section name header

Evidence summaries

Intracervical Prostaglandins for Induction of Labour

Intracervical prostaglandins appear to be effective for induction of labour compared to placebo, but may be inferior when compared to vaginal prostaglandins. Level of evidence: "B"

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 56 trials involving a total 7 738 women. The risk of not achieving vaginal delivery within 24 hours was decreased with intracervical prostaglandins E2 (PGE2) compared to placebo (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.79, 4 trials, n=198) but increased with intracervical PGE2 compared to vaginal PGE2 (RR 1.26; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.41, 11 trials, n=2 200). The risk of caesarean section was non-significantly reduced with intracervical PGE2 compared with placebo/no treatment (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.00, 27 trials, n=3 734), and not altered with intracervical vs vaginal PGE2 (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.22, 28 trials, n=3 781). The risk of hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes was not significantly increased with intracervical PGE2 vs placebo/no treatment (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.72 to 2.05, 12 trials, n=2 296) or with intracervical vs vaginal PGE2 (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.49, 13 trials, n=1 428). Intracervical dose was lower than vaginal dose.

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by study quality (unclear allocation concealment).

    References

    • Boulvain M, Kelly A, Irion O. Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD006971. [PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords