section name header

Evidence summaries

Psychological Treatments for Insomnia

Psychological (cognitive behavioural) interventions may be more effective than no intervention or zopiclone for improving sleep in patients with insomnia. Level of evidence: "C"

A Cochrane review [Abstract] 1 included 6 studies with a total of 282 subjects. The final total of participants included in the meta-analysis was 224. The data suggest a mild effect of CBT for sleep problems in older adults, best demonstrated for sleep maintenance insomnia.

A systematic review 2 including 66 studies with a total of 1 538 subjects in experimental and 369 subjects in no-treatment groups was abstracted in DARE. The interventions included progressive muscular relaxation-based approaches, other relaxation techniques, paradoxical intention approaches, sleep restriction approaches, and combination treatments. The results for all treatments investigated were as follows (weighted mean effect):

  • Sleep onset latency: overall weighted mean effect 0.87 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.16)
  • Total sleep time 0.49
  • Number of nocturnal wakenings 0.63
  • Quality sleep ratings 0.94 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.60).

Comment: The review has many methodological problems. Controlled and uncontrolled studies were analysed together.

In a subsequent RCT 3 adults (mean age 60.8 y; 22 women) with chronic primary insomnia were assigned to CBT (sleep hygiene, sleep restriction, stimulus control, cognitive therapy, and relaxation; n = 18), sleep medication (7.5-mg zopiclone each night; n = 16), or placebo medication (n = 12) for 6 weeks. CBT resulted in improved short- and long-term outcomes compared with zopiclone. For most outcomes, zopiclone did not differ from placebo. Participants receiving CBT improved their sleep efficiency from 81.4% at pretreatment to 90.1% at 6-month follow-up compared with a decrease from 82.3% to 81.9% in the zopiclone group. Participants in the CBT group spent much more time in slow-wave sleep (stages 3 and 4) compared with those in other groups, and spent less time awake during the night. Total sleep time was similar in all 3 groups; at 6 months, patients receiving CBT had better sleep efficiency using polysomnography than those taking zopiclone.

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by imprecise results (limited study size for each comparison) and by indirectness (differences in studied interventions and outcomes).

References

Primary/Secondary Keywords