section name header

Evidence summaries

Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection

Laparoscopic colorectal resection, as compared to conventional colorectal resection, appears to have clinically relevant advantages in selected patients under traditional perioperative treatment. Level of evidence: "B"

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 25 studies. Methodological quality of most of these trials was only moderate and perioperative treatment was very traditional in most studies.

Operative time was longer in laparoscopic surgery, but intraoperative blood was less than in conventional surgery. Intensity of postoperative pain and duration of postoperative ileus was shorter after laparoscopic colorectal resection and pulmonary function was improved after a laparoscopic approach. Total morbidity and local (surgical) morbidity was decreased in the laparoscopic groups. General morbidity and mortality was not different between both groups. Until the 30th postoperative day, quality of life was better in laparoscopic patients. Postoperative hospital stay was less in laparoscopic patients.

Authors' conclusion: If the long-term oncological results of laparoscopic and conventional resection of colonic carcinoma show equivalent results, the laparoscopic approach should be preferred in patients suitable for this approach to colectomy.

References

  • Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003145. [PubMed]

Primary/Secondary Keywords