 years of age with CD4+ T-cell counts less than 500/mm3 or CD4+ T-cell percentages less than 15% and in HIV-infected children 6-12 years of age with CD4+ T-cell counts less than 200/mm3 or CD4+ T-cell percentages less than 15%.156 These experts recommend that all HIV-infected infants younger than 1 year of age (regardless of CD4+ T-cell count or percentage) receive primary PCP prophylaxis.156 In addition, infants born to HIV-infected mothers should be considered for primary PCP prophylaxis beginning at 4-6 weeks of age and those with indeterminate HIV status should continue to receive prophylaxis until they are determined to be non-HIV-infected or presumptively non-HIV-infected.156 Those found to be HIV-infected should receive primary PCP prophylaxis throughout the first year of life; at 1 year of age, the need for continued PCP prophylaxis should be reassessed based on age-specific CD4+ T-cell thresholds.156
HIV-infected children who have a history of PCP should receive long-term suppressive or chronic maintenance therapy (secondary prophylaxis) to prevent recurrence.156
CDC, NIH, IDSA, and AAP state that, in HIV-infected children who have received at least 6 months of antiretroviral therapy, discontinuance of primary or secondary PCP prophylaxis should be considered in those 1 to less than 6 years of age if CD4+ T-cell counts have remained at 500/mm3 or greater or CD4+ T-cell percentages have remained at 15% or greater for more than 3 consecutive months and in those 6-12 years of age if CD4+ T-cell counts have remained at 200/mm3 or greater or CD4+ T-cell percentages have remained at 15% or greater for more than 3 consecutive months.156 If primary or secondary PCP prophylaxis is discontinued in HIV-infected children, CD4+ T-cell counts and CD4+ T-cell percentages should be assessed every 3 months and PCP prophylaxis reinitiated if indicated based on age-specific CD4+ T-cell thresholds.156
Co-trimoxazole is the drug of choice for primary and secondary PCP prophylaxis in HIV-infected infants and children.156 CDC, NIH, IDSA, and AAP recommend that co-trimoxazole be continued, if clinically feasible, in individuals who experience adverse reactions to the drug that are not life-threatening; however, co-trimoxazole should be permanently discontinued and an alternative used in those with life-threatening adverse reactions to the drug.155,156
Alternative regimens recommended by CDC, NIH, IDSA, and AAP for primary and secondary PCP prophylaxis in HIV-infected infants and children who cannot tolerate co-trimoxazole are dapsone (1 month of age or older), atovaquone (1 month of age or older), or aerosolized pentamidine (5 years of age or older).156
Dapsone is used in conjunction with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin) as an alternative for primary prophylaxis to prevent initial episodes of toxoplasmosis caused by Toxoplasma gondii in HIV-infected adults, adolescents, and children.155,156 Dapsone is designated an orphan drug by FDA for toxoplasmosis prophylaxis in severely immunocompromised individuals with CD4+ T-cell counts less than 100/ mm3.185
Dapsone is not included in CDC, NIH, IDSA, and AAP recommendations for treatment of toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected individuals or for chronic maintenance therapy to prevent relapse of toxoplasmosis (secondary prophylaxis) in HIV-infected individuals.155,156
Prevention of Initial Episode (Primary Prophylaxis)
CDC, NIH, and IDSA recommend primary prophylaxis against T. gondii encephalitis in HIV-infected adults and adolescents who are seropositive for Toxoplasma IgG antibody and have CD4+ T-cell counts less than 100/mm3.155
CDC, NIH, and IDSA state that primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis should be discontinued in HIV-infected adults and adolescents who have responded to antiretroviral therapy and have CD4+ T-cell counts that have remained greater than 200/mm3 for longer than 3 months.155 Discontinuance of primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis is recommended in these individuals since it appears to add little benefit in terms of toxoplasmosis disease prevention and discontinuance reduces the medication burden, cost, and potential for toxicity, drug interactions, and selection of drug-resistant pathogens.155 Primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis should be reinitiated in HIV-infected adults and adolescents if CD4+ T-cell counts decrease to less than 100-200/mm3.155
Co-trimoxazole is the drug of choice for primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis in HIV-infected adults and adolescents.155 Dapsone in conjunction with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin) is the preferred alternative for such prophylaxis in HIV-infected adults and adolescents who cannot tolerate co-trimoxazole.155 CDC, NIH, and IDSA state that other alternatives for primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis in those who cannot tolerate co-trimoxazole are atovaquone alone or atovaquone in conjunction with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin).155
Primary Prophylaxis in Children
Although specific levels of immunosuppression that increase the risk for T. gondii encephalitis in HIV-infected children are less well defined than those for HIV-infected adults and adolescents, CDC, NIH, IDSA, and AAP recommend primary prophylaxis against T. gondii encephalitis in toxoplasma-seropositive HIV-infected children younger than 6 years of age who have CD4+ T-cell percentages less than 15% and in toxoplasma-seropositive HIV-infected children 6 years of age or older who have CD4+ T-cell counts less than 100/mm3.156
The safety of discontinuing primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis in HIV-infected children whose immunologic status improves in response to antiretroviral therapy has not been extensively studied.156 CDC, NIH, IDSA, and AAP state that primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis should not be discontinued in HIV-infected children younger than 1 year of age.156 However, based on data from adults, these experts state that discontinuance of primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis can be considered in HIV-infected children 1 to less than 6 years of age who have received at least 6 months of antiretroviral therapy and have CD4+ T-cell percentages that have remained at 15% or greater for longer than 3 months.156 In HIV-infected children 6 years of age or older who have received at least 6 months of antiretroviral therapy, primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis can be discontinued if CD4+ T-cell counts have remained greater than 200/mm3 for longer than 3 months.156 Primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis should be reinitiated if CD4+ T-cell percentages decrease to less than 15% in HIV-infected children younger than 6 years of age or if CD4+ T-cell counts decrease to less than 100-200/mm3 in HIV-infected children 6 years of age or older.156
For primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis in HIV-infected infants and children, the drug of choice is co-trimoxazole.156 Dapsone in conjunction with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin) is the preferred alternative for such prophylaxis in those 1 month of age or older who cannot tolerate co-trimoxazole.156 CDC, NIH, IDSA, and AAP state that atovaquone alone is another alternative for primary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis in HIV-infected children and adolescents 1 month of age or older; those 4-24 months of age can receive atovaquone alone or in conjunction with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin).156
Dapsone is administered orally.116
For administration to children, commercially available tablets of dapsone have been crushed and dissolved in strawberry syrup; however, studies evaluating bioavailability of the drug following administration of this preparation have not been published to date.
Treatment of Multibacillary Leprosy
For treatment of multibacillary leprosy, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that adults receive dapsone in a dosage of 100 mg once daily in conjunction with rifampin (600 mg once monthly) and clofazimine (50 mg once daily and 300 mg once monthly) given for 12 months.217,218 WHO recommends that children 10-14 years of age with multibacillary leprosy receive dapsone in a dosage of 50 mg once daily in conjunction with rifampin (450 mg once monthly) and clofazimine (50 mg once every other day and 150 mg once monthly) given for 12 months.217,218 Children younger than 10 years of age should receive a 12-month regimen using appropriately adjusted dosage based on weight217,218 (e.g., dapsone 2 mg/kg once daily in conjunction with rifampin [10 mg/kg once monthly] and clofazimine [1 mg/kg once every other day]).218
For US patients, the National Hansen's Disease Program (NHDP) recommends that adults with multibacillary leprosy receive dapsone in a dosage of 100 mg once daily in conjunction with rifampin (600 mg once daily) and clofazimine (50 mg once daily) given for 24 months.216 These experts recommend that children with multibacillary leprosy receive dapsone in a dosage of 1 mg/kg once daily in conjunction with rifampin (10-20 mg/kg [up to 600 mg] once daily) and clofazimine (1 mg/kg once daily or 2 mg/kg once every other day) given for 24 months.216
Treatment of Paucibacillary Leprosy
For treatment of paucibacillary leprosy, WHO recommends that adults receive dapsone in a dosage of 100 mg once daily in conjunction with rifampin (600 mg once monthly) given for 6 months.217,218 WHO recommends that children 10-14 years of age with paucibacillary leprosy receive dapsone in a dosage of 50 mg once daily in conjunction with rifampin (450 mg once monthly) given for 6 months.217,218 Children younger than 10 years of age should receive a 6-month regimen using appropriately adjusted dosage based on weight217,218 (e.g., dapsone 2 mg/kg once daily in conjunction with rifampin [10 mg/kg once monthly]).218
For US patients, NHDP recommends that adults with paucibacillary leprosy receive dapsone in a dosage of 100 mg once daily in conjunction with rifampin (600 mg once daily) given for 12 months.216 These experts recommend that children with paucibacillary leprosy receive dapsone in a dosage of 1 mg/kg once daily in conjunction with rifampin (10-20 mg/kg [up to 600 mg] once daily) given for 12 months.216
For treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis, dapsone dosage should be individually titrated to find the daily dosage that most effectively controls pruritus and lesions; daily dosage should then be reduced to a minimum maintenance dosage as soon as possible.116
The manufacturer recommends that adults receive an initial dapsone dosage of 50 mg daily for treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis and, if full control is not achieved within the range of 50-300 mg daily, higher dosage may be tried.116 For treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis in children, the manufacturer recommends correspondingly smaller doses of dapsone.116
Some clinicians state that dapsone dosages of 25-100 mg daily usually control symptoms of dermatitis herpetiformis.211
Occasional new lesions (3 or 4 per week) may occur during dapsone maintenance therapy and are not generally an indication to alter maintenance dosage of the drug. Maintenance dosage of dapsone often can be reduced or the drug discontinued after several months in patients who adhere to a gluten-free diet.211 The manufacturer states that the average time for dapsone dosage reduction is 8 months (range 4 months to 2.5 years) and the average time before discontinuance of the drug is 29 months (range 6 months to 9 years).116
Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia
Treatment of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia
When used as an alternative for treatment of mild to moderate Pneumocystis jirovecii (formerly Pneumocystis carinii ) pneumonia (PCP) in adults and adolescents 13 years of age or older, including those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, dapsone is given in a dosage of 100 mg once daily for 21 days in conjunction with oral trimethoprim (5 mg/kg 3 times daily for 21 days).134,155
Although efficacy and safety data are limited in children,156 some clinicians state that dapsone may be given in a dosage of 2 mg/kg (up to 100 mg) once daily for 21 days in conjunction with oral trimethoprim (5 mg/kg 3 times daily for 21 days) as an alternative for treatment of mild to moderate PCP in children younger than 13 years of age.134,156
Prevention of Initial Episode (Primary Prophylaxis)
When dapsone monotherapy is used as an alternative for prevention of initial episodes (primary prophylaxis) of PCP in adults and adolescents 13 years of age or older, including HIV-infected individuals, the usual dosage is 100 mg once daily or 50 mg twice daily.134,155 Alternatively, dapsone can be given in a dosage of 50 mg once daily in conjunction with oral pyrimethamine (50 mg once weekly) and oral leucovorin (25 mg once weekly) or, alternatively, in a dosage of 200 mg once weekly in conjunction with oral pyrimethamine (75 mg once weekly) and oral leucovorin (25 mg once weekly).155 The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) state that primary PCP prophylaxis should be discontinued in HIV-infected adults and adolescents if CD4+ T-cell counts have remained greater than 200/mm3 for longer than 3 months in response to antiretroviral therapy, but should be reinitiated if CD4+ T-cell counts decrease to less than 200/mm3.155 (See Prevention of Initial Episode [Primary Prophylaxis] under Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia: Prevention of Pneumocystis jirovecii Infections, in Uses.)
When dapsone monotherapy is used as an alternative for primary PCP prophylaxis in HIV-infected children and infants 1 month of age or older, CDC, NIH, IDSA, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and others recommend a dosage of 2 mg/kg (up to 100 mg) once daily or 4 mg/kg (up to 200 mg) once weekly.134,156 In HIV-infected children 1 year of age or older who have received at least 6 months of antiretroviral therapy, CDC, NIH, IDSA, and AAP state that discontinuance of primary PCP prophylaxis should be considered based on age-related CD4+ T-cell counts or CD4+ T-cell percentages, but should be reinitiated if these parameters decrease below the age-related thresholds.156 (See Primary and Secondary Prophylaxis in Children under Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia: Prevention of Pneumocystis jirovecii Infections, in Uses.)
Prevention of Recurrence (Secondary Prophylaxis)
When dapsone monotherapy is used as an alternative for prevention of recurrence (secondary prophylaxis) of PCP in adults and adolescents 13 years of age or older, including HIV-infected individuals, the usual dosage is 100 mg once daily or 50 mg twice daily.134,155 Alternatively, dapsone can be given in a dosage of 50 mg once daily in conjunction with oral pyrimethamine (50 mg once weekly) and oral leucovorin (25 mg once weekly) or, alternatively, in a dosage of 200 mg once weekly in conjunction with oral pyrimethamine (75 mg once weekly) and oral leucovorin (25 mg once weekly).155 CDC, NIH, and IDSA state that secondary PCP prophylaxis generally can be discontinued in HIV-infected adults and adolescents if CD4+ T-cell counts have remained greater than 200/mm3 for longer than 3 months in response to antiretroviral therapy, but should be reinitiated if CD4+ T-cell counts decrease to less than 200/mm3.155 However, secondary prophylaxis probably should be continued for life (regardless of CD4+ T-cell count) if PCP occurred or recurred when CD4+ T-cell counts were greater than 200/mm3.155 (See Prevention of Recurrence [Secondary Prophylaxis] under Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia: Prevention of Pneumocystis jirovecii Infections, in Uses.)
When dapsone monotherapy is used as an alternative for secondary prophylaxis of PCP in HIV-infected children and infants 1 month of age or older, CDC, NIH, IDSA, AAP, and others recommend a dosage of 2 mg/kg (up to 100 mg) once daily or 4 mg/kg (up to 200 mg) once weekly.134,156 In HIV-infected children 1 year of age or older who have received at least 6 months of antiretroviral therapy, CDC, NIH, IDSA, and AAP state that discontinuance of secondary PCP prophylaxis should be considered based on age-related CD4+ T-cell counts or CD4+ T-cell percentages, but should be reinitiated if these parameters decrease below the age-related thresholds.156 (See Primary and Secondary Prophylaxis in Children under Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia: Prevention of Pneumocystis jirovecii Infections, in Uses.)
Prevention of Initial Episode (Primary Prophylaxis)
When used as an alternative for primary prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected adults and adolescents, CDC, NIH, and IDSA recommend that dapsone be given in a dosage of 50 mg once daily in conjunction with pyrimethamine (50 mg once weekly) and oral leucovorin (25 mg once weekly).155 Alternatively, HIV-infected adults and adolescents can receive a dapsone dosage of 200 mg once weekly in conjunction with pyrimethamine (75 mg once weekly) and oral leucovorin (25 mg once weekly).155
When used as an alternative for primary prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected children and infants 1 month of age or older, CDC, NIH, IDSA, and AAP recommend a dapsone dosage of 2 mg/kg or 15 mg/m2 (up to 25 mg) once daily in conjunction with pyrimethamine (1 mg/kg [up to 25 mg] once daily) and oral leucovorin (5 mg once every 3 days).156
CDC, NIH, and IDSA state that primary prophylaxis against toxoplasmosis should be discontinued in HIV-infected adults and adolescents who have CD4+ T-cell counts that have remained greater than 200/mm3 for longer than 3 months in response to antiretroviral therapy,155 but should be reinitiated if CD4+ T-cell counts decrease to less than 100-200/mm3.155 The safety of discontinuing primary prophylaxis against toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected children whose immunologic status improves in response to antiretroviral therapy has not been extensively studied.156 (See Prevention of Toxoplasmosis under Uses: Toxoplasmosis.)
The most frequent adverse effects of dapsone are dose-related hemolytic anemia and methemoglobinemia. Hemolysis occurs in most patients receiving 200 mg or more of dapsone daily; however, symptomatic anemia occurs only occasionally. The manufacturer states that the hemoglobin level is generally decreased by 1-2 g/dL, the reticulocyte count is increased 2-12%, erythrocyte life span is shortened, and methemoglobinemia occurs in most patients receiving dapsone. Heinz body formation also occurs frequently. Unless severe, hemolysis or methemoglobinemia does not generally require discontinuance of dapsone therapy. These adverse hematologic effects occur in patients with or without glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PD) deficiency, but are most severe in patients with G-6-PD deficiency. Hemolysis and Heinz body formation may be exaggerated in patients with G-6-PD deficiency, methemoglobin reductase deficiency, or hemoglobin M. Hemolysis and methemoglobinemia may be poorly tolerated by patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease. In addition, dapsone-induced adverse hematologic effects may be poorly tolerated by some patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) receiving the drug for treatment of Pneumocystis jirovecii (formerly Pneumocystis carinii ) pneumonia, since such patients may have preexisting anemia and/or hypoxemia.142 Generally, however, dapsone is well tolerated in AIDS patients,110,142,145,148,150,153,154,161,162 although asymptomatic methemoglobinemia has been reported in two-thirds of such patients receiving 100 mg of dapsone daily concomitantly with trimethoprim 20 mg/kg daily.161,162 (See Drug Interactions: Trimethoprim.) Methemoglobinemia has been reported substantially less frequently in AIDS patients receiving dapsone alone.162
Cyanosis, which is usually associated with mild methemoglobinemia, may occur during dapsone therapy. Acute methemoglobinemia occurs rarely, but may result in anemia, vascular collapse, and death. Unless the patient has G-6-PD deficiency, acute methemoglobinemia should be treated with IV methylene blue. (See Acute Toxicity: Treatment.) Prophylactic administration of ascorbic acid, folate, and iron reportedly may prevent some of the adverse hematologic effects of dapsone.
Leukopenia has been reported occasionally during therapy with dapsone, and potentially fatal agranulocytosis and aplastic anemia have been reported rarely.
Effective treatment of leprosy with dapsone or other antileprosy agents generally results in abrupt changes in the clinical and immune status of the patient and many patients have reactive episodes (reactions) that may be mild to severe.105,116,216 Leprosy reactive episodes can occur before, during, or after treatment is completed and apparently result from destruction of Mycobacterium leprae and immune responses to released bacterial antigens.216,217 Reactive episodes are classified into 2 main types: reversal reactions (type 1) and erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) reactions (type 2).216 Other reactions (e.g., neuritis or silent neuropathies, iridocyclitis, orchitis) also can occur independently of reactive episodes.216
Reversal reactions (type 1) occur mainly in borderline tuberculoid, mid-borderline, and borderline lepromatous leprosy patients.116,216 Reversal reactions are usually evidenced by edema and erythema of pre-existing lesions.216 These reactions presumably occur because the patient is able to mount an enhanced delayed hypersensitivity response to the residual infection and this leads to swelling (reversal) of existing skin and nerve lesions.116 Existing lesions become erythematous and edematous and may ulcerate; fever and an increased leukocyte count frequently occur, and acute neuritis and loss of nerve function may develop.
ENL reactions (type 2) are recurrent immunologically mediated reactions that occur principally in patients with multibacillary leprosy (borderline lepromatous and lepromatous leprosy).116,203,205,206,216 While ENL reactions have been reported to occur in 10-50% of lepromatous leprosy patients116,203,204,206,207,208 and 25-30% of borderline lepromatous patients,204,207,208 these reactions have been reported less frequently in patients receiving currently recommended multidrug therapy (MDT) regimens that include clofazimine than in patients who received dapsone monotherapy.204,208 ENL reactions usually manifest with fever and painful erythematous nodules, but peripheral neuritis, orchitis, lymphadenitis, iridocyclitis, nephritis, periostitis, arthralgia, malaise, albuminuria, epistaxis, or depression may also occur.116,216 These reactions are considered to be a manifestation of the disease rather than an adverse reaction to antileprosy regimens.206,207,208
Treatment of leprosy reactional states depends on the severity of manifestations;105,114,116,129,132,195,207,209,216 severe reactions may require hospitalization.116,132 In general, the usual antileprosy regimen is continued despite the occurrence of a leprosy reactional state116,118,129,130,132,216 and, if nerve injury or skin ulceration is threatened, corticosteroids are administered.118,129
Reversal reactions that include neuritis or ulceration always require treatment with corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone 1 mg/kg daily);116,216 although only a short course of corticosteroid treatment may be needed if the patient has only minimally active disease and no neuritis, prolonged treatment (4-6 months) may be required in those with neuritis.216 Mild ENL reactions may require no treatment or only symptomatic measures (e.g., analgesics); treatment with corticosteroids generally is effective and is always indicated in those with acute neuritis since this may prevent permanent nerve injury.216 Thalidomide and clofazimine also are effective for treatment of ENL reactions.114,116,129,130,132,192,195,204,207,216 For additional information on treatment on ENL, see Uses: Erythema Nodosum Leprosum, in Thalidomide 92:20 and see Leprosy Reactional States under Uses: Leprosy, in Clofazimine 8:16.92.
Early diagnosis and treatment of leprosy reactional states is important since these reactions are associated with considerable morbidity, especially if chronic, recurrent ENL occurs.105,195,196,203,204
Therapy for leprosy and leprosy reactional states should be undertaken in consultation with an expert in the treatment of leprosy.203 In the US, clinicians should contact the National Hansen's Disease Program (NHDP) at 800-642-2477 on weekdays from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time or via email at nhdped@hrsa.gov for information on management of leprosy reactional states.116,216
Adverse cutaneous effects, which usually result from sensitization to dapsone, occur rarely during therapy with the drug. Cutaneous reactions include exfoliative dermatitis, toxic erythema, erythema multiforme, toxic epidermal necrolysis, morbilliform and scarlatiniform eruptions, urticaria, and erythema nodosum. If a new or toxic dermatologic reaction occurs during therapy with dapsone, the drug should be discontinued and appropriate therapy initiated.116 Rash reportedly occurs in about 30-40% of AIDS patients receiving dapsone concomitantly with trimethoprim,161,162 but less frequently in those receiving dapsone alone.162
Peripheral neuropathy with motor loss has been reported rarely in patients receiving high dosage of dapsone (200-500 mg daily). If muscle weakness occurs during therapy with dapsone, the drug should be discontinued; complete recovery may occur if the drug is withdrawn, but may take many months to several years. The mechanism of recovery is reportedly by axonal regeneration, and some recovered patients have tolerated retreatment with dapsone using a lower dosage of the drug. Although peripheral neuropathy has not been reported to date in patients with leprosy receiving dapsone, presumably because lower dosage is used, this adverse effect may be difficult to distinguish from a leprosy reactional state.
Insomnia, headache, nervousness, vertigo, and psychosis have also been reported with dapsone.116
Adverse GI effects including anorexia, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting have occurred in patients receiving dapsone.
Toxic hepatitis and cholestatic jaundice have been reported with dapsone.116 Cholestatic jaundice may be a hypersensitivity reaction, and generally appears to be reversible following discontinuance of the drug. Adverse hepatic effects have occurred shortly after initiation of dapsone therapy and may be manifested by increased serum concentrations of alkaline phosphatase, AST, bilirubin, and LDH.113 Liver function test abnormalities reportedly occur more frequently during combined dapsone and trimethoprim therapy than during dapsone alone.162 Hyperbilirubinemia has also occurred during dapsone therapy and may occur more often in patients with G-6-PD deficiency.
Albuminuria, nephrotic syndrome, and renal papillary necrosis have occurred rarely during dapsone therapy. Mild, generally asymptomatic hyperkalemia has been reported frequently in patients receiving combined dapsone and trimethoprim therapy, but serum potassium concentrations generally returned to normal during continued therapy.161
Blurred vision, tinnitus, fever, phototoxicity, hyperpigmented macules, hypoalbuminemia without proteinuria, drug-induced lupus erythematosus, and an infectious mononucleosis-like syndrome have been reported with dapsone. Tachycardia has also occurred with dapsone, particularly with excessive dosage of the drug.
Precautions and Contraindications
Dapsone is contraindicated in patients who are hypersensitive to the drug or dapsone derivatives.116
Dapsone should not be administered to patients with severe anemia; the anemia should be treated prior to initiation of dapsone therapy. Dapsone should be used with caution in patients with G-6-PD deficiency, methemoglobin reductase deficiency, or hemoglobin M. Dapsone should also be used with caution in patients who are exposed to other drugs or agents that are capable of inducing hemolysis (see Drug Interactions) and in patients with conditions associated with hemolysis (e.g., certain infections, diabetic ketosis). Some clinicians recommend that screening for G-6-PD deficiency be performed prior to initiating dapsone therapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, and that hemoglobin and methemoglobin concentrations and hematocrit be monitored periodically in such patients, particularly those receiving the drug concomitantly with trimethoprim.160,161,162,164 (See Drug Interactions: Trimethoprim.)
Complete blood cell counts (CBCs) should be performed frequently during dapsone therapy. Some clinicians recommend that CBCs be performed weekly during the first month of therapy, monthly for the next 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. If a substantial reduction in leukocytes, platelets, or hematopoiesis is evident, dapsone should be discontinued and the patient closely monitored.
Because toxic hepatitis and cholestatic jaundice have been reported with dapsone, liver function should be monitored, when feasible, before and during therapy with the drug. If any abnormality in liver function is evident, the drug should be discontinued until the source of the abnormality is established. Patients should be instructed to report to their clinician the presence of sore throat, fever, pallor, purpura, or jaundice during dapsone therapy.
Leprosy patients should be informed about the signs and symptoms of neuritis and cautioned about the importance of immediately reporting such signs and symptoms to a clinician.105 (See Cautions: Leprosy Reactional States.)
Dapsone is labeled for treatment of leprosy and for treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis in children.116 The drug is generally considered to have no effect on growth, development, and functional development of children.116
Although data are limited regarding efficacy and safety in children, some experts recommend a regimen of dapsone in conjunction with trimethoprim as an alternative for treatment of mild to moderate Pneumocystis jirovecii (formerly Pneumocystis carinii ) pneumonia (PCP) in children and recommend dapsone monotherapy as an alternative for primary and secondary prophylaxis of PCP in HIV-infected children 1 month of age or older (see Uses: Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia).156 In addition, dapsone in conjunction with pyrimethamine (and leucovorin) is recommended as an alternative for primary prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected children 1 month of age or older (see Uses: Toxoplasmosis).156
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Dapsone was not mutagenic in microbial tests using Salmonella typhimurium , with or without microsomal activation.116
Dapsone has been found to be carcinogenic in animal studies.116 The drug has caused mesenchymal tumors in the spleen and peritoneum of male rats and female mice and thyroid carcinoma in female rats.116
Pregnancy, Fertility, and Lactation
Animal reproduction studies have not been performed with dapsone.116 Although dapsone has been used in pregnant women without evidence of fetal abnormalities, the drug should be used during pregnancy only when clearly needed.116
In patients with leprosy, some clinicians recommend maintaining dapsone treatment during pregnancy.116 In addition, dapsone has been important for the management of dermatitis herpetiformis in some pregnant women.116
Infertility has been reported in males receiving dapsone;116 in 2 patients, fertility was restored following discontinuance of the drug.
Because dapsone is distributed into milk and because of the tumorigenic potential demonstrated in animal studies, a decision should be made to discontinue nursing or the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the woman.116
Drugs Associated with Adverse Hematologic Effects
Because the drugs have similar adverse hematologic effects, concurrent use of a folic acid antagonist (e.g., pyrimethamine) and dapsone may result in an increased risk of these adverse effects.116 Agranulocytosis has developed during the second and third months of therapy in patients receiving concomitant treatment with weekly pyrimethamine and dapsone.116 If pyrimethamine is used concomitantly with dapsone, the patient should be monitored more frequently than usual for adverse hematologic effects.116
Because effects may be additive, dapsone should be used with caution in patients with G-6-PD deficiency receiving or exposed to other drugs or agents which are capable of inducing hemolysis in these individuals (e.g., nitrite, aniline, phenylhydrazine, naphthalene, niridazole, nitrofurantoin, primaquine).
Results of several studies indicate that concomitant clofazimine does not affect the pharmacokinetics of dapsone,120,125 although a transient increase in urinary excretion of dapsone reportedly occurred in a few patients receiving concomitant therapy with the drugs.124 In a study in lepromatous leprosy patients receiving dapsone (100 mg daily) and rifampin (600 mg daily), concomitant administration of clofazimine (100 mg daily) did not affect plasma dapsone concentrations or the plasma half-life or urinary elimination of dapsone.119
There is some evidence that dapsone may decrease or nullify some of the anti-inflammatory effects of clofazimine.121,122,123,126 In vitro, clofazimine and dapsone have opposing effects on neutrophil motility and lymphocyte transformation.121,122,126,127 Some clinicians suggest that this theoretically could adversely affect the efficacy of clofazimine in patients with erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) reactions.121,122,123,126 Several borderline leprosy and lepromatous leprosy patients with severe, recurrent ENL reactions reportedly required higher clofazimine dosage to control these reactions when dapsone therapy was given concomitantly than when clofazimine was given alone.126 The manufacturer of clofazimine, however, suggests that further study is needed to confirm this interaction and states that it is advisable to continue treatment with both clofazimine and dapsone in patients who develop leprosy-associated inflammatory reactions, including ENL, during concomitant therapy with the drugs.118 There is no evidence to date that dapsone and clofazimine interfere with the antimycobacterial activity of each other.126
Failure of dapsone to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii (formerly Pneumocystis carinii ) pneumonia (PCP) was reported in about 40% of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who were receiving didanosine concomitantly.159 This failure rate was substantially higher than that reported in other studies in which dapsone was not administered with didanosine or that were observed when didanosine was used in patients receiving co-trimoxazole or aerosolized pentamidine for prevention of PCP.159 Although the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction was not evaluated in these patients, it was suggested that the buffers present in the didanosine preparation, which provides a pH of 7-8 to facilitate GI absorption of the antiretroviral agent, may interfere with GI absorption of dapsone.159 Dapsone is insoluble at neutral pH, while solubility is facilitated at acidic pH.159 However, in a study in 6 healthy adults and 6 HIV-infected adults, the pharmacokinetics of dapsone was not affected when 100 mg of the drug was administered 5 minutes after a 200-mg dose of didanosine given as chewable/dispersible, buffered tablets (no longer commercially available in the US) in the patients, or 5 minutes after administration of placebo tablets containing the aluminum and magnesium buffer without didanosine, in the healthy individuals.181 It has been suggested that dapsone be administered at least 2 hours before didanosine,159 although some clinicians have observed prophylactic failure of dapsone despite such separation of dosing and therefore recommend that the drugs not be used concomitantly.182
Concomitant use of dapsone (single 100-mg dose) and buffered didanosine (200 mg every 12 hours for 14 days) did not have a clinically important effect on peak plasma concentrations or area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of dapsone.183
Concomitant use of rifabutin (300 mg daily) and dapsone (50 mg daily) in HIV-infected individuals decreased the AUC of dapsone by about 27-40%.215
Rifampin may accelerate metabolism of dapsone;213 decreased serum dapsone concentrations (7-10 times lower) and increased urinary excretion of dapsone have been reported.114,116,125 Dosage adjustments may be necessary when rifampin and dapsone are used concomitantly;213 however, dosage adjustments are not required when rifampin and dapsone are used concomitantly for treatment of leprosy.114,116
Rifapentine may accelerate metabolism of dapsone;214 dosage adjustments may be necessary if rifapentine and dapsone are used concomitantly.214
Concomitant use of dapsone and trimethoprim may increase serum dapsone concentrations and potentially increase the risk of adverse effects associated with dapsone.161,162 In a study in adults with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) who received oral dapsone (100 mg once daily) alone or in conjunction with oral trimethoprim (20 mg/kg daily) for treatment of PCP, plasma dapsone concentrations were 40% higher with the combined regimen than with dapsone alone and methemoglobinemia occurred more frequently with the combined regimen (67%) than with dapsone alone (11%).162 There also is some evidence that dapsone may increase plasma trimethoprim concentrations,161,162 but an increased risk of trimethoprim-associated adverse effects was not identified in this study.162
Periodic monitoring for potential toxicity (e.g., methemoglobinemia) is recommended in patients receiving dapsone in conjunction with trimethoprim.160,162
Overdosage of dapsone generally results in nausea, vomiting, and hyperexcitability within a few minutes to up to 24 hours later.116 Methemoglobin-induced depression, seizures, and severe cyanosis may occur and require prompt treatment.116 Hemolysis may occur 7-14 days after an acute ingestion.104
In patients who do not have G-6-PD deficiency, dapsone-induced methemoglobinemia should be treated with methylene blue (1-2 mg/kg given by slow IV injection).116 The effect usually is complete within 30 minutes, but methylene blue may need to be readministered if methemoglobin reaccumulates.116 Alternatively, in nonemergency situations, methylene blue may be given orally in a dosage of 3-5 mg/kg every 4-6 hours.116 Methylene blue should not be administered to patients with G-6-PD deficiency, since methylene blue reduction depends on G-6-PD.116 Orally administered activated charcoal (20 g 4 times daily) has been shown to substantially enhance the elimination of dapsone and its monoacetyl derivative in several cases of acute dapsone overdosage, and some clinicians recommend it as a treatment of choice in the management of acute dapsone intoxication.104 Hemodialysis also enhances the elimination of dapsone and its monoacetyl derivative.104
Dapsone is bacteriostatic or weakly bactericidal in action against Mycobacterium leprae .116,216,217 The mechanism of action of dapsone has not been fully elucidated.116 Because the antibacterial activity of dapsone is inhibited by p -aminobenzoic acid (PABA), the drug probably has a mechanism of action similar to that of sulfonamides which involves inhibition of folic acid synthesis in susceptible organisms.
Some studies indicate that dapsone may inhibit the alternate pathway of complement activation and interfere with the myeloperoxidase-H2O2-halide-mediated cytotoxic system within neutrophils.126,127 In vitro studies indicate that dapsone stimulates neutrophil motility.121,126 The drug also appears to inhibit spontaneous and induced synthesis of prostaglandin E2 by polymorphonuclear leukocytes obtained from healthy individuals or patients with leprosy.122,123
The mechanism of action of dapsone in the treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis is unknown;116 dapsone only suppresses the disease, and cutaneous IgA and complement deposition are not affected by the drug. It has been suggested that dapsone may act as an immunomodulator when used in the treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis and other dermatologic diseases.
Dapsone is active in vivo against Mycobacterium leprae. Although M. leprae cannot be cultured in vitro, in vivo mouse footpad studies using M. leprae recovered from untreated patients with leprosy indicate that dapsone concentrations of 1-10 ng/mL generally inhibit susceptible strains of the organism. Dapsone is also active against M. tuberculosis and several other species of mycobacteria. In vitro, most susceptible strains of M. tuberculosis are inhibited by dapsone concentrations of 10 mcg/mL.
Dapsone also has some activity against Pneumocystis jirovecii (formerly Pneumocystis carinii )110,111,112 and Plasmodium.
Resistant strains of initially susceptible M. leprae may develop during therapy with dapsone; resistance to the drug appears to develop in a slow, stepwise manner. It has been estimated that resistance to dapsone develops in 2-10% of patients with lepromatous leprosy who have received dapsone alone for many years. Resistance has been reported to occur as long as 5-24 years after initiation of dapsone therapy; resistance has been reported most frequently when the drug was given in low dosage or intermittently.
Although primary resistance to dapsone used to be reported only rarely, resistance to the drug has been reported with increasing frequency in M. leprae recovered from newly diagnosed cases of leprosy in patients who have not previously received therapy with a sulfone.
M. leprae resistant to both dapsone and clofazimine, but susceptible to rifampin, has been reported rarely.117
Following oral administration, dapsone is rapidly and almost completely absorbed from the GI tract and peak serum concentrations of the drug are attained within 4-8 hours.116 When a dosage of 200 mg daily is used, steady-state serum concentrations of the drug range from 0.1-7 mcg/mL and average 2.3 mcg/mL after 8 days of therapy.116 Following oral administration of a single 100-mg oral dose of dapsone, serum concentrations of the drug range from 0.4-1.2 mcg/mL 24 hours after the dose. Trace amounts of dapsone may be found in serum for 8-12 days after oral administration of a single 200-mg dose of the drug or for as long as 35 days after discontinuance of repeated doses of the drug. Dapsone and its monoacetyl metabolite (MADDS) appear to undergo enterohepatic circulation.103,104,107,128
The volume of distribution of dapsone is reportedly 1.5-2.5 L/kg in adults.
Dapsone is distributed into most body tissues. Dapsone is reportedly retained in skin, muscle, kidneys, and liver; trace concentrations of the drug may be present in these tissues up to 3 weeks after discontinuance of dapsone therapy. Dapsone is also distributed into sweat, saliva, sputum, and tears. The drug is also distributed into bile.
Although in one study using radiolabeled dapsone in patients with leprosy, higher concentrations of radioactivity were attained in diseased than in presumably healthy skin, other studies indicate little or no difference in sulfone content of healthy and diseased skin in patients with leprosy. Dapsone may not penetrate ocular tissue well, since eye lesions may develop or progress during therapy of leprosy even though the disease may be controlled or eliminated in other tissues.
Dapsone crosses the placenta.128 Dapsone is distributed into milk.116 In a woman receiving dapsone in a dosage of 50 mg daily, dapsone concentrations in milk were 1.1 mcg/mL; concurrent maternal serum concentrations of the drug were 1.6 mcg/mL.
Dapsone is 50-90% bound to plasma proteins. The major metabolite of dapsone, monoacetyldapsone, is almost completely bound to plasma proteins.128,135,136
There are large interindividual variations in the plasma half-life of dapsone.116 The plasma half-life of dapsone may range from 10-83 hours and averages 20-30 hours.
Dapsone is acetylated in the liver to monoacetyl and diacetyl derivatives. The major metabolite of dapsone is monoacetyldapsone (MADDS).128 The rate of acetylation of dapsone is genetically determined and is subject to interindividual variation, although the rate is usually constant for each individual. The drug also is hydroxylated in the liver to hydroxylamine dapsone (NOH-DDS).128,137 NOH-DDS appears to be responsible for methemoglobinemia and hemolysis induced by the drug.128,137,138,139
Approximately 20% of each dose of dapsone is excreted in urine as unchanged drug, 70-85% is excreted in urine as water-soluble metabolites, and a small amount is excreted in feces. Dapsone is excreted in urine as acid-labile mono- N -glucuronide and mono- N -sulfamate derivatives in addition to some unidentified metabolites.
Orally administered activated charcoal has been shown to substantially enhance the elimination of dapsone and its monoacetyl derivative in healthy adults and in several cases of acute dapsone overdosage.103,104,107 Hemodialysis also reportedly enhances the elimination of dapsone and its monoacetyl derivative.104
Dapsone is a synthetic sulfone anti-infective. Dapsone occurs as a white or creamy white, crystalline powder that has a slightly bitter taste. The drug is very slightly soluble in water and freely soluble in alcohol.
Dapsone tablets should be stored at 20-25°C and protected from light.116 Dapsone may discolor following exposure to light.
Additional Information
The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. represents that the information provided in the accompanying monograph was formulated with a reasonable standard of care, and in conformity with professional standards in the field. Readers are advised that decisions regarding use of drugs are complex medical decisions requiring the independent, informed decision of an appropriate health care professional, and that the information contained in the monograph is provided for informational purposes only. The manufacturer's labeling should be consulted for more detailed information. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. does not endorse or recommend the use of any drug. The information contained in the monograph is not a substitute for medical care.
Excipients in commercially available drug preparations may have clinically important effects in some individuals; consult specific product labeling for details.
Please refer to the ASHP Drug Shortages Resource Center for information on shortages of one or more of these preparations.
Routes | Dosage Forms | Strengths | Brand Names | Manufacturer |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oral | Tablets | 25 mg* | Dapsone Tablets (scored) | |
100 mg* | Dapsone Tablets (scored) |
* available from one or more manufacturer, distributor, and/or repackager by generic (nonproprietary) name
103. Neuvonen PJ, Elonen E, Mattila MJ. Oral activated charcoal and dapsone elimination. Clin Pharmacol Ther . 1980; 27:823-7. [PubMed 7379451]
104. Neuvonen PJ, Elonen E, Haapanen EJ. Acute dapsone intoxication: clinical findings and effect of oral charcoal and haemodialysis on dapsone elimination. Acta Med Scand . 1983; 214:215-20. [PubMed 6660028]
105. American Academy of Pediatrics. Red Book: 2012 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 29th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012.
107. Berlin G, Brodin B, Hilden JO et al. Acute dapsone intoxication: a case treated with continuous infusion of methylene blue, forced diuresis and plasma exchange. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol . 1984-5; 22:537-48.
110. Leoung GS, Mills J, Hopewell PC et al. Dapsone-trimethoprim for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Intern Med . 1986; 105:45-8. [PubMed 2940954]
111. Mills J, Leoung G, Medina I et al. Dapsone is ineffective therapy for pneumocystis pneumonia in patients with AIDS. Clin Res . 1986; 34:101A.
112. Hughes WT, Smith BL. Efficacy of diaminodiphenylsulfone and other drugs in murine Pneumocystis carinii pneumonitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1984; 26:436-40. [PubMed 6335017][PubMedCentral]
113. Johnson DA, Cattau EL, Kuritsky JN et al. Liver involvement in the sulfone syndrome. Arch Intern Med . 1986; 146:875-7. [PubMed 3963977]
114. Jacobson RR. Treatment. In: Hastings RC, ed. Leprosy. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1985:193-222.
116. Jacobus Pharmaceutical Co. Inc. Dapsone tablets USP prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2009 Aug.
117. Kar HK, Bhatia VN, Harikrishnam S. Combined clofazimine- and dapsone-resistant leprosy: a case report. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis . 1986; 54:389-91. [PubMed 3528345]
118. Geigy Pharmaceuticals. Lamprene® (clofazimine) prescribing information. Ardsley, NY; 1986 Dec.
119. Venkatesan K, Mathur A, Girdhar BK et al. The effect of clofazimine on the pharmacokinetics of rifampicin and dapsone in leprosy. J Antimicrob Chemother . 1986; 18:715-8. [PubMed 3818497]
120. Venkatesan K, Bharadwaj VP, Ramu G et al. Study on drug interactions. Lepr Ind . 1980; 52:229-35.
121. van Rensburg CEJ, Gatner EMS, Imkamp FMJH et al. Effects of clofazimine alone or combined with dapsone on neutrophil and lymphocyte functions in normal individuals and patients with lepromatous leprosy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1982; 21:693-7. [PubMed 7049077][PubMedCentral]
122. Anderson R. Enhancement by clofazimine and inhibition by dapsone of production of prostaglandin E2 by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1985; 27:257-62. [PubMed 3857019] [PubMedCentral]
123. Anderson R, Lukey P, van Rensburg C et al. Clofazimine-mediated regulation of human polymorphonuclear leukocyte migration by pro-oxidative inactivation of both leukoattractants and cellular migratory responsiveness. Int J Immunopharmacol . 1986; 8:605-19. [PubMed 3793326]
124. Grabosz JAJ, Wheate HW. Effect of clofazimine on the urinary excretion of DDS (dapsone). Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis . 1975; 43:61-2. [PubMed 1171834]
125. Balakrishnan S, Seshadri PS. Drug interactions: the influence of rifampicin and clofazimine on the urinary excretion of DDS. Lepr Ind . 1981; 53:17-22.
126. Imkamp FMJH, Anderson R, Gatner EMS. Possible incompatibility of dapsone with clofazimine in the treatment of patients with erythema nodosum leprosum. Lepr Rev . 1982; 53:148-53. [PubMed 7098753]
127. Pruzanski W, Saito S. Influence of agents with immunomodulating activity on phagocytosis and bactericidal function of human polymorphonuclear cells. J Rheumatol . 1983; 10:688-93. [PubMed 6417331]
128. Zuidema J, Hilbers-Modderman ESM, Merkus FWHM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of dapsone. Clin Pharmacokinet . 1986; 11:299-315. [PubMed 3530584]
129. Jolliffe DS. Leprosy reactional states and their treatment. Br J Dermatol . 1977; 97:345-51. [PubMed 336075]
130. Beeching NJ, Ellis CJ. Leprosy and its chemotherapy. J Antimicrob Chemother . 1982; 10:81-7. [PubMed 6749788]
132. Yawalkar SJ, Vischer W. Lamprene (clofazimine) in leprosy. Lepr Rev . 1979; 50:135-44. [PubMed 396428]
133. Food and Drug Administration. Recent drug approvals. FDA Drug Bull . 1987; 17:8-10.
134. Anon. Drugs for parasitic infections. Treat Guidel Med Lett . 2010; 8:e1-16. [Web]
135. Ahmad RA, Rogers HJ. Pharmacokinetics and protein binding interactions of dapsone and pyrimethamine. Br J Clin Pharmacol . 1980; 10:519-24. [PubMed 7437265][PubMedCentral]
136. Peters JH, Murray JF Jr, Gordon GR et al. Dapsone in saliva and plasma of man. Pharmacology . 1981; 22:162-71. [PubMed 7208598]
137. Katz SI, Hall RP III, Lawley TJ et al. Dermatitis herpetiformis: the skin and the gut. Ann Intern Med . 1980; 93:857-74. [PubMed 7447195]
138. Glader BE, Conrad ME. Hemolysis by diphenylsulfones: comparative effects of DDS and hydroxylamine-DDS. J Lab Clin Med . 1973; 81:267-72. [PubMed 4683425]
139. Kramer PA, Glader BE, Li TK. Mechanism of methemoglobin formation by diphenylsulfones: effect of 4-amino-4-hydroxy amino diphenylsulfone and other p -substituted derivatives. Biochem Pharmacol . 1972; 21:1265-74. [PubMed 5038672]
142. Reiter WM, Cimoch PJ. Dapsone-induced methemoglobinemia in a patient with P. carinii pneumonia and AIDS. N Engl J Med . 1987; 317:1740-1. [PubMed 3501070]
143. Vischer WA. The experimental properties of G 30 320 (B 663)a new anti-leprotic agent. Lepr Rev . 1969; 40:107-110. [PubMed 5792376]
144. Vischer WA. Antimicrobial activity of the leprostatic drug 3-(p-chloranilino)-10-(p-chlorphenyl)-2, 10-dihydro-2-(isopropylimino)-phenazine (G 30 320). Arzneimittelforschung . 1968; 8:1529-35.
145. Mills J, Leoung G, Medina I et al. Dapsone treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1988; 32:1057-60. [PubMed 3263834][PubMedCentral]
148. Hughes WT, Kennedy W, Dugdale M et al. Prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonitis in AIDS patients with weekly dapsone. Lancet . 1990; 336:1066. [PubMed 1977035]
150. Mallolas J, Zamora L, Gtell JM et al. Low-dose co-trimoxazole, aerosolised pentamidine, or dapsone plus pyrimethamine for prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Lancet . 1991; 337:1162-3.
153. Davey RT, Masur H. Recent advances in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1990; 34:499-504. [PubMed 2140495][PubMedCentral]
154. Masur H, Lane C, Kovacs JA et al. Pneumocystis pneumonia: from bench to clinic. Ann Intern Med . 1989; 111:813-26. [PubMed 2683916]
155. Panel on Opportunistic Infections in HIV-infected Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents: recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (May 7, 2013). Updates may be available at HHS AIDS Information (AIDSinfo) website. [Web]
156. Panel on Opportunistic Infection in HIV-exposed and HIV-infected children, US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-exposed and HIV-infected children: recommendations from the National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the American Academy of Pediatrics (Nov 6, 2013). Updates may be available at HHS AIDS Information (AIDSinfo) website. [Web]
159. Metroka CE, McMechan MF, Laubenstein LJ et al. Failure of prophylaxis with dapsone in patients taking dideoxyinosine. N Engl J Med . 1991; 325:737. [PubMed 1908060]
160. Reviewers' comments (personal observations).
161. Medina I, Mills J, Leoung G et al. Oral therapy for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: a controlled trial of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus trimethoprim-dapsone. N Engl J Med . 1990; 323:776-82. [PubMed 2392131]
162. Lee BL, Medina I, Benowitz NL et al. Dapsone, trimethoprim, and sulfamethoxazole plasma levels during treatment of pneumocystis pneumonia in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS): evidence of drug interactions. Ann Intern Med . 1989; 110:606-11. [PubMed 2784648]
164. Cox G, Roberts MS. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. N Engl J Med . 1991; 324:1742-3.
165. Clotet B, Sirera G, Romeu J et al. Twice weekly dapsone-pyrimethamine for preventing P. carinii pneumonia relapses in HIV infected patients. Int Conf AIDS . 1990; 6:225.
166. Clotet B, Sirera G, Romeu J et al. Twice weekly dapsone-pyrimethamine for preventing primary and secondary Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP): its role in the prevention of cerebral toxoplasmosis. Int Conf AIDS . 1991; 7:228.
167. Lavelle J, Falloon J, Morgan A et al. Weekly dapsone/pyrimethamine for PCP prophylaxis. Int Conf AIDS . 1991; 7:233.
168. Girard PM, Landman R, Gaudebout C et al. Dapsone-pyrimethamine (D/P) vs aerosolized pentamidine (AP) for primary prophylaxis of pneumocystis (PCP) and neurotoxoplasmosis: the PRIO group. Int Conf AIDS . 1992; 8:We48.
169. Antinori A, Murri R, Ammassari A et al. Primary prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: an open controlled study on three different regimens. Int Conf AIDS . 1992; 8:B134.
170. Opravil M, Heald A, Lazzarin A et al. Combined prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and toxoplasmosis: prospective, randomized trial of dapsone + pyrimethamine vs. aerosolized pentamidine. The Swiss Group for Clinical Studies on AIDS. Int Conf AIDS . 1992; 8:B139.
171. Ogata-Arakaki D, Falloon J, Lavelle J et al. The safety of weekly dapsone and weekly dapsone + pyrimethamine as pneumocystis prophylaxis. Int Conf AIDS . 1990; 6:224.
172. Pont M, Clotet B, Sirera G et al. Dapsone + pyrimethamine twice weekly (group A) versus once weekly associated with aerosolized pentamidine once monthly (group B) to prevent P. carinii pneumonia events in AIDS. Int Conf AIDS . 1992; 8:123.
174. Hughes WT. Use of dapsone in the prevention and treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: a review. Clin Infect Dis . 1998; 27:191-204. [PubMed 9675476]
176. Fishman JA. Treatment of infection due to Pneumocystis carinii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1998; 42:1309-14. [PubMed 9624465][PubMedCentral]
177. Stavola JJ, Noel GJ. Efficacy and safety of dapsone prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children. Pediatr Infect Dis J . 1993; 12:644-7. [PubMed 8414776]
178. Girard PM, Landman R, Gaudebout C et al. Dapsone-pyrimethamine compared with aerosolized pentamidine as primary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and toxoplasmosis in HIV infection. N Engl J Med . 1993; 328:1514-20. [PubMed 8479488]
179. Martin MA, Cox PH, Beck K et al. A comparison of the effectiveness of three regimens in the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Arch Intern Med . 1992; 152:523-8. [PubMed 1546914]
180. Blum RN, Miller LA, Gaggini LC et al. Comparative trial of dapsone versus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for primary prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr . 1992; 5:341-7. [PubMed 1548570]
181. Sahai J, Garber G, Gallicano K et al. Effects of the antacids in didanosine tablets on dapsone pharmacokinetics. Ann Intern Med . 1995; 123:584-7. [PubMed 7677298]
182. Reviewers' comments (personal observations) on Didanosine 8:18.08.20.
183. Bristol-Myers Squibb. Videx® EC (didanosine) delayed-release capsules enteric-coated beadlets prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2013 Aug.
184. Torres RA, Barr M, Thorn M et al. Randomized trial of dapsone and aerosolized pentamidine for the prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and toxoplasmic encephalitis. Am J Med . 1993; 95:573-83. [PubMed 8018144]
185. Food and Drug Administration. List of orphan designations and approvals. From FDA web site. [Web]
192. Celgene, Warren, NJ: Personal communication.
194. Whitty CJ, Lockwood DN. Leprosynew perspectives on an old disease. J Infect . 1999; 38:2-5. [PubMed 10090496]
195. Jacobson RR, Krahenbuhl JL. Leprosy. Lancet . 1999; 353:655-60. [PubMed 10030346]
196. MacDougall AC, Ulrich MI. Mycobacterial Disease: Leprosy. In: Fitzpatrick TB, Eisen AZ, Wolff K et al, eds. Dermatology in General Medicine, 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw -Hill Inc; 1993:2395-2410.
197. Panda S. Let's learn some clinical facts on leprosy - before it is eradicated. Bull on Drug Health Information (India) . 1998; 5:5-12.
203. Gelber RH. Leprosy (Hansen's disease). In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 4th ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1995:2243-50.
204. Lockwood DNJ. The management of erythema nodosum leprosum: current and future options. Lepr Rev . 1996; 67:253-9. [PubMed 9033196]
205. Schreuder PAM. The occurrence of reactions and impairments in leprosy: experience in the leprosy control program of three provinces in Northeastern Thailand, 1978-1995. II. Reactions. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis . 1998; 66:159-69. [PubMed 9728448]
206. Bhargava P, Mal Kuldeep C, Mathur NK. Erythema nodosum leprosum in subgroups of lepromatous leprosy. Lepr Rev . 1998; 68:373-85.
207. Meyerson MS. Erythema nodosum leprosum. Int J Dermatol . 1996; 35:389-92. [PubMed 8737869]
208. Willcox ML. The impact of multiple drug therapy on leprosy disabilities. Lepr Rev . 1997; 68:350-66. [PubMed 9503872]
209. Kirk O, Lundgren JD, Pedersen C et al. Can chemoprophylaxis against opportunistic infections be discontinued after an increase in CD4 cells induced by highly active antiretroviral therapy? AIDS . 1999; 13:1647-51.
211. Bolotin D, Petronic-Rosic V. Dermatitis herpetiformis. Part II. Diagnosis, management, and prognosis. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2011; 64:1027-33; quiz 1033-4. [PubMed 21571168]
213. Sanofi-Aventis. Rifadin® (rifampin capsules) and Rifadin® IV (rifampin for injection) prescribing information. Bridgewater, NJ; 2013 Feb.
214. Sanofi-Aventis. Priftin® (rifapentine) tablets prescribing information. Bridgewater, NJ; 2010 May.
215. Pfizer. Mycobutin® (rifabutin) capsules USP prescribing information. New York, NY; 2007 Oct.
216. National Hansen's Disease (Leprosy) Program. From the US Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) website. Accessed 2014 May 20. [Web]
217. World Health Organization. WHO recommended multidrug therapy (MDT) regimens. From the WHO website. Accessed 2014 May 20. [Web]
218. World Health Organization. WHO Expert Committee on leprosy: eighth report. WHO Technical Report Series No. 968. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.