section name header

Questions

  

C.22. What is thromboelastometry? How can it guide transfusion?

Answer:

Rotational thromboelastography (ROTEM) and thromboelastography (TEG) are point-of-care viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VEAs) used to assess clot kinetics. Both tests employ a suspended pin that sits in a conical cup containing whole blood. As a clot forms with the addition of an activator, the change in resistance is detected by VEA and plotted as a thromboelastogram. Results can then be used to tailor transfusion therapy in trauma resuscitation by goal-directed coagulation therapy; nevertheless, VEA has not been shown to improve mortality.

Rotation Thromboelastography

ROTEM uses a rotating pin in a stationary cup to detect increases in tensile force as a clot forms. It determines several different clotting parameters:

  • INTEMintrinsic pathway of the coagulation cascade

  • HEPTEMthe intrinsic pathway of the coagulation cascade with the addition of heparinase, which removes the effects of heparin from the results

  • EXTEMthe extrinsic pathway of the coagulation cascade

  • FIBTEMextrinsic pathway of the coagulation cascade with the addition of cytochalasin D, which inhibits the effects of platelets on clot formation

  • APTEMextrinsic pathway with the addition of aprotinin to block fibrinolysis

These tests generate images based on the coagulation status, which can be used to guide transfusion therapy (Figures 57.1-57.6). Algorithms have been developed to guide therapy based on ROTEM results (Figure 57.7).

Figure 57.1.: Basic ROTEM Thromboelastogram.

Basic ROTEM thromboelastogram. Clotting time (CT): the measured time until clot formation starts; affected by clotting factors and anticoagulants. Clot formation time (CFT): a measure of the initial rate of clot formation, the time from clot formation until the clot forms to an amplitude of 20 mm; depends on platelets and fibrinogen. α Angle: a measure of the initial rate of clot formation. Maximum clot firmness (MCF): the maximum tensile strength of the clot; describes the quality of the clot and is dependent on platelets, fibrinogen, factor XIII, and fibrinolysis. Maximum lysis (ML): reduction of clot firmness during measurement; abnormality in the ML at 30 minutes indicated fibrinolysis. Amplitude: A5/A10/A15 is the amplitude of the clot at 5, 10, and 15 minutes.

Figure 57.2.: ROTEM in a Patient with Normal Coagulation Parameters.

ROTEM in a patient with normal coagulation parameters.

Figure 57.3.: ROTEM in a Patient with a Platelet Deficiency.

ROTEM in a patient with a platelet deficiency.

Figure 57.4.: ROTEM in a Patient with a Fibrinogen Deficiency.

ROTEM in a patient with a fibrinogen deficiency.

Figure 57.5.: ROTEM in a Patient with Hyperfibrinolysis.

ROTEM in a patient with hyperfibrinolysis.

Figure 57.6.: ROTEM in a Patient with Heparin Influence.

ROTEM in a patient with heparin influence.

Figure 57.7.: Guide to Therapy Based on ROTEM Results. !!flowchart!!

Guide to therapy based on ROTEM results. aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; CT, computed tomography; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; MCF, maximum clot firmness; ML, maximum lysis; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate; PT, prothrombin time. (Reprinted from Bolliger D, Seeberger MD, Tanaka KA. Principles and practice of thromboelastography in clinical coagulation management and transfusion practice. Transfus Med Rev. 2012;26:1-13. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier. With permission.)

Thromboelastography

TEG is based on the same principles as ROTEM except that instead of having a mobile pin in a stationary cup, TEG has a stationary pin in a mobile cup (Figure 57.8). TEG values can be compared to ROTEM values (Table 57.1). Some examples of the effect of different coagulation states on TEG (Figure 57.9) and a guideline for transfusion therapy (Figure 57.10) are shown.

Table 57.1: Thromboelastography (TEG) Values Compared to Their Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) Equivalents

TEGMeasuresROTEM Equivalent
R timeTime to 2 mm amplitudeCT
K timeTime from 2 to 20 mmCFT
αAngleThe slope between R and KαAngle
MAMaximum amplitude of clotMCF
LY30Percentage of clot lysis at 30 min after MAML
A30Size of a clot at 30 min after MAA10
GClot elasticityMCE
CIThe coagulation index is the value determined by a manufacturer-created mathematical formula which takes into account R, K, α angle, and MA to give an overall assessment of the state of coagulation.

CFT, clot formation time; CI, coagulation index; CT, clotting time; K, kinetics; MA, maximum amplitude; MCE, maximum clot elasticity; MCF, maximum clot firmness; ML, maximum lysis; R, reaction time.

Figure 57.8.: Basic Thromboelastogram.

Basic thromboelastogram.

Figure 57.9.: Effects of Different Coagulation States on TEG Results.

Effects of different coagulation states on TEG results.DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; TEG, thromboelastography.

Figure 57.10.: A Guideline for Transfusion Based on TEG Results. !!flowchart!!

A guideline for transfusion based on TEG results. CI, coagulation index; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; G, clot elasticity; K, kinetics; MA, maximum amplitude; Pln, plain; TEG, thromboelastography.


References

  • Baksaas-Aasen KGall LSStensballe J, et al. Viscoelastic haemostatic assay augmented protocols for major trauma haemorrhage (ITACTIC): a randomized, controlled trialIntensive Care Med2021;47:49-59.
  • Bolliger DSeeberger MDTanaka KAPrinciples and practice of thromboelastography in clinical coagulation management and transfusion practiceTransfus Med Rev2012;26:1-13.
  • Jackson GNAshpole KJYentis SMThe TEG vs the ROTEM thromboelastography/thromboelastometry systemsAnaesthesia2009;64:212-215.
  • Johansson PIStissing TBochsen L, et al. Thrombelastography and thromboelastometry in assessing coagulation in traumaScand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med2009;17:45.
  • Ogawa SSzlam FChen EP, et al. A comparative evaluation of rotation thromboelastometry and standard coagulation tests in hemodilution-induced coagulation changes after cardiac surgeryTransfusion2012;52:14-22.
  • TEM Systems. Result interpretation. Accessed April 15, 2023. http://www.rotem-usa.com/methodology/result-interpretation/