section name header

Evidence summaries

Wound Cleansing for Pressure Ulcers

There is insufficient evidence to support the use of any particular wound cleansing solution or technique for pressure ulcers. Level of evidence: "D"

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 3 studies with a total of 169 subjects. No studies compared cleansing with no cleansing. Two studies compared different wound cleansing solutions: a statistically significant improvement in Pressure Sore Status Tool scores occurred for wounds cleansed with saline spray containing Aloe vera, silver chloride and decyl glucoside (Vulnopur) compared to isotonic saline (p = 0.025), but no statistically significant change in healing was seen when water was compared to saline (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.21, 41.89). One study compared cleansing techniques; for pressure ulcers cleansed with pulsatile lavage, compared with sham (the lavage flow was directed into a wash basin positioned adjacent to the wound and not visible to the participants), there was a statistically significant reduction in ulcer volume at the end of the 3 week study period in the lavage group compared with the sham group (MD -6.60, 95% CI-11.23 to -1.97).

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by imprecise results (limited study size for each comparison) and by limitations in study quality (inadequate or unclear allocation concealment).

    References

    • Moore ZE, Cowman S. Wound cleansing for pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(3):CD004983. [PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords