section name header

Evidence summaries

Active Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain

Active treatment consisting of proprioceptive training, relaxation and behavioural support may be more effective than home exercises or rest in chronic neck pain. Level of evidence: "C"

In a randomized comparative study with single-blind outcome assessments 1 the efficacy of a multimodal treatment emphasizing proprioceptive training (ACTIVE) was compared with activated home exercises (HOME) and recommendation of exercise (CONTROL) in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain. Seventy-six patients (22 men, 54 women) with chronic, nonspecific neck pain participated. Sixty-two participated the 1-year follow-up. Subjective pain and disability, cervical ranges of motion, and pressure pain threshold in the shoulder region were measured at baseline, at 3 months, and at 12 months. The ACTIVE treatment consisted of 24 sessions of proprioceptive exercises, relaxation, and behavioral support. The HOME regimen included a neck lecture and two sessions of practical training for home exercises and instructions for maintaining a diary of progress. The CONTROL treatment included a lecture regarding care of the neck with a recommendation to exercise. The average self-experienced total benefit was highest in the ACTIVE group, and the HOME group rated over the CONTROL group (P < 0.001). Differences between the groups in favour of the ACTIVE treatment were recorded in reduction of neck symptoms and improvements in general health and self-experienced working ability (P < 0.01-0.03). Changes in measures of mobility and pressure pain threshold were minor.

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by sparse data and indirectness of evidence; only subjective outcomes were improved.

References

  • Taimela S, Takala EP, Asklöf T, Seppälä K, Parviainen S. Active treatment of chronic neck pain: a prospective randomized intervention. Spine 2000 Apr 15;25(8):1021-7. [PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords