section name header

Evidence summaries

Cephalomedullary Nails Versus Extramedullary Implants for Extracapsular Hip Fractures in Older Adults

Cephalomedullary nails may not be better than extramedullary devices, most commonly the sliding hip screw, in terms of functional outcomes or mortality in the management of extracapsular hip fractures in older adults. Level of evidence: "C"

The quality of evidence is downgraded by study limitations (high or unclear risk of bias) and imprecision (few studies, different measures).

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 76 studies (66 RCTs, 10 quasi-RCTs) with a total of 10,979 participants. The mean ages of participants in the studies ranged from 54 to 85 years; 72% were women. The majority of the studies included a mix of fracture types. More than half of the studies were conducted before 2010 and care pathways may have differed from current standards of care. Few studies considered patient-relevant outcomes such as performance of activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, mobility, or delirium.

There was no difference in functional status or mortality T1. In addition, using a cephalomedullary nail in preference to an extramedullary device saves one superficial infection per 303 patients (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.96; 35 studies, n=5087) and leads to fewer non-unions (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.96; 40 studies, n=4959). However, the risk of intraoperative implant-related fractures was greater with cephalomedullary nails (RR 2.94, 95% CI 1.65 to 5.24; 35 studies, n=4872), as was the risk of later fractures (RR 3.62, 95% CI 2.07 to 6.33; 46 studies, n=7021).

Cephalomedullary nails compared to extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults.

OutcomesAnticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)Relative effect(95% CI)n of participants(studies), GRADE
Risk with extramedullary implantsRisk with cephalomedullary nails
Functional status 4 months on Zűckerman functional recovery score (0 to 44), and 100-point functional recovery scale; higher scores = better functionSMD 0.02 higher(-0.27 lower to 0.3 higher)188(2 studies), C
Mobility 4 months; n of participants with independent mobility594 per 1,000665 per 1000(600 to 730)RR 1.12(1.01 to 1.23)719(7 studies), D
Mortality 4 months83 per 1,00080 per 1000(66 to 98)RR 0.96(0.79 to 1.18)4603(30 studies), B
Mortality at 12 months204 per 1000202 per 1000(184 to 220)RR 0.99(0.90 to 1.08)7618(47 studies), B
Unplanned return to theatre (at end of follow-up, between 3-24 months)43 per 1,00049 per 1000(38 to 64)RR 1.15(0.89 to 1.50)8398(50 studies), C

    References

    • Lewis SR, Macey R, Gill JR et al. Cephalomedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022;(1):CD000093. [PubMed].

Primary/Secondary Keywords