section name header

Evidence summaries

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after Fibrinolysis

Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) less than 12 hours after failed fibrinolysis compared to no PCI appears to reduce death or reinfarction. Level of evidence: "B"

A systematic review 1 including 15 studies with a total of 5253 subjects was abstracted in DARE. A meta-analysis of randomized trials that enrolled ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with fibrinolysis was performed to assess the potential benefits of: 1) rescue PCI (less than 12 hours after failed fibrinolysis) versus no PCI after failed fibrinolysis (5 studies, n=920); 2) systematic and early (within 24 hours) PCI, regardless of success of fibrinolysis, versus delayed or ischemia-guided PCI (6 studies, n=1507); 3) fibrinolysis-facilitated PCI (with less than 6 hours delay between fibrinolysis and PCI) versus primary PCI alone (4 studies, n=2679). The included studies were conducted during the 'stent era' (stenting rate greater than 25%) and the 'balloon era'. In studies evaluating systematic and early angioplasty conducted in the 'stent era', aspirin and thienopyridines were given to more than 80% of patients receiving early PCI and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists were given to between 10 and 30% of patients. The duration of follow-up in the included studies ranged from hospital stay to 1 year.

Rescue PCI for failed fibrinolysis reduced mortality (6.9% vs. 10.7%; OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.99) and the rate of death or reinfarction (10.8% vs. 16.8%; OR 0.60 95% CI 0.41 to 0.89) but increased major bleeding (11.9% vs. 1.3%; OR 9.05, 95% CI 3.71 to 22.06). Bleeding most commonly (82%) originated in the femoral sheath and no cases were fatal. Systematic and early PCI performed during the "stent era" led to a nonsignificant reduction in mortality compared with delayed or ischemia-guided PCI (3.8% vs. 6.7%; OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.05), to a 2-fold reduction in the rate of death or reinfarction (7.5% vs. 13.2%; OR 0.53 95% CI 0.33 to 0.83), and no significant increase in major bleeding (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.30). This benefit contrasted with a nonsignificant increase in the rate of both mortality (5.5% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.33) or death or reinfarction (9.6% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.06) observed in the "balloon era." Fibrinolysis-facilitated PCI was associated with more reinfarction as compared with primary PCI alone (5.0% vs. 3.0%; OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.51) without significant impact on mortality (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.83). There was no significant difference between strategies in the risk of major bleeding (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.05).

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by limitations in the review quality (study quality was not assessed).

References

  • Collet JP, Montalescot G, Le May M, Borentain M, Gershlick A. Percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis: a multiple meta-analyses approach according to the type of strategy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 Oct 3;48(7):1326-35. [PubMed] [DARE]

Primary/Secondary Keywords