A. Overview
- Common cause of abdominal pain
- About 250,000 new cases per year in USA, with ~6% lifetime risk
- Highly variable presentation
- Requires high degree of suspicion in any patient with abdominal or flank pain
- Seriel observation of patient is critical
- Diagnosis of acute appendicitis is incorrect in ~20% of surgically removed organs
- Diagnosis is missed in a number of cases (due mainly to variable presentation)
- Inappropriate surgical procedures are carried out due to incorrect diagnosis
- Neuroimmune appendicitis with pain but little inflammation may be responsible [2]
B. Symptoms [3]
- Fever
- Fever with abdominal pain in children increases likelihood of appendicitis 3.4
- Absence of abdominal pain reduces likelihood of appendicitis by 70%
- Nausea and vomiting
- Nonspecific colicky abdominal pain, possibly with inital diarrhea
- Typical Pain Patterns [3]
- Only present in ~20% of patients
- Pain usually begins in mid epigastrium or periumbilical area
- It then migrates to right (R) lower quadrant (RLQ)
- Focal tenderness is present in RLQ in most patient
- Location of focal pain is completely dependent on position of appendix
- Pain migrating from midepigastrium to RLQ more likely appendicitis than pure RLQ pain
- Rebound tenderness triples odds of appendicitis
- Atypical Pain Patterns
- RUQ or R flank tenderness - elevated cecum (riding high in abdominal cavity)
- Deep RLQ pain - appendix lying deep in RLQ
- Bladder symptoms may occur due to irritation of bladder
- Women may have pain associated with inflammation of ovary and/or fallopian tube
- May mimic pelvic inflammatory disease
- Delay in presentation >12 hours after symptom onset associated with perforations
C. Pathophysiology
- Generally caused by obstruction of appendix by appendicolith (stone)
- Obstruction leads to pressure build up, bacterial invasion, increased inflammation
- Perforation follows if treatment not instituted
- Peritonitis, sepsis and death may result without treatment
- Neuroimmune Appendicitis [2]
- Pain without acute inflammation may occur
- Increased substance P or vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) activity present
- This disorder may account for non-inflammatory appendicitis found in ~20% of cases
D. Diagnosis
- High clinical suspicion is critical to avoid missing cases of appendicitis
- Clinical history is key in considering diagnosis
- Careful physical examination is necessary
- Despite careful history and physical, diagnosis may be very difficult [4]
- Variant clinical presentations are not uncommon (~20%)
- Right upper quadrant pain
- Pain may begin in epigrasrium or hypogastrium
- Pain may be in flank region, particularly with retroperitoneal appendix
- Laboratory
- Leukocytosis with left shift (immature forms)
- Total white cell count <10K/µL reduces likelihood of appendicitis to 0.22
- An absolute neutrophil count of <6750/µL associated with likelihood ratio of 0.06
- Hyponatremia
- Acidosis - usually due to bicarbonate loss in intestine
- Radiographic
- Plain X-rays are non-specific, often showing air-fluid levels typical of ileus
- Calcified stone may be visible in appendix area
- Ultrasound is initial study but computed tomography (CT) is more accurate [5]
- CT sensitivity 0.94, speificity 0.95; Ultrasound sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.81
- CT is extremely helpful and cost effective in confiming diagnosis [6]
- If ultrasound is indeterminant or negative but clinical suspicion is high, then patients should definitely undergo CT scan with rectal contrast [7]
- CT may replace ultrasound as initial diagnostic test
- Surgical exploration and verification is gold standard
E. Differential Diagnosis
- Crohn's Disease
- Psoas Abscess
- Pyelonephritis
- Pelvic abscess, ovarian disease, fallopian tube disease
- Pelvic inflammatory disease
- Cholecystitis
- Intestinal perforation due to obstruction (e.g. right sided colon cancer)
- Non-inflammmatory neuroimmune appendicitis [2]
F. Treatment
- Surgery
- Removal of appendix is definitive therapy
- Laparoscopic surgery has reduced wound infection risk, earlier return to acitivites
- Fluid management is critical
- Antibiotic therapy, including anaerobic coverage, is required
References
- Pauker SG and Kopelman RI. 1994. NEJM. 330(22):1596 (Case Discussion)
- Di Sebastiono P, Fink T, Di Mola FF, et al. 1999. Lancet. 354(9177):461
- Bundy DG, Byerley JS, Liles EA, et al. 2007. JAMA. 298(4):438
- Fisk DT, Saint S, Tierney LM Jr. 1999. NEJM. 341(10):747 (Case Discussion)
- Terasawa T, Blcakmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ. 2004. Ann Intern Med. 141(7):537
- Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. 1998. NEJM. 338(3):141
- Garcia Pena BM, Mandl KD, Kraus SJ, et al. 1999. JAMA. 282(11):1041