section name header

Information

Synonym/Acronym

indirect antiglobulin test (IAT), antibody screen.

Rationale

To check recipient serum for antibodies prior to blood transfusion.

Patient Preparation

There are no food, fluid, activity, or medication restrictions unless by medical direction.

Normal Findings

(Method: Hemagglutination) Negative (no agglutination).

Critical Findings and Potential Interventions

N/A

Overview

(Study type: Blood collected in a red-top tube; related body system: Circulatory/hematopoietic and immune systems.)

IAT detects and identifies unexpected circulating antibodies or complement molecules in the patient’s serum. The first use of this test was for the detection and identification of anti-D antibodies using an indirect method. The test is now commonly used to screen a patient’s serum for the presence of any antibodies that may react against transfused RBCs. During testing, the patient’s serum is allowed to incubate with reagent RBCs. The reagent RBCs used are from group O donors and have most of the clinically significant antigens present (D, C, E, c, e, K, M, N, S, s, Fya, Fyb, Jka, and Jkb). Anti-D is the antibody most commonly identified by IAT and is the most potent RBC antigenic initiator of in vivo hemolysis. Antibodies present in the patient’s serum coat antigenic sites on the RBC membrane. The reagent cells are washed with saline to remove any unbound antibody. Antihuman globulin is added in the final step of the test. If the patient’s serum contains antibodies, the antihuman globulin will cause the antibody-coated RBCs to stick together or agglutinate. (See study titled “Blood Typing, Antibody Screen, and Crossmatch” for information regarding blood product transfusion reactions.)

Individuals who are RhD negative do not have the Rh antigen on the surface of their RBCs and will develop alloantibodies to the D antigen if exposed to RhD-positive RBCs either through a transfusion or in the case of a pregnant patient when RhD-positive fetal cells cross the placental barrier. Subsequent exposure to RhD-positive RBCs will likely result in significant hemolysis to the transfused recipient’s own RBCs or to the in utero fetus’s RBCs. Laboratory protocols for “weak D” testing have always been required as part of the compatibility process for transfusions; it was optional for certain other patient populations, most notably for obstetric patients. Obstetric patients with the “weak D” phenotype by serotyping are reported as RhD negative as a means of ensuring they receive Rh(D) immune globulin RhoGAM intramuscular (IM) or Rhophylac IM or IV, thus protecting them from inadvertent alloimmunization by an RhD-positive fetus.

Administration of RhIG (Rh immune globulin) to these candidates is not harmful. The advent of molecular technology has led to blood group genotyping (BGG). RhD genotyping offers the advantages of avoiding unnecessary injections of RhIG and transfusion of Rh-negative blood when Rh-positive products could be safely used instead. Alloimmunization may still occur in Rh-negative typed females of reproductive potential as an unintended consequence of RBC transfusion, unknown miscarriage, or failure to receive the recommended RhIG protocol. In the United States, RhD genotyping is available but not routinely used due to the high cost and longer turnaround time for producing genotyping results vs in-house serological methods. Patient and fetal specimens may be collected and sent to larger reference laboratories for RhD genotyping and/or RhD copy testing. RhD genotyping does not evaluate specimens for the presence or absence of RhD but rather for the presence or absence of the other major Rh antigens associated with coexpression or absence of RhD (C, c, E, e). RhD genotyping also identifies other RBC alloantigens known to cause a hemolytic reaction (e.g., Duffy, Kell, Kidd, MNS). The RhD copy test, also available from larger reference laboratories, uses molecular methods to identify the number of copies of RhD in amniotic fluid or patient whole blood specimens; negative findings presume the fetal/patient phenotype is RhD negative.

The inheritance pattern of the RhD antigen is autosomal dominant; homozygotes (DD) will always pass the RhD antigen gene on to their offspring, and heterozygotes (Dd) will pass the RhD antigen gene to their offspring with a probability of 50%. RhD genotyping is recommended when there is a discrepancy in testing for any patient expected to receive a transfusion (due to variability in reagent system sensitivity or when findings at various points in testing are discordant, e.g., immediate spin stage is negative but IAT is positive) or when the biological father’s Rh type is unknown or cannot be positively confirmed at the time the patient undergoes prenatal blood work.

Indications

Interfering Factors

Potential Medical Diagnosis: Clinical Significance of Results

Positive Findings in

Circulating antibodies or medications attach to the patient’s RBCs, and hemolysis occurs. Agglutination is graded from 1+ to 4+ in manual testing systems, with 4+ being the strongest degree of agglutination. Automated testing systems are capable of reporting 1+ to 4+ graded results, providing images of the tested material so laboratory professionals can interpret the results, or providing computer-assisted interpretation of the test results as positive or negative findings.

  • Hemolytic anemia (autoimmune or induced by drugs or other substances)
  • Hemolytic disease of the newborn (related to ABO or Rh incompatibility)
  • Incompatible crossmatch
  • Infections (mycoplasma pneumonia, mononucleosis, syphilis)
  • Other diseases (e.g., autoimmune) may cause a positive IAT to include chronic lymphocytic leukemia and SLE.

Negative Findings in

  • Samples in which the patient’s antibodies exhibit dosage effects (i.e., stronger reaction with homozygous than with heterozygous expression of an antigen) and reagent erythrocyte antigens contain single-dose expressions of the corresponding antigen (heterozygous)
  • Samples in which reagent erythrocyte antigens are unable to detect low-prevalence antibodies
  • Samples in which sensitization of erythrocytes has not occurred (true negative, complete absence of antibodies)

Nursing Implications

Before the Study: Planning and Implementation

Teaching the Patient What to Expect

  • Explain that a blood sample from the patient is needed for the test.
  • Discuss how this test can assist in assessing for blood compatibility prior to transfusion.

Potential Nursing Actions

  • Review the patient’s transfusion history.
  • Note and report previous problems encountered during blood product transfusion, including any recent or past blood or blood product transfusion or bone marrow transplantation, which could complicate or interfere with test results.

If transfusion is expected, ensure that informed and written consent is obtained prior to blood product administration.

After the Study: Implementation & Evaluation Potential Nursing Actions

Avoiding Complications

  • Transfusion reaction is a critical finding that may occur in some patients.
  • Signs and symptoms of blood product transfusion reaction range from mildly febrile to anaphylactic and may include chills, dyspnea, fever, headache, nausea, vomiting, palpitations and tachycardia, chest or back pain, apprehension, flushing, hives, angioedema, diarrhea, hypotension, oliguria, hemoglobinuria, acute kidney injury, sepsis, shock, and jaundice.
  • Acute hemolytic reactions, whether immune mediated or developed due to sensitivities to drugs or other substances, can be immediate and life threatening. Chronic hemolytic anemia is also a significant condition that requires timely identification of the problem in order to treat the condition. Complications from disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) may also occur.
  • Interventions/actions related to mildly febrile transfusion reactions include the following: Slow the rate of infusion, then verify and compare patient identification, transfusion requisition, and blood bag label. Monitor closely for further development of signs and symptoms. Administer epinephrine if ordered.
  • Interventions/actions related to a more severe transfusion reaction may include the following: Immediately stop infusion, notify the HCP, keep the IV line open with saline or lactated Ringer solution, collect red- and lavender-top tubes for posttransfusion work-up, collect urine, monitor vital signs every 5 min, order additional testing if DIC is suspected, maintain patent airway and blood pressure, and administer mannitol.
  • Further testing may be necessary if the biological mother is typed Rh negative and the IAT is positive; samples may be requested from the biological father and the fetus.
  • Monitoring of the patient’s antibody titers during the pregnancy may be sufficient to identify increased risk of developing HDN.
  • In some high-risk cases, the HCP may need to determine fetal Rh type by obtaining samples from a chorionic villus biopsy, amniotic fluid, or patient blood (to detect cell free fetal DNA). Any sampling method that involves penetration of natural tissue barriers carries the risk of infection. Incidental patient Rh sensitization can result from fetal RBCs mixing with blood of an Rh-negative patient carrying an Rh-positive fetus.

Treatment Considerations

  • Negative tests during the first 12 wk of gestation should be repeated at 28 wk to rule out the presence of an antibody.
  • Positive test results in pregnant patients after 28 wk of gestation indicate the need for antibody identification testing and possible administration of RhIG.

Safety Considerations

  • It is important for the patient to be made aware of the presence of unusual antibodies. A person may have circulating antibodies, other than ABO/Rh group antibodies, that may respond to transfused blood.
  • The patient’s circulating antibodies attach to the donor’s RBCs, damaging the integrity of the cell wall, and hemolysis occurs. Therefore, it is important to screen for the presence of antibodies in the recipient’s serum prior to transfusion. Unexpected antibodies, other than ABO/Rh, can develop at any time. If present in a pregnant person's blood, they can be potentially harmful to the fetus, which makes antibody screening an important test in prenatal care.

Clinical Judgement

  • Consider how to address concerns over the necessity of taking RhIG.

Follow-Up Evaluation and Desired Outcomes

  • Acknowledges the importance of knowing transfusion history and the presence of unusual antibodies in order to prevent a potentially fatal transfusion reaction should the need for a blood product transfusion arise.
  • Correctly states reportable transfusion reaction symptoms.