A. Pathophysiology
- Not entirely clear
- Altered renal blood flow (vasoconstriction)
- Contrast may induce renal vasoconstriction
- Renal medulla is relatively hypoxic and sensitive to ischemic injury
- Reduced blood flow in medulla predisposes to damage
- Other drugs which increase renal vasoconstriction (such as NSAIDs) increase risk
- Direct Tubular Injury
- Production of reactice oxygen species has been found
- Increased superoxide, peroxides and lipid peroxidation
- Induction of superoxide dismutase (SOD, an oxygen scavenger enzyme)
- Oxidation effects of radiocontrast material suggests use of anti-oxidants
- N-Acetylcysteine, an antioxidant, may reduce risk of radiocontrast nephropathy [2]
- Intraluminal obstruction by tubular cells
- This causes secondary acute tubular necrosis (ATN)
- Leads to oliguria in many cases
- Vasoconstriction and tubular injury occur immediately with dye exposure
- Clinical signs (exept oliguria) not usually seen until 24-48 hours
B. Risk Factors [14]
- Baseline Renal Insufficiency
- Risk of creatinine increase >0.5mg/dL is about 20% in patients with baseline Cr>2.0mg/dL
- In diabetic patients with creatinine >3.0mg/dL, risk of severe renal failure >50%
- Iso-osmolar nonionic (iodixanol) has much reduced risk compared with low-osmolar nonionic (iohexol) contrast medias [3]
- N-acetylcysteine given with radiocontrast reduces renal damage (see below) [2,4]
- Older age increases risk, likely due to effect on baseline renal function
- Prerenal Failure
- Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) / left ventricular systolic dysfunction
- Cirrhosis, especially with ascites
- Dehydration
- Dye Load
- Load >125mL has ~20% risk of significant nephropathy (versus 2% for <125mL)
- Second dye load within 72 hours of first increases risk significantly
- Diabetes Mellitus [3,6]
- Appears to be greatest risk factor for dye-induced renal failure
- For a given creatinine, diabetics have lower renal blood flow than non-diabetics
- In diabetics with creatinine >2.5mg/dL, risk of renal failure is >50%
- Probable Contributing Factors
- Renal and Peripheral Vascular Disease
- Multiple Myeloma
- Dehydration
- ACE Inhibitors
- Nephrotoxic drugs - NSAIDs, cyclosporine, aminoglycosides
- Low osmolar contrast medias are more toxic than iso-osmolar medias [3]
- Possible Contributing Factors
- Hypertension
- Hyperuricemia / gout
- Liver dysfunction (increased renal dye clearance)
- No decrease in incidence of radiocontrast nephropathy with non-ionic contrast [4]
C. Predicting Renal Decline After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Table 1, Ref [1])
- Risk of Increase in Serum Creatinine >0.5mg/dL or >25% / Dialysis Risk
- Total risk score <6: 7.5% / 1 in 2500 (0.04%)
- Risk score 6-10: 14% / 1 in 850 (0.12%)
- Risk score 11-15: 26%; 1 in 90 (1.09%)
- Risk score >15: 57% / 1 in 8 (12.6%)
- Risk Factors and Points
- Systolic pressure <800mm Hg for >1 hour and patient requires inotropic support or intraaortic balloon pump within 24 hours after the procedure: 5 points
- CHF (NYHA Class III or IV) and/or history of pulmonary edema: 5 points
- Age >75 years: 4 points
- Hematocrit <39% in men, <36% in women: 3 points
- Diabetes Mellitus: 3 points
- Volume of contrast media: 1 point for each 100 mL
- Baseline Renal Function:
- Serum creatinine level >1.5mg/dL: 4 points OR
- Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 40-59mL/min/1.73m2: 2 points OR
- GFR 20-39mL/min/1.73m2: 4 points OR
- GFR <20mL/min/1.73m2: 6 points
D. Diagnosis
- Oliguria
- However, initially, osmotic diuresis may occur
- Oliguria often follows; anuria is very unusual
- Serum creatinine elevation >0.5mg/dL 24-48 hours after dye load
- Low urinary sodium (Na) and Low Fractional Excretion of Na
- Renal arteriolar vasoconstriction appears to be major effect of dye
- Result is mainly a "prerenal" response by tubular cells with increased Na resorption
- Compare with acute tubular necrosis, which has high urinary Na
- Urinary Microscopic Exam
- Renal Tubular Cells
- Muddy Brown Casts are not common
- Coarse Granular Casts are more common
E. Prevention and Treatment [1]
- High Risk Patients [14]
- Good hydration ± bicarbonate is critical
- Strongly consider iso-osmolar nonionic contrast media such as iodixanol [3]
- N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is clearly superior to hydration alone for prevention [5,17]
- NAC provides dose-dependent protection from contrast nephropathy after angioplasty [15]
- Strongly consider prophylactic administration of NAC [16,17]
- Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) also of some benefit in very high risk patients
- Avoid use of mannitol or diuretics
- Maintain slightly hypervolemic fluid status with isotonic saline [6]
- Good hydration beginning 6-12 hours prior to dye exposure
- Hydration with isotonic saline superior to that with half-isotonic
- Starting dose 1mL/kg/hour at 8:00 AM on day of angioplasty until 8:00 AM day after
- Maintain good urine output
- Close monitoring and correction of electrolytes
- Especially sodium, potassium and magnesium
- Calcium and phosphate in renal failure
- N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) [2,4,5,15]
- Antioxidant agent with vasodilating and other properties
- Oral dosing 600mg bid on day before and day of contrast administration
- May also use 600mg IV dosing prior to and then oral 600mg bid x 48 hours after contrast
- IV dosing 150mg/kg 30 minutes before and 50mg/kg over 4 hours after radiocontrast [7]
- NAC oral or IV reduced incidence of creatinine rise >0.5mg/dL by 65-90%
- NAC showed trends to reducing hospital utilization after primary angioplasty [15]
- NAC was well tolerated with side effects similar to placebo
- Strongly recommend use of NAC in patients with any pre-existing renal dysfunction [16,17]
- Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO3) [8,14]
- 119 patients with creatinine >1.0mg/dL who are to recieve iopamidol contrast
- Receive either 154 mEq/L infusion with either normal saline (NaCl) or NaHCO3
- Solution given as 3mL/kg/hr x 1 hour before contrast, 1mL/kg/hr x 6 hours after
- Contast induced nephropathy in 13.6% with NaCl versus 1.7% with NaHCO3 (P=0.02)
- In additional 191 consecutive patients receiving NaHCO3, nephropathy occured in 1.6%
- Consider NaHCO3 for moderate to high risk patients
- Fenoldapam (Corlopam®) [9,10]
- Intravenous selective DA1 receptor agonist
- Vasodilatory and natriuretic effects approved for treatment of hypertensive crisis
- Starting dose is 0.1-0.3µg/kg/minute IV infusion; maximum 1.6µg/kg/minute IV
- Onset 4-5 minutes, duration 10-30 minutes
- Did not prevent radiocontrast nephropathy in patients with chronic renal failure [11]
- Side effects typical of vasodilation (hypotension, flushing, headache, dizziness)
- Forced diuresis is no longer recommended [1]
- Intravenous furosemide and/or mannitol recommended in past
- Saline 0.45% alone more effective in preventing renal failure than forced diuresis
- Furosemide and/or mannitol in diabetics receiving contrast is contraindicated
- Dopamine
- "Renal Range" ~1-3.5µg/kg/min IV
- Excellent for increasing diuresis in patients with underlying CHF but overall no ability to alter course of progression or prevent acute renal failure (ARF)
- Monitor heart rate (may increase with dopamine)
- Hemofiltration [12]
- Investigated in 114 patients at risk for ARF with serum creatinine >2mg/dL (>176.8mM)
- Definition of ARF in study is 25% increase in baseline creatinine
- Hemofiltration group had 5% incidence of ARF versus 50% with control patients
- Hemofiltration group had 9% in hospital events versus 52% with placebo
- Hemofiltration group had 10% 1-year mortality versus 30% with control
- Hemodialysis
- Short term dialysis may be needed
- Dialysis should only be instituted if needed
- Prophylactic hemodialysis is potentially harmful after nonionic contrast [13]
References
- Barrett BJ and Parfrey PS. 2006.
- Kay J, Chow WH, Chan TM, et al. 2003. JAMA. 289(5):553
- Aspelin P, Aubry P, Fransson SG, et al. 2003. NEJM. 348(6):491
- Tepel M, van der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, et al. 2000. NEJM. 343(3):180
- Birck R, Krzossok S, Markowetz F, et al. 2003. Lancet. 362(9382):598
- Mueller C, Buerlke G, Buettner HJ, et al. 2002. Arch Intern Med. 162:329
- Baker CS, Wragg A, Kumar S, et al. 2003. J Am Coll Cardiol. 41:2114
- Merten GJ, Burgess WP, Gray LV, et al. 2004. JAMA. 291(19):2328
- Murphy MB, Murray C, Shorten GD. 2001. NEJM. 345(21):1548
- Kini AS, Miltre CA, Kamran M, et al. 2002. Am J Cardiol. 89:999
- Stone GW, McCullough PA, Tumlin JA, et al. 2003. JAMA. 290(17):2284
- Marenzi G, Marana I, Lauri G, et al. 2003. NEJM. 349(14):1333
- Vogt B, Ferrari P, Schonholzer C, et al. 2001. Am J Med. 111(9):692
- Pannu N, Wiebe N, Tonelli M. 2006. JAMA. 295(23):2765
- Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Maranta I, et al. 2006. NEJM. 354(26):2773
- Goldfarb S. 2008. Ann Intern Med. 148(1):49
- Kelly AM, Dwamena B, Cronin P, et al. 2008. Ann Intern Med. 148(4):284