section name header

Evidence summaries

Endoscopic Pneumatic Dilation Versus Botulinum Toxin Injection in the Management of Primary Achalasia

Pneumatic dilatation (PD) is the more effective than botulinum toxin (BTX) treatment in the long term (greater than six months) for patients with achalasia. Level of evidence: "B"

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 7 studies with a total of 178 subjects.

There was no significant difference between pneumatic dilatation (PD) or botulinum toxin (BTX) treatment in remission within four weeks of the initial intervention; with a risk ratio of remission of 1.11 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.27). There was also no significant difference in the mean oesophageal pressures between the treatment groups; with a weighted mean difference for PD of -0.77 (95% CI -2.44 to 0.91, P = 0.37). Data on remission rates following the initial endoscopic treatment were available for three studies at six months and four studies at 12 months. At six months 46 of 57 PD participants were in remission compared to 29 of 56 in the BTX group, giving a risk ratio of 1.57 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.08, P = 0.0015); whilst at 12 months 55 of 75 PD participants were in remission compared to 27 of 72 BTX participants, with a risk ratio of 1.88 (95% CI 1.35 to 2.61, P = 0.0002). No serious adverse outcomes occurred in participants receiving BTX, whilst PD was complicated by perforation in three cases.

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by imprecise results (few patients).

References

  • Leyden JE, Moss AC, MacMathuna P. Endoscopic pneumatic dilation versus botulinum toxin injection in the management of primary achalasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;12():CD005046. [PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords