A topic in Clinical Evidence 1 summarizes the evidence on the effectiveness of CABG versus medical treatment. 8 RCTs were included with a total of 3260 patients. RCTs performed up to the mid 1980s found a greater risk of death in the first year but a reduced risk at 5 - 10 years. A subsequent RCT 3 found that revascularisation decreased mortality at 2 years (absolute risk of death 1.1% with routine revascularisation vs 6.6% and 4.4% in the two medical treatment groups. Revascularization mortality or rates of myocardial infarction at 1 and 2 years vs medical treatment (AR of myocardial infarction or death 4.7% with revascularisation versus 8.8% with symptom guided treatment vs 12% with symptom plus electrocardiogram guided treatment. A recent RCT 2 found that at one year CABG reduced symtoms of angina but showed no difference in mortality or infarction (survival 96.0% with CABG v 98.5% with medical treatment alone; myocardial infarction free survival: 98% with CABG v 97% with medical treatment alone).
Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by indirectness (both medical treatment and surgical techniques have developed after the trials were performed).
Primary/Secondary Keywords