section name header

Authors

Authors: Alexander B. Olawaiye, Ian Hagemann, Christopher Otis, Donna M. Gress, Priya Bhosale, Jana Vandenberg, Brian A. Rous, Lee-may Chen, Mauricio Cuello, Daniel C. Sullivan, Thomas Baker, Barbara Crothers, Christi Cox, Uppal Shitanshu, Bunja Rungruang, Adriana Bermudez, Lorraine Portelance, Keiichi Fujiwara, Matt Powell, and David G. Mutch, for the American Joint Committee on Cancer Expert Panel on Cancers of the Female Reproductive Organs

Other Contributors:

Acknowledgements and disclaimers: With guidance from Kay Washington, Heidi Nelson, Elaine Alexander, Vicki Bernard, AJCC Staff, AJCC Expert Panel for Tumors of the Female Reproductive Organs, AJCC Editorial Committee, and AJCC Executive Committee

We would like to acknowledge Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) for its support of this work, provided, in part, under cooperative agreement NU58DP006459 and the subject matter expertise provided by Vicki Benard. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the CDC or NPCR.

Author contributions: ABO, DGM, DMG, and PB wrote the manuscript. IH, CO, JV, L-MC, BAR, MC, TB, and DCS performed critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. BC, CC, VB, US, BR, AB, LP, KF, and MP reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Alice Chen Kitterman revised the illustrations.

The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors (TB, BC) and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Army/Navy/Air Force, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government.

Chapter Summary

Cancers Staged Using This Staging System

Carcinomas and carcinosarcomas arising primarily in the cervix are staged in this protocol.

Cancers Not Staged Using This Staging System

These histopathologic types of cancer…Are staged according to the classification for…

Sarcomas

Lymphomas

Melanomas

Corpus uteri sarcoma

Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas

Not staged

The following protocol is intended to standardize communication of critical components of cancer staging. It includes corresponding explanatory notes that provide the level of evidence for each critical element. While the focus of this protocol with synoptic report format is on cancer staging for clinical care and registry support, information on additional and emerging prognostic factors is included. Additional information on staging may be found in the AJCC 8th Edition Chapter 1: Principles of Staging on the AJCC website cancerstaging.org.

Synoptic Staging Report Format

Explanatory Nodes

Supplemental Information

Instructions for the use of this synoptic staging report:

This synoptic staging report format was designed to demonstrate documentation of critical elements for AJCC stage classifications of primary carcinomas (including carcinosarcomas) of the uterine cervix.

Explanatory notes are provided for further descriptions and specifications for each data element.

Summary of Changes

ChangeDetails of ChangeLevel of Evidence
Federation Internationale de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique (FIGO) staging updatesAll imaging modalities are now used in staging.N/A
Definition of Primary Tumor (T)The T1b definition has been modified.I
Definition of Regional Lymph Nodes (N)N1 and N2 categories for pelvic and para-aortic nodes have been added.I
AJCC Prognostic Stage GroupsNodal involvement is now included in stage grouping.I
Histopathologic TypeThe histopathology list has been updated to include HPV-associated and HPV-independent carcinomas.I

Classifications specify the timeframe in the patient's care and the criteria used to assign TNM. The same classification should be used throughout the assignment of TNM and stage group.

Additional classifications for recurrence/retreatment and autopsy:

CodeDescription
C53.0Endocervix
C53.1Exocervix
C53.8Overlapping lesion of cervix uteri
C53.9Cervix uteri

Clinical Examination (Note CE)

Imaging (Note 1)

Diagnostic Procedures/Surgical Treatment

This table is a simplified algorithm of the investigations and procedures required to generate cervical cancer clinical TNM staging information.

Its purpose is to provide clarity regarding appropriate modalities to use in determining the individual categories of the cervical cancer clinical TNM staging.

DIAGNOSTIC WORKUPDESCRIPTIONSPECIFIC CONTRIBUTION TO TNM CATEGORY
Clinical exam
ColposcopySize, local spreadT1a-T1b
BiopsyMicroscopic confirmationT1a-T4
Endocervical curettageMicroscopic confirmationT1a-T1b
Conization, cone biopsyLoop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)Microscopic confirmationT1a1 - may be treatment
Inspection and palpationVisible and palpable lesionsT1b-T4
Exam under anesthesia (EUA)CystoscopyProctoscopySize, spread to vagina, parametrium, or pelvic wallBladder or rectum mucosa involvementT1b-T4
Imaging
СТChest/abdomen/pelvis for T1b-T4T1b-T4, NO-2: T1a not seen on imaging
PET/CT (whole body)Base of neck to mid-thighT1b-T4, NO-2, MO-1
MRIPelvis - define extent of local diseaseT1b-T3b, NO-1; T1a not seen on imaging
USPelvis - define extent of local diseaseTIL-T3b, NO-1; T1a not seen on imaging
Intravenous urography (IVP)HydronephrosisT3b
X-ray lungs, skeletonPulmonary metastasisM1 distant metastasis
Labs
p16Immunohistochemistry (IHC), microscopyHistopathological classification

This table is a simplified algorithm of the investigations and procedures required to generate cervical cancer pathological TNM staging information.

Its purpose is to provide clarity regarding appropriate modalities for the pathologist and managing physician to use in determining the individual categories of the cervical cancer pathological TNM staging.

CATEGORYSPECIMENPATHOLOGISTMANAGING PHYSICIAN (Stage Documented by Cancer Registry)
General Information
  • Assignment of PTNM categories are based on surgical resection specimen, as well as intraoperative findings, biopsy procedures and clinical evaluation up to the point of definitive surgical treatment, if available
  • All other surgical procedure specimens use CTNM. For example, biopsy of a positive regional lymph node without surgical resection of the primary carcinoma is classified as cN1
  • Assignment of PTNM categories for the patient requires use of information from all biopsy procedures performed during the clinical evaluation up to and including definitive surgical treatment
  • Requires information from clinical assessment or imaging studies or interoperative findings to assign PTNM categories (may not change pTNM, but must be considered)
PTXNot for use by pathologist; assigned only by managing physicianMay assign if unable to determine pT category after surgical resection
pTONo tumor found in specimen and never identified on diagnostic biopsiesNo tumor found in specimen and never identified on diagnostic biopsies
PT1Conization specimen, trachelectomy, simple or radical hysterectomyPathologic information from surgical specimen(s) onlyPathology Report(s)
pT1a
pT1a1
pT1a2
pT1bIf unable to determine greatest dimension from microscopic examination of surgical specimen(s), may use clinical or imaging measurement, if availablePathology Reports +/- appropriate imaging studies, interoperative findings and clinical evaluation
pT1b1
pT1b2
pT1b3
pT2Simple or radical hysterectomy
pT2a
pT2a1
pT2a2
pT2bPerineural invasion of the parametrium qualifies as parametrial involvement
pT3
pT3a
pT3bMay require clinical or intraoperative findings of hydronephrosis or non-functioning kidney to assign pT3b
pT4May require biopsy proven documentation of bladder/rectum or adjacent organ spread to assign pT4
pNXNot for use by pathologist; assigned only by managing physician
  • May assign if unable to determine pN category
  • No regional node(s) sampled or resected
pN0Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA), core needle biopsy, sentinel node biopsy, lymph node dissection (including procedures performed prior to definitive surgical resection)Note: These procedures in the absence of a surgical resection are cNRequires:
  • At least one lymph node sampled
  • May require information from a previous node biopsy procedure to assign pN category
  • For FNA or core biopsy: use (f) modifier
  • For sentinel node biopsy: use (sn) modifier

Primary site surgical resection is required to assign pN

Requires:
  • Same information as the pathologist
  • Supplement with clinically positive nodes from examination or imaging
pN0(i+)
pN1
pN1mi
pN1a
pN2
pN2mi
pN2a
cM0Not assigned by pathologistWhen no clinical or pathologic evidence of metastatic disease, assign cM0
cM1Not assigned by pathologistSigns/symptoms of distant metastasis, and/or imaging findings, assign cM1
pM1Pathologic confirmation of metastatic disease by any method
  • Do not use pMX or pM0
  • Pathologic confirmation includes procedures performed prior to definitive resection
  • Uterine serosa or adnexal involvement is considered M1 disease
  • Do not use pMX or pM0
  • pM1 includes all clinically confirmed metastasis if at least one metastatic site is confirmed microscopically
  • Uterine serosa or adnexal involvement is considered MI disease

Introduction

Cervical cancer is the third most common gynecologic cancer in the United States and the most common gynecologic cancer worldwide.3

Most women who develop cervical cancer are in developing countries, as it is predominantly a disease of women with poor access to surveillance and advanced imaging technologies. In this version of AJCC staging, information from all imaging modalities may now be incorporated into cervical cancer clinical and pathological staging. These modalities include X-rays, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and positron emission tomography (PET). In addition to clinical examination, imaging findings, such as nodal and parametrial involvement, are used to determine treatment planning. Treatment modalities include surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Furthermore, nodal involvement, along with tumor size and tumor volume, are prognostic factors.4-7 Response to treatment also may be assessed with additional imaging at key intervals, and salvage interventions, if needed, may be undertaken to improve outcome.8 If for any reason information from imaging is not obtainable, stage should be assigned on the basis of the extent of information available to the clinician. Assignment of the T category based purely on clinical observatgions is acceptable.

Human papilomaviruses (HPV) have been identified as the main causative agent for cervical cancer, and HPV can be found in most cervical cancers. However, not all cervical cancers are assoicated with infections from HPV. The etiologic relationship between cervical cancer and HPV is of prognostic significance as HPV-independent cervical cancers generally have a poorer prognosis.9

Classification Rules

Introduction to TNM Staging Classification

Stage may be defined at several time points in the care of the cancer patient. To properly stage a patient's cancer, it is essential to first determine the time point in a patient's care. These points in time are termed classifications and are based on time during the continuum of evaluation and management of the disease. Then, T, N, and M categories are assigned for a particular classification (clinical, pathological, posttherapy, recurrence, and/or autopsy) by using information obtained during the relevant time frame, sometimes also referred to as a staging window. These staging windows are unique to each particular classification and are set forth explicitly in the Supplemental Information. The prognostic stage groups then are assigned using the T, N, and M categories, and sometimes also site-specific prognostic and predictive factors.

Among these classifications, the two predominant are clinical classification (i.e., pretreatment) and pathological classification (i.e., after surgical treatment as initial therapy).

Note C: Rules for Clinical TNM Classification

Clinical stage classification is based on patient history, physical examination, and any imaging done before initiation of treatment. Imaging study information may be used for clinical staging, but clinical stage may be assigned based on whatever information is available. No specific imaging is required to assign a clinical stage for any cancer site. When performed within this framework, biopsy information on regional lymph nodes and/or other sites of metastatic disease may be included in the clinical classification.

See General Staging Rules Table and Stage Classifications Table in Supplemental Information for additional guidance, including the time frame/staging window for determining clinical stage.

Clinical stage is important to record for all patients because:

Clinical stage may be the only stage classification by which comparisons can be made across all patients, because not all patients will undergo surgical treatment before other therapy, and response to treatment varies. Differences in primary therapy make comparing groups of patients difficult if that comparison is based on pathological assessment. For example, it is difficult to compare patients treated with primary surgery with those treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery or neoadjuvant therapy.

Clinical classification is based on evidence acquired from the date of diagnosis until initiation of primary treatment. Examples of primary treatment include definitive surgery, radiation therapy, systemic therapy, and neoadjuvant radiation and systemic therapy.

Clinical Classification

The clinical stage should be determined before definitive therapy begins, and the clinical stage must not be changed because of subsequent findings once treatment has started; the only exception to this is in early cervical cancer, in which primary surgery can give staging information and at the same time represents the definitive therapy. If there is doubt regarding the stage to which a particular cancer should be assigned, the lesser stage should be selected. This classification applies only to carcinomas, including carcinosarcomas. There should be histologic confirmation of the disease.

A description of the cervical tumor size is important, especially for stage I and II cancers, for which tumor size has prognostic utility. The 2018 Federation Internationale de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique (FIGO) staging classification has adopted T subcategories based on tumor size (4 cm: T2al; >4 cm: T2a2) for cervical carcinoma spreading beyond the cervix but not to the pelvic wall or lower third of the vagina (T2 lesions).10

Imaging by all modalities may be incorporated into clinical staging. Ultrasonography and roentgenography of the lungs and skeleton are recommended worldwide. If available, CT, MRI, or PET may supplement or replace some of these more traditional tests. PET is usually combined with CT if both tests are available. In clinical practice, selectivity is applied regarding which tests are done even when all these tests are available. If a whole-body PET/CT is done, for example, all other imaging tests except pelvic MRI become unnecessary.

Lymph node status to assign CN may be assessed by surgical means (radiologic-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA], laparoscopic or extraperitoneal biopsy, sentinel node mapping, or lymphadenectomy) or by imaging technologies (CT, MRI, or PET). If the cN is determined by FNA or core biopsy, the (f) suffix is added, for example, cN1a(f). If the cN is determined by a sentinel node procedure, then the (sn) suffix is used. The results of these examinations or procedures may be used to determine clinical staging and to develop a treatment plan and prognostic information. Single tumor cells or small clusters of cells smaller than 0.2 mm in greatest diameter are classified as isolated tumor cells (ITCs). These may be detected by routine histology or by immunohistochemical methods. They are designated as NO(i+) and are not considered nodal metastases.

If nodal metastases are identified, it is important to identify the anatomic location of the involved nodes (pelvic lymph nodes and/or para-aortic lymph nodes) and the methodology by which the diagnosis was established (pathological or radiologic).

Note P: Rules for Pathologic TNM Classification

Classification of T, N, and M after surgical treatment is denoted by use of a lowercase p prefix: pT, pN, and cM0, cM1, or pM1. The purpose of pathological classification is to provide additional precise and objective data for prognosis and outcomes, and to guide subsequent therapy.

Pathological stage classification is based on clinical stage information supplemented/modified by operative findings and pathological evaluation of the resected specimens. This classification is applicable when surgery is performed before initiation of adjuvant radiation or systemic therapy.

See General Staging Rules Table and Stage Classifications Table in Supplemental Information for additional guidance.

Pathological Classification

Cervical excision (cone or loop electrosurgical excision procedure [LEEP]) should be the minimum required to assign staging (pT category) for cervical cancer that is not visible and apparently confined to the cervix. Cervical biopsies or endocervical curettage are not sufficient to determine the T category. Depending on the stage of disease at diagnosis, other suitable surgical treatments to determine the pT category include radical trachelectomy and simple or radical hysterectomy. Pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node biopsy, sentinel lymph node assessment, or full lymphadenectomy can all be used to determine the pN category.

In surgically treated cases, the pathologist?s findings permit the most accurate measurement of the local extent of disease. These findings should take priority over clinical- or image-based staging and should be used for the pathological staging of disease assigned by the managing physician.

Occasionally, the cancer is incompletely resected with a first procedure, and subsequent resection removes the residual tumor; or the resection is completed in 1 procedure, but there are 2 or more specimens each containing part of the cancer. The pathologist should make an effort to ascertain tumor size from the 2 specimens, realizing that this is an inherently inaccurate method of determining overall tumor size, with expected interobserver variation. Correlation with imaging data may be helpful in such cases.

Pathologists are cautioned that certain prosection techniques may result in measuring the circumference of the tumor instead of the diameter, which in turn will overestimate the size of the tumor if not interpreted in 3-dimensional context.

Although staging under AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition11 considered horizontal spread for T1a sub-category determination, this information has been dropped in the current staging update. Some stakeholders still feel that horizontal spread may have prognostic significance in early stage cervical cancer. We encourage collection of these data to create an opportunity for future analysis.

Perineural invasion in the parametrium is sufficient to qualify as pT2b disease and has been reported to be an adverse prognostic feature in a retrospective series.12

Methods of lymph node sampling may include FNA, biopsies, sentinel node procedures, and lymphadenectomy. For TNM staging, the number of resected lymph nodes is immaterial, but the number of resected and positive nodes should be recorded. Pathological classification based on the histologic status of those lymph nodes should be recorded, with the caveat that nodes with ITCs are not considered positive for staging purposes.

MO cannot be assigned pathologically. PM1 requires microscopic confirmation of metastatic disease. Involvement of uterine serosa and adnexa are considered M1 disease. In the absence of clinical or pathological evidence of M1 disease, CMO should be assigned. MX is not a valid category and should not be used.

Note YC: Rules for Posttherapy Clinical TNM Classification

Stage determined after treatment for patients receiving systemic and/or radiation therapy alone or as a component of their initial treatment, or as neoadjuvant therapy before planned surgery, is referred to as posttherapy classification. It also may be referred to as post neoadjuvant therapy classification.

See General Staging Rules Table and Stage Classifications Table in Supplemental Information for additional guidance.

Observed changes between the clinical classification and the posttherapy classification may provide clinicians with information regarding the response to therapy. The clinical extent of response to therapy may guide the scope of planned surgery, and the clinical and pathological extent of response to therapy may provide prognostic information and guide the use of further adjuvant radiation and/or systemic therapy.

Classification of T, N, and M after systemic or radiation treatment intended as definitive therapy is denoted by use of a lowercase yc prefix: yct, ycN, c/pM. The c/pM category may include cMO, CM1, or pM1. The post neoadjuvant therapy assessment of the T and N (YTNM) categories uses specific criteria. In contrast, the M category for post neoadjuvant therapy classification remains the same as that assigned in the clinical stage before initiation of neoadjuvant therapy (e.g., if there is a complete clinical response to therapy in a patient previously categorized as CM1, the M1 category is used for final yc and yp staging).

See Stage Classifications Table in Supplemental Information for additional guidance.

Note YP: Rules for Posttherapy Pathological TNM Classification

Classification of T, N, and M after systemic or radiation neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery is denoted by use of a lowercase yp prefix:ypt, ypN, c/PM. The c/PM category may include cMO, MI, or PM1. The post neoadjuvant therapy assessment of the T and N (yTNM) categories uses specific criteria. In contrast, the M category for post neoadjuvant therapy classification remains the same as that assigned in the clinical stage before initiation of neoadjuvant therapy (e.g., if there is a complete clinical response to therapy in a patient previously categorized as CM1, the M1 category is used for final yc and yp staging).

The time frame for assignment of ypT and ypN should be such that the post neoadjuvant therapy surgery and staging occur within a period that accommodates disease-specific circumstances.

Criteria: First therapy is systemic and/or radiation therapy followed by surgery.y-pathological (yp) classification is based on the:

  • y-clinical stage information, and supplemented/modified by
  • operative findings, and
  • pathological evaluation of the resected specimen.

Examples of treatments that satisfy the definition of neoadjuvant therapy for cervix may be found in sources such as the NCCN Guidelines, ASCO guidelines, or other treatment guidelines. Systemic therapy includes chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and immunotherapy. Not all medications given to a patient meet the criteria for neoadjuvant therapy (e.g., a short course of therapy that is provided for variable and often unconventional reasons, should not be categorized as neoadjuvant therapy).

See Stage Classifications Table in Supplemental Information for additional guidance.

Note R: Rules for Recurrence/Retreatment TNM Classification

Staging classifications at the time of retreatment for a recurrence or disease progression is referred to as recurrence classification. It also may be referred to as retreatment classification. Classification of T, N, and M for recurrence or retreatment is denoted by use of the lowercase r prefix: rct, reN, rc/rpM, and rpT, rpN, rc/rpM. The rc/rpM may include rcMO, rcM1, or rpMI.

See Stage Classifications Table in Supplemental Information for additional guidance.

Note A: Rules for Autopsy TNM Classification

Staging classification for cancers identified only at autopsy is referred to as autopsy classification. This classification is used when cancer is diagnosed at autopsy and there was no prior suspicion or evidence of cancer before death. All clinical and pathological information obtained at the time of death and through post-mortem examination is included. Classification of T, N, and M at autopsy is denoted by use of the lowercase a prefix: aT, aN, aM.

See Stage Classifications Table in Supplemental Information for additional guidance.

Note CE: Clinical Examination

Careful clinical examination should be performed in all cases, preferably by an experienced examiner and with the patient under anesthesia. Examination under anesthesia (EUA) allows the clinician to optimally visualize and palpate the tumor without subjecting the patient to undue discomfort. EUA is typically coupled with colposcopy, cystourethroscopy, rigid proctoscopy, and biopsies of the primary tumor and suspected mucosal surfaces.

Note I: Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the preferred modality for local assessment of cervical cancer.13 Contrast-enhanced CT does not have the soft-tissue resolution necessary to evaluate the local extent of the tumor and may not be helpful in assessing early disease, specifically in patients who want to undergo fertility-preserving surgery.

Determination of lymph node metastases on cross-sectional imaging is based on lymph node size, with abnormal being >1 cm in the short axial dimension. Hybrid PET/CT also may be used to determine lymph node status in patients who have locally advanced cancer. Metabolically active lymph nodes of any size on PET/CT are considered metastatic, unless there is another known cause for metabolic activity. PET/CT is considered superior to other modalities in evaluating for extrapelvic disease and bone metastases.

MRI

MRI has excellent soft-tissue contrast resolution. Intravaginal gel is recommended prior to imaging of the pelvis in the setting of cervical cancer staging evaluation. The vaginal gel helps distend the vagina, provides better assessment of tumor extension to the vagina, and may help guide radiation treatment planning. A prospective multicenter trial in patients with early-stage cervical cancer showed a sensitivity of 53% for MRI versus 29% for clinical examination to help detect parametrial extension.14

MRI is superior to CT scans or clinical examinations owing to its superior soft-tissue resolution in determining tumor size (measured as the largest diameter of the tumor in the axial plane or the craniocaudal dimension), as well as in assessing the tumor's local relationship with the surrounding structures.15-18

Stage IB disease can be detected on MRI with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 98%. Tumors <1 cm can be detected on dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).19-21

With its better soft-tissue resolution, MRI has a sensitivity of 90% to 98% in the detection of internal os involvement.13,22,23 It is specifically useful in patients undergoing trachelectomy. However, MRI has limited ability to assess postbiopsy inflammatory changes because postbiopsy changes may appear as focal areas of enhancement, which can be mistaken as tumor. This limitation can be overcome by correlating with the diffusion-weighted sequence along with apparent diffusion coefficient maps, which have been able to to differentiate the 2 entities.

Despite these advances with MRI techniques, stage IA disease may not be visible on MRI because it is microscopic and can be better assessed on pathology. MRI has the ability to clearly define the tumor's relationship with the surrounding structures. It can assess vaginal involvement with an accuracy of 86% to 93%.22,24,25 It is particularly useful when assessment of the vaginal apex may be difficult on physical examination owing to pelvic pain or agglutination.

Disruption of the cervical stroma on MRI suggests parametrial extension, and this can increase the T category from T2a to T2b. However, microscopic invasion of the parametrium may not be visible on imaging and may result in false-negative findings, whereas inflammation surrounding the tumor may yield a false-positive finding. One study has shown that MRI accompanied by clinical examination increases sensitivity for parametrial invasion and helps select surgical candidates with a higher accuracy.22

Soft-tissue extension from the tumor to the adjacent organs as seen on MRI has a 100% reported accuracy in assessing involvement of the rectum22 or bladder invasion and thus can reliably exclude category T4 disease. This can be assessed on postcontrast T1-weighted imaging or the T2-weighted nonfat saturated sequence.

MRI has a specificity of 96.8% and a low sensitivity of 50% for pelvic nodal metastasis versus 66.6% and 100%, respectively, for para-aortic nodal metastasis.22,27-30 The low sensitivity may reflect the fact that tumor-involved lymph nodes are mostly detected by their size on imaging, which may appear normal in the early metastatic process. The cutoff value used to predict pathologic lymph nodes on imaging is 0.8 to 1.0 cm in the short axis. However, the sensitivity of MRI increases when detecting lymph node metastasis in bulky cervical tumors. A recent meta-analysis by Shen et al31 found that DWI imaging may improve detection of metastatic lymph nodes as the reported pooled sensitivity and specificity of DWI for assessment of metastatic lymph nodes were 86% and 84%, respectively.

PET/CT

PET/CT is limited in evaluating primary tumor size as well as parametrial involvement, internal os involvement, and soft-tissue invasion of the vagina and adjacent organs.32,33 PET/CT can assess metabolic activity in the tumor,26 making the tumor conspicuous; however, it is not able to identify microscopic disease. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) activity in the bladder can obscure adjacent organ involvement, specifically, bladder involvement.

PET/CT has a higher ability to detect metastatic lymph nodes compared with MRI,34 because metastatic lymph nodes may be metabolically active even when they may morphologically show a normal size. One PET study35 showed a positive and negative predictive value of 91% and 85%, respectively, and an overall accuracy of 88% for pelvic lymph nodes. Benign inflammatory lymph nodes, however, can be metabolically active, and this may limit the accuracy of PET/CT. PET/CT performs better in assessing lymph nodes in late-T category disease,36,37 with a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 95%, respectively, compared with 53% to 73% and 90% to 97%, respectively, in early-stage disease.38,39 PET has also been shown to alter management in up to 28% of patients36,37 by detecting extrapelvic disease and can be used as a one-stop shop for suspected metastases, specifically in bulky tumors.

CT Scan

Although CT is widely available, it has limited value in the detection and local staging of cervical cancer owing to its poor soft-tissue resolution. Small cervical tumors may have similar attenuation to the cervix and may be invisible; large cervical tumors may appear as an enlarged cervix.40

CT has a lower accuracy of 72% compared with 95% accuracy of MRI for assessment of parametrial invasion.41,42 The overall reported accuracy of CT in assessing bladder invasion ranges between 96% and 98%,43-46 especially in bulky disease.

The reported accuracy of CT in detecting lymph node metastases ranges from 37% to 86%.37,47 Similar to MRI, size criteria are used with CT for detection of metastatic lymph nodes.

Ultrasound

Ultrasound is a widely available, noninvasive imaging modality and is available at a lower cost than other imaging technologies.

Fischerova et al48 found that transrectal ultrasound is able to detect cervical cancer with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 93%, 95%, and 94%, respectively. However, transrectal ultrasound is not performed in routine practice. A European multicenter study found that ultrasound detected cervical cancer at a rate of 97% with a specificity of 90% compared with the rates for MRI of 90% and 67%, respectively.49 Ultrasound is operator dependent, has high interobserver variability, and depends on the patient's body habitus. Ultrasound is limited in detection of distant enlarged lymph nodes. Testa et als50 found that ultrasound failed to detect 91% of lymph node metastasis owing to its small field of view. In a study by Epstein et al,49 ultrasound detected only 3 of 38 lymph node metastases. Retroperitoneal lymph nodes may be difficult to detect, specifically in obese patients and in the presence of bowel gas.

PET/MRI

PET/MRI is a promising new modality that combines the advantage of local staging by MRI and nodal detection by PET. PET/MRI has a sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 94%, respectively, for lymph node detection.51 It has the ability to locally stage a patient's tumor owing to the superior soft-tissue resolution of MRI. More studies will be needed to assess the staging efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this powerful new tool.

Contribution of Imaging to TNM Staging

Category T1a disease is not seen on imaging. Although invasion may be suspected on the basis of imaging, the depth of invasion cannot be assessed with a level of certainty appropriate for clinical use, and the use of imaging, including MRI, for this purpose is discouraged. In T1b disease, the tumor is visible on imaging, and the T (ie, size) category is assessed by measuring the greatest diameter of the tumor in any plane, on the sequence in which it is most conspicuous. T2a disease involves the upper two-thirds of the vagina, which is visible on MRI. Another important assessment typically made by MRI is parametrial involvement, which can determine the primary modality of therapy in apparently early cervical cancer. When the tumor causes hydronephrosis or extends to the pelvic wall, it is considered to be clinical category T3b. Involvement of adjacent organs is considered to be category T4; however, the presence of bullous edema on the bladder mucosa is not considered true bladder involvement and does not represent T4 disease.

When there is discordance between imaging and clinical examination, and before surgical resection or if surgical resection is not done, the ct category should be based on imaging measurement of size, which is typically more accurate than clinically estimated size.

Regional nodal metastases are considered N1 or N2 disease and may be assessed on CT and MRI. This classification is based on the criterion for abnormal size of >1 cm in the short axial dimension. However, metabolically active lymph nodes of any size on FDG PET scans are considered metastatic.

The presence of involved lymph nodes beyond the pelvis or para-aortic region, or bone metastases, is considered MI disease, and PET/CT is considered the best modality to assess for this. If PET/CT is not available, contrast-enhanced CT may be used. In low-resource settings, a total body bone scan may be used to survey for skeletal metastases.

Suggested Imaging Report Format

  1. Primary tumor
    • Size (diameter in the axial and the craniocaudal dimension)
  2. Local extent
    • Involvement of the internal os and distance from the internal os
    • Depth of cervical invasion (in mm)
    • Involvement of the vagina (upper third, middle third, and lower third)
    • Parametrial extension, with presence or absence of hydronephrosis
    • Involvement of the bladder and rectum/adjacent bowel loops
  3. Adenopathy
    • Regional (pelvic and para-aortic)
    • Distant lymph node: inguinal, mediastinal, and supraclavicular
    • Extrapelvic disease
  4. Distant organ involvement
    • Liver, peritoneum, lungs, and other organs
  5. Bone involvement

General Staging Rules

TopicRules
Microscopic confirmation
  • Microscopic confirmation is necessary for TNM classification, including clinical classification(with rare exception).
  • In rare clinical scenarios, patients who do not have any biopsy or cytology of the tumor may be staged. This is recommended in rare clinical situations, only if the cancer diagnosis is NOT in doubt. In the absence of histologic confirmation, survival analysis may be performed separately from staged cohorts with histologic confirmation. Separate survival analysis is not required if clinical findings support a cancer diagnosis and specific site.

Example: Lung cancer diagnosed by CT scan only, that is, without a confirmatory biopsy

Time frame/staging window for determining clinical stageInformation gathered about the extent of the cancer is part of clinical classification:
  • from date of diagnosis before initiation of primary treatment or decision for watchful waiting orsupportive care to one of the following time points, whichever is shortest:
    • 4 months after diagnosis
    • to the date of cancer progression if the cancer progresses before the end of the 4 month window; data on the extent of the cancer is only included before the date of observed progression
Time frame/staging window for determining pathological stageInformation including clinical staging data and information from surgical resection and examination of the resected specimens - if surgery is performed before the initiation of radiation and/or systemic therapy - from the date of diagnosis:
  • within 4 months after diagnosis
  • to the date of cancer progression if the cancer progresses before the end of the 4-month window; data on the extent of the cancer is included only before the date of observed progression
  • and includes any information obtained about the extent of cancer up through completion of definitive surgery as part of primary treatment if that surgery occurs later than 4 months after diagnosis and the cancer has not clearly progressed during the time window
Note: Patients who receive radiation and/or systemic therapy (neoadjuvant therapy) before surgical resection are not assigned a pathological category or stage, and instead are staged according to post neoadjuvant therapy criteria.
Time frame/staging window for staging post neoadjuvant therapy or posttherapyAfter completion of neoadjuvant therapy, patients should be staged as:
  • ye: posttherapy clinical
After completion of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery, patients should be staged as:
  • yp: posttherapy pathological
The time frame should be such that the post neoadjuvant surgery and staging occur within a time frame that accommodates disease-specific circumstances, as outlined in the specific disease sites and in relevant guidelines.Note: Clinical stage should be assigned before the start of neoadjuvant therapy.
Progression of diseaseIf there is documented progression of cancer before therapy or surgery, only information obtained before the documented progression is used for clinical and pathological staging.

Progression does not include growth during the time needed for the diagnostic workup, but rather a major change in clinical status.

Determination of progression is based on managing physician judgment, and may result in a major change in the treatment plan.

Uncertainty among T, N, or M categories, and/or stage groups: rules for clinical decision makingIf uncertainty exists regarding how to assign a category, subcategory, or stage group, the lower of the two possible categories, subcategories, or groups is assigned for
  • T, N, or M
  • prognostic stage group/stage group
Stage groups are for patient care and prognosis based on data. Physicians may need to make treatment decisions if staging information is uncertain or unclear.

Note: Unknown or missing information for T, N, M or stage group is never assigned the lower category, subcategory, or group.

Uncertainty rules do not apply to cancer registry data

If information is not available to the cancer registrar for documentation of a subcategory, the main (umbrella) category should be assigned (e.g., TI for a breast cancer described as <2 cm in place of T1a, T1b, or T1c).

If the specific information to assign the stage group is not available to the cancer registrar (including subcategories or missing prognostic factor categories), the stage group should not be assigned but should be documented as unknown.

Prognostic factor category information is unavailableIf a required prognostic factor category is unavailable, the category used to assign the stage group is:
  • X, or
  • If the prognostic factor is unavailable, default to assigning the anatomic stage using clinical judgment
GradeThe recommended histologic grading system for each disease site and/or cancer type, if applicable, is specified in each disease site and should be used by the pathologist to assign grade.

The cancer registrar will document grade for a specific site according to the coding structure in the relevant disease site.

Synchronous primary tumors in a single organ: (m) suffixIf multiple tumors of the same histology are present in one organ:
  • the tumor with the highest T category is classified and staged, and
  • the (m) suffix is used
  • An example of a preferred designation is: pT3(m) NO MO.
  • If the number of synchronous tumors is important, an acceptable alternative designation is to specify the number of tumors. For example, pT3(4) NO MO indicates four synchronous primary tumors.
Note: The (m) suffix applies to multiple invasive cancers. It is not applicable for multiple foci of in situ cancer or for a mixed invasive and in situ cancer.
Synchronous primary tumors in paired organs

Cancers occurring at the same time in each of paired organs are staged as separate cancers. Examples include breast, lung, and kidney.

Exception: For tumors of the thyroid, liver, and ovary, multiplicity is a T-category criterion, thus multiple synchronous tumors are not staged independently.

Metachronous primary tumorsSecond or subsequent primary cancers occurring in the same organ or in different organs outside the staging window are staged independently and are known as metachronous primary tumors.

Such cancers are not staged using the y prefix.

Unknown primary or no evidence of primary tumor

If there is no evidence of a primary tumor, or the site of the primary tumor is unknown, staging may be based on the clinical suspicion of the organ site of the primary tumor, with the tumor categorized as TO. The rules for staging cancers categorized as TO are specified in the relevant disease sites.

Example: An axillary lymph node with an adenocarcinoma in a woman, suspected clinically to be from the breast, may be categorized as TO N1 (or N2 or N3) MO and assigned Stage II (or Stage III).

Examples of exception: The TO category is not used for head and neck squamous cancer sites, as such patients with an involved lymph node are staged as unknown primary cancers using the "Cervical Nodes and Unknown Primary Tumors of the Head and Neck" system (TO remains a valid category for human papillomavirus (HPV)- and Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]-associated oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal cancers).

Date of diagnosis

It is important to document the date of diagnosis, because this information is used for survival calculations and time periods for staging.

The date of diagnosis is the date a physician determines the patient has cancer. It may be the date of a diagnostic biopsy or other microscopic confirmation or of clear evidence on imaging. This rule varies by disease site and shares similarities with the earlier discussion on microscopic confirmation.

Stage Classifications

Stage classifications are determined according to the point in time of the patient's care in relation to diagnosis and treatment. The five stage classifications are clinical, pathological, posttherapy/post neoadjuvant therapy, recurrence/ retreatment, and autopsy.

ClassificationDesignationDetails
ClinicalcTNM or TNMCriteria: used for all patients with cancer identified before treatmentIt is composed of diagnostic workup information, until first treatment, including:
  • clinical history and symptoms
  • physical examination
  • imaging
  • endoscopy
  • biopsy of the primary site
  • biopsy or excision of a single regional node or sentinel nodes, or sampling of regional nodes, with clinical T
  • biopsy of distant metastatic site
  • surgical exploration without resection
  • other relevant examinations

Note: Exceptions exist by site, such as complete excision of primary tumor for melanoma.

PathologicalpTNMCriteria: used for patients if surgery is the first definitive therapy

It is composed of infor from:

  • diagnostic workup from clinical staging combined with
  • operative findings, and
  • pathology review of resected surgical specimens
Posttherapy or post neoadjuvant therapyycTNM and ypTNMFor purposes of posttherapy or post neoadjuvant therapy, neoadjuvant therapy is defined as systemic and/or radiation therapy given before surgery: primary radiation and/or systemic therapy is treatment given as definitive therapy without surgery.

ycThe yc classification is used for staging after primary systemic and/or radiation therapy, or after neoadjuvant therapy and before planned surgeryCriteria: First therapy is systemic and/or radiation therapy.

ypThe yp classification is used for staging after neoadjuvant therapy and planned post neoadjuvant therapy surgery.

Criteria: First therapy is systemic and/or radiation therapy and is followed by surgery.

Recurrence or retreatmentrTNMThis classification is used for assigning stage at time of recurrence or progression until treatment is initiated.

Criteria: Disease recurrence after disease-free interval or upon disease progression if further treatment is planned for a cancer that:

  • recurs after a disease-free interval or
  • progresses (without a disease-free interval)

rcClinical recurrence staging is assigned as rc.

rpPathological staging information is assigned as rp for the rTNM staging classification.

This classification is recorded in addition to and does not replace the original previously assigned clinical (c), pathological (p), and/or posttherapy (yc, yp) stage classifications, and these previously documented classifications are not changed.

AutopsyaTNMThis classification is used for cancers not previously recognized that are found as an incidental finding at autopsy, and not suspected before death (i.e., this classification does not apply if an autopsy is performed in a patient with a previously diagnosed cancer).

Criteria: No cancer suspected prior to death

Both clinical and pathological staging information is used to assign a TNM.

Note S: Identification of Primary Site(s)

The cervix is the lower third of the uterus. It is roughly cylindrical and projects into the upper vagina (Figure Cervix Uteri-anatomy). The endocervical canal is lined by glandular or columnar epithelium and runs through the cervix; it is the passageway connecting the vagina with the uterine cavity. The vaginal portion of the cervix, known as the exocervix, is covered by squamous epithelium. The original squamocolumnar junction is located on the ectocervix, vaginal fornix, or upper vagina, but squamous metaplasia causes a new squamocolumnar junction to be established at the external cervical os, where the endocervical canal begins. The area between these 2 junctions is called the transformation zone. Cancer of the cervix may originate from the squamous epithelium of the exocervix or the glandular epithelium of the canal; however, most of these cancers arise in the transformation zone.

64.fig-AJCCFig52 FIGURE CERVIX UTERI-ANATOMY. Anatomic sites and subsites of the cervix uteri.

The anatomy of the cervix is described in Note S: Identification of Primary Site(s) with a figure of the anatomy. The following figures depict the local extent of tumor described in the T categories.

Regional Lymph Nodes

The cervix is drained by parametrial, cardinal, and uterosacral ligament routes into the following regional lymph nodes (Figure 64.1):

  • Parametrial
  • Obturator
  • Internal iliac (hypogastric)
  • External iliac
  • Sacral
  • Presacral
  • Common iliac
  • Para-aortic

64.1 Regional lymph nodes for the cervix uteri.

Metastatic Sites

The most common sites of distant spread include the mediastinal nodes, lungs, peritoneal cavity, and skeleton. Mediastinal or supraclavicular node involvement is considered distant metastasis and is assigned M1.

Emerging Factors for Collection

None recommended

Additional Factors Relevant for Clinical

Additional data elements that are clinically significant but not required for staging are identified with a dagger symbol.(†)

  1. †FIGO stage
  2. †Tumor Size
  3. †Lymph Node Metastasis
  4. †Fractional Depth of Invasion
  5. †p16 status
  6. †Histopathologic Type
  7. †HIV status
Registry Data Collection Variables
  1. FIGO stage
  2. p16 status
  3. Pelvic nodal status and method of assessment (microscopic, CT, PET, MR imaging)
  4. Para-aortic nodal status and method of assessment
  5. Distant (mediastinal, scalene) nodal status and method of assessment
  6. HIV status

Prognostic Factors

Prognostic Factors Required for Stage Grouping

Beyond the factors used to assign T, N, or M categories, no additional prognostic factors are required for stage grouping.

AJCC Level of Evidence:
Level IThe available evidence includes consistent results from multiple large, well-designed, and well-conducted national and international studies in appropriate patient populations, with appropriate endpoints and appropriate treatments.

Both prospective studies and retrospective population-based registry studies are acceptable; studies should be evaluated on the basis of methodology rather than chronology.

Level IIThe available evidence is obtained from at least 1 large, well-designed, and well-conducted study in appropriate patient populations with appropriate endpoints and with external validation.
Level IIIThe available evidence is somewhat problematic because of a factor such as the number, size, or quality of individual studies; inconsistency of results across individual studies; propriateness of patient population used in 1 or more studies; or the appropriateness of outcomes used in 1 or more studies.
Level IVThe available evidence is insufficient because appropriate studies have not yet been performed.

Risk Assessment

Risk Assesment Models

Risk Assessment Models (Note RA)

None endorsed

TNM Definitions

Assignment of AJCC TNM

AJCC data elements required for staging are identified with an asterisk (*).

*Stage classification based on time frame and criteria(see Rules for Classification)

The same classification should be used throughout the assignment of TNM and stage group.

*Definition of Primary Tumor (T) (Note T)

The definitions of the T categories correspond to the stages accepted by the Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d’Obstétrique (FIGO). Both systems are included for comparison.

T CategoryFIGO StageT Criteria
TXN/APrimary tumor cannot be assessed
T0N/ANo evidence of primary tumor
T1ICarcinoma is strictly confined to the cervix (extension to the corpus should be disregarded)
T1aIAInvasive carcinoma that can be diagnosed only by microscopy with maximum depth of invasion 5 mm
T1a1IA1Measured stromal invasion 3 mm in depth
T1a2IA2Measured stromal invasion >3 mm and 5 mm in depth
T1bIBInvasive carcinoma with measured deepest invasion >5 mm (greater than stage IA); lesion limited to the cervix uteri with size measured by maximum tumor diameter

The involvement of vascular/lymphatic spaces should not change the staging. The lateral extent of the lesion is no longer considered.

T1b1IB1Invasive carcinoma >5 mm depth of stromal invasion and 2 cm in greatest dimension
T1b2IB2Invasive carcinoma >2 cm and 4 cm in greatest dimension
T1b3IB3Invasive carcinoma >4 cm in greatest dimension
T2IICervical carcinoma invades beyond the cervix, but has not extended onto the lower third of the vagina or to the pelvic wall
T2aIIAInvolvement limited to the upper two-thirds of the vagina without parametrial invasion
T2a1IIA1Invasive carcinoma 4 cm in greatest dimension
T2a2IIA2Invasive carcinoma > 4 cm in greatest dimension
T2bIIBWith parametrial invasion but not up to the pelvic wall
T3IIICarcinoma involves the lower third of the vagina and/or extends to the pelvic wall and/or causes hydronephrosis or non-functioning kidney

The pelvic wall is defined as the muscle, fascia, neurovascular structures, and skeletal portions of the bony pelvis. Cases with no cancer-free space between the tumor and pelvic wall by rectal examination are FIGO III.

T3aIIIACarcinoma involves lower third of the vagina, with no extension to the pelvic wall
T3bIIIBExtension to the pelvic wall and/or hydronephrosis or non-functioning kidney (unless known to be due to another cause)
T4IVACarcinoma has involved (biopsy proven) the mucosa of the bladder or rectum, or has spread to adjacent organs. (Bullous edema, as such, does not permit a case to be allotted to stage IVA)

Primary Tumor Suffix

___ (m) Multiple synchronous primary tumors

*Definition of Regional Lymph Nodes (N) (Note N)

The definitions of the N categories correspond to the stages accepted by the Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d’Obstétrique (FIGO). Both systems are included for comparison.

N CategoryFIGO StageN Criteria
NXN/ARegional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0N/ANo regional lymph node metastasis
N0(i+)N/AIsolated tumor cells in regional lymph node(s) 0.2 mm, or single cells or clusters of cells 200 cells in a single lymph node cross section
N1IIIC1Regional lymph node metastasis to pelvic lymph nodes only
N1miIIIC1Regional lymph node metastasis (> 0.2 mm but 2.0 mm in diameter) to pelvic lymph nodes
N1aIIIC1Regional lymph node metastasis (> 2.0 mm in diameter) to pelvic lymph nodes
N2IIIC2Regional lymph node metastasis to paraaortic lymph nodes, with or without positive pelvic lymph nodes
N2miIIIC2Regional lymph node metastasis (> 0.2 mm but 2.0 mm in diameter) to para-aortic lymph nodes, with or without positive pelvic lymph nodes
N2aIIIC2Regional lymph node metastasis (> 2.0 mm in diameter) to para-aortic lymph nodes, with or without positive pelvic lymph nodes

Regional Lymph Nodes Suffix

  • (f) FNA or core biopsy
  • (sn) Sentinel node procedure

*Definition of Distant Metastasis (M) (Note M)

The definitions of the M categories correspond to the stages accepted by the Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d’Obstétrique (FIGO). Both systems are included for comparison.

M CategoryFIGO StageM Criteria
M0N/ANo distant metastasis
M1IVBDistant metastasis (includes metastasis to inguinal lymph nodes, intraperitoneal disease, lung, liver, or bone) (excludes metastasis to pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes, or vagina)
M1IVBMicroscopic evidence of distant metastasis (includes metastasis to inguinal lymph nodes, intraperitoneal disease, lung, liver, or bone) (excludes metastasis to pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes, or vagina)

Stage Prognostic

!!Calculator!!

AJCC Prognostic Stage Groups (Note PSG)

AJCC data elements required for staying are identified with an asterisk (*).

*AJCC prognostic stage group is assigned based on the stage classification and categories chosen.

When T is…and N is…and M is…Then the Clinical Prognostic Stage Group is…
T1N0M0I
T1aN0M0IA
T1a1N0M0IA1
T1a2N0M0IA2
T1bN0M0IB
T1b1N0M0IB1
T1b2N0M0IB2
T1b3N0M0IB3
T2N0M0II
T2aN0M0IIA
T2a1N0M0IIA1
T2a2N0M0IIA2
T2bN0M0IIB
T3N0M0III
T3aN0M0IIIA
T3bN0M0IIIB
TX, T0, T1-3N1M0IIIC1
TX, T0, T1-3N2M0IIIC2
T4Any NM0IVA
Any TAny NM1IVB

Histopathologic type

Histopathologic Type (Note HT)

Additional data elements that are clinically significant but not required for staging are identified with a dagger symbol.(†)

WHO Classification of Tumors

†Histopathologic Codes

NOTE: This list includes histology codes and preferred terms from the WHO Classification of Tumours2 and the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O).1 Most of the terms in this list represent malignant behavior. For cancer reporting purposes, behavior codes /3 (denoting malignant neoplasms), /2 (denoting in situ neoplasms), and in some cases, /1 (denoting neoplasms with uncertain and unknown behavior) may be appended to the 4-digit histology codes to create a complete morphology code.

CodeDescription
8085§Squamous cell carcinoma, HPV-associated
8086§Squamous cell carcinoma, HPV-independent
8070§Squamous cell carcinoma, NOS (acceptable when p16 or HPV testing is not available)
8072Squamous cell carcinoma, non-keratinizing
8071Squamous cell carcinoma, keratinizing
8083Squamous cell carcinoma, basaloid
8054Squamous cell carcinoma, warty (condylomatous)
8051Squamous cell carcinoma, verrucous
8052Squamous cell carcinoma, papillary
8082Squamous cell carcinoma, lymphoepithelioma-like
8120Squamous cell carcinoma, squamotransitional
8140§Adenocarcinoma, NOS
8483§Adenocarcinoma, HPV-associated
8484§Adenocarcinoma, HPV-independent, NOS
8482§Adenocarcinoma, HPV-independent, gastric type
8310§Adenocarcinoma, HPV-independent, clear cell type
9110§Adenocarcinoma, HPV-independent, mesonephric type
8380§Adenocarcinoma, HPV-independent, endometrioid type
8380§Endometrioid adenocarcinoma, NOS
8441Serous adenocarcinoma
8263Adenocarcinoma, villoglandular
8480Adenocarcinoma, mucinous
8144Adenocarcinoma, intestinal type
8490Adenocarcinoma, signet ring cell type
8483Adenocarcinoma, stratified mucin-producing type
8020Carcinoma, unclassifiable (undifferentiated carcinoma)
8980§Carcinosarcoma
8560§Adenosquamous carcinoma
8430§Mucoepidermoid carcinoma
8098§Adenoid basal carcinoma
8015Glassy cell carcinoma
8240§Neuroendocrine tumor, NOS (carcinoid tumor)
8240§Neuroendocrine tumor, grade 1
8249§Neuroendocrine tumor, grade 2
8041§Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
8013§Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
8246Neuroendocrine carcinoma, NOS
8045§Combined small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
8013§Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
8574Carcinoma admixed with neuroendocrine carcinoma
8154Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm
§These histologic types are included in the WHO Classification of Tumours and are the preferred terminology.
8000§§Neoplasm, malignan
8010§§Carcinoma, NOS
8076§§Squamous cell carcinoma, microinvasive
8323§§Mixed cell adenocarcinoma
8384§§Adenocarcinoma, endocervical type
§§ Histology is not ideal for clinical use in patient care, as it describes an unspecified or outdated diagnosis. Data collectors may use this code only if there is not enough information in the medical record to document a more specific diagnosis.
Sources: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Female Genital Tumours.2; International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. ICD-O-3.2-Online.1 Used with permission.

Histologic grade

HISTOLOGIC GRADE (G)

Histologic Grade (G) (Note G)

Additional data elements that are clinically significant but not required for staging are identified with a dagger symbol.(†)

†Grade is assigned based on histopathologic assessment.

GG Definition
GXGrade cannot be assessed
G1Well differentiated
G2Moderately differentiated
G3Poorly differentiated

Illustrations

64.2 T1a1 is measured stromal invasion 3.0 mm or less in depth and 7.0 mm or less in horizontal spread (B).

64.3 T1a2 is measured stromal invasion more than 3.0 mm and not more than 5.0 mm with a horizontal spread 7.0 mm or less (B).

64.4 T1b is clinically visible lesion confined to the cervix or microscopic lesion greater than T1a (B and C).

64.5 T1b1 is clinically visible lesion 4.0 cm or less in greatest dimension.

64.6 T1b2 is clinically visible lesion more than 4.0 cm in greatest dimension.

64.7 T2a is tumor without parametrial invasion. T2a1 is clinically visible lesion 4.0 cm or less in greatest dimension

64.8 T2a2 is clinically visible lesion more than 4.0 cm in greatest dimension.

64.9 T2b is tumor with parametrial invasion.

64.10 T3a is tumor involves lower third of vagina but not extending to the pelvic wall.

64.11 T3b is tumor extends to pelvic wall and/or causes hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney.

64.12 T4 is tumor invading mucosa of bladder or rectum, and/or extends beyond true pelvis (bullous edema is not sufficient to classify a tumor as T4).

Bibliography

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. Mar 1 2015;136(5):E359-386.
  2. Cheng X, Cai S, Li Z, Tang M, Xue M, Zang R. The prognosis of women with stage IB1-IIB node-positive cervical carcinoma after radical surgery. World journal of surgical oncology. 2004;2:47.
  3. Graflund M, Sorbe B, Karlsson M. Immunohistochemical expression of p53, bcl-2, and p21(WAF1/CIP1) in early cervical carcinoma: correlation with clinical outcome. International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society. May-Jun 2002;12(3):290-298.
  4. Aoki Y, Sasaki M, Watanabe M, et al. High-risk group in node-positive patients with stage IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and postoperative pelvic irradiation. Gynecologic oncology. May 2000;77(2):305-309.
  5. Sakuragi N, Satoh C, Takeda N, et al. Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with Stages IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer. Apr 1 1999;85(7):1547-1554.
  6. Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, D'andrea G, et al. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study. Cancer. May 15 2000;88(10):2267-2274.
  7. Hong JH, Tsai CS, Lai CH, et al. Risk stratification of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of cervix treated by radiotherapy alone. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. Oct 1 2005;63(2):492-499.
  8. Mayr NA, Yuh WT, Jajoura D, et al. Ultra-early predictive assay for treatment failure using functional magnetic resonance imaging and clinical prognostic parameters in cervical cancer. Cancer. Feb 15 2010;116(4):903-912.
  9. Bhosale P, Peungjesada S, Devine C, Balachandran A, Iyer R. Role of magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to clinical staging in cervical carcinoma. Journal of computer assisted tomography. Nov-Dec 2010;34(6):855-864.
  10. Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Chao KS, Mutch DG, Lockett MA. Tumor size, irradiation dose, and long-term outcome of carcinoma of uterine cervix. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. May 1 1998;41(2):307-317.
  11. Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Nene SM, et al. Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. Cancer. Jun 1 1992;69(11):2796-2806.
  12. Eifel PJ, Morris M, Wharton JT, Oswald MJ. The influence of tumor size and morphology on the outcome of patients with FIGO stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. Apr 30 1994;29(1):9-16.
  13. Wagenaar HC, Trimbos JB, Postema S, et al. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer. Gynecologic oncology. Sep 2001;82(3):474-482.
  14. Mayr NA, Magnotta VA, Ehrhardt JC, et al. Usefulness of tumor volumetry by magnetic resonance imaging in assessing response to radiation therapy in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. Jul 15 1996;35(5):915-924.
  15. Horn LC, Hentschel B, Galle D, Bilek K. Extracapsular extension of pelvic lymph node metastases is of prognostic value in carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Gynecologic oncology. Jan 2008;108(1):63-67.
  16. Petereit D, Hartenbach E, Thomas G. Para-aortic lymph node evaluation in cervical cancer: the impact of staging upon treatment decisions and outcome. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 1998;8:353-364.
  17. Kattan MW, Hess KR, Amin MB, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer acceptance criteria for inclusion of risk models for individualized prognosis in the practice of precision medicine. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. Jan 19 2016.
  18. Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2001;6(1):7-43.
  19. Bodurka-Bevers D, Morris M, Eifel PJ, et al. Posttherapy surveillance of women with cervical cancer: an outcomes analysis. Gynecologic oncology. Aug 2000;78(2):187-193.
  20. Coucke PA, Maingon P, Ciernik IF, Phuoc Do H. A survey on staging and treatment in uterine cervical carcinoma in the Radiotherapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. Mar 2000;54(3):221-228.
  21. Koh W-J, Panwala K, Greer B. Adjuvant therapy for high-risk, early stage cervical cancer. Paper presented at: Seminars in radiation oncology2000.
  22. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. May 2009;105(2):103-104.
  23. Siegel CL, andreotti RF, Cardenes HR, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pretreatment planning of invasive cancer of the cervix. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2012;9(6):395-402.
  24. Zaino RJ. Glandular lesions of the uterine cervix. Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc. Mar 2000;13(3):261-274.