Any high-risk factors which mandates radiography? | Yes No - |
~ - Age >= 65 years | |
~ - Dangerous mechanism | |
~ - Fall from an elevation >=3 ft or 5 stairs | |
~ - Axial load to the head (e.g., diving) | |
~ - Motor vehicle collision (MVC) at high speed (>100 km/hr) or with rollover or ejection | |
~ - Collision involving a motorized recreational vehicle; or a bicycle collision | |
~ - Paraesthesia in any extremity | |
Any low-risk factor which allows safe assessment of range of motion? | Yes No - |
~ - Simple rear-end road motor vehicle collision (MVC)** OR | |
~ - Pushed into oncoming traffic | |
~ - Hit by a bus or a large truck | |
~ - Rollover | |
~ - Hit by a high-speed vehicle | |
~ - Sitting position in ED OR | |
~ - Ambulatory at any time OR | |
~ - Delayed (not immediate) onset of neck pain after trauma OR | |
~ - Absence of midline cervical spine tenderness | |
Able to actively rotate neck? | Yes No - |
~ - 45° left and right | |
The C-Spine Rule is a high sensitive clinical decision rule for C-spine radiography in trauma patients whare stable and alert (Glasgow Coma Scale = 15).
The objective of this decision tool is trecognize imaging requirement for evaluation of cervical spine fractures in trauma patients.
The questionnaire utilized in this calculation includes:
Abbreviations used:
Interpretation
The user needs to select Yes or No for the appropriate questions in the correct order which is then used tindicate the result, i.e, Radiography or No Radiography
References:
Canadian CT Head and C-Spine (CCC) Study Group. Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: I. Background and rationale. CJEM. 2002;4(2):84-90.
Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286(15):1841-8.