section name header

Evidence summaries

Single Agent Versus Combination Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer

Compared with single-chemotherapy agents, combination regimens show advantage for survival, tumor response and time to progression in women with metastatic breast cancer but they also produce more toxicity. Level of evidence: "A"

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 43 studies with a total of 9 742 women, 55% of whom were receiving first-line treatment for metastatic disease. For overall survival there was a statistically significant difference in favour of the combination regimens with no heterogeneity (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.93; 36 studies, n=7147). Results were very similar when trials of first-line treatment were analysed, and for analyses where the single agent was also included in the combination regimen. Combination regimens showed a statistically significant advantage for survival over single agent taxane (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.89; 8 studies, n= 2646), but not anthracycline (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.02; 16 studies, n= 2985). Combination regimens were associated with significantly better time to progression (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.82; 27 studies, n=6501) and response (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.45; 46 studies, n=9 044) although significant heterogeneity was observed probably due to clinical diversity of the participants and interventions. Women receiving combination regimens experienced a statistically significant detrimental effect on white cell count, increased alopecia and nausea and vomiting.

    References

    • Carrick S, Parker S, Thornton CE, Ghersi D, Simes J, Wilcken N. Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2):CD003372. [PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords