section name header

Evidence summaries

Cervical Stitch (Cerclage) for Preventing Preterm Birth in Singleton Pregnancy

Cervical cerclage appears to reduce the incidence of preterm birth compared with no treatment in women at risk of recurrent preterm birth, without statistically significant reduction in perinatal mortality or neonatal morbidity. Level of evidence: "B"

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by study limitations (unclear allocation concealment and unclear blinding of outcome assessment).

Summary

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 15 studies with a total of 3490 subjects.

When cerclage was compared with no treatment, cerclage probably leads to a reduced risk of perinatal death when compared with no cerclage, although the confidence interval (CI) crosses the line of no effect (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04; 10 studies, 2927 women; moderate quality evidence). Considering stillbirths and neonatal deaths separately reduced the numbers of events and sample size. Although the relative effect of cerclage is similar, estimates were less reliable with fewer data and assessed as of low quality (stillbirths RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.75; 5 studies, 1803 women; low quality evidence; neonatal deaths before discharge RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.39; 6 studies, 1714 women; low quality evidence). Serious neonatal morbidity was similar with and without cerclage (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.18; 6 studies, 883 women; low-quality evidence). Pregnant women with and without cerclage were equally likely to have a baby discharged home healthy (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.06; 4 studies, 657 women; moderate quality evidence).Pregnant women with cerclage were less likely to have preterm births compared to controls before 37, 34 (average RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.89; 9 studies, 2415 women; high quality evidence) and 28 completed weeks of gestation.Five subgroups based on clinical indication provided data for analysis (history-indicated; short cervix based on one-off ultrasound in high risk women; short cervix found by serial scans in high risk women; physical exam-indicated; and short cervix found on scan in low risk or mixed populations). There were too few trials in these clinical subgroups to make meaningful conclusions and no evidence of differential effects.

Two trials (129 women) compared cerclage to prevention with vaginal progesterone in high risk women with short cervix on ultrasound; these trials were too small to detect reliable, clinically important differences for any review outcome. One included trial compared cerclage with intramuscular progesterone (75 women) which lacked power to detect group differences.

Another Cochrane review [Abstract] 2 assessing cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments included 2 studies with a total of 73 subjects. One small study comparing cervical cerclage in combination with an antibiotic and tocolytic vs cervical cerclage alone did not show significant differences in neonatal morbidity, perinatal loss, or preterm birth. The other study did not provide usable data.

Clinical comments

Note

Date of latest search: 06 October February 2020

References

  • Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;(6):CD008991. [PubMed]
  • Eleje GU, Eke AC, Ikechebelu JI et al. Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;(9):CD012871.[PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords