Vortioxetine for Depression in Adults
Vortioxetine appears to be more effective than placebo in the treatment of depressive symptoms. In comparison to SNRIs, there appears to be no advantage for vortioxetine. Level of evidence: "B"Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by study quality (high drop-out rates).
Clinical comment: No studies compared vortioxetine with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), which are usually recommended as first-line treatments for acute depression.
Summary
A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 15 studies with a total of 7746 subjects. Seven studies were placebo controlled; eight studies compared vortioxetine to serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). There were no studies that compared vortioxetine to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
- Vortioxetine vs. placebo: Vortioxetine was more efficacious across 3 efficacy outcomes: response (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.49; 14 studies, n=6220), remission (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.53; 14 studies, n=6220) and depressive symptoms measured using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale (MADRS) (MD -2.94, 95% CI -4.07 to -1.80; 14 studies, n=5566). There was no evidence of a difference in total dropout rates (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.19; 14 studies, n=6220). More patients discontinued vortioxetine than placebo because of adverse effects (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.81; 14 studies, n=6220) but fewer discontinued due to inefficacy (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.90; 14 studies, n=6220).
- Vortioxetine vs. other antidepressants:There were no clinically significant difference between vortioxetine and SNRIs as a class for response (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.00; 8 studies, n=3159) or remission (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.03; 8 studies, n=3155). There was a small difference favouring SNRIs for depressive symptom scores on the MADRS (MD 1.52, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.53; 8 studies, n=2807). There were no significant differences between vortioxetine and the SNRIs as a class for total dropout rates (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.08; 8 studies, n=3159), dropouts due to adverse events (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.08) and dropouts due to inefficacy (RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.70 to 3.30).Vortioxetine may be less effective than duloxetine in terms of response rates (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94; 6 studies, n=2392) and depressive symptoms scores on the MADRS scale (MD 1.99, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.83; 6 studies; n=2106). Against venlafaxine, meta-analysis of two studies found no statistically significant differences (response: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.25; n=767; depressive symptom scores: MD 0.02, 95% CI -2.49 to 2.54; n=701). In terms of number of participants reporting at least one adverse effect (tolerability), vortioxetine was better than the SNRIs as a class (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.94; 8 studies, n=3134) and duloxetine (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.95; 6 studies; n=2376).
References
- Koesters M, Ostuzzi G, Guaiana G et al. Vortioxetine for depression in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7():CD011520. [PubMed]