section name header

Evidence summaries

Psychosocial Interventions for Recurrent Abdominal Pain in Childhood

Cognitive behavioural therapy and hypnotherapy may have some effect in reducing pain in the short term in children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain compared to usual care or wait-list control. Level of evidence: "C"

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by study limitations (lack of blinding of personnel and outcome assessment) and by imprecise results (small studies and few patients).

Summary

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 18 studies with a total of 928 children and adolescents between the ages of 6 and 18 years. No organic cause for this pain can be found on physical examination or investigation for the majority of such children. Treatment success occurred more often with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) compared to control after the intervention, but there was no evidence of treatment success at medium-term follow-up (table T1). There was no evidence of effects of intervention on pain intensity scores measured postintervention or at medium-term follow-up (table T1). There was no difference in quality of life or functional disability between the groups.

For hypnotherapy (including studies of guided imagery) compared to control, there was evidence of greater treatment success postintervention as well as reductions in pain intensity and pain frequency (table T2). For yoga therapy compared to control, there was no evidence of effectiveness on pain intensity reduction postintervention (SMD -0.31, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.05; Z = 1.69; P = 0.09; 3 studies; n=122; low-quality evidence).

Cognitive behavioural therapy compared with usual care or wait-list control for children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain

OutcomeOR(95% CI)Probable outcome with control or usual careProbable outcome with CBTNumber of participants(studies) Quality of evidence
Treatment success: postinterventionPooled OR 5.67 (1.18 to 27.32)211 / 1000494 / 1000175 (4) Very low
Treatment success: medium-term follow-up (between 3 and 12 months)Pooled OR 3.08(0.93 to 10.16)349 / 1000551 / 1000139 (3) Low
Pain intensity: postintervention Lower score equals less pain.-The pain score in the CBT groups was, on average, 0.33 SDs lower (95% CI -0.74 to 0.08) than in the control groups405 (7) Low
Pain intensity: medium-term follow-up (between 3 and 12 months) Lower score equals less pain.-The pain score in the CBT groups was, on average, 0.32 SDs lower (95% CI -0.85 to 0.20) than in the control groups301 (4) Low

Hypnotherapy compared with usual care or wait-list control for children and adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain

OutcomesOR(95% CI)Probable outcome with control or usual careProbable outcome with hypnotherapyNumber of participants(studies) Quality of evidence
Treatment success: postinterventionPooled OR 6.78 (2.41 to 19.07)136 / 1000525 / 1000146 (4) Low
Pain intensity: postintervention Lower score equals less pain.-The pain intensity score in the hypnotherapy groups was, on average, 1.01 SDs lower (95% CI -1.41 to -0.61) than in the control groups.146 (4) Low
Pain frequency: postintervention Lower score equals less pain.-The pain frequency score in the hypnotherapy groups was, on average, 1.28 SDs lower (95% CI -1.84 to -0.72) than in the control groups.146 (4) Low

Clinical comments

Note

Date of latest search: 9 june 2016

    References

    • Abbott RA, Martin AE, Newlove-Delgado TV et al. Psychosocial interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;(1):CD010971. [PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords