section name header

Evidence summaries

Chlorpromazine Versus Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs for Schizophrenia

There might possibly be no difference in efficacy between chlorpromazine and atypical antipsychotic drugs, but there might possibly be more side effects with chlorpromazine. However, the evidence is insufficient. Level of evidence: "D"

Comment:The quality of evidence is downgraded by study quality (unclear allocation concealment), inconsistency (heterogeneity in interventions) and indirectness (short follow-up time, all studies were conducted in China).

Summary

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 71 studies comparing chlorpromazine to olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine. Thirty-seven of the 45 studies were under 8 weeks in length.

  1. Chlorpromazine vs. olanzapine:In the short term, there appeared to be a significantly greater clinical response in people receiving olanzapine (RR 2.34, 95% CI 1.37 to 3.99; 3 RCTs, n = 204). There was no difference between drugs for relapse (RR 1.5, 95% CI 0.46 to 4.86; 1 RCT, n = 70), nor in average endpoint score using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) for mental state (MD 3.21, 95% CI 0.62 to 7.05; 4 RCTs, n = 245). There were significantly more extrapyramidal symptoms amongst people receiving chlorpromazine (RR 34.47, 95% CI 4.79 to 248.30; 2 RCTs, n = 298). Quality of life ratings using the general quality of life interview (GQOLI) - physical health subscale were more favourable with people receiving olanzapine (MD 10.10, 95% CI 13.93 to 6.27; 1 RCT, n = 61). There was no difference between groups for people leaving the studies early (RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.45 to 6.40; 3 RCTs, n = 139).
  2. Chlorpromazine vs. risperidone:In the short term, there appeared to be no difference in clinical response between chlorpromazine or risperidone (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.34; 7 RCTs, n = 475), nor in average endpoint score using the BPRS for mental state (MD 0.90, 95% CI 3.49 to 5.28; 4 RCTs, n = 247), or any observed extrapyramidal adverse effects (RR 1.7, 95% CI 0.85 to 3.40; 3 RCTs, n= 235). Quality of life ratings using the QOL scale were significantly more favourable with people receiving risperidone (MD 14.2, 95% CI 20.50 to 7.90; 1 RCT, n = 100). There was no difference between groups for people leaving the studies early (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.11; 1 RCT, n = 41).
  3. Chlorpromazine vs. quetiapine:In the short term, there appeared to be no difference in clinical response between chlorpromazine or quetiapine (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.06; 28 RCTs, n = 3241) nor in average endpoint score using the BPRS for mental state (MD 0.18, 95% CI 1.23 to 0.88; 6 RCTs, n = 548). Quality of life ratings using the GQOL1-74 scale were significantly more favourable with people receiving quetiapine (MD 6.49, 95% CI 11.30 to 1.68; 1 RCT, n = 59). Significantly more people receiving chlorpromazine experienced extrapyramidal adverse effects (RR 8.03, 95% CI 4.78 to 13.51; 8 RCTs, n = 644). There was no difference between groups for people leaving the studies early in the short term (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.41;12 RCTs, n = 1223).

Clinical comments

Note

Date of latest search:

    References

    • Saha KB, Bo L, Zhao S et al. Chlorpromazine versus atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;4():CD010631. [PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords