MRSA infections have been reported in many countries in North America, Europe, and Asia. It is likely that MRSA is distributed in the horse population worldwide. MR-CoNS are ubiquitous.
Infections caused by MRS are not clinically discernable from those caused by susceptible strains. Clinical signs vary with the type of disease, and details are provided under specific topics.
Causes of specific staphylococcal dermatologic diseases are covered elsewhere. There should be no difference for infections caused by MRS.
Risk factors for methicillin-resistant staphylococcal dermatitis have not been reported. A history of MRSA infection or colonization on the farm should increase suspicion. Prior antimicrobial therapy and hospitalization are associated with a higher risk of colonization by MRSA. Infections often occur in the absence of identifiable risk factors.
Differential diagnoses vary with the type of dermatologic disease and are covered elsewhere.
These may be indicated to identify an underlying disease (e.g. hyperadrenocorticism).
Aims of treatment are to eliminate the clinical signs of infection and to limit the risk of transmission to other horses or humans. Addressing underlying risk factors is critical. Elimination of MRS from the body, at either the site of infection or colonization sites (e.g. nose, pharynx) would be desirable but is not the goal, because colonization with MRS after a successful clinical response is not uncommon.
Most cases can be managed on the farm or as outpatients. The main reasons for hospitalization would be severe infection and an inability of the owner to properly treat the horse.
Nursing care is dependent on the specific staphylococcal disease. Infection control precautions should be instituted as described below.
Medically, there is no reason to limit activity. The main reason to limit activity is for infection control. MRSA is transmissible to other horses and humans, and infected horses should be isolated. There is less concern with other MRS.
Horses should be prevented from licking sites where topical antimicrobials have been applied, as that might reduce efficacy or pose a risk for antimicrobial-associated diarrhea.
Prudent antimicrobial use is important to decrease the prevalence of MRSA in the population and to reduce the chance of a horse acquiring MRSA. The same probably applies to many other MRS, although it is likely that MR-CoNS are part of the normal microbiota and there are no effective means of eliminating normal commensals. Application of general infection control practices may be useful for restricting the spread and impact of MRS infections.
MRSA is a zoonotic pathogen, and transmission from colonized and infected horses to humans has been documented. Infection control precautions should be implemented to limit contact with infected horses. These include the use of barrier precautions (gloves, dedicated outerwear) whenever the horse or its environment is contacted, restricted contact, and careful attention to hand hygiene. People at higher risk for developing an MRSA infection, such as immunocompromised individuals, should not have contact with infected or colonized horses. The risk with other MRS is unclear and is likely minimal; however, it is sensible to implement the same precautions with any multidrug-resistant infection.
Bergström K, , , et al. Longitudinal study of horses for carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus following wound infections. Vet Microbiol 2013;163:388391.
Click here for Additional Further Reading