section name header

Evidence summaries

Cup Feeding Versus Bottle Feeding for Newborn Infants Unable to Fully Breastfeed

Cup feeding as a supplement to breastfeeding may have some benefits on breastfeeding rates up to 6 months of age compared to bottle feeding for preterm infants unable to fully breastfeed when transitioning from full nasogastric feeds to full breastfeeds. Level of evidence: "C"

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 5 studies with a total of 971 preterm infants with mean gestational ages at birth from 29 to 35 weeks. No studies comparing the intervention in the term newborn population were found. All studies compared cup versus bottle feeds as a supplement to breastfeeding when transitioning from full nasogastric feeds to full breastfeeds. Two studies reported results for weight gain, and there was no statistically significant difference between groups. Two studies reported average time to feed which showed no difference between groups. Two studies assessed length of hospital stay and there was considerable variation in results and in the direction of effect. Results for not breastfeeding at different time points favoured cup feeding, and are shown in table T1.

Cup feeding versus bottle feeding

OutcomeParticipants (studies)RR (95% CI)
Not breastfeeding at hospital discharge957 (4 studies)0.64 (0.49 to 0.85)1)
Not fully breastfeeding at hospital discharge893 (4 studies)0.61 (0.52 to 0.71)2)
Not breastfeeding at 3 months883 (3 studies)0.83 (0.71 to 0.97)
Not breastfeeding at 6 months803 (2 studies)0.83 (0.72 to 0.95)3)
1) statistical heterogeneity, I2 =72%; 2) I2 =57%; 3) I2 =55%
Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by study limitations (lack of blinding), and by inconsistency (variability in results).

References

  • Flint A, New K, Davies MW. Cup feeding versus other forms of supplemental enteral feeding for newborn infants unable to fully breastfeed. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(8):CD005092. [PubMed].

Primary/Secondary Keywords