section name header

Evidence summaries

Motivational Interviewing for Alcohol Misuse in Young Adults

Motivational interviewing appears not to be effective for alcohol misuse in young adults compared with no intervention or usual care. Level of evidence: "B"

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by study limitations (unclear allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessment).

Summary

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 66 studies with a total of 17 901 subjects. Four trials were cluster randomised. Motivational interviewing was compared with control (placebo, no intervention or treatment as usual) or with alternative intervention (e.g. self-control training, skills-based training, confrontative feedback, skills-based counselling, 12-step facilitation, brief feedback, risk reduction, relapse prevention, cognitive behavioural therapy).At 4 or more months follow-up, effects were found for self-reported quantity of alcohol consumed (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.14; 95% CI -0.20 to -0.08 or a reduction from 13.7 drinks/week to 12.2 drinks/week; 28 trials, n=6676); frequency of alcohol consumption (SMD -0.11; 95% CI -0.19 to -0.03 or a reduction in the number of days/week alcohol was consumed from 2.74 days to 2.57 days; 16 trials, n=4390). A marginal effect was found for alcohol problems (SMD -0.08; 95% CI -0.15 to 0.00 or a reduction in an alcohol problems scale score from 8.91 to 8.18). No effects were found for binge drinking (SMD -0.05; 95% CI -0.12 to 0.01), drink-driving (SMD -0.11; 95% CI -0.31 to 0.09), or other alcohol-related risky behaviour (SMD -0.14; 95% CI -0.30 to 0.02).

Clinical comments

Note

Date of latest search: 2 October 2013

    References

    • Foxcroft DR, Coombes L, Wood S et al. Motivational interviewing for alcohol misuse in young adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(8):CD007025. [PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords