section name header

Basics

Description
Epidemiology

Incidence

  • Peak incidence in the 6th and 7th decades with the mean age of diagnosis at 63 years
  • Males account for 65% of cases
  • Circadian and seasonal patterns have been described with peak frequency between 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM and during winter months.
  • 3.5 per 100,000 persons per year (US data)

Prevalence

Actual prevalence unknown since many patients (~20%) die prior to hospital presentation. Autopsy series report 1 acute aortic dissection for every 128 to 745 autopsies.

Morbidity

Neurologic complications are the main cause of disability among survivors.

Mortality

  • Acute dissection of the ascending aorta has a 30-day mortality rate of 20% with surgical repair and 50% with medical therapy alone.
  • Death most often results from aortic rupture, cardiac tamponade, stroke, and visceral ischemia.
Etiology/Risk Factors
Physiology/Pathophysiology
Anesthetic Goals/Guiding Principles

Diagnosis

Symptoms

History

  • 96% of acute aortic dissections are identified with the following prediction model:
    • Aortic pain with immediate onset, a tearing or ripping character, or both
    • Mediastinal widening, aortic widening, or both on chest radiography
    • Pulse differentials (absence of a proximal extremity or carotid pulse), blood pressure differentials (systolic pressure difference >20 mm Hg between arms), or both

Signs/Physical Exam

  • Hypertension (69% of distal and 36% of proximal dissections)
  • Hypotension, shock, or tamponade (27% of proximal dissections)
  • Pulse or blood pressure differentials (20%)
  • Focal neurologic deficits (12%)
  • Murmur of aortic insufficiency (32%)
  • Pleural effusion (left > right)
  • Horner syndrome
  • Superior vena cava syndrome
Diagnostic Tests & Interpretation

Labs/Studies

  • Baseline and serial cardiac biomarkers, BUN/Cr, CBC with platelets, coagulation profile and TEG, if available
  • ECG may be normal (~30%) or show nonspecific ST-T changes (40%), left ventricular hypertrophy (26%), ischemia (15%), or infarction (10%).
  • Chest radiograph findings include mediastinal widening (61%), abnormal aortic contour (49%), pleural effusion (19%), displacement/calcification of aorta (14%). Normal findings are present in 12% of patients.
  • CT angiography is quick, highly sensitive, and specific; 64-slice multidetector CT with cardiac gating may allow for simultaneous evaluation of pulmonary and coronary arteries.
  • TEE is highly sensitive for ascending aortic dissection and allows rapid evaluation of hemodynamic instability (tamponade, coronary dissection, valvular regurgitation, tension hemothorax, etc.).
  • MRI/MRA has high sensitivity and specificity, avoids radiation, and iodinated contrast; but is more time-consuming and contraindicated with metallic implants.
  • Aortography: Previously the reference standard, this is performed less often and rarely as the initial study.
CONCOMITANT ORGAN DYSFUNCTION
Circumstances to delay/Conditions
Classifications

Treatment

PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION

Premedications

  • Short-acting drugs permit rapid termination of effect, if desired, and should be considered.
  • Morphine, beta-blockers, and vasodilating drugs can be used to control pain and blood pressure. Esmolol is ultra-short-acting and has organ-independent elimination (metabolized within red blood cells).
  • Sodium nitroprusside may cause an increase in aortic dP/dt; it is generally added only after a negative inotrope is administered.
  • Nicardipine may be preferred in patients intolerant of beta-antagonists and does not cause a reflex tachycardia.
  • Enalaprilat may be useful in refractory hypertension due to renal artery compromise.
  • Phenylephrine and norepinephrine are preferred pressors due to a relative lack of associated increase in aortic dP/dt.
INTRAOPERATIVE CARE

Choice of Anesthesia

  • No superiority has been demonstrated with any given anesthetic technique.
  • for open repair, GETA is typically employed, alone or in combination with epidural anesthesia; epidural placement may be precluded by hemodynamic instability.
  • Evoked-potentials monitoring may influence technique (i.e., volatile anesthetic concentration, use of muscle relaxant).
  • for endovascular repair, local, regional, and general techniques may be used.

Monitors

  • ECG with ST-segment analysis
  • Temperature (central and peripheral sites if bypass is to be used)
  • Foley catheter
  • Arterial line: Right radial artery may be preferred if blood flow to the left subclavian artery is disrupted due to dissection or cross-clamp placement. Femoral artery insertion may permit monitoring of distal perfusion pressures.
  • Central venous access may be appropriate for IV access and administration of vasoactive medications.
  • Pulmonary artery catheterization can provide SvO2, SVR, CO, PAP.
  • TEE aids in diagnosis, anatomic localization, identification of complications, and characterization of valvular and ventricular function in real time.
  • Lumbar drains and evoked-potentials may be placed for patients at risk for spinal cord ischemia.
  • The potential for catastrophic hemorrhage necessitates appropriate vascular access, availability of blood products, rapid infuser system, and autologous red cell salvage.

Induction/Airway Management

  • Slow, controlled titration of medications to the desired effect can help maintain hemodynamic stability. Hypertension and tachycardia increase shear stress and risk of rupture.
  • Single-lumen ETT may be typically placed for a median sternotomy approach.
  • Lung isolation with a double lumen tube or bronchial blocker aids in the exposure of the descending aorta and is preferred for procedures using the lateral thoracotomy approach.

Maintenance

  • Thermoregulation: forced air and fluid warming systems are necessary due to significant heat loss with open procedures.
  • Fluid management: Maintenance of intravascular volume may be challenging due to significant hemorrhage and evaporative losses; no specific colloid or crystalloid strategy has emerged as superior.
  • Coagulation: Consumption and dilution of coagulation factors and platelets may be significant; replacement is guided by conventional coagulation studies as well as TEG, if available.
  • Renal protection: Maintenance of renal blood flow and urine output is essential; IV mannitol and fenoldopam can be employed to reduce the risk of kidney injury.

Extubation/Emergence

  • Ongoing cardiac or pulmonary instability, bleeding, hypothermia, or neurologic injury may necessitate continued mechanical ventilation; otherwise patients may be extubated at the conclusion of the procedure.
  • Pain, hypertension, and tachycardia should be anticipated and addressed.

Follow-Up

Bed Acuity

Intensive care unit

Complications

References

  1. Clouse WD , Hallett Jr JW , Schaff HV , et al. Acute aortic dissection: Population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:176180.
  2. Hagan PG , Nienaber CA , Isselbacher EM , et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): New insights into an old disease. JAMA. 2000;283:897903.
  3. Golledge J , Eagle KA. Acute aortic dissection. Lancet. 2008;372:5566.
  4. Penco M , Paparoni S , Dagianti A , et al. Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of aortic dissection. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:53G56G.
  5. von Kodolitsch Y , Schwartz AG , Nienaber CA. Clinical prediction of acute aortic dissection. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:29772982.
  6. Isselbacher EM , Cigarroa JE , Eagle KA. Cardiac tamponade complicating proximal aortic dissection: Is pericardiocentesis harmful? Circulation. 1994;90:23752379.

Additional Reading

See Also (Topic, Algorithm, Electronic Media Element)

Codes

ICD9
ICD10

Clinical Pearls

Author(s)

Michael L. Boisen , MD

David G. Metro , MD