The quality of evidence is downgraded by study limitations (unclear allocation concealment and lack of blinding).
A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 22 studies with a total of 2388 participants. Patients with acute upper GI bleeding with an endoscopically-confirmed diagnosis of bleeding peptic ulcer were included. The participants were patients admitted to hospital for the bleeding episode or in-patients who developed acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer while hospitalized for other reasons. The studies were categorized based on the cumulative dose of PPI received within the first 72 hours of treatment as follows:
Results of the main comparisons are given in table 1.
Outcome | Number of participants (studies) | Assumed risk*Medium/low dose PPI | Corresponding riskHigh dose PPI | Relative effect |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mortality | 1667 (12) | 3 per 100 | 3 per 100(2 to 5) | RR 0.85 (0.47 to 1.54) |
Re-bleeding | 1716 (13) | 9 per 100 | 11 per 100(9 to 14) | RR 1.27 (0.96 to 1.67) |
Surgery | 1270 (9) | 2 per 100 | 3 per 100(1 to 4) | RR 1.33(0.63 to 2.77) |
Length of hospital stay | 1069 (6) | The mean length of hospital stay was0.26 higher(0.08 lower to 0.6 higher) | ||
Further endoscopic treatment | 902 (9) | 7 per 100 | 9 per 100(6 to 12) | RR 1.39(0.88 to 2.18) |
* Median control group risk across studies |
Date of latest search:
Primary/Secondary Keywords