section name header

Introduction

VA Class:CV200

AHFS Class:

Generic Name(s):

Chemical Name:

Molecular Formula:

Felodipine is a 1,4-dihydropyridine-derivative calcium-channel blocking agent (calcium-channel blocker).1,  2

Uses

Hypertension

Felodipine is used alone or in combination with other classes of antihypertensive agents in the management of hypertension.1,  2,  3,  1200

Calcium-channel blockers (e.g., felodipine) are considered one of several preferred antihypertensive drug classes for the initial management of hypertension according to current evidence-based hypertension guidelines; other preferred options include angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and thiazide diuretics.501,  502,  503,  504,  1200 While there may be individual differences with respect to recommendations for initial drug selection and use in specific patient populations, current evidence indicates that these antihypertensive drug classes all generally produce comparable effects on overall mortality and cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal outcomes.501,  502,  504,  1200,  1213 (See Uses: Hypertension, in Amlodipine 24:28.08.)

Calcium-channel blockers may be beneficial in the management of hypertension in patients with certain coexisting conditions such as ischemic heart disease (e.g., angina)523 and in geriatric patients, including those with isolated systolic hypertension.502,  510 (See Uses: Hypertension, in Amlodipine 24:28.08.)

In the Antihypertensive and Lipid-lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) study, the long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality benefit of a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker (amlodipine), a thiazide-like diuretic (chlorthalidone), and an ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) were compared in a broad population of patients with hypertension at risk for coronary heart disease.75,  76,  81,  82,  83,  84 Although these antihypertensive agents were comparably effective in providing important cardiovascular benefit, apparent differences in certain secondary outcomes were observed.75,  76 Patients receiving the ACE inhibitor experienced higher risks of stroke, combined cardiovascular disease, GI bleeding, and angioedema, while those receiving the calcium-channel blocker were at higher risk of developing heart failure.83,  84 The ALLHAT investigators suggested that the favorable cardiovascular outcome may be attributable, at least in part, to the greater antihypertensive effect of the calcium-channel blocker compared with that of the ACE inhibitor, especially in women and black patients.83,  84 (See Clinical Benefits of Thiazides in Hypertension under Hypertension in Adults: Treatment Benefits, in Uses in the Thiazides General Statement 40:28.20.)

Most patients with hypertension, especially black patients, will require at least 2 antihypertensive drugs to achieve adequate blood pressure control.1200 Calcium-channel blockers may be particularly useful in the management of hypertension in black patients;81,  82,  501,  504,  1250,  1251,  1252,  1253,  1254,  1255 these patients tend to have greater blood pressure response to calcium-channel blockers and thiazide diuretics than to other antihypertensive drug classes (e.g., ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists).501,  504,  1200 However, the combination of an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor antagonist with a calcium-channel blocker or thiazide diuretic produces similar blood pressure lowering in black patients as in other racial groups.1200 (See Race under Hypertension: Other Special Considerations for Antihypertensive Therapy, in Uses in Amlodipine 24:28.08.)

For additional information on the role of calcium-channel blockers in the management of hypertension, see Uses: Hypertension, in Amlodipine 24:28.08. For information on overall principles and expert recommendations for treatment of hypertension, see Uses: Hypertension in Adults and also see Uses: Hypertension in Pediatric Patients, in the Thiazides General Statement 40:28.20.

Hypertensive Crises

Because of the slow onset of hypotensive effect with extended-release tablets containing felodipine,1,  2,  3 these dosage forms are not suitable for use as acute therapy in rapidly reducing blood pressure in patients with severe hypertension in whom reduction of blood pressure is considered urgent (i.e., hypertensive urgencies) nor in hypertensive emergencies.7

Dosage and Administration

Administration

Felodipine is administered orally as extended-release tablets.1,  2,  3 The tablets should be swallowed intact and should not be chewed or crushed.1 Since peak concentrations of the drug were increased by 60% when felodipine was administered with a high-fat or high-carbohydrate meal and no changes in pharmacokinetics were observed when the drug was administered with a light meal (e.g., orange juice, toast, and cereal), the manufacturer states that felodipine should be taken either without food or with a light meal.1 However, the bioavailability of felodipine as determined by area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was not affected when the extended-release tablets containing felodipine were administered with a high-fat or high-carbohydrate meal.1

Concomitant administration with doubly concentrated grapefruit juice has been shown to increase oral bioavailability of felodipine twofold compared with concomitant administration with orange juice or water.1,  8,  53,  67,  69 Concomitant oral administration of 1,4-dihydropyridine-derivative calcium-channel blocking agents (e.g., felodipine) with grapefruit juice usually should be avoided since potentially clinically important increases in hemodynamic effects can result.45,  64,  65,  66,  69 (See Drug Interactions: Grapefruit Juice, in Nifedipine 24:28.08.)

In addition, important drug interactions may occur when felodipine is administered concomitantly with some other drugs.1,  51 Metabolism of felodipine is mediated by the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzyme 3A4 and the possibility exists that drugs and foods that inhibit this isoenzyme (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin, grapefruit juice, cimetidine) may increase plasma felodipine concentrations several-fold, which may result in increased cardiac effects (e.g., decreases in blood pressure and increases in heart rate).1,  51 Therefore, the manufacturer states that caution should be exercised in the concomitant use of felodipine and these known inhibitors of the CYP enzyme system.1,  51 The possibility that felodipine may share the drug interaction potential of nifedipine, another 1,4-dihydropyridine derivative, also should be considered and the usual precautions observed. (See Drug Interactions in Nifedipine 24:28.08.)

Dosage

Hypertension

Usual Dosage

For the management of hypertension in adults, the initial dosage of felodipine is 2.5-5 mg once daily.1 Dosage of the drug should be adjusted according to the patient's blood pressure response and tolerance, generally at intervals of not less than 2 weeks.1 The usual maintenance dosage in adults is 2.5-10 mg once daily.1,  1200 While dosages exceeding 10 mg daily were associated with an increased blood pressure response in clinical studies, such dosages were also associated with exaggerated adverse vasodilatory effects (e.g, peripheral edema).1

Although safety and efficacy remain to be fully established in children, 1,  51 some experts have recommended pediatric dosages for hypertension based on clinical experience. 1150 If felodipine is used for the management of hypertension in children,   a usual initial dosage of 2.5 mg once daily is recommended in children at least 6 years of age.1150 Experts state that the dosage may be increased every 2-4 weeks until blood pressure is controlled, the maximum dosage is reached (10 mg once daily), or adverse effects occur.1150 For information on overall principles and expert recommendations for treatment of hypertension in pediatric patients, see Uses: Hypertension in Pediatric Patients, in the Thiazides General Statement 40:28.20.

Blood Pressure Monitoring and Treatment Goals

Blood pressure should be monitored regularly (i.e., monthly) during therapy and dosage of the antihypertensive drug adjusted until blood pressure is controlled.1200 If an adequate blood pressure response is not achieved with calcium-channel blocker monotherapy, the dosage may be increased or another antihypertensive agent with demonstrated benefit and preferably with a complementary mechanism of action (e.g., angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor antagonist, thiazide diuretic) may be added; if target blood pressure is still not achieved, a third drug may be added.1200,  1216 (See Uses: Hypertension.) In patients who develop unacceptable adverse effects with felodipine, the drug should be discontinued and another antihypertensive agent from a different pharmacologic class should be initiated.1200,  1216

The goal of hypertension management and prevention is to achieve and maintain optimal control of blood pressure.1200 However, the optimum blood pressure threshold for initiating antihypertensive drug therapy and specific treatment goals remain controversial.505,  506,  507,  508,  515,  523,  530,  1201,  1207,  1209,  1222 A 2017 multidisciplinary hypertension guideline from the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and a number of other professional organizations generally recommends a blood pressure goal of less than 130/80 mm Hg in all adults regardless of comorbidities or level of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.1200,  1207 Many patients will require at least 2 drugs from different pharmacologic classes to achieve this blood pressure goal; the potential benefits of hypertension management and drug cost, adverse effects, and risks associated with the use of multiple antihypertensive drugs also should be considered when deciding a patient's blood pressure treatment goal.1200,  1220

For additional information on target levels of blood pressure and on monitoring therapy in the management of hypertension, see Blood Pressure Monitoring and Treatment Goals under Dosage: Hypertension, in Dosage and Administration in the Thiazides General Statement 40:28.20.

Dosage in Hepatic or Renal Impairment and in Geriatric Patients

Dosage of felodipine should be adjusted carefully and blood pressure response should be closely monitored with each dosage adjustment in geriatric patients and in patients with impaired hepatic function; the usual initial dosage is 2.5 mg daily in such patients.1,  68 In clinical trials, the risk of peripheral edema was increased substantially in geriatric patients receiving dosages exceeding 10 mg daily.1 Adjustment of felodipine dosage generally is not necessary in patients with renal impairment.1

Other Information

Description

Felodipine is a 1,4-dihydropyridine-derivative calcium-channel blocking agent that is structurally related to nifedipine and nimodipine.1,  2

Additional Information

SumMon® (see Users Guide). For additional information on this drug until a more detailed monograph is developed and published, the manufacturer's labeling should be consulted. It is essential that the labeling be consulted for detailed information on the usual cautions, precautions, and contraindications.

Preparations

Excipients in commercially available drug preparations may have clinically important effects in some individuals; consult specific product labeling for details.

Please refer to the ASHP Drug Shortages Resource Center for information on shortages of one or more of these preparations.

Felodipine

Routes

Dosage Forms

Strengths

Brand Names

Manufacturer

Oral

Tablets, extended-release

2.5 mg*

Felodipine Extended-release Tablets

Plendil®

AstraZeneca

5 mg*

Felodipine Extended-release Tablets

Plendil®

AstraZeneca

10 mg*

Felodipine Extended-release Tablets

Plendil®

AstraZeneca

* available from one or more manufacturer, distributor, and/or repackager by generic (nonproprietary) name

Copyright

AHFS® Drug Information. © Copyright, 1959-2025, Selected Revisions March 18, 2019. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc., 4500 East-West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, MD 20814.

† Use is not currently included in the labeling approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

References

1. AstraZeneca LP. Plendil® (felodipine) extended-release tablets prescribing information. Wilmington, DE; 2003 Nov.

2. Saltiel E, Ellrodt AG, Monk JP et al. Felodipine: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension. Drugs . 1988; 36:387-428. [PubMed 3069435]

3. Yedinak KC, Lopez LM. Felodipine: a new dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist. DICP . 1991; 25:1193-206. [PubMed 1763537]

5. Anon. Drugs for hypertension. Med Lett Drugs Ther . 1984; 26:107-12. [PubMed 6150424]

7. Reviewers' comments (personal observations).

8. Bailey DG, Spence JD, Munoz C et al. Interaction of citrus juices with felodipine and nifedipine. Lancet . 1991; 337:268-9. [PubMed 1671113]

10. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp. DynaCirc® (isradipine) capsules prescribing information. East Hanover, NJ; 1992 Jun.

11. Lopez LM, Santiago TM. Isradipine—another calcium-channel blocker for the treatment of hypertension and angina. Ann Pharmacother . 1992; 26:789-99. [PubMed 1535246]

12. Fitton A, Benfield P. Isradipine: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease. Drugs . 1990; 40:31-74. [PubMed 2143980]

13. Walton T, Symes LR. Felodipine and isradipine: new calcium-channel blocking agents for the treatment of hypertension. Clin Pharm . 1993; 12:261-75. [PubMed 8458178]

14. Prisant LM, Carr AA, Nelson EB et al. Isradipine vs propranolol in hydrochlorothiazide-treated hypertensives: a multicenter evaluation. Arch Intern Med . 1989; 149:2453-7. [PubMed 2530945]

15. Anon. Isradipine for hypertension. Med Lett Drugs Ther . 1991; 33:51-4. [PubMed 1827655]

16. Alderman MH. Which antihypertensive drugs first—and why! JAMA . 1992; 267:2786-7. Editorial.

17. Weber MA, Laragh JH. Hypertension: steps forward and steps backward: the Joint National Committee fifth report. Arch Intern Med . 1993; 153:149-52. [PubMed 8422205]

18. Glasser SP, Clark PI, Lipicky RJ et al. Exposing patients with chronic, stable, exertional angina to placebo periods in drug trials. JAMA . 1991; 265:1550-4. [PubMed 1671885]

19. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. NHLBI panel reviews safety of calcium channel blockers. Rockville, MD; 1995 Aug 31. Press release.

20. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. New analysis regarding the safety of calcium-channel blockers: a statement for health professionals from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Rockville, MD; 1995 Sep 1.

21. Anon. NHLBI panel stands by JNC V in response to Circulation CCB article; AIM report supports use of beta blockers for prevention of sudden cardiac death. F-D-C Rep . 1995; 57(Sep 4):3-4.

22. American Heart Association. Public advisory statement on calcium channel blocker drugs. Dallas, TX; 1995 Aug 28.

23. Psaty BM, Heckbert SR, Koepsell TD et al. The risk of myocardial infarction associated with antihypertensive drug therapies. JAMA . 1995; 274:620-5. [PubMed 7637142]

24. Psaty BM, Heckbert SR, Koepsell TD et al. The risk of incident myocardial infarction associated with anti-hypertensive drug therapies. Circulation . 1995; 91:925.

25. Buring JE, Glynn RJ, Hennekens CH. Calcium channel blockers and myocardial infarction: a hypothesis formulated but not yet tested. JAMA . 1995; 274:654-5. [PubMed 7637148]

26. Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Meyer JV. Nifedipine: dose-related increase in mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. Circulation . 1995; 92:1326-31. [PubMed 7648682]

27. Opie LH, Messerli FH. Nifedipine and mortality: grave defects in the dossier. Circulation . 1995; 92:1068-73. [PubMed 7648646]

28. Kloner RA. Nifedipine in ischemic heart disease. Circulation . 1995; 92:1074-8. [PubMed 7648647]

29. Yusuf S. Calcium antagonists in coronary artery disease and hypertension: time for reevaluation? Circulation . 1995; 92:1079-82. Editorial.

30. Lenfant C. The calcium channel blocker scare: lessons for the future. Circulation . 1995; 91:2855-6. [PubMed 7796490]

31. Habib GB. Are calcium antagonists harmful in hypertensive patients? Distinguishing hype from reality. Chest . 1995; 108:3-5. [PubMed 7606987]

32. Horton R. Spinning the risks and benefits of calcium antagonists. Lancet . 1995; 346:586-7. [PubMed 7650997]

33. Yusuf S, Held P, Furberg C. Update of effects of calcium antagonists in myocardial infarction or angina in light of the Second Danish Verapamil Infarction Trial (DAVIT-II) and other recent studies. Am J Cardiol . 1991; 67:1295-7. [PubMed 2035457]

34. Egstrup K, Andersen PE Jr. Transient myocardial ischemia during nifedipine therapy in stable angina pectoris, and its relation to coronary collateral flow and comparison with metoprolol. Am J Cardiol . 1993; 71:177-83. [PubMed 8421980]

35. Wagenknecht LE, Furberg CD, Hammon JW et al. Surgical bleeding: unexpected effect of a calcium antagonist. BMJ . 1995; 310:776-7. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 7711582]

36. Miles Inc. American Heart Association, Dr. Psaty and Miles Inc. release statements qualifying possible risks of calcium channel blockers. West Haven, CT; 1995 Mar 15. Press release.

37. Dear healthcare professional letter regarding calcium-channel blockers and increased risk of heart attack. Chicago:Searle. 1995 Mar 17.

38. McClellan K. Unexpected results from MIDAS in atherosclerosis. Inpharma Wkly . 1994; Apr 9:4.

39. Anon. Groups act to dispel concerns about calcium-channel blockers. Am J Health-Syst Pharm . 1995; 52:1154, 1158. [PubMed 7656105]

40. Waters D. Proischemic complications of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. Circulation . 1991; 84:2598-600. [PubMed 1959210]

41. Messerli FH. Case-control study, meta-analysis, and bouillabaisse: putting the calcium antagonist scare into context. Ann Intern Med . 1995; 123:888-9. [PubMed 7486476]

42. Reviewers' comments (personal observations).

43. Pratt Pharmaceuticals. Procardia® (nifedipine) capsules prescribing information (dated 1993 Feb). In: Physicians' desk reference. 49th ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Company Inc; 1995:1906-7.

44. Held PH, Yusuf S, Furberg CD. Calcium channel blockers in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina: an overview. BMJ . 1989; 299:1187-92. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 2513047]

45. Bailey DG, Arnold JMO, Spence JD. Grafefruit juice and drugs: how significant is the interaction? Clin Pharmcokinet . 1994; 26:91-8.

47. Kaplan NM. Choice of initial therapy for hypertension. JAMA . 1996; 275:1577-80. [PubMed 8622249]

48. Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovich DS et al. Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA . 1997; 277:739-45. [PubMed 9042847]

51. AstraZeneca LP. Lexxel® (enalapril maleate/felodipine) extended-release tablets prescribing information. Wilmington, DE; 2007 Mar.

52. Gradman AH, Cutler NR, Davis PJ et al. Combined enalapril and felodipine extended release (ER) for systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol . 1997; 9:431-5.

53. Bailey DG, Arnold JMO, Bend JR et al. Grapefruit juice-felodipine interaction: reproducibitlity and characterization with the extended release drug formulation. Br J Clin Pharmacol . 1995; 40:135-40. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 8562295]

54. Velussi M, Brocco E, Frigato F et al. Effects of cilazapril and amlodipine on kidney function in hypertensive NIDDM patients. Diabetes . 1996; 45:216-22. [PubMed 8549868]

55. Estacio RO, Jeffers BW, Hiatt WR et al. The effect of nisoldipine as compared with enalapril on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes and hypertension. N Engl J Med . 1998; 338:645-52. [PubMed 9486993]

56. Pahor M, Psaty BM, Furberg CD. Treatment of hypertensive patients with diabetes. Lancet . 1998; 351:689-90. [PubMed 9504510]

57. Tatti P, Pahor M, Byington RP et al. Outcome results of the Fosinopril versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events randomized Trial (FACET) in patients with hypertension and NIDDM. Diabetes Care . 1998; 21:597-603. [PubMed 9571349]

58. Byington RP, Craven TE, Furberg CD et al. Isradipine, raised glycosylated haemoglobin, and risk of cardiovascular events. Lancet . 1997; 350:1075-6. [PubMed 10213554]

59. Alderman M, Madhavan S, Cohen H. Calcium antagonists and cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension and diabetes. Lancet . 1998; 351:216-7. [PubMed 9449897]

60. Josefson D. Infarction risk found with calcium channel blocker. BMJ . 1998; 316:797.

61. Cutler JA. Calcium-channel blockers for hypertension—uncertainty continues. N Engl J Med . 1998; 338:679-81. [PubMed 9486999]

62. Bayer, West Haven, CT: Personal communication.

63. Bakris GL, Copley JB, Vicknair N et al. Calcium channel blockers versus other antihypertensive therapies on progression of NIDDM associated nephropathy. Kidney Int . 1996; 50:1641-50. [PubMed 8914031]

64. Ameer B, Weintraub RA. Drug interactions with grapefruit juice. Clin Phramacokinet . 1997; 33:103-21.

65. Roller L. Drugs and grapefruit juice. Clin Pharmacol Ther . 1998; 63:87. [PubMed 9465845]

66. Spence JD. Drugs and grapefruit juice. Clin Pharmacol Ther . 1998; 63:87-8. [PubMed 9465845]

67. Bailey DG, Arnold MO, Munoz C et al. Grapefruit juice—felodipine interaction: mechanism, predictability, and effect of naringin. Clin Pharmacol Ther . 1993; 53:637-42. [PubMed 8513655]

68. Manufacturer's comments (Astra Merck, Wayne, PA): Personal communication.

69. Bailey DG, Arnold JMO, Spence JD. Grapefruit juice and drugs: how significant is the interaction? Clin Pharmacokinet . 1994; 26:91-8.

71. Izzo JL, Levy D, Black HR. Importance of systolic blood pressure in older Americans. Hypertension . 2000; 35:1021-4. [PubMed 10818056]

72. Frohlich ED. Recognition of systolic hypertension for hypertension. Hypertension . 2000; 35:1019-20. [PubMed 10818055]

73. Bakris GL, Williams M, Dworkin L et al. Preserving renal function in adults with hypertension and diabetes: a consensus approach. Am J Kidney Dis . 2000; 36:646-61. [PubMed 10977801]

74. Associated Press (American Diabetes Association). Diabetics urged: drop blood pressure. Chicago, IL; 2000 Aug 29. Press Release from web site. [Web]

75. Appel LJ. The verdict from ALLHAT—thiazide diuretics are the preferred initial therapy for hypertension. JAMA . 2002; 288:3039-60. [PubMed 12479770]

76. The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA . 2002; 288:2981-97. [PubMed 12479763]

81. Wright JT, Dunn JK, Cutler JA et al. Outcomes in hypertensive black and nonblack patients treated with chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril. JAMA . 2005; 293:1595-607. [PubMed 15811979]

82. Neaton JD, Kuller LH. Diuretics are color blind. JAMA . 2005; 293:1663-6. [PubMed 15811986]

83. Leenen FHH, Nwachuku CE, Black HR et al. Clinical events in high-risk hypertensive patients randomly assigned to calcium-channel blocker versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial. Hypertension . 2006; 48:374-84. [PubMed 16864749]

84. Messerli FH, Staessen JA. Amlodipine better than lisinopril: how one randomized clinical trial ended fallacies from observational studies? Hypertension . 2006; 48:359-61. Editorial.

501. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA . 2014; 311:507-20. [PubMed 24352797]

502. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens . 2013; 31:1281-357. [PubMed 23817082]

503. Go AS, Bauman MA, Coleman King SM et al. An effective approach to high blood pressure control: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hypertension . 2014; 63:878-85. [PubMed 24243703]

504. Weber MA, Schiffrin EL, White WB et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community: a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) . 2014; 16:14-26. [PubMed 24341872]

505. Wright JT, Fine LJ, Lackland DT et al. Evidence supporting a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 150 mm Hg in patients aged 60 years or older: the minority view. Ann Intern Med . 2014; 160:499-503. [PubMed 24424788]

506. Mitka M. Groups spar over new hypertension guidelines. JAMA . 2014; 311:663-4. [PubMed 24549531]

507. Peterson ED, Gaziano JM, Greenland P. Recommendations for treating hypertension: what are the right goals and purposes?. JAMA . 2014; 311:474-6. [PubMed 24352710]

508. Bauchner H, Fontanarosa PB, Golub RM. Updated guidelines for management of high blood pressure: recommendations, review, and responsibility. JAMA . 2014; 311:477-8. [PubMed 24352759]

510. Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators. Lancet . 1997; 350:757-64. [PubMed 9297994]

511. JATOS Study Group. Principal results of the Japanese trial to assess optimal systolic blood pressure in elderly hypertensive patients (JATOS). Hypertens Res . 2008; 31:2115-27. [PubMed 19139601]

515. Thomas G, Shishehbor M, Brill D et al. New hypertension guidelines: one size fits most?. Cleve Clin J Med . 2014; 81:178-88. [PubMed 24591473]

516. Wright JT, Bakris G, Greene T et al. Effect of blood pressure lowering and antihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease: results from the AASK trial. JAMA . 2002; 288:2421-31. [PubMed 12435255]

522. Patel A, ADVANCE Collaborative Group, MacMahon S et al. Effects of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the ADVANCE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet . 2007; 370:829-40. [PubMed 17765963]

523. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation . 2012; 126:e354-471.

524. WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, Yancy CW, Jessup M et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation . 2013; 128:e240-327.

525. Smith SC, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO et al. AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients with Coronary and other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation . 2011; 124:2458-73. [PubMed 22052934]

526. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR et al. Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke . 2014; :. [PubMed 24788967]

527. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation . 2013; 127:e362-425. [PubMedCentral]

530. Myers MG, Tobe SW. A Canadian perspective on the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8) hypertension guidelines. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) . 2014; 16:246-8. [PubMed 24641124]

535. Taler SJ, Agarwal R, Bakris GL et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for management of blood pressure in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis . 2013; 62:201-13. [PubMedCentral][PubMed 23684145]

536. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Blood Pressure Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl . 2012: 2: 337-414.

541. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J . 2012; 33:1635-701. [PubMed 22555213]

1150. Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM et al. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics . 2017; 140 [PubMed 28827377]

1200. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension . 2018; 71:el13-e115. [PubMed 29133356]

1201. Bakris G, Sorrentino M. Redefining hypertension - assessing the new blood-pressure guidelines. N Engl J Med . 2018; 378:497-499. [PubMed 29341841]

1202. Carey RM, Whelton PK, 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guideline Writing Committee. Prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: synopsis of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guideline. Ann Intern Med . 2018; 168:351-358. [PubMed 29357392]

1207. Burnier M, Oparil S, Narkiewicz K et al. New 2017 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology guideline for hypertension in the adults: major paradigm shifts, but will they help to fight against the hypertension disease burden?. Blood Press . 2018; 27:62-65. [PubMed 29447001]

1209. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, Rich R et al. Pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in adults aged 60 years or older to higher versus lower blood pressure targets: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Ann Intern Med . 2017; 166:430-437. [PubMed 28135725]

1210. SPRINT Research Group, Wright JT, Williamson JD et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med . 2015; 373:2103-16. [PubMed 26551272]

1213. Reboussin DM, Allen NB, Griswold ME et al. Systematic review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2017; [PubMed 29146534]

1216. Taler SJ. Initial treatment of hypertension. N Engl J Med . 2018; 378:636-644. [PubMed 29443671]

1220. Cifu AS, Davis AM. Prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults. JAMA . 2017; 318:2132-2134. [PubMed 29159416]

1222. Bell KJL, Doust J, Glasziou P. Incremental benefits and harms of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association high blood pressure guideline. JAMA Intern Med . 2018; 178:755-7. [PubMed 29710197]

1223. LeFevre M. ACC/AHA hypertension guideline: what is new? what do we do?. Am Fam Physician . 2018; 97(6):372-3. [PubMed 29671534]

1224. Brett AS. New hypertension guideline is released. From NEJM Journal Watch website. Accessed 2018 Jun 18. [Web]

1229. Ioannidis JPA. Diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines and in the real world. JAMA . 2018; 319(2):115-6. [PubMed 29242891]

1250. Weir MR, Josselson J, Giard MJ et al. Sustained-release diltiazem compared with atenolol monotherapy for mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol . 1987; 60:36-41I. [PubMed 3604943]

1251. Muller FB, Bolli P, Erne P et al. Use of calcium antagonists as monotherapy in the management of hypertension. Am J Med . 1984; 77(Suppl 2B):11-5. [PubMed 6385691]

1252. Kiowski W, Bühler FR, Fadayomi MO et al. Age, race, blood pressure and renin: predictors for antihypertensive treatment with calcium antagonists. Am J Cardiol . 1985; 56:81-5H.

1253. Frishman WH, Charlap S, Michelson EL. Calcium channel blockers in systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol . 1986; 58:157-60. [PubMed 3524178]

1254. Halperin AK, Cubeddu LX. The role of calcium channel blockers in the treatment of hypertension. Am Heart J . 1986; 111:363-82. [PubMed 3511651]

1255. Laragh JH. Issues, goals, and guidelines in selecting first-line drug therapy for hypertension. In: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop on antihypertensive drug treatment. Bethesda, MD; June 11-12, 1987. Hypertension . 1989; 13(Suppl I):I-103-12. [PubMed 2490815]