section name header

Introduction

AHFS Class:

Associated Monographs

Other Information

Classification of Penicillins Based on Spectra of Activity

Penicillins are natural or semisynthetic antibiotics produced by or derived from certain species of the fungus Penicillium . The drugs are β-lactam antibiotics structurally and pharmacologically related to other β-lactam antibiotics, including cephalosporins and cephamycins. Penicillins contain a 6-aminopenicillanic acid (6-APA) nucleus, which is composed of a β-lactam ring fused to a 5-membered thiazolidine ring ([Web]). Although the 6-APA nucleus has little antibacterial activity itself, it is a major structural requirement for antibacterial activity of penicillins. In currently available penicillins, cleavage at any point in the penicillin nucleus, including the β-lactam ring, results in complete loss of antibacterial activity. A free carboxyl group in the thiazolidine ring and one or more substituted amino side chains at R are also essential for antibacterial activity.

Addition of various side chains at R on the penicillin nucleus results in penicillin derivatives with differences in spectra of activity, stability against hydrolysis by β-lactamases, acid stability, GI absorption, and protein binding.

Currently available penicillins can be divided into 4 groups based principally on their spectra of activity:

NATURAL PENICILLINS

penicillin G

penicillin V

Natural penicillins are produced by fermentation of mutant strains of Penicillium chrysogenum . Natural penicillins with different side chains at R are produced by altering the composition of the culture media of Penicillium . Although various natural penicillins have been produced (e.g., penicillins F, G, N, O, V, X), only penicillin G and penicillin V are used clinically.

Natural penicillins are active in vitro against many gram-positive aerobic cocci including nonpenicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis , Streptococcus pneumoniae , S. pyogenes (group A β-hemolytic streptococci; GAS), S. agalactiae (group B streptococci; GBS), other β-hemolytic streptococci (e.g., groups C, G, H, L, R), viridans streptococci, and nonenterococcal group D streptococci. Although some strains of enterococci are susceptible to penicillin G in vitro, many strains are resistant and penicillin tolerance has been reported. Natural penicillins are readily hydrolyzed by staphylococcal penicillinases and are therefore inactive against penicillinase-producing strains of S. aureus and S. epidermidis . The drugs are active in vitro against some gram-positive aerobic bacilli including Bacillus anthracis , Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae , and Listeria monocytogenes .

Natural penicillins also are active in vitro against some gram-negative aerobic cocci including Neisseria meningitidis . Although natural penicillins may be active in vitro against strains of nonpenicillinase-producing N. gonorrhoeae , penicillinase-producing strains of N. gonorrhoeae (PPNG) are resistant. The drugs are active in vitro against some gram-negative aerobic bacilli including some strains of Haemophilus influenzae , Pasteurella multocida , Streptobacillus moniliformis , and Spirillum minus . However, Pseudomonas and most Enterobacteriaceae are resistant to natural penicillins.

Natural penicillins are active in vitro against many gram-positive anaerobic bacteria, including Actinomyces israelii , Clostridium ( C. botulinum , C. perfringens , and C. tetani ), Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes ), Eubacterium , Lactobacillus , Peptococcus , and Peptostreptococcus . Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria vary in their susceptibility to the drugs. Although penicillin G is active in vitro against some strains of Fusobacterium , Veillonella , and Bacteroides oralis , the B. fragilis group (e.g., B. fragilis , B. distasonis , B. ovatus , B. thetaiotaomicron , B. vulgatus ) require high penicillin G concentrations for in vitro inhibition and usually are resistant.

The drugs also are active against spirochetes, including Treponema pallidum subsp pallidum , T. pallidum subsp pertenue , T. carateum , Leptospira , Borrelia burgdorferi (causative agent of Lyme disease), B. hermsii , and B. recurrentis .

PENICILLINASE-RESISTANT PENICILLINS

dicloxacillin

oxacillin

nafcillin

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins are semisynthetic derivatives of 6-APA that are stable against hydrolysis by staphylococcal penicillinases. These penicillins have bulky side chains at R on the 6-APA nucleus that result in steric hindrance and help to prevent attachment of penicillinases to the β-lactam ring.

Because penicillinase-resistant penicillins are not hydrolyzed by most staphylococcal penicillinases, these drugs are active in vitro against many penicillinase-producing strains of S. aureus and S. epidermidis that are resistant to natural penicillins, aminopenicillins, and extended-spectrum penicillins.

Penicillinase-resistant penicillins also have some in vitro activity against other gram-positive bacteria and some gram-negative bacteria and spirochetes; however, the drugs generally are less active on a weight basis against these organisms than natural penicillins, and use of penicillinase-resistant penicillins generally is limited to the treatment of infections caused by susceptible penicillinase-producing staphylococci.

AMINOPENICILLINS

amoxicillin

ampicillin

Aminopenicillins are semisynthetic derivatives of 6-APA which have a free amino group at the α-position at R on the penicillin nucleus. Partly because of this polar group, aminopenicillins have enhanced activity against gram-negative bacteria compared with natural penicillins and penicillinase-resistant penicillins.

In vitro, aminopenicillins are generally active against gram-positive aerobic cocci and gram-positive aerobic bacilli that are susceptible to natural penicillins. However, with the possible exception of enterococcal infections, natural penicillins are generally the penicillins of choice for the treatment of infections caused by gram-positive cocci that are susceptible to both natural penicillins and aminopenicillins. Like natural penicillins and extended-spectrum penicillins, aminopenicillins are readily hydrolyzed by staphylococcal penicillinases and are therefore inactive against penicillinase-producing strains of S. aureus and S. epidermidis .

Aminopenicillins are generally active in vitro against gram-negative aerobic cocci, gram-negative aerobic bacilli, and anaerobic bacteria that are susceptible to natural penicillins. In addition, aminopenicillins are active in vitro against some Enterobacteriaceae including some strains of Escherichia coli , Proteus mirabilis , Salmonella , and Shigella . Aminopenicillins are generally inactive against other Enterobacteriaceae, B. fragilis , and Pseudomonas .

Because clavulanic acid and sulbactam are β-lactamase inhibitors that can inhibit certain β-lactamases that inactivate aminopenicillins, fixed combinations of amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium (amoxicillin/clavulanate) and fixed combinations of ampicillin sodium and sulbactam sodium (ampicillin/sulbactam) are active in vitro against many β-lactamase-producing organisms that are resistant to the aminopenicillin alone.

EXTENDED-SPECTRUM PENICILLINS

piperacillin

ticarcillin (no longer commercially available in the US)

Extended-spectrum penicillins are semisynthetic derivatives of 6-APA that have a wider spectra of activity than natural penicillins, penicillinase-resistant penicillins, and aminopenicillins.

The group of extended-spectrum penicillins is composed of 2 different subgroups: Acylaminopenicillins (piperacillin) and α-carboxypenicillins (ticarcillin; no longer commercially available in the US). Acylaminopenicillins have basic groups on the side chain at R on the penicillin nucleus and α-carboxypenicillins have a carboxylic acid group at the α-position at R on the penicillin nucleus. Partly because of these polar groups, extended-spectrum penicillins are more active against gram-negative aerobic and gram-negative anaerobic bacilli than aminopenicillins, and use of extended-spectrum penicillins is generally limited to the treatment of serious infections caused by susceptible gram-negative bacilli or mixed aerobic-anaerobic bacterial infections.

In vitro, extended-spectrum penicillins are generally active against gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic cocci that are susceptible to natural penicillins and aminopenicillins. Like natural penicillins and aminopenicillins, extended-spectrum penicillins are hydrolyzed by staphylococcal penicillinases and are therefore inactive when used alone against penicillinase-producing strains of S. aureus and S. epidermidis . Extended-spectrum penicillins have some activity against gram-positive aerobic and gram-positive anaerobic bacilli, but the drugs are generally less active in vitro on a weight basis against these organisms than are natural penicillins and aminopenicillins.

Extended-spectrum penicillins are generally active in vitro against gram-negative bacilli that are susceptible to aminopenicillins. The drugs are also active against many Enterobacteriaceae and some Pseudomonas that are resistant to other currently available penicillins. α-Carboxypenicillins are active in vitro against some strains of E. coli , Morganella morganii , P. mirabilis , P. vulgaris , Providencia rettgeri , Salmonella , Shigella , and Ps. aeruginosa . In addition to these organisms, acylaminopenicillins are generally active in vitro against some strains of Citrobacter , Enterobacter , Klebsiella , and Serratia . Extended-spectrum penicillins are more active in vitro against B. fragilis than other currently available penicillins.

The only extended-spectrum penicillin commercially available in the US is piperacillin sodium in fixed combination with tazobactam sodium (piperacillin/tazobactam). Because tazobactam has a high affinity for and irreversibly binds to certain β-lactamases that can inactivate extended-spectrum penicillins, piperacillin/tazobactam is active against many β-lactamase-producing bacteria that are resistant to piperacillin alone.

Copyright

AHFS® Drug Information. © Copyright, 1959-2024, Selected Revisions February 2, 2022. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc., 4500 East-West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, MD 20814.

References

3. Pfizer. Bicillin® L-A (penicillin G benzathine) injectable suspension prescribing information. New York, NJ; 2016 Jun.

4. Pfizer. Bicillin® C-R 900/300 (penicillin G benzathine and penicillin G procaine) injectable suspension for deep IM injection only prescribing information. New York, NY; 2016 Jun.

5. Pfizer. Bicillin® C-R (penicillin G benzathine and penicillin G procaine) injectable suspension disposable syringe for deep IM injection only prescribing information. New York, NY; 2016 Jun.

7. Pfizer. Penicillin G procaine injectable suspension for deep IM injection only prescribing information. New York, NY; 2016 Oct.

8. Sandoz. Penicillin G sodium for injection, USP 5 million units prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2014 May.

9. Pfizer. Pfizerpen (penicillin G potassium) for injection prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2016 Dec.

10. Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MK, eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 8th ed. Elsevier Saunders; Philadelphia, PA; 2015.

11. Baxter Healthcare Corporation. Penicillin G potassium injection, USP for intravenous use only prescribing information. Deerfield, IL; 2017 Nov.

12. WG Critical Care. Penicillin G potassium for injection, USP prescribing information. Paramus, NJ; 2013 Feb.

18. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. Penicillin V potassium tablets, USP and penicillin V potassium for oral solution, USP prescribing information. North Wales, PA; 2014 Nov.

19. Par Pharmaceutical. Penicillin V potassium tablets, USP and penicillin V potassium for oral solution, USP prescribing information. Fort Lee, NJ; 2014 Mar.

20. Sandoz Inc. Penicillin-VK® (penicillin V potassium) tablets, USP prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2014 Apr.

21. Aurobindo Pharma Limited. Penicillin V potassium tablets, USP prescribing information. Dayton, NJ; 2017 Aug.

27. Sandoz. Dicloxacillin sodium capsules, USP prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2020 Nov.

28. Hospira. Nafcillin injection, powder for solution prescribing information. Lake Forest, IL; 2020 Dec.

29. Baxter Healthcare. Nafcillin injection solution for IV use only prescribing information. Deerfield, IL; 2018 Sep.

34. Fresenius Kabi USA. Oxacillin injection powder for solution, USP prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2020 Jun.

35. Baxter Healthcare. Oxacillin injection for IV use only prescribing information. Deerfield, IL; 2018 Sep.

36. Sandoz. Amoxicillin capsules, tablets, and powder for oral suspension prescribing information. Princeton, NJ: 2020 Jun.

37. Teva. Amoxicillin capsules, powder for oral suspension, and chewable tablets prescribing information. North Wales, PA: 2018 Aug.

38. Hospira. Ampicillin sodium injection, powder, for solution prescribing information. Lake Forest, IL; 2020 Aug.

39. Sandoz. Ampicillin capsules prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2020 Aug.

40. Sandoz. Amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium tablets, powder for suspension, and chewable tablets prescribing information. New York, NY; 2020 Sep.

41. Roerig. Unasyn® (ampicillin sodium and sulbactam sodium injection, powder, for solution) prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2020 Sep.

55. Hospira. Piperacillin and tazobactam injection, powder, lyophilized, for solution prescribing information. Lake Forest, IL; 2020 May.

56. Williams JD. Interactions between antibiotics and beta-lactamase inhibitors. Infect Med . 1993; 10(Suppl A):15-21.

57. Fuchs PC, Barry AL. In vitro activity of piperacillin/tazobactam: a review. Infect Med . 1993; 10(Suppl A):22-7.

61. Grayson ML, ed. Kucers' the use of antibiotics: a clinical review of antibacterial, antifungal, antiparasitic, and antiviral drugs. 7th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2018:.

62. Hou JP, Poole JW. β-Lactam antibiotics: their physiochemical properties and biological activities in relation to structure. J Pharm Sci . 1971; 60:503-27. [PubMed 4336386]

63. Neu HC. Penicillins: microbiology, pharmacology, and clinical use. In: Kagan BM, ed. Antimicrobial therapy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1980:20-34.

64. Mandell GL, Sande MA. Antimicrobial agents: penicillins and cephalosporins. In: Gilman AG, Goodman L, Gilman A, eds. Goodman and Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 6th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company; 1980:1126-61.

67. Wilkowske CJ. The penicillins. Mayo Clin Proc . 1977; 52:616-24. [PubMed 242733]

68. Rolinson GN, Sutherland R. Semisynthetic penicillins. Adv Pharmacol Chemother . 1973; 11:152-220.

69. Marcy SM, Klein JO. The isoxazolyl penicillins: oxacillin, cloxacillin, and dicloxacillin. Med Clin North Am . 1970; 52:1127-43.

70. Fishman LS, Hewitt WL. The natural penicillins. Med Clin North Am . 1970; 54:1081-99. [PubMed 4248661]

71. Sabath LD. Phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V) and phenethicillin. Med Clin North Am . 1970; 54:1101-11. [PubMed 4990453]

72. Ball AP, Gray JA, Murdoch JM. Antibacterial drugs today: Part I. Drugs . 1975; 10:1-55. [PubMed 1100345]

73. Brogden RN, Speight TM, Avery GS. Amoxycillin: a review of its antibacterial and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use. Drugs . 1975; 9:88-140. [PubMed 1126306]

74. Neu HC. New broad-spectrum penicillins. Drugs . 1975; 8:81-7.

75. Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speight TM et al. Amoxycillin injectable: a review of its antibacterial spectrum, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use. Drugs . 1979; 18:169-84. [PubMed 387371]

76. Reeves DS, Bullock DW. The aminopenicillins: development and comparative properties. Infection . 1979; 7(Suppl 5):S425-32. [PubMed 389819]

78. Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speight TM et al. Ticarcillin: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs . 1980; 20:325-52. [PubMed 7002527]

79. Russo J, Russo ME. Comparative review of two new wide-spectrum penicillins: mezlocillin and piperacillin. Clin Pharm . 1982; 1:207-16. [PubMed 6224627]

80. Barza M. Antimicrobial spectrum, pharmacology and therapeutic use of antibiotics. Part 2: penicillins. Am J Hosp Pharm . 1977; 34:57-67. [PubMed 318800]

88. Selwyn S. The mechanisms and range of activity of penicillins and cephalosporins. In: Selwyn S, ed. The beta-lactam antibiotics: penicillins and cephalosporins in perspective. London: Hodder and Stoughton; 1980:56-90.

89. Wolff ME, ed. Burger's medicinal chemistry. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1980:84-157.

97. Neu HC. Antistaphylococcal penicillins. Med Clin North Am . 1982; 66:51-60. [PubMed 7038340]

99. Butler K, English AR, Ray VA et al. Carbenicillin: chemistry and mode of action. J Infect Dis . 1970; 122(Suppl):S1-8. [PubMed 4248289]

100. Neu HC. Carbenicillin and ticarcillin. Med Clin North Am . 1982; 66:61-77. [PubMed 7038341]

102. Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC. Azlocillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin: new broad-spectrum penicillins. Ann Intern Med . 1981; 97:755-60.

103. Christensen BG. Structure-activity relationships in β-lactam antibiotics. In: Salton M, Shockman GD, eds. β-Lactam antibiotics: mode of action, new developments, and future prospects. New York: Academic Press; 1981:101-11.

116. Lorian V, ed. Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:298-341, 418-73, 607-722.

117. Lomothe F, Auger F, Lacroix J-M. Effect of clavulanic acid on the activities of ten β-lactam agents against members of the Bacteroides fragilis group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1984; 25:662-5. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6732233]

118. Yogev R, Melick C, Kabat WJ. In vitro and in vivo synergism between amoxicillin and clavulanic acid against ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae type b. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1981; 19:993-6. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6973952]

119. Reading C, Farmer T, Cole M. The β-lactamase stability of amoxycillin with the β-lactamase inhibitor, clavulanic acid. J Antimicrob Chemother . 1983; 11:27-32. [PubMed 6600741]

120. Fuglesang JE, Bergan T. Antibacterial activity and kill kinetics of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid combinations against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella aerogenes . Infection . 1983; 11:329-35. [PubMed 6365790]

171. Hall WH, Schierl EA, Maccani JE. Comparative susceptibility of penicillinase-positive and -negative Neisseria gonorrhoeae to 30 antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1979; 15:562-7. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 111617]

172. Cohen MS, Cooney MH, Blackman E et al. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of penicillinase-producing and intrinsically resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1983; 24:597-9. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6418065]

173. Bourgault AM, Wilson WR, Washington JA. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of species of viridans streptococci. J Infect Dis . 1979; 140:316-21. [PubMed 501146]

174. Bayer AS, Morrison JO, Kim KS. Comparative in vitro bactericidal activity of cefonicid, ceftizoxime, and penicillin against group B streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1982; 21:344-6. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6280602]

176. Rodriguez J, Fuxench-Chiesa Z, Ramirez-Ronda CH et al. In vitro susceptibility of 50 non-β-lactamase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains to 12 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1983; 23:242-4. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6404217]

177. Tarpay MM, Welch DF, Salari H et al. In vitro activity of antibiotics commonly used in the treatment of otitis media against Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with different susceptibilities to penicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1982; 22:145-7. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6922691]

178. Barbour AG, Todd WJ, Stoenner HG. Action of penicillin on Borrelia hermsii . Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1982; 21:823-9. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 7103461]

179. Denys GA, Jerris RC, Swenson JM et al. Susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes clinical isolates to 22 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1983; 23:335-7. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6838191]

181. Jacobs MR, Kelly F, Speck WT. Susceptibility of group B streptococci to 16 β-lactam antibiotics, including new penicillin and cephalosporin derivatives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1982; 22:887-900.

183. Stevens DL, Higbee JW, Oberhofer TR et al. Antibiotic susceptibilities of human isolates of Pasteurella multocida . Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1979; 16:322-4. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 507787]

194. Marrie TJ, Haldane EV, Swantee CA et al. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to nine antimicrobial agents and demonstration of decreased susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to penicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1981; 19:51-5. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6264842]

197. Coppens L, Klastersky J. Comparative study of antipseudomonas activity of azlocillin, mezlocillin, and ticarcillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1979; 15:396-9. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 111610]

198. Standiford HC, Kind AC, Kirby WM. Laboratory and clinical studies of carbenicillin against gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1968:286-91.

202. Basker MJ, Edmondson RA, Sutherland R. Comparative antibacterial activity of azlocillin, mezlocillin, carbenicillin and ticarcillin and relative stability to beta-lactamases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella aerogenes . Infection . 1979; 7:67-72. [PubMed 108220]

203. Sheagren JN. Staphylococcus aureus—the persistent pathogen (second of two parts). N Engl J Med . 1984; 310:1437-42. [PubMed 6371536]

204. Verbist L. Comparison of the activities of the new ureidopenicillins piperacillin, mezlocillin, azlocillin, and Bay k 4999 against gram-negative organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1979; 16:115-9. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 485123]

205. Sanders CC. Comparative activity of mezlocillin, penicillin, ampicillin, carbenicillin, and ticarcillin against gram-positive bacteria and Haemophilus influenzae . Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1981; 2:843-6.

206. Jacobs MR, Path FF, Path MR et al. Emergence of multiply resistant pneumococci. N Engl J Med . 1978; 299:735-40. [PubMed 29219]

208. White AR, Comber KE, Sutherland R. Comparative bactericidal effects of azlocillin and ticarcillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1980; 18:182-9. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6774663]

209. Seidenfeld SM, Sutker WL, Luby JP. Fusobacterium necrophorum septicemia following oropharyngeal infection. JAMA . 1982; 248:1348-50. [PubMed 6955528]

210. Fass RJ, Barnishan J. In vitro susceptibilities of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa to 32 antimicrobial agents. Rev Infect Dis . 1980; 2:841-52. [PubMed 7012987]

211. Aldridge KE, Sanders CV, Janney A et al. Comparison of the activities of penicillin G and new β-lactam antibiotics against clinical isolates of Bacteroides species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1984; 26:410-3. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6334491]

212. Lam K, Bayer AS. In vitro bactericidal synergy of gentamicin combined with penicillin G, vancomycin, or cefotaxime against group G streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1984; 26:260-2. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6091537]

213. Shanson DC, Gazzard BG, Midgley J et al. Streptobacillus moniliformis isolated from blood in four cases of Haverhill fever: first outbreak in Britain. Lancet . 1983; 2:92-4. [PubMed 6134972]

215. Hall WH, Opfer BJ, Gerding DN. Comparative activities of the oxa-β-lactam LY127935, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, cefamandole, and ticarcillin against multiply resistant gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1980; 17:273-9. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6247970]

219. McAllister TA. Piperacillin against clinical isolates: antimicrobial profile and clinical role. J Antimicrob Chemother . 1982; 9(Suppl B):75-84. [PubMed 6460736]

220. Mursic VP, Wilske B, Schierz G. In vitro and in vivo susceptibility of Borrelia burgdorferi . Eur J Clin Microbiol . 1987; 6:424-6. [PubMed 3665899]

221. Johnson RC, Kodner CB, Jurkovich PJ et al. Comparative in vitro and in vivo susceptibilities of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi to cefuroxime and other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1990; 34:2133-6. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 2073103]

222. Gravenkemper CF, Bennett JV, Brodie JL et al. Dicloxacillin: in vitro and pharmacologic comparisons with oxacillin and cloxacillin. Arch Intern Med . 1965; 116:340-5. [PubMed 14325906]

223. Hammerstrom CF, Cox F, McHenry MC et al. Clinical, laboratory, and pharmacological studies of dicloxacillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1966:69-74.

224. Klein JO, Finland M. Nafcillin: antibacterial action in vitro and absorption and excretion in normal young men. Am J Med Sci . 1963; 246:44-60.

225. Kirby WM, Rosenfeld LS, Brodie J. Oxacillin: laboratory and clinical evaluation. JAMA . 1962; 181:739-44. [PubMed 14456243]

226. Sutherland R, Croydon EA, Rolinson GN. Amoxycillin: a new semi-synthetic penicillin. Br Med J . 1972; 3:13-6. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 4402672]

227. Muckter H, Sous H, Poszich G et al. Comparative studies of the activity of ciclacillin and dicloxacillin. Chemotherapy . 1976; 22:183-9. [PubMed 1269288]

228. Rolinson GN. Laboratory evaluation of amoxicillin. J Infect Dis . 1974; 129(Suppl):S139-45. [PubMed 4601188]

237. Winston DJ, Wang D, Young LS et al. In vitro studies of piperacillin, a new semisynthetic penicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1978; 13:944-50. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 677861]

239. Fu KP, Neu HC. Piperacillin, a new penicillin active against many bacteria resistant to other penicillins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1978; 13:358-67. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 122519]

240. Verbist L. In vitro activity of piperacillin, a new semisynthetic penicillin with an unusually broad spectrum of activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1978; 13:349-57. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 122518]

246. Fass RJ. In vitro activities of β-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics: a comparative study of 20 parenterally administered drugs. Arch Intern Med . 1980; 140:763-8. [PubMed 7387270]

261. Lam K, Bayer AS. Serious infections due to group G streptococci: report of 15 cases with in vitro-in vivo correlations. Am J Med . 1983; 75:561-70. [PubMed 6556004]

288. Kaye D. Enterococci: biologic and epidemiologic characteristics and in vitro susceptibility. Arch Intern Med . 1982; 142:2006-9. [PubMed 6812524]

302. Gillet AP. Antibiotics against Pseudomonas . J Antimicrob Chemother . 1982; 9(Suppl):41-8.

311. Wise R, Andrews JM, Bedford KA. In vitro study of clavulanic acid in combination with penicillin, amoxycillin, and carbenicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1978; 13:389-93. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 122520]

312. Hunter PA, Coleman K, Fisher J et al. In vitro synergistic properties of clavulanic acid, with ampicillin, amoxycillin and ticarcillin. J Antimicrob Chemother . 1980; 6:455-70. [PubMed 6968746]

314. Girouard YC, Maclean IW, Ronald AR et al. Synergistic antibacterial activity of clavulanic acid and amoxicillin against β-lactamase-producing strains of Haemophilus ducreyi . Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1981; 20:144-5. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6974538]

316. Matsuura M, Nakazawa H, Hashimoto T et al. Combined antibacterial activity of amoxicillin with clavulanic acid against ampicillin-resistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1980; 17:908-11. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6967713]

318. Brogden RN, Carmine A, Heel RC et al. Amoxycillin/clavulanic acid: a review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use. Drugs . 1981; 22:337-62. [PubMed 7037354]

406. Rutenburg AM, Greenberg HL. Oxacillin in staphylococcal infections: clinical evaluation of oral and parenteral administration. JAMA . 1964; 187:127-32.

427. Gilbert DN, Sanford JP. Methicillin: critical appraisal after a decade of experience. Med Clin North Am . 1970; 54:1113-25. [PubMed 4248509]

518. Gergan T. Overview of acylureidopenicillin pharmacokinetics. Scand J Infect Dis . 1981; 29(Suppl):33-48.

570. Dickinson GM, Droller DG, Greenman RL et al. Clinical evaluation of piperacillin with observations on penetrability into cerebrospinal fluid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 1981; 20:481-6. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 6211133]

575. Martin AR. Antibiotics. In: Doerge RF, ed. Wilson and Gisvold's textbook of organic medicinal and pharmaceutical chemistry. 8th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1982:228-47.

581. Anderson KC, Maurer MJ, Dajani AS. Pneumococci relatively resistant to penicillin: a prevalence survey in children. J Pediatr . 1980; 97:939-41. [PubMed 6904489]

593. Fortner CL, Finley RS, Schimpff SC. Piperacillin sodium: antibacterial spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse reactions. Pharmacotherapy . 1982; 2:287-99. [PubMed 6220262]

865. Kunin CM. Penicillinase-resistant penicillins. JAMA . 1977; 237:1605-6. [PubMed 576661]

953. Gooding PG, Clark BJ, Sathe SS. Piperacillin: a review of clinical experience. J Antimicrob Chemother . 1982; 9(Suppl B):93-9. [PubMed 6460738]

955. Finegold SM. Pathogenic anaerobes. Arch Intern Med . 1982; 142:1988-92. [PubMed 7125789]