section name header

Basic Information ⬇

AUTHOR: C. John Sperati, MD, MHS

Definition

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a life-threatening disorder characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and severe acute kidney injury. HUS is a manifestation of the broader syndrome known as thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA).1 HUS, as opposed to some other forms of TMA, is notable for the severity of kidney injury. Although lacking a precise definition, HUS is commonly defined by the presence of acute kidney injury, anemia (hemoglobin <lower limit of normal), hemolysis (lactate dehydrogenase >upper limit of normal), and thrombocytopenia (platelets <lower limit of normal). Shiga toxin-producing E. coli infection (STEC-HUS) and hereditary or acquired complement dysregulation (atypical HUS, aHUS) are two important causes of HUS and are the focus of this chapter.

Synonyms

HUS

STEC-HUS (Shiga toxin-producing E. coli-hemolytic uremic syndrome)

aHUS (atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome)

TMA (thrombotic microangiopathy)

ICD-10CM CODES
D59.3Hemolytic-uremic syndrome
M31.1Thrombotic microangiopathy
Epidemiology & Demographics

Diarrhea-associated HUS, most commonly a result of infection with STEC-HUS, is largely a disease of children and the most common form of HUS in children <5 yr of age. The incidence is estimated at 2 to 3/100,000 persons. It is more common in summer and fall months and in rural areas.1,2

The incidence of atypical HUS (aHUS) is far less common, estimated at ∼0.1 per million children <17 yr old and <0.5 per million adults. The disease may be more common in adult women than men, without an apparent sex difference in pediatric patients. Although germline mutations that affect the complement cascade are common, a positive family history is present in <30%.3

Physical Findings & Clinical Presentation

In children with STEC-HUS, fever, abdominal pain, vomiting, and nonbloody diarrhea begin a median of 3 days after ingestion of contaminated material. Bloody diarrhea ensues 1 to 3 days later, and STEC-HUS typically develops within a week of the onset of diarrhea. Fever is often absent at clinical presentation, and fatigue, dehydration, oliguria, and pallor are common presenting signs. Seizures can develop with severe disease. Leukocytosis is associated with a worse prognosis.

The onset of aHUS may be preceded by an identifiable “second hit” event such as infection or pregnancy in 50% of patients or fewer. Acute kidney injury is particularly severe in aHUS, with 70% to 80% of patients requiring kidney replacement therapy (e.g., hemodialysis) shortly after presentation. The absence of severe acute kidney injury should prompt consideration of an alternative diagnosis. Thrombocytopenia is modest and often >60,000 cells/mm.3 Schistocytes may be present on peripheral blood smear but are often fewer than expected. Notably, GI symptoms may be present in 30% of patients, potentially mimicking STEC-HUS. Multi-organ system involvement with cardiovascular and neurologic complications is common. C3 levels are low in ∼50% of cases. Therefore, normal C3 concentration does not exclude aHUS. Proteinuria, potentially in the nephrotic range, and microscopic hematuria are frequently found.

Etiology

Endothelial activation and injury with subsequent microvascular thrombosis underlie the pathophysiology of HUS.

STEC-HUS is commonly attributed to ingestion of beef contaminated with the enterohemorrhagic O157:H7 strain of E. coli. However, non-O157 strains now account for approximately 50% of cases, and sources include contaminated water, milk, cider, fish, and vegetables. Endothelial injury is initiated by binding of Shiga toxin, followed by leukocyte recruitment, increased thrombin generation, impaired fibrinolysis, and small vessel thrombosis. Secondary activation of complement may contribute to endothelial injury early in the disease.

In aHUS, a germline sequence variant affecting the alternative pathway of complement or an acquired autoantibody directed against complement factor H is identified in 60% to 80% of patients. A second-hit or “complement amplifying condition” (e.g., infection, pregnancy, inflammation) may be present. Endothelial injury results from the terminal membrane attack complex (C5b-9) and leukocyte recruitment, leading to activation of the coagulation system and small vessel thrombosis. The genes most commonly implicated in aHUS are complement factors H (CFH), I (CFI), and B (CFB); membrane cofactor protein (MCP); complement component 3 (C3); thrombomodulin (THBD); and complement factor H-related protein 5 (CFHR5). Homozygous deletion of the gene region encompassing complement factor H-related protein 1 (CFHR1) is associated with the development of autoantibodies against factor H (FH). Mutations of the diacylglycerol kinase Ε (DGKE) and metabolism of cobalamin associated C (MMACHC) genes are associated with aHUS, although the mechanism of TMA remains unclear and may not involve complement dysregulation.4,5

Diagnosis ⬆ ⬇

Diagnosis requires recognition of the presence of a TMA (e.g., hemolytic anemia, increased lactate dehydrogenase, schistocytes) associated with significant kidney injury. Table E1 summarizes common laboratory findings with HUS. Although STEC-HUS and aHUS are important causes, many other diseases have similar presentations (Table E2). In particular, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), malignant hypertension, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) should be excluded. Severely depressed activity of ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) to <5% to 10% is consistent with TTP.6

TABLE E1 Common Laboratory Findings With Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

EVIDENCE OF MICROANGIOPATHIC HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA
Anemia
Thrombocytopenia
Presence of schistocytes, helmet cells, and burr cells on peripheral blood smear
Increased LDH
Decreased haptoglobin
Increased indirect bilirubin
Increased AST
Elevated reticulocyte count
EVIDENCE OF RENAL INJURY
Elevated serum creatinine
Oliguria
Presence of hematuria, proteinuria, pyuria, casts on urinalysis
OTHER POTENTIAL FINDINGS
Leukocytosis
Positive stool culture for E. coli O157:H7
Positive stool test for Shiga toxin
Elevated amylase/lipase

AST, Aspartate aminotransferase; E. coli, Escherichia coli; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

From Marcdante KJ et al: Nelson essentials of pediatrics, ed 9, Philadelphia, 2023, Elsevier.

TABLE E2 Differential Diagnosis of Etiologies of Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome

ADAMTS13 Deficiency <5%-10%Drugs
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP)Quinine
Infection-AssociatedP2Y12 antagonists
Shiga toxin-producing E. coliTacrolimus, cyclosporine A
Streptococcus pneumoniaeSirolimus, everolimus
Campylobacter jejuniMuromonab-CD3 (OKT3)
Human immunodeficiency virusGemcitabine
CytomegalovirusMitomycin C
Epstein-Barr virusInterferon
Influenza virusVascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors
Parvovirus B19Tyrosine kinase inhibitors
SARS-CoV-2Cocaine
Primary Abnormality in Complement RegulationOxymorphone
Atypical HUSMalignant Hypertension
Immune DysregulationPregnancy
Monoclonal light chainSevere preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome
Systemic lupus erythematosusMalignancy
Antiphospholipid antibody syndromePost-Bone Marrow Transplant
Scleroderma renal crisisOther
Metabolic/Cell SignalingCastleman disease
MMACHC gene mutationPOEMS
Diacylglycerol kinase Ε gene mutationHemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)

HELLP, Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count; HUS, hemolytic uremic syndrome; POEMS, polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy/edema, monoclonal protein, skin changes.

Differential Diagnosis

Diagnostic considerations are shown in Table E2. Occasionally, C3 glomerulopathy may demonstrate kidney histology compatible with chronic microangiopathy. Typically, overt small vessel thrombosis is absent, and peripheral hemolysis is rarely present.

Workup

The workup for suspected HUS includes blood, urine, and stool testing.

Laboratory Tests

  • Routine: Peripheral blood smear, lactate dehydrogenase level, haptoglobin level, prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times, fibrinogen, ADAMTS13 activity, C3 and C4 levels, complement CH50 test, direct antiglobulin test (i.e., Coombs), vitamin B12 level, methylmalonic acid level, and β-hCG (beta human chorionic gonadotropin) level
  • Infection associated: Stool Shiga toxin assay, blood/urine/stool cultures, HIV antibody, and urine pneumococcal antigen, if indicated
  • Acquired: Antiphospholipid antibody testing (Russell viper venom time, β2-glycoprotein antibodies, anticardiolipin antibodies), antinuclear antibodies, serum-free light chains, and factor H autoantibody
  • In-born: Genetic testing
Imaging Studies

There is no specific imaging study for HUS, and imaging should be performed as required for diseases under consideration.

Treatment ⬆ ⬇

The local health department should be notified if STEC is isolated; an epidemiologic investigation may be required to prevent or mitigate a larger foodborne outbreak.

The mainstay of therapy for STEC-HUS is supportive care. Addressing hypovolemia is a major determinant of outcome, and patients should be aggressively but carefully volume resuscitated. Hypertension should be controlled. Antibiotics, especially fluoroquinolones, have generally been contraindicated in STEC infection, as they may precipitate HUS or worsen established disease. This guidance, however, remains controversial, and fosfomycin, if administered early, may be beneficial. Plasma exchange and anticomplement C5 therapy (eculizumab) are not routinely recommended and have an unclear role in managing this disease. There is no established role for corticosteroids or anticoagulation.7

The standard of care for aHUS is anticomplement C5 therapy with eculizumab or ravulizumab. As aHUS is often a diagnosis of exclusion, it is important to promptly exclude other conditions for which treatment may differ (e.g., anticoagulation for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, plasma exchange for TTP). Plasma exchange may initially stabilize aHUS, but long-term outcomes of aHUS are poor when managed only with plasma exchange. Plasma exchange, however, may be initially beneficial in the setting of deficient levels of complement factors H, B, or I, or in the presence of factor H autoantibody-associated disease.8-10 Hypertension should be managed with an ACE inhibitor similar to scleroderma renal crisis. Kidney replacement therapy (e.g., hemodialysis) may be required.

Any clearly associated triggering condition should be addressed. For example, in gemcitabine-associated HUS, the drug should be discontinued if feasible.

Outcome

The vast majority of pediatric patients with STEC-HUS recover. Death occurs in ∼3% of patients. In survivors, albuminuria develops in 20% to 40%, abnormal kidney function in 10% to 20%, and hypertension in 5% to 15%.

Historically, in aHUS, 40% to 60% of plasma exchange-treated patients either died or developed end-stage renal disease by 1 yr. With eculizumab treatment, mortality is low: 50% develop chronic kidney disease, and 3% to 10% have cardiovascular complications. Approximately 80% of patients requiring hemodialysis regain sufficient kidney function to discontinue kidney replacement therapy. Many patients can discontinue anticomplement C5 treatment under expert guidance.11 Many forms of aHUS may recur in the transplanted kidney.

Pearls & Considerations ⬆ ⬇

Related Content

Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome (Patient Information)

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (Related Key Topic)

Related Content ⬆

  1. Fakhouri F. : Haemolytic uraemic syndromeLancet. ;390(10095):681-696, 2017.https://doi.10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30062-4
  2. Tarr P.I. : Shiga-toxin-produing Escherichia coli and haemolytic uraemic syndromeLcancet. ;365(9464):1073-1086, 2005.https://doi.10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71144-2
  3. Kavanagh D. : Atypical hemolytic uremic syndromeSemin Nephrol. ;33(6):508-530, 2013.https://doi.10.1016/j.semnephrol.2013.08.003
  4. Goodship T.H. : Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy: conclusions from a "Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes" (KDIGO) Controversies ConferenceKidney Int. ;91(3):539-551, 2017.http://doi.10.1016/j.kint.2016.10.005
  5. Fakhouri F., Fremeaux-Bacchi V. : Thrombotic microangiopathy in aHUS and beyond: clinical clues from complement geneticsNat Rev Nephrol. ;17(8):543-553, 2021.http://doi.10.1038/s41581-021-00424-4
  6. Joly B.S. : An update on pathogenesis and diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraExpert Rev Hematol. ;12(6):383-395, 2019.https://doi.10.1080/17474086.2019.1611423
  7. Walsh P.R., Johnson S. : Treatment and management of children with haemolytic uraemic syndromeArch Dis Child. ;103(3):285-291, 2018.https://doi/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311377
  8. Loirat C. : An international consensus approach to the management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in childrenPediatr Nephrol. ;31(1):15-39, 2016.https://doi:10.1007/s00467-015-3076-8
  9. Fakhouri F., Loirat C. : Anticomplement treatment in atypical and typical hemolytic uremic syndromeSemin Hematol. ;55(3):150-158, 2018.https://doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2018.04.009
  10. Sperati C.J. : How I treat complement-mediated TMAClin J Am Soc Nephrol. ;17(3):452-454, 2022.https://doi.10.2215/CJN.13581021
  11. Chaturvedi S. : Outcomes of a clinician-directed protocol for discontinuation of complement inhibition therapy in atypical hemolytic uremic syndromeBlood Adv 2021. ;5(5):1504-1512, 2021.http://doi.10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003175