A. Etiology [3,4]
- Idiopathic (~85%) - often classified as viral, but etiology not clear
- Viral Pericarditis (~2%)
- Cocksackie B Virus
- Echovirus
- Adenovirus
- Other enteroviruses
- Smallpox live attenuated vaccine - myopericarditis 7.8 per 100,000 primary vaccinees []
- Malignancy (~7%)
- Lung and Breast Cancers and Lymphoma are most common
- Mesothelioma (usually associated with asbestosis)
- Metastatic Gastrointestinal Tumors
- Metabolic
- Uremia - up to 5% of severe renal failure
- Up to 15% of chronic hemodialysis patients
- Hypercholesterolemia
- Myxedema - only severe hypothyroidism
- Other infections
- Tuberculosis (~4%): subacute, usually followed by calcification, often with effusion [14]
- Acute Bacterial: Staphylococcus, Pneumococcus, Klebsiella, anaerobic species
- Helicobacter (previously Campylobacter) cinaedi (very rare) [4]
- Fungal: Candida, Aspergillus, Nocardia, Histoplasmosis (very uncommon)
- Lyme Disease
- Rickettsia - spotted fever (R. rickettsii), R. helvetica, R. typhis, others [7]
- Drug Induced
- Procainamide: up to 50% of patients
- Hydralazine
- Very uncommon: phenytoin (Dilantin®), minoxidil
- These agents induce pericarditis usually in setting of drug-induced lupus syndrome
- Serum eosinophilia is often present
- Idiopathic Inflammatory Disease
- Commonly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [5], rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis (scleroderma), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD)
- Less commonly associated with acute rheumatic fever, polyarteritis nodosum (PAN), Wegener's granulomatosis
- Still's Disease
- Sarcoidosis
- Loffler's Endomyocarditis
- Following Myocardial Injury
- Dressler's (Post-Cardiotomy) Syndrome: usually 1-3 weeks after myocardial infarction (MI)
- Pericarditis occurs in 5-10% of patients with MI
- After open heart surgery, especially post-pericardiectomy, bypass surgery
- Post-infectious pericarditis
- Fever is very common
- Radiation Induced Injury
- Miscellaneous
- Trauma
- Pancreatitis
- Aortic Dissection
- Whipple's Disease
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Calcific Constrictive Pericarditis [9]
- Previously relatively common, due to tuberculosis infection
- Now occurs in ~25% of patients with pericarditis, usually idiopathic
- Calcification associated with larger atrial size and atrial arrhythmias
- Independent predictor of increased perioperative mortality
- Effusive-Constrictive Pericarditis [13]
- Uncommon pericardial syndrome
- Tense pericardial effusion with constriction by visceral pericardium
- May progress to tamponade
- May be missed in some patients with tamponade
- Pericardiocentesis usually leads to only partial improvement (due to constriction)
- Extensive epicardiectomy is procedure of choice in most patients
- Pericarditis and myocarditis often coexist, particularly with infectious etiologies
- Nearly all entities which cause pericarditis can cause pericardial effusion
B. Characteristics
- Symptoms depend largely on absence or presence and size of effusion
- Chest Pain
- Most common presentation
- Pain is usually either sharp ("pleuritic"), or dull and oppressive
- Typically retrosternal, radiating to L side of neck/back, trapezius or scapula
- Position dependent: worse lying back, best standing up or leaning forward
- Coughing or deep inspiration increases chest pain
- Radiation to L arm, or more squeezing quality of pain are concerning for MI
- Lasts hours to days
- Recent "viral syndrome" is quite common - fever, cough, myalgias
- Other Symptoms
- Cough due to bronchus irritation
- Hiccups due to phrenic nerve compression
- Effusion can cause ventricular dysfunction and failure [15]
- Symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF) can occur
- Dyspnea and tachycardia early
- Slowly progressive frank CHF symptoms with normal ejection fraction
- May be due to effusion and/or progressive constrictive pericarditis
- Peripheral edema due to impedence of right heart filling
- Late progression to hypotension and cardiogenic shock
C. Physical Exam
- Friction Rub
- Present in ~85% of cases
- Often heard throughout heart beat, throughout in systole and diastole
- A scratchy, high-pitched sound - due to inflamed pericardial surfaces rubbing together
- May be triphasic
- Ventricular systole - loudest
- Early diastolic (V filling) - most difficult to hear
- Late diastolic (atrial systole) - present in ~70% of cases
- Typically, only one or two phases are heard
- Audible when patient holds their breath (contrast with pleural rub)
- Vital Signs
- Critical to complete evaluation - concern is evidence of tamponade
- Relative tachycardia (most sensitive)
- Hypotension - most concerning for tamponade
- Fever may be present
- Ewart's Sign: dullness beneath angle of L scapula, suggests pericardial effusion
- Effusion (see below)
- Pericardial friction rub often heard
- Tachycardia
- Larger effusions cause reduced venous return and lower cardiac output
- Severe: hypotension, distended neck veins, hepatomegaly, edema, ascites
D. Laboratory
- Standard Evaluation for all patients
- Blood counts - CBC
- Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
- Electrolyte (and renal) panel
- Evaluate cardiac muscle enzyme levels for myocarditis or infarction
- ECG
- Changes are typical for subepicardial involvement
- relies on segment depression or elevation
- ECG segment baseline is the TP segment
- Diffuse ST segment elevations, usually with classic J point elevations in nearly all leads
- PR interval depression in most leads are characteristic
- Leads aVR and V1 nearly always show reverse: ST depression and PR elevation
- Ratio of ST segment elevation to T wave amplitude in lead V6 >0.24 highly specific [4]
- Low voltage may indicate effusion
- Electrical alternans typically with pericardial effusion due to changing position of heart
- Q waves absent; T waves inverted even after ST segments normalized
- Atrial fibrillation or flutter are common
- Echocardiographic Changes
- Rarely occur with pure inflammation or small effusions (see below)
- Main concerns are septal deviation and chamber collapse
- Equalization of pressures indicates an emergency
- Fluid surrounding heart should be drained and analyzed
- Specific Tests
- Rheumatologic Diseases: ANA, RF, consider anti-Scl70 Abs (scleroderma)
- Lyme Titers
- Pericardial fluid analysis: Gram Stain, AFB, Culture, Chemistry, Cell Counts
- All patients should have PPD and controls placed to rule out tuberculosis
- Enlargement of Pericardium
- Normal parietal and visceral pericardium are 1-2mm thick
- MRI or CT can detect thickened (inflamed and/or fibrotic) pericardium
- Poor Prognostic Signs
- Leukocytosis with left shift
- Exposure to systemic anticoagulation
- Fever
- Signs of myonecrosis / myocarditis
E. Treatment [1,3]
- Pain and inflammation
- Usually controlled well with NSAIDs (such as ibuprofen 400-800mg po qid)
- Aspirin 650mg po tid-qid may be used in patients with history of MI
- Indomethacin 25-50mg po tid is effective but poorly tolerated
- Colchicine has also been used effectively and is safer than glucocorticoids
- Colchicine 0.6mg po bid adjunct to NSAIDs or prednisone can be used
- Colchicine 1.0-2.0mg on day 1 then maintenance 0.5-1.0mg/d for 6 months reduced risk of recurrent pericarditis >50% and was well tolerated when added to standard care [10]
- Prednisone short course (40mg qd-bid initially with taper) may be required (second step)
- Note that tuberculosis should be ruled out if possible before starting glucocorticoids
- Glucocorticoids should be reserved for recurrent or severe disease
- Intrapericardial instillation of non-absorbable glucocorticoid has been used with good effect
- Treat underlying cause
- Urokinase may be useful in exudative fibrinous pericarditis
- Fibrotic pericardium may best be treated by surgical resection (pericardiectomy)
- Recurrence occurs in 15-30% of idiopathic disease
OTHER PERICARDIAL DISEASES |
A. Pericardial Effusions [1]- Accumulation of Fluid
- Normal pericardial fluid volume 15-35mL
- Up to 2 liters can accumulate slowly in normal pericardium without problems
- About 40% of patients with symptomatic pericarditis develop effusions [8]
- Large, chronic pericardial effusions can be tolerated for years in many patients [8]
- Determinants of cardiac compromise with effusion
- Total Volume
- Rate of accumulation
- Pericardial distensibility
- Causes of Effusions (overall)
- Biopsy of pericardium and culture of fluid are highly diagnostic
- Malignancy (23%), Viral Infection (14%), Radiation (14%), CVD (12%), Uremia (12%)
- Other infections: Mycobacterial (7%), Mycoplasma (4%), Other Bacterial (2%); ? in 7%
- Drug induced effusions should strongly be considered
- Hemopericardium
- Neoplasm most common - malignant metastases or primary cardiac tumor
- Myocardial and great vessel rupture
- Tuberculosis [14]
- Surgery or Trauma
- Drugs
- Underlying cause in setting of anti-coagulation
- Uremia - coagulopathy may predispose to bleeding
- Symptoms of Pericardial Effusion
- Shortness of Breath
- Dizziness - Hypotension
- Fatigue
- Pedal Edema
- Cough
- Symptoms of Tamponade should be evaluated (see below)
- Electrocardiographic Changes
- Diffuse low voltage
- Electrical alternans
- PR Depression and ST elevation may be present (as for pericarditis)
- Evaluation of Pericardial Fluid
- Complete fluid count with cell differential
- Lactate dehydrogenase, pH, glucose, protein, consider amylase (pancreatitis)
- Viral Titers / Culture - usually in serum
- Stains for AFB, bacteria, fungus
- Cultures, including mycobacteria and fungus
- Routine drainage of large pericardial effusions in asymptomatic patients not useful
- Recurrance after therapeutic pericardiocentesis should prompt pericardiectomy [8]
B. Pericardial (Cardiac) Tamponade [6,12]
- Life-threatening compression of heart due to pericardial fluid accumulation
- May be rapid (acute) or slow (chronic)
- Classic Triad of Symptoms
- Elevated Jugular Venous Pressure
- Low Blood Pressure
- Pulsus paradoxus: exaggerated ( >10mm Hg ) fall in systolic blood pressure with inspiration
- In practice, these are unreliable indicators of impending cardiac arrest
- Note normal systolic pressure decreases slightly with inspiration
- Pathophysiology
- Stiffness of pericardium and rate of fluid accumulation determine symptoms
- Under chronic inflammatory conditions with flexible pericardium, over 2 liters of fluid may accumulate prior to development of life-threatening tamponade
- Tamponade leads to inability to fill the cardiac chambers in diastole
- Rising intracardiac pressures
- Reduction in stroke volume and cardiac output leads to hypotension
- Diagnostic Evaluation [6]
- Nearly all patients have at least dyspnea, tachycardia, or chest fullness
- Pulsus paradoxus (not a paradox, but an exaggeration) is also usually present
- Chest Radiograph: increased cardiac silhouette only with >250cc fluid accumulation
- Certainty of tamponade diagnosis requires echocardiography or catheterization
- Once effusion is documented, follow progression with heart rate and echocardiography
- Echocardiographic Changes
- RV collapse: >30% free wall inversion during diastole (respiratory flow variation)
- LA collapse: LA wall inversion
- Catheterization: equalization of chamber pressures, loss of Y descent
- Treatment
- Drainage of fluid - pericardiocentesis
- Treat symptoms as for pericarditis
- Pericardiectomy or Window Placement may be required
- Pericardiocentsis [12]
- Needle drainage of pericardial fluid
- Best done with aide of imaging
- Paraxiphoid area (just to patient's left of xiphoid process) usually chosen if not imaged
- Angle needle 15° bypassing costal margin and aim toward left shoulder
- Slowly advance needle until pericardium is reached
- Sheethed 16-18 gauge PTFE needle is recommended since core can be removed
- Prolonged drainage facilitated by passing guide wire through sheath and then introducing pigtail angiographic catheter
References
- Troughton RW, Asher CR, Klein AL. 2004. Lancet. 363(9410):717
- Spodick DH. 2003. JAMA. 289(9):1150
- Lange RA and Hillis LD. 2004. NEJM. 351(21):2195
- Lewis GD, Holmes CB, Holmvang G, Butterton JR. 2007. NEJM. 356(11):1153 (Case Record)
- Caro I and Zembowicz A. 2003. NEJM. 348(7):630 (Case Record)
- Roy CL, Minor MA, Brookhart MA, Choudhry NK. 2007. JAMA. 297(16):1810
- Nilsson K, Lindquist O, Pahlson C. 1999. Lancet. 354(9185):1169
- Sagrista-Sauleda J, Angel J, Permanyer-Miralda G, Soler-Soler J. 1999. NEJM. 341(27):2054
- Ling LH, Oh JK, Breen JF, et al. 2000. Ann Intern Med. 132(6):444
- Imazio M, Bobbio M, Cecchi E, et al. 2005. Arch Intern Med. 165(17):1987
- Halsell JS, Riddle JR, Atwood JE, et al. 2003. JAMA. 289(24):3283
- Spodick DH. 2003. NEJM. 349(7):684
- Sagrista-Sauleda J, Angel J, Sanchez A, et al. 2004. NEJM. 350(5):469
- Nardell EA, Fan D, Shepard JO, Mark EJ. 2004. NEJM. 351(3):279 (Case Record)
- Wang A and Bashore TM. 2004. NEJM. 351(10):1014 (Case Discussion)