section name header

Evidence summaries

Pharmacological Interventions for Cholestatic Pruritus in Adult Palliative Care Patients

Rifampicin and flumecinol may be more effective than placebo for cholestatic pruritus in patients with advanced disease. Level of evidence: "C"

The quality of evidence is downgraded by inconsistency (variability in results), and by imprecise results (few patients).

Summary

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 50 studies with a total of 1 916 adult subjects with 39 different treatments for pruritus in 4 different patient groups: uraemic pruritus (n=1 574), cholestatic pruritus caused by hepatobiliary diseases (n=276), pruritus associated with malignancies (n=26), and pruritus as a symptom associated with HIV (n=40). This evidence summary concerns cholestatic pruritus (CP).

Rifampin (VAS 0 to 100: MD 24.64, 95% CI 31.08 to 18.21, statistical heterogeneity I2 =95%; 2 studies, n=42) and flumecinol (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.39, statistical heterogeneity I2 =59%; 2 studies, n=69) were more effective for CP and showed a low incidence of adverse events compared to placebo. The opioid antagonist naltrexone reduced pruritus (VAS 0 to 10: MD 2.26, 95% CI 3.19 to 1.33, statistical heterogeneity I2 =55%; 2 studies, n=52) but increased the risk of adverse events (RR 4.07, 95% CI 2.07 to 8.00; 3 studies, n=116) compared to placebo. Large doses of opioid antagonists (e.g. naltrexone) could be inappropriate in palliative care patients because of the risk of reducing analgesia.

Clinical comments

Note

Date of latest search:

    References

    • Siemens W, Xander C, Meerpohl JJ et al. Pharmacological interventions for pruritus in adult palliative care patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(11):CD008320. [PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords