section name header

Evidence summaries

Episiotomy for Vaginal Birth

Restrictive episiotomy policies is effective for reducing severe perineal trauma compared to routine episiotomy policies. Level of evidence: "A"

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 12 studies with a total of 6 177 women. In the routine episiotomy group, 61 to 100% of women had episiotomies, while the rate in the restrictive episiotomy group was 8% to 59%. Compared with routine use, restrictive episiotomy resulted in less severe perineal trauma . There was no clear difference in blood loss at delivery, Apgar score less than seven at five minutes, perineal infection, dyspareunia, or urinary incontinence.

Selective versus routine episiotomy: all vaginal births where operative vaginal delivery was not anticipated

OutcomeRelative effect(95% CI)Risk with control -Routine episiotomyRisk with intervention - Selective episiotomy (95% CI)of participants(studies)
Severe perineal/vaginal traumaRR 0.70(0.52 to 0.94)3.6 per 1002.5 per 100(1.9 to 3.4)5375(8)
Blood loss at delivery-The mean blood loss at delivery was 278 mL27 mL less (95% CI from 75 mL less to 20 mL more)336(2)
Babies with newborn Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutesno events0 per 100 501(20 per 100501 (2)
Perineal infectionRR 0.90(0.45 to 1.82)2 per 1002 per 100(0.9 to 3.6)1467(3)
Women with moderate or severe pain (measured by visual analogue scale)RR 0.71(0.48 to 1.05)45.1 per 10032 per 100(21.6 to 47.3)165(1)
Women with long-term dyspareunia ( 6 months)RR 1.14(0.84 to 1.53)12.9 per 10014.8 per 100(10.9 to 19.8)1107(3)
Women with long-term urinary incontinence( 6 months)RR 0.98(0.67 to 1.44)32.2 per 10031 per 100(21.5 to 46.3)1107(3)

    References

    • Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G et al. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;(2):CD000081. [PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords