Info
A. Characteristics
- Opportunistic Infection
- Epidemiology
- Seroprevalence 40-100% in adults
- Variable seroprevalence strongly related to socioeconomic status
- Asymptomatic infection or mononucleosis like syndrome in healthy non-infants
- Serious infection including pneumonia, hepatitis, rash is rare in healthy persons [6]
- Clinically apparent in immunocompromised patients and infants
- Serious infection in ~1% of all neonates
- Risk Factors for Significant Infection
- HIV Infection
- Organ or Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Prolonged (usually high dose) glucocorticoid or immunosuppressive therapy
- Congenital CMV: "C" in TORCHS series of congenital infections
- Infants
- Increasing problem as more patients are immunosuppressed
B. Organ Involvement [1]
- CMV Retinopathy is most common problem [2,3]
- Mainly in patients with HIV [15]
- Less common in organ transplantation
- Retinitis (ultimately leads to blindness) - up to 40% of patients with AIDS
- Conjunctivitis also occurs, particularly in HIV
- Pneumonia
- Severe interstitial pneumonitis
- Common in organ / bone marrow transplant patients
- Very rare in healthy persons, but can present with negative gram stain [6]
- CMV Encephalitis
- Majority of cases occur in patients with advanced AIDS; <5% are immunocompetent
- In advanced HIV, pathology shows ventriculoencephalitis, a unique entity
- Over 50% of patients also have CMV retinitis
- Lethargy and confusion are most common symptoms
- Average CD4 count at presentation was 20/µL
- Spinal fluid analysis should include a polymerase chain reaction for CMV DNA
- Combination ganciclovir and foscarnet therapy is recommended but unproved
- Cauda Equina Syndrome (Polyradiculopathy)
- CD4+ T cell count usually <50µL
- Caused by CMV
- Severe and rapid loss of lower extremity strength ± sensation
- Bladder and bowel incontinence are common presenting symptoms
- Poor response to single agent anti-CMV Therapy
- Ganciclovir (DHPG) + Foscarnet may be used (poorly tolerated)
- Hepatitis
- Probably cause of hepatitis in immunocompromised persons
- Probably not a cause of hepatitis in immunocompetent persons
- May cause high fevers when found with liver disease
- Particularly dangerous in setting of liver transplantation
- CMV positivity (donor and/or recipient) predicts poor liver transplant outcome [5]
- Gastrointestinal Disturbances
- Usually colitis [4], esophagitis, particularly in HIV infection [7]
- Colitis in solid organ transplant (>1 month after transplant) [11]
- HIV, other immunodeficiency, or immunosuppressive drugs increase risk [4]
- Occasionally seen in elderly patients without overt immunodeficiency
- Erosive or ulcerative process
- Mucosal biopsy required for diagnosis
- Bone Marrow Infiltration
- Severe bone marrow suppression (pancytopenia)
- High Fevers
- Vascular Inflammation
- CMV seropositivity is associated with high restenosis rates post-atherectomy [8]
- CMV also plays a key role in damage to transplanted organs [19]
- CMV infection of HIV+ infants increases rate of progression of HIV-1 disease [22]
- Congenital CMV [16,21]
- Occurs in ~40% neonates in ~40% of women with primary CMV infection
- Symptomatic in ~10% of infected neonates
- Significant neurologic deficits in 50% of these
- Sensorineural hearing loss (leading cause in USA)
- Cognitive impairment
- Cerebral palsy
- Visual impairment
- Thrombocytopenia [17]
- Virus transmitted to fetus during primary maternal infection during pregnancy
- Naturally acquired immunity leads to ~70% reduction in risk of congenital CMV infection
C. Diagnosis
- Seropositivity is major method for detection of prior infection
- IgM titers acutely
- IgG titers for previous infection (most persons are positive)
- Seropositive perons are considered to have latent CMV
- CMV is reactivated with immunosuppression
- Culture of virus possible, with generation of bizarre large cells
- In situ hybridization on biopsy specimens is diagnostic
- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
- CMV DNA test based on hybridization is now commercially available
- These are ~99% sensitive
- Likely that the PCR based test will supplant culture and biopsy for diagnosis
D. Treatment [1,9]
- Overview
- Prophylaxis in organ and bone marrow transplantation (see below)
- Treatment with Ganciclovir and/or Foscarnet, or resistant strains with cidofovir
- Cidofovir intravitreous injection for initial CMV retinopathy therapy
- Patients with immunodeficiency may require lifelong treatment
- However, highly active anti-HIV therapy may reverse CMV disease and need for therapy
- Anti-CMV agents can be stopped in patients with stable CMV disease and CD4 counts >150/µL [23]
- CMV hyperimmune globulin reduces transmission in pregnant women with primary CMV infection and CMV or CMV DNA in amniotic fluid [16]
- Ganciclovir (Cytovene®)
- Indications: CMV retinitis, CMV organ infections (except pneumonia)
- Dose: 5mg/kg IV bid for 2-3 wks or oral therapy for prophylaxis in HIV [10]
- Dose must be adjusted for renal dysfunction; 1 hour infusion time requred
- Side Effects: granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, severe myelosuppression with AZT
- G-CSF and/or erythropoietin may be given for cytopenias
- Oral ganciclovir 4500-6000mg/day is efficacious and has fewer side effects than IV
- Oral ganciclovir is recommended for maintenance therapy after IV induction [1]
- Oral or IV ganciclovir reduces risk of Kaposi's sarcoma in HIV+ patients as well
- Ganciclovir resistant CMV is an emerging problem in solid-organ transplants [24]
- Valganciclovir (Valcyte®) [9,25]
- Valgancyclovir is L-valyl ester of ganciclovir with excellent oral availability
- Valgancyclovir should replace both IV and PO ganciclovir for CMV retinitis [25]
- Induction 900mg po bid (usually for 3 weeks for CMV retinitis)
- Maintenance 900mg po qd
- Intraocular Ganciclovir (Vitrasert®) [14]
- Intraocular implant with sustained release ganciclovir
- Duration of efficacy very long; overall more effective than IV therapy
- Intraocular ganciclovir leads to more CMV systemic disease in HIV than IV drug
- Requires surgical implantation and complications of surgery can occur
- Effects can last >7 months in implanted eye
- Retinitis in contralateral eye occurred in ~55% of persons over 7 months
- Combination of implant with oral ganciclovir reduces recurrence of CMV retinitis
- Foscarnet (Foscavir®)
- Indications: acyclovir resistant HSV, VSV; CMV retinitis, pneumonia, others
- Dose: 60mg/kg IV q8hr for 2-3 weeks
- Maintenance dose is 120mg/kg IV daily (2 hour infusion times requred)
- Side Effects: azotemia (50%), renal failure, nausea, vomiting, anemia, fatigue, seizures
- Side Effects: hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hypo- and hypercalcemia, abnormal phosphate
- This agent is not myelosuppressive
- Cidofovir (Vistide®) [3,12]
- Nucleoside analog highly active against CMV given intravitreous or intravenous
- Intravitreous injections of 20µg cidofovir is safe and effective in CMV retinitis [13]
- Low risk of retinal detachment with multiple injections
- Intravenous dose 5mg/kg weekly for 2 weeks, then 3-5mg/kg every two weeks
- Given with probenecid (4gm peri-infusion) and saline hydration
- Main side effects of IV therapy are proteinuria, creatinine elevation and neutropenia
- For systemic disease, this is the easiest agent to administer
- Fomivirsen (Vitravene®)
- Antisense oligonucleotide for intravitreal treatment of CMV retinitis
- Used for patients resistant to other therapies
- Should not be used within 2-4 weeks of cidofovir treatment
- Adverse effects: iritis, vitritis, increased intraocular pressure, vision changes
- Development of resistance by CMV has not been documented
- Combination Therapy
- Combined ganciclovir and foscarnet may be required in severe infections
- Consider for cauda equina syndrome other serious infections
- In vitro data suggest that cidofovir and other anti-CMV therapy are synergistic [2]
- HIV associated Retinitis requires indefinite therapy in many patients
E. Prophylaxis
- Given to all persons at high risk for CMV disease (immunocompromised persons)
- Solid organ transplantation and bone marrow / stem cell transplantation
- Universal prophylaxis reduced bacterial infections 50% and death 38% in solid organ transplant recipients (both acyclovir and ganciclovir were effective) [26]
- Drugs for Prophylaxis [18]
- Oral ganciclovir is expensive and fairly effective [10]
- Oral valacyclovir is highly effective and well tolerated [20]
- Oral valganciclovir is likely more effective than oral ganciclovir [9]
- Overall, prophylaxis reduced risk of any CMV disease ~60%, mortality ~40% in solid organ transplant patients [18]
- Patients with late stage HIV (decreasing numbers due to active anti-HIV therapy)
- High-titer (Hyperimmune) Anti-CMV Immune Globulin
- Reduces risk of disseminated CMV in high risk transplant patients original modality
- Significantly (~68%) reduces risk of congenital CMV infection without adverse effects [16]
References
- Whitley RJ, Jacobson MA, Friedberg DN, et al. 1999. Arch Intern Med. 158(9):957
- Jacobson MA. 1997. NEJM. 337(2):105
- Studies of Ocular Complications of AIDS Research Group. 1997. Ann Intern Med. 126(4):264
- Babyatsky MW, Keroack MD, Blake MA, et al. 2007. NEJM. 357(20):2068 (Case Record)
- Falagas ME, Snydman DR, Griffith J, et al. 1997. Ann Intern Med. 126(4):275
- Amory JK, Rosen H, Sukut C, et al. 2006. NEJM. 354(14):1516 (Case Discussion)
- Ives DV and Smith RN. 1996. NEJM. 334(22):1461
- Zhou YF, Leon MB, Waclawiw MA, et al. 1996. NEJM. 335(9):624
- Drugs for Non-HIV Viral Infections. 2002. Med Let. 44(1123):9
- Spector SA, McKinley GF, Lalezari JP, et al. 1996. NEJM. 334(24):1491
- Rubin RH, Gilman MD, Kradin RL. 2006. NEJM. 354(2):180 (Case Record)
- Lalezari JP, Stagg RJ, Kuppermann BD, et al. 1997. Ann Intern Med. 126(4):257
- Rahhal FM, Arevalo JF, de la Paz EC, et al. 1996. Ann Intern Med. 125(2):98
- Musch DC, Martin DF, Gordon JF, et al. 1997. NEJM. 337(2):83
- Whitcup SM. 1996. JAMA. 275(2):142
- Nigro G, Adler SP, La Torre R, Best AM. 2005. NEJM. 353(13):1350
- Modlin JF, Grant PE, Makar RS, et al. 2003. NEJM. 349(7):691 (Case Record)
- Hodson EM, Jones CA, Webster AC, et al. 2005. Lancet. 365:2105
- Fishman JA and Rubin RH. 1998. NEJM. 338(24):1741
- Martin DF, Kuppermann BD, Wolitz RA, et al. 1999. NEJM. 340(14):1063
- Fowler KB, Stagno S, Pass RF. 2003. JAMA. 289(8):1008
- Kovacs A, Schluchter M, Easley K, et al. 1999. NEJM. 341(2):77
- Whitcup SM, Fortin E, Lindblad AS, et al. 1999. JAMA. 282(17):1633
- Limaye AP, Corey L, Koelle DM, et al. 2000. Lancet. 356(9230):645
- Martin DF, Sierra-Madero J, Walmsley S, et al. 2002. NEJM. 346(15):1119
- Kalil AC, Levitsky J, Lyden E, et al. 2005. Ann Intern Med. 143(12):870