ESSENTIALS OF DIAGNOSIS | ||
|
Classification & Epidemiology
Table 8-1. Hearing Loss Classification categorizes hearing loss as normal, mild, moderate, severe, or profound and outlines the vocal equivalent as well as the decibel range.
Classification | Vocal Equivalent | Decibel (dB) Range |
---|---|---|
Normal | Soft whisper | 0-20 dB |
Mild | Soft spoken voice | 20-40 dB |
Moderate | Normal spoken voice | 40-60 dB |
Severe | Loud spoken voice | 60-80 dB |
Profound | Shout | >80 dB |
A. Conductive Hearing Loss
Conductive hearing loss results from a mechanical disruption of the external auditory canal or middle ear. Several mechanisms may result in impairment of the passage of sound vibrations to the inner ear, such as obstruction (eg, cerumen impaction), mass loading (eg, middle ear effusion), stiffness (eg, otosclerosis), and discontinuity (eg, ossicular disruption). Conductive losses in adults are most commonly due to cerumen impaction or transient eustachian tube dysfunction from upper respiratory tract infection. Persistent conductive losses usually result from chronic ear infection, trauma, or otosclerosis. Perforations of the tympanic membrane may also result in a conductive hearing loss. Conductive hearing loss is often correctable with medical (eg, use of a hearing aid) or surgical (eg, repair of tympanic membrane and ossicular chain) therapy, or both. CT of the temporal bone may be used as an adjunct to physical examination to determine the potential cause of conductive hearing loss.
B. Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Sensorineural hearing losses are common in adults and generally result from deficits of the inner ear or central (brain) auditory pathway. Sensory hearing loss results from deterioration of the cochlea, usually due to loss of sensory hair cells within the organ of Corti. The most common form of sensorineural hearing loss is age-related hearing loss that manifests as a gradually progressive, predominantly high-frequency hearing loss. Other causes of sensorineural hearing loss include excessive noise exposure; head trauma; ototoxic medications, such as cisplatin-based chemotherapy; and systemic diseases.
While most types of sensorineural hearing loss are gradual, sensorineural hearing loss may be sudden. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss, often called idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, is considered an otologic emergency and may be treatable with oral or intratympanic corticosteroids if delivered within several weeks of onset. Long-term severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss due to deficits at the level of the inner ear may be correctable with surgery, such as cochlear implantation. Sensorineural hearing loss may also be due to deficits at the level of the central auditory pathway, including lesions involving the eighth cranial nerve, auditory nuclei, ascending tracts, or auditory cortex. Examples of central causes of hearing loss include acoustic neuroma, multiple sclerosis, and auditory neuropathy. Treatment of hearing loss due to central causes are usually aimed at addressing the underlying pathology.
US Preventive Services Task Force; KristAHet al. Screening for hearing loss in older adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325:1196. [PMID: 33755083] |
Evaluation of Hearing (Audiology)
In a quiet room, the hearing level may be estimated by having the patient repeat aloud words presented in a soft whisper, a normal spoken voice, or a shout. Normal spoken voice is about 60 decibels. A 512-Hz tuning fork is useful in differentiating conductive from sensorineural hearing loss. In the Weber test, the tuning fork is placed directly on the forehead or front teeth. In conductive losses, the sound is heard as louder in the ear with poorer hearing; however, in sensorineural losses, the sound radiates to the ear that hears better than the other ear. In the Rinne test, the tuning fork is placed alternately on the mastoid bone (bone conduction) and in front of the ear canal (air conduction). In conductive losses greater than 25 dB, bone conduction sounds louder than air conduction.
Formal audiometric studies are performed in a soundproofed room. Pure-tone thresholds in decibels (dB) are obtained over the range of 250-8000 Hz. Conductive losses create a gap between the air and bone thresholds, whereas in sensorineural losses, both air and bone thresholds are equally diminished. Speech discrimination measures the clarity of hearing, reported as percentage correct (90-100% is normal). Auditory brainstem-evoked response screening method is most commonly used in newborn screening and may determine the approximate location of the lesion (eg, cochlea or brain). MRI scanning is the most sensitive and specific test to determine the possible location of a defect resulting in sensorineural hearing loss.
Every patient who reports hearing loss should be referred for audiologic evaluation unless the cause is easily remediable (eg, cerumen impaction, otitis media). Immediate audiometric referral is indicated for patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss because it requires treatment (corticosteroids) within a limited several-week time period. Routine audiologic screening is recommended for adults who report hearing loss. There are evolving data that suggest an association between hearing loss, cognitive decline, and depression, pointing to a potential reversible cause with hearing rehabilitation.
FeltnerCet al. Screening for hearing loss in older adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2021;325:1202. [PMID: 33755082] IraceALet al. Longitudinal associations of subclinical hearing loss with cognitive decline. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022;77:623. [PMID: 34516645] PowellDSet al. Hearing impairment and cognition in an aging world. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2021;22:387. [PMID: 34008037] SharmaRKet al. Age-related hearing loss and the development of cognitive impairment and late-life depression: a scoping overview. Semin Hear. 2021;42:10. [PMID: 33883788] |
Hearing Amplification
Patients with hearing loss not correctable by medical therapy may benefit from hearing amplification. Contemporary hearing aids are comparatively free of distortion and have been miniaturized to the point where they often may be contained entirely within the ear canal or lie inconspicuously behind the ear. To optimize the benefit, a hearing aid must be carefully selected to conform to the nature of the hearing loss. Digitally programmable hearing aids are widely available and allow optimization of speech intelligibility and improved performance in difficult listening circumstances. Aside from hearing aids, many assistive devices are available to improve comprehension in individual and group settings, to help with hearing television and radio programs, and for telephone communication. In 2022, the US FDA changed exam and prescription mandates for hearing aids, which may both increase access and decrease cost of hearing rehabilitation devices.
For patients with conductive loss or unilateral profound sensorineural loss, bone-conducting hearing aids directly stimulate the ipsilateral cochlea (for conductive losses) or contralateral ear (profound unilateral sensorineural loss). In most adults with severe to profound sensory hearing loss, the cochlear implant—an electronic device that is surgically implanted into the cochlea to stimulate the auditory nerve—offers socially beneficial auditory rehabilitation. New trends in cochlear implantation include its use for only partially deaf patients, preserving residual hearing and allowing both acoustic and electrical hearing in the same ear, and for patients with single-sided deafness. An increasing number of insurance companies are paying for these expanded indications.
BuchmanCAet al. Unilateral cochlear implants for severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review and consensus statements. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146:942. [PMID: 32857157] CarlsonML.Cochlear implantation in adults. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1531. [PMID: 32294347] DixonPRet al. Health-related quality of life changes associated with hearing loss. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146:630. [PMID: 32407468] LindquistNRet al. Cochlear implants for single-sided deafness: quality of life, daily usage, and duration of deafness. Laryngoscope. 2023;133:2362. [PMID: 36254870] ZeitlerDMet al. American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force: Recommendations for determining cochlear implant candidacy in adults. Laryngoscope. 2024;134 (Suppl 3):S1. [PMID: 37435829] |