The quality of evidence is downgraded by study limitations (lack of/unclear allocation concealment).
A randomized, open-label controlled study 2 evaluating the efficacy of ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin G for early syphilis was conducted in 4 hospitals in Jiangsu Province. 230 subjects completed the follow-ups. Treatment comprised either ceftriaxone (1.0 g, i.v., once daily for 10 days) or benzathine penicillin (2.4 million units, i.m., once weekly for 2 weeks). A serological response was defined as a HASH(0x2fcfe80)4-fold decline in the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer. The serological response at 6 months of follow-up was observed in 90.2% in ceftriaxone group and 78.0% in benzathine penicillin group (P = .01). There was no significant difference between treatment groups in patients with primary or early latent syphilis, but among patients with secondary syphilis the difference was highly significant (95.8% vs 76.2%; P < .01). Moreover, patients exhibiting a Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction after treatment might have a shorter period before a serological response (P = .03).
A network meta-analysis 1 included 3 RCTs and 7 cohort studies assessing treatments with penicillin, doxycycline/tetracycline, and ceftriaxone for early syphilis. Used treatments were benzathine penicillin 2.4 MU. i.m. or 3 x 2,4 MU i.m or different doses procain penicillin, ceftriaxone 1 or 2 g i.m./i.v. for 14 to 21 days, or doxycycline 100mg twice a day for 14 days (tetracycline 500 mg orally, 4 times a day for 14 days). No significant differences existed in serological response rate at 12-month follow-up between any two of the 3 treatments (doxycycline/tetracycline vs. penicillin RR 1.01, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.14; ceftriaxone vs. penicillin RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.13; ceftriaxone vs. doxycycline/tetracycline RR 0.99, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.03), which was consistent with the outcomes of the direct meta-analysis. In addition, the direct meta-analysis indicated that, at 12-month follow-up, penicillin and ceftriaxone treatment groups had similar treatment failure rates (RR 0.92, 95%CI 0.12 to 6.93), while treatment failure rate was significantly lower among penicillin recipients than among doxycycline/tetracycline recipients (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.89).
A meta-analysis 3 of ceftriaxone comparing with penicillin included 7 RCTs involving 281 participants (159 patients with ceftriaxone and 122 patients with penicillin). There were no significant differences in 3-month response rate (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.42), 6-month response rate (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.38), 12-month response rate (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.32), relapse rate (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.84), serofast rate (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.12) or failure rate (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.03 to 15.76) in patients treated with ceftriaxone compared with those treated with penicillin.
There is an alert for bacterial drug resistance for macrolides.
When procaine penicillin is used, longer treatment is warranted.
Date of latest search: 2019-11-22
Primary/Secondary Keywords