section name header

Basics

Description

General

  • Appendicitis is caused by an obstruction of the appendiceal lumen and can result in inflammation, edema, and the potential for rupture of the viscus.
  • Appendectomy is a surgical procedure that can be performed, open or laparoscopically, to remove the appendix when infection and/or inflammation are suspected or present. Removal is undertaken to avoid the complication of a ruptured appendix with resultant peritonitis.
  • Laparoscopic appendectomies are primarily performed today. Following trochar insertion and the establishment of a pneumoperitoneum, the cecum is identified and retracted in order to mobilize the appendix. An incision or window is made into the mesoappendix prior to clamping and ligating the base. The appendix may be removed through the trochar or placed into a bag depending on its size. Benefits over an open procedure include: Less postoperative pain, smaller incisions (better cosmetic result), and reduced length of stay. Drawbacks include: Greater cost, potentially longer operative time, and requirement of general anesthesia due to insufflation.
  • Open appendectomy involves adequate exposure of the cecum, followed by pulling of the cecum through the incision site to expose the attached appendix. The base is clamped and cut and drains are inserted prior to wound closure.
    • Laparoscopic cases may be converted to open when operating conditions are suboptimal for laparoscopy.
    • It is commonly performed for complicated appendicitis or patients with extensive previous intra-abdominal surgeries.
    • May be performed under regional anesthesia for patients who are at high risk for complications of general anesthesia (e.g., pregnancy, pulmonary hypertension).

Position

  • Open: Supine with arms out or tucked
  • Laparoscopy: Supine with arms tucked; surgeon stands on the left side of the patient. Rightward tilt of the bed and Trendelenburg position may facilitate surgical exposure.

Incision

  • Laparoscopy: 1 cm incision at the umbilicus, and two to three 5 mm incisions in the lower abdomen for the insertion of trochars.
  • Open: Transverse right lower quadrant incision (McBurney or Rockey-Davis)

Approximate Time

15–60 minutes for either approach

EBL Expected

Less than 75 mL

Hospital Stay

  • 24 hours for uncomplicated appendicitis
  • Ruptured or otherwise complicated appendicitis has an average length of stay of 5 days.

Special Equipment for Surgery

Laparoscopy equipment

Epidemiology

Incidence

  • In the US, ~250,000 cases of appendicitis annually
  • Most common in 10–19 year olds

Prevalence

In the US, approximately 7% of people are affected at some point in their lives.

Morbidity

Varies from 5% to 11% and is related to the perforation of the appendix and degree of peritonitis

Mortality

  • Overall rate of 0.2–0.8% related to appendicitis, not surgical intervention
  • Rate following appendectomy: 0–0.2%
  • Elderly have the highest mortality rate.
Anesthetic GOALS/GUIDING Principles

Diagnosis

Symptoms

History

Periumbilical pain that migrates to the right lower quadrant (RLQ) is present in approximately 50% of cases.

Signs/Physical Exam

  • RLQ pain, tenderness
  • Guarding, rebound on abdominal exam
  • Pain with rectal exam
  • Psoas sign; inflammation from retrocecal appendix
  • Palpation of the mass in the RLQ
Medications

Antibiotic therapy may be considered for nonsurgical candidates, such as those with severe lung disease or recent myocardial infarction.

Diagnostic Tests & Interpretation

Labs/Studies

  • KUB, ultrasound, and/or CT scan have reduced the incidence of "normal" appendixes mimicking appendicitis.
  • WBC count with differential
  • Beta-HCG, to rule out ectopic pregnancy as a cause of pain in females
  • Concomitant organ dysfunction may necessitate additional preoperative assessment such as EKG, basic metabolic panel, etc.
Pregnancy Considerations
Most common general surgery intervention during pregnancy with an incidence of 0.06–0.1%
Preoperative diagnosis is difficult in the setting of pregnancy. Additionally, the gravid patient has an elevated WBC at baseline.
An ultrasound diagnosis is preferred over CT scan to avoid radiation exposure.
The appendix is located at the umbilical level in the second trimester and the RUQ in the third trimester.
4% risk of pregnancy loss, 7% risk of early labor and delivery related to appendectomy

Treatment

PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION

Premedications

  • GI prophylaxis including a H2 blocker, non-particulate antacid, and possibly a pro-motility agent
  • Preoperative hydration and electrolyte repletion, as needed

Antibiotics/Common Organisms

  • One dose is adequate for uncomplicated disease.
  • Metronidazole plus a first-generation cephalosporin, aminoglycoside, or quinolone
  • Common organisms are Escherichia coli, Bacteroides, Klebsiella, Enterococcus, and Pseudomonas.
INTRAOPERATIVE CARE

Choice of Anesthesia

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy:
    • General endotracheal anesthesia (GETA)
  • Open appendectomy:
    • GETA
    • Spinal or epidural anesthesia with a T10 level is also possible.

Monitors

  • Standard ASA monitors
  • Foley, if patient has not voided in the immediate preoperative period, or per surgeon request to improve visualization

Induction/Airway Management

  • Sequential compression devices should be placed prior to induction.
  • Rapid-sequence induction with endotracheal intubation is often required unless a difficult airway is anticipated. If there is a potential for a difficult airway, consider an awake fiberoptic intubation.
  • Muscle relaxants: The speed of onset of succinylcholine is favorable; however, it may be contraindicated in certain patients (e.g., children, stroke, etc.). Non-depolarizing muscle relaxants administered at induction doses may not be reversible by the end of the case.
  • Place an orogastric tube after intubation for gastric emptying

Maintenance

  • Choice of inhalation agent
  • Muscle relaxation can enhance surgical exposure. If succinylcholine was used at induction, subsequent non-depolarizing administration may be needed.
  • If a laparoscopic approach is used, the initial insufflation may lead to bradycardia from vagal stimulation, which should resolve with time. Desufflation may be necessary if the patient becomes hemodynamically unstable.
  • As with other laparoscopic procedures, the pneumoperitoneum is created to enhance visualization. However, it can impair ventilation by decreasing lung compliance and functional residual capacity. Additionally, the Trendelenburg position is often implemented to displace bowel with gravity and can further impair ventilatory efforts.

Extubation/Emergence

The patient should be fully awake, fully reversed, and capable of protecting their airway to avoid aspiration.

Pediatric Considerations
Appendicitis is more difficult to diagnose in children because of an inability to obtain a good history. Younger children are more likely to present with perforated appendicitis because of this diagnostic challenge.
Surgery may be safely delayed until morning, without undertaking significant risk to the child.
Consider performing an ipsilateral transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block to improve pain control and decrease postoperative narcotic requirements.

Follow-Up

No need to continue antibiotics postoperatively for uncomplicated appendicitis

Bed Acuity
Analgesia
Complications

References

  1. Katkhouda N , Mason R , Towfigh S , et al. Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy: A prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005;242(3):439448.
  2. McGory M , Zingmond D , Tillou A , et al. Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a significant risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(4):534540.
  3. Sauerland S , Jaschinski T , Neugebauer EAM. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10:CD001546.
  4. Surana R , Quinn F , Puri P. Is it necessary to perform appendectomy in the middle of the night in Children?BMJ. 1993;306(6886):1168.

Additional Reading

See Also (Topic, Algorithm, Electronic Media Element)

Laparoscopy

Clinical Pearls

Author(s)

Emily L. Drennan , MD