section name header

Basic Information

AUTHORS: Omar Karim, BS and Manuel F. DaSilva, MD

Definition

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by autoantibody production responsible for antibody-mediated and immune complex deposition tissue damage. SLE involves multiple organ systems and has heterogeneous disease patterns. Relapses and remissions are a common feature.

Synonyms

SLE

Lupus

ICD-10CM CODES
M32Systemic lupus erythematosus
M32.0Drug-induced systemic lupus erythematosus
M32.8Other forms of systemic lupus erythematosus
M32.9Systemic lupus erythematosus, unspecified
M32.10Systemic lupus erythematosus, organ or system involvement unspecified
M32.11Endocarditis in systemic lupus erythematosus
M32.12Pericarditis in systemic lupus erythematosus
M32.13Lung involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus
M32.14Glomerular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus
M32.15Tubulo-interstitial nephropathy in systemic lupus erythematosus
M32.19Other organ or system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus
Epidemiology & Demographics
Incidence

Varies across gender, racial/ethnic groups, and geography, with a prevalence of 24 to 207 cases per 100,000 persons per year. Prevalence is higher among African Americans, Asian Americans, and Hispanics. There are an estimated 350,000 people diagnosed with SLE in the U.S.1,2

Predominant Sex

Female:male ratio is 9:1. The ratio is highest in reproductive age group, and about half of that in patients younger than 16 and older than 55.3

Predominant Age

Mean age at diagnosis is 31.

Physical Findings & Clinical Presentation

  • Constitutional: Unexplained fever, fatigue (80% to 100% patients), malaise (Table 1)
  • Mucocutaneous lesions (more than 80% of patients):
    1. Acute (associated with + Ro antibody): Malar rash (Fig. E1) sparing nasolabial folds (acute cutaneous lupus); annular or papulosquamous rash (subacute cutaneous lupus)

TABLE 1 Potential Clinical Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Target OrganPotential Clinical Manifestations
ConstitutionalFatigue, anorexia, weight loss, fever, lymphadenopathy
MusculoskeletalArthritis, myositis, arthralgias, myalgias, avascular necrosis, osteoporosis
SkinMalar rash, discoid rash, photosensitive rash, cutaneous vasculitis, livedo reticularis, periungual capillary abnormalities, Raynaud phenomenon, alopecia, oral and nasal ulcers
RenalHypertension, proteinuria, hematuria, edema, nephrotic syndrome, renal failure
CardiovascularPericarditis, myocarditis, conduction system abnormalities, Libman-Sacks endocarditis
NeurologicSeizures, psychosis, cerebritis, stroke, transverse myelitis, depression, cognitive impairment, headaches, pseudotumor, peripheral neuropathy, chorea, optic neuritis, cranial nerve palsies
PulmonaryPleuritis, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hemorrhage, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary embolism
HematologicImmune-mediated cytopenias (hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia or leukopenia), anemia of chronic inflammation, hypercoagulability, thrombocytopenic thrombotic microangiopathy
GastroenterologyHepatosplenomegaly, pancreatitis, vasculitis affecting bowel, protein-losing enteropathy
OcularRetinal vasculitis, scleritis, episcleritis, papilledema

Figure E1 Systemic lupus erythematosus.

This young man has the typical malar rash of systemic lupus erythematosus. Note the prominent nasolabial sparing.

From Callen JP et al: Dermatological signs of systemic disease, ed 5, Philadelphia, 2017, Elsevier.

    1. Chronic: Raised erythematous patches with subsequent edematous plaques and adherent scales (discoid cutaneous lupus), lupus profundus, lupus tumidus; alopecia, photosensitivity, nasal, or oropharyngeal ulcerations (classically painless, but discoid lesions [Fig. E2] may be painful); Raynaud phenomenon; leukocytoclastic vasculitis, chilblains; livedo reticularis or livedo racemosa (secondary to antiphospholipid antibody syndrome)

Figure E2 Erosive lesions of discoid lupus erythematosus involving the palms.

Typical lesions of discoid lupus erythematosus are present elsewhere.

From Callen JP et al: Dermatological signs of systemic disease, ed 5, Philadelphia, 2017, Elsevier.

    1. Skin biopsy hallmark: Interface dermatitis
  1. Musculoskeletal (about 90% of lupus patients): Arthralgias are more common than true arthritis, but nonerosive deforming arthritis is not rare; myositis
  2. Cardiac: Pericardial rub (pericarditis) is most common; valvular heart disease (e.g., valve sclerosis, Libman-Sacks endocarditis); congestive heart failure, myocarditis, premature atherosclerotic heart disease
  3. Pulmonary: Pleuritis (most common), acute or chronic pneumonitis, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, pulmonary hypertension
  4. Gastrointestinal: Dysphagia, mesenteric vasculitis, peritonitis, pancreatitis, hepatitis
  5. Neuropsychiatric: Headache, psychosis, seizure, acute confusion states, peripheral or cranial neuropathy, transverse myelitis, stroke (may be associated with antiphospholipid syndrome), cognitive dysfunction
  6. Hematologic (about 50% of lupus patients): Anemia (hemolytic, anemia of chronic disease, aplastic anemia), thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, lymphadenopathy, secondary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
  7. Renal: Acute renal failure, proteinuria, nephritic syndrome, nephrotic syndrome
Etiology

Lupus may develop in genetically susceptible individuals, triggered by endogenous and exogenous factors. SLE susceptibility involves major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II polymorphism with commonly observed association with HLA-DR-2, DR3, DR4, and DR8. SLE is also associated with inherited deficiencies of C1q, C2, C4a, others. There is predilection for familial clustering of SLE with risk in monozygotic twins-about 25% to 50%-and 5% in dizygotic twins. Environmental factors such as ultraviolet (UV) light, Epstein-Barr virus infection, and tobacco smoking may have a triggering role. Autoantibody production is the hallmark of disease development and diagnosis of SLE. Evidence supports the improper processing of nuclear proteins and nucleic acid from cell death. Impairments in neutrophil cell death via a process termed NET-osis (nuclear extracellular trap) contribute to the accumulation of nuclear debris. This, in turn, can lead to the presentation of self-nuclear material to plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells propagate antibody and immune complex production via a type I interferon-dependent mechanism (Fig. E3).4

FIG E3 Contributors to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pathogenesis.

Mechanisms that promote development of SLE are related to the underlying genetic profile of the individual. Many of the disease-associated genetic variants (examples are illustrated) contribute to excessive production or impaired clearance of stimulatory nucleic acids; increased generation of products of the innate immune response, particularly type I interferon (IFN); or an altered threshold for activation or efficiency of signaling of cells of the adaptive immune response. In most cases, multiple genetic risk variants are required to establish a state of immune activation that is receptive to environmental triggers that promote development of autoimmunity. In rare cases, a mutation of a critical regulator of immune activation can be sufficient to initiate the altered immune state that can lead to disease. IFN is a product of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). Activation of the cells by intracellular nucleic acids or exogenous triggers, such as a virus or debris derived from damaged or dying cells, might represent mechanisms of initiation of disease. Once IFN-α is produced, it mediates numerous effects on immune system cells that mimic the response to a viral infection. The antigen-presenting capacity of myeloid dendritic cells can be augmented, promoting activation of self-reactive T cells and differentiation of B cells toward production of pathogenic antibodies. Activated T cells express CD154 (CD40 ligand) and produce interleukin-21 (IL-21), providing effective help for B cells to generate antibody-producing plasma cells. IFN-α also supports the production of B cell-activating factor (BAFF, also known as B lymphocyte stimulator), a survival and differentiation factor for B cells. Once autoantibodies are produced, immune complexes amplify immune activation by accessing endosomal Toll-like receptors in pDCs and B cells and depositing them directly in the vicinity of blood vessels, inducing complement activation, inflammation, and tissue damage. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and proinflammatory cytokines produced by monocytes and macrophages contribute to tissue damage, as does IFN-α, which stimulates endothelial cells and is associated with poor vascular repair and sclerosis. Ag-MHC, Antigen-major histocompatibility complex; BCR, B cell receptor; DC, dendritic cell; FcR, Fc receptor; MØ, macrophage; PMN, polymorphonuclear neutrophil; TCR, T cell receptor.

From Firestein GS et al: Firestein & Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2021, Elsevier.

Diagnosis

Differential Diagnosis

  • Rheumatoid arthritis, mixed connective tissue disease, systemic vasculitis
  • Neoplastic disorder
  • Hematologic malignancy, paraneoplastic syndrome
  • Systemic infection
  • Other: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome, primary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
Evaluation

The diagnosis of SLE is clinical. The 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE (Table 2) includes positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) at least once as obligatory entry criterion, followed by additive weighted criteria grouped in seven clinical (constitutional, hematologic, neuropsychiatric, mucocutaneous, serosal, musculoskeletal, renal), and three immunologic (antiphospholipid antibodies, complement proteins, SLE-specific antibodies) domains, and weighted from 2 to 10. Patients accumulating 10 points are classified as having systemic lupus. The new criteria had a sensitivity of 96.1% and specificity of 93.4%, compared with 82.8% sensitivity and 93.4% specificity of the ACR 1997 (see later) and 96.7% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 criteria.5

TABLE 2 The American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

ClinicalImmunologic
ConstitutionalFever2aPLaCL IgG or B2GP1 or LA2
CutaneousNonscarring alopecia
Oral ulcers
SCLE or discoid
ACLE
2
2
4
6
ComplementLow C3 or C4
Low C3 + C4
3
4
ArthritisArthritis (synovitis in 2 joints or TTP and a.m. stiffness)6AntibodiesAnti-DNA
Anti-Sm
6
6
NeurologicDelirium
Psychosis
Seizure
2
3
5
SerositisPleural/pericardial effusion
Acute pericarditis
5
6
HematologicLeukopenia
Thrombocytopenia
AIHA
3
4
4
RenalUPCR >0.5
Class II or V
Class III or IV
4
8
10

aCL, Anticardiolipin antibodies; ACLE, acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus; AIHA, autoimmune hemolytic anemia; aPL, antiphospholipid antibodies; IgG, immunoglobulin G; SCLE, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus; Sm, Smith; TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; UPCR, urine protein/creatinine ratio.

From Firestein GS et al: Firestein & Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2021, Elsevier.

1997 ACR Criteria:

  • Malar rash
  • Discoid rash
  • Photosensitivity (recurrence of unusual skin rash in sun-exposed areas)
  • Oral or nasopharyngeal painless ulceration, observed by physician
  • Arthritis (nonerosive)
  • Serositis (pleuritis, pericarditis)
  • Renal disorder (persistent proteinuria >0.5 g/day, or 3+ on dipstick if quantification not performed; cellular casts)
  • Neurologic disorder (seizures, psychosis [in absence of offending drugs or metabolic derangement])
  • Hematologic disorder:
    1. Hemolytic anemia with reticulocytosis
    2. Leukopenia (<4000/mm3 total on two or more occasions)
    3. Lymphopenia (<1500/mm3 on two or more occasions)
    4. Thrombocytopenia (<100,000/mm3 in the absence of offending drugs)
  • Immunologic disorder:
    1. Anti-double-stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA)
    2. Anti-Smith antibody (anti-Sm)
    3. Antiphospholipid antibodies (anticardiolipin immunoglobulin M [IgM] or IgG, lupus anticoagulant, antibeta-2 glycoprotein IgM or IgG, or false-positive fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test or Treponema pallidum immobilization for 6 mo)
  • ANA: An abnormal titer of ANA by immunofluorescence or equivalent assay at any time in the absence of drugs known to be associated with drug-induced lupus syndrome

2012 SLICC Criteria: SLE can be diagnosed if6:

  • Biopsy-proven nephritis with either ANA or anti-dsDNA antibodies or
  • Patient satisfies four clinical criteria, requiring at least one clinical and at least one immunologic criterion
  • Clinical criteria:
    1. Acute cutaneous lupus (malar rash, bullous lupus, toxic epidermal necrolysis, photosensitive lupus rash, maculopapular lupus, subacute cutaneous lupus)
    2. Chronic cutaneous lupus (discoid, hypertrophic verrucous, panniculitis, mucosal lupus, lupus tumidus, chilblains lupus, lichen planus)
    3. Oral ulcers or nasal ulcers
    4. Nonscarring alopecia
    5. Synovitis (more than two joints or inflammatory arthralgias of more than two joints)
    6. Serositis (pleurisy for more than 1 day, pericardial pain for more than 1 day)
    7. Renal (>500 mg proteinuria/24 h or RBC casts)
    8. Neurologic (seizures, psychosis, mononeuritis multiplex, myelitis, peripheral or cranial neuropathy, acute confusion state)
    9. Hemolytic anemia
    10. Lymphopenia (<1000/mm3 at least once)
    11. Thrombocytopenia (<100,000/mm3 at least once)
  • Immunologic criteria:
    1. ANA
    2. Anti-dsDNA (>2× laboratory reference range)
    3. Anti-Smith
    4. Antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant, rapid plasma reagin [RPR], anticardiolipin IgA, IgG, IgM, anti-β2 glycoprotein IgA, IgG, IgM)
    5. Low complement
    6. Direct Coombs test in the absence of hemolytic anemia

Definitions of SLE classification criteria are included in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Definitions of SLE Classification Criteria 2019

CriteriaDefinition
Antinuclear antibodies (ANA)ANA at a titer of 1:80 on HEp-2 cells or an equivalent positive test at least once. Testing by immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells or a solid-phase ANA screening immunoassay with at least equivalent performance is highly recommended.
FeverTemperature >38.3° C (100.9° F)
LeukopeniaWhite blood cell count <4000/mm³
ThrombocytopeniaPlatelet count <100,000/mm³
Autoimmune hemolysisEvidence of hemolysis, such as reticulocytosis, low haptoglobin, elevated indirect bilirubin, elevated LDH, AND positive Coombs (direct antiglobulin) test
DeliriumCharacterized by 1) change in consciousness or level of arousal with reduced ability to focus, 2) symptom development over hours to <2 days, 3) symptom fluctuation throughout the day, 4) either 4a) acute/subacute change in cognition (e.g., memory deficit or disorientation) or 4b) change in behavior, mood, or affect (e.g., restlessness, reversal of sleep/wake cycle)
PsychosisCharacterized by 1) delusions and/or hallucinations without insight and 2) absence of delirium
SeizurePrimary generalized seizure or partial/focal seizure
Nonscarring alopeciaNonscarring alopecia observed by a clinician†
Oral ulcersOral ulcers observed by a clinician†
Subacute cutaneous OR discoid lupusSubacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus observed by a clinician: †Annular or papulosquamous (psoriasiform) cutaneous eruption, usually photodistributed
If skin biopsy is performed, typical changes must be present (interface vacuolar dermatitis consisting of a perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, often with dermal mucin noted)
OR Discoid lupus erythematosus observed by a clinician:
Erythematous-violaceous cutaneous lesions with secondary changes of atrophic scarring, dyspigmentation, often follicular hyperkeratosis/plugging (scalp), leading to scarring alopecia on the scalp
If skin biopsy is performed, typical changes must be present (interface vacuolar dermatitis consisting of a perivascular and/or lymphohistiocytic infiltrate of the appendages. In the scalp, follicular keratin plugs may be seen. In longstanding lesions, mucin deposition may be noted)
Acute cutaneous lupusMalar rash or generalized maculopapular rash observed by a clinician. If skin biopsy is performed, typical changes must be present (interface vacuolar dermatitis consisting of a perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, often with dermal mucin noted. Perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate may be present early in the course)
Pleural or pericardial effusionImaging evidence (such as ultrasound, x-ray, CT scan, MRI) of pleural or pericardial effusion, or both
Acute pericarditis2 of 1) pericardial chest pain (typically sharp, worse with inspiration, improved by leaning forward), 2) pericardial rub, 3) EKG with new widespread ST elevation or PR depression, 4) new or worsened pericardial effusion on imaging (such as ultrasound, x-ray, CT scan, MRI)
Joint involvementEither 1) synovitis involving two or more joints characterized by swelling or effusion, or 2) tenderness in two or more joints and at least 30 min of morning stiffness
Proteinuria >0.5 g/24 hProteinuria >0.5 g/24 h by 24-h urine or equivalent spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio
Class II or V lupus nephritis on renal biopsy according to ISN/RPS 2003 classificationClass II: Mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis: Purely mesangial hypercellularity of any degree or mesangial matrix expansion by light microscopy, with mesangial immune deposit. A few isolated subepithelial or subendothelial deposits may be visible by immunofluorescence or electron microscopy, but not by light microscopy.
Class V:
Membranous lupus nephritis: Global or segmental subepithelial immune deposits or their morphologic sequelae by light microscopy and by immunofluorescence or electron microscopy, with or without mesangial alterations
Class III or IV lupus nephritis on renal biopsy according to ISN/RPS 2003 classificationClass III: Focal lupus nephritis: Active or inactive focal, segmental, or global endocapillary or extracapillary glomerulonephritis involving <50% of all glomeruli, typically with focal subendothelial immune deposits, with or without mesangial alterations
Class IV:
Diffuse lupus nephritis: Active or inactive diffuse, segmental, or global endocapillary or extracapillary glomerulonephritis involving 50% of all glomeruli, typically with diffuse subendothelial immune deposits, with or without mesangial alterations. This class includes cases with diffuse wire loop deposits but with little or no glomerular proliferation.
Positive antiphospholipid antibodiesAnticardiolipin antibodies (IgA, IgG, or IgM) at medium or high titer (>40 APL, GPL, or MPL, or >the 99th percentile) or positive anti-β2GPI antibodies (IgA, IgG, or IgM) or positive lupus anticoagulant
Low C3 OR low C4C3 OR C4 below the lower limit of normal
Low C3 AND low C4Both C3 AND C4 below their lower limits of normal
Anti-dsDNA antibodies OR anti-Sm antibodiesAnti-dsDNA antibodies in an immunoassay with demonstrated 90% specificity for SLE against relevant disease controls OR anti-Sm antibodies

anti-β2GPI, Anti-β2-glycoprotein I; anti-dsDNA, anti-double-stranded DNA; anti-Sm, anti-Smith CT, computed tomography; EKG, electrocardiography; Ig, immunoglobulin; ISN, International Society of Nephrology; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RPS, Renal Pathology Society; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

This may include physical examination or review of a photograph.

Laboratory Tests

Suggested initial laboratory evaluation of suspected SLE:

  • ANA by immunofluorescence or similar high-quality method
    1. CBC with differential, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine, urinalysis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), complements (C3, C4)

Consider additional laboratory testing in a patient with strong suspicion for systemic lupus:

  • Anti-dsDNA, anti-Smith, anti-SSA, anti-SSB, anti-RNP antibodies. Table 4 summarizes autoantibodies and clinical significance in SLE
  • Lupus anticoagulant, RPR, anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta-2 glycoprotein antibodies especially in patients with thrombotic events or recurrent miscarriages
  • Urinalysis for red blood cell (RBC), cellular casts
  • Random spot urine protein: Urine creatinine ratio, 24-h urine protein collection if proteinuria; >0.5 or >500 mg/24 h is abnormal, respectively. Evaluation of renal biopsy specimens in lupus nephritis (LN) is summarized in Table E5

TABLE 4 Autoantibodies and Clinical Significance in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

AutoantibodyPrevalence in SLE (%)Clinical Associations
Antinuclear Antibody
Anti-dsDNA6095% specificity for SLE; fluctuates with disease activity; associated with glomerulonephritis
Anti-Smith20-3099% specificity for SLE; associated with anti-U1RNP antibodies
Anti-U1RNP30Antibody associated with mixed connective tissue disease and lower frequency of glomerulonephritis
Anti-Ro/SS-A30Associated with Sjögren syndrome, photosensitivity, SCLE, neonatal lupus, congenital heart block
Anti-La/SS-B20Associated with Sjögren syndrome, SCLE, neonatal lupus, congenital heart block, anti-Ro/SS-A
Antihistone70Also associated with drug-induced lupus
Antiphospholipid30Associated with arterial and venous thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity

SCLE, Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

From Firestein GS et al: Firestein & Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2021, Elsevier.

TABLE E5 Evaluation of Renal Biopsy Specimens in Lupus Nephritis

Renal Biopsy ParametersEvaluation
Ensure that sample is adequateSpecimens with <10 glomeruli are suboptimal
Light microscopy stainsHematoxylin and eosin: Best to identify inflammatory cells
Trichrome (Masson): Best for interstitial fibrosis, glomerulosclerosis
Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS): Identify basement membrane abnormalities
Immunofluorescence studiesUseful for identification of immune deposits
Electron microscopyHelps to define distribution (subendothelial, epithelial, membranous deposits) of immune complexes and detection of podocytopathy
Activity and chronicity indexesUseful in organizing renal biopsy report as a complement to ISN/RPS 2003 classification
Important elements to considerActivity index (especially crescents, fibrinoid necrosis)
Chronicity index (especially interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, glomerular sclerosis)
Renal vascular lesions (related to presence of antiphospholipid antibodies)

ISN, International Society of Nephrology; RPS, Renal Pathology Society.

From Hochberg MC: Rheumatology, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.

Direct Coombs test

Imaging Studies

  • Chest x-ray examination for evaluation of pulmonary involvement (pleural effusion, infiltrates)
  • Electrocardiogram for chest pain
  • Echocardiogram if murmur, evidence of new or unexplained congestive heart failure, or suspected pericarditis

Treatment

Nonpharmacologic Therapy

  • Avoidance of sunlight and use of high-SPF sunscreen (>35).
  • Screening and counseling for modifiable cardiovascular risk factors such as cigarette smoking, diet, exercise, cholesterol, and uncontrolled hypertension (HTN).
  • Counseling for pregnancy planning for patients of childbearing age.
  • Calcium and vitamin D supplementation for prevention of early osteoporosis (see “Osteoporosis”).7
General Rx

  • There are only four FDA-approved SLE medications: Aspirin, corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine (1955), and belimumab (2011).
  • Treatment should be targeted toward the involved organ(s). Recommended drugs for the treatment of SLE according to stratification of disease severity are described in Fig. 4. Indications for immunosuppressive therapy in SLE are summarized in Table 6.
  • Limited and defined courses of corticosteroids are useful for a variety of SLE symptoms. Steroid therapy should be restricted to acute or subacute control of symptoms, due to the increased cardiovascular risk and increased organ damage associated with chronic steroid use. Recommended drug monitoring in SLE is summarized in Table 7.
  • Consider checking G6PD in certain ethnic groups more predisposed to antimalarial- induced hemolytic anemia.
  • Hydroxychloroquine has best evidence for reducing flares, organ damage, lipids, thrombosis; improving survival; augmenting action of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in LN; and preventing seizures. Currently recommend not to exceed an oral dose of 5 mg/kg/day to decrease risk of retinal toxicity.1
  • Methotrexate and azathioprine are used as steroid-sparing agents. Indications include cutaneous and joint involvement.1
  • Joint pain and mild serositis are generally well controlled with NSAIDs or low-dose corticosteroids. Hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate are also effective for arthritis. Belimumab does well for joint and cutaneous manifestations. Leflunomide and rituximab may be considered for refractory arthritis. Treatment approach for musculoskeletal features of SLE is summarized in Table 8.
  • Cutaneous manifestations:
    1. Topical or intradermal corticosteroids are helpful for individual discoid lesions, especially in the scalp.
    2. Hydroxychloroquine alone or in combination with quinacrine and/or chloroquine can be considered for refractory skin disease.
    3. Refractory cases may be treated with belimumab, MMF, dapsone, or combination treatment.1,8
    4. Fig. E5 and Table E9 summarize general management of cutaneous lesions in SLE.
  • Hematologic manifestations:
    1. Corticosteroids are first-line therapy. Table E10 summarizes the treatment and main hematologic features of SLE.

TABLE E9 General Management of Cutaneous Lesions in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

AcuteSCLEDLE
Nonpharmacologic Measures
PhotoprotectionPhotoprotectionPhotoprotection
Avoidance of photosensitizing drugsAvoidance of photosensitizing drugsAvoidance of photosensitizing drugs
Smoking cessationSmoking cessationSmoking cessation
Topical Treatment
Topical calcineurin inhibitorsTopical glucocorticoidsTopical corticosteroids
Topical calcineurin inhibitorsTopical calcineurin inhibitors
Intralesional glucocorticoidsIntralesional glucocorticoids
R-salbutamol
Systemic Treatment
First lineAntimalarialsAntimalarialsAntimalarials
GlucocorticoidsGlucocorticoids
Second lineSystemic retinoidsMTX
Systemic retinoids
Antimalarial combination
Refractory Cases
According to systemic involvementThalidomideDapsone
RTXLeflunomideThalidomide
BelimumabMMFBelimumab
IVIGsRTX
RTXLenalidomide
Belimumab
Therapies Under Investigation
AbataceptAbataceptAbatacept
SifalimumabSifalimumab
ApremilastApremilast

DLE, Discoid lupus erythematosus; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MTX, methotrexate; RTX, rituximab; SCLE, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

From Hochberg MC: Rheumatology, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.

Figure E5 Suggested Algorithm for the Management of Cutaneous Manifestations in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

!!flowchart!!

CNI, Calcineurin inhibitors; GC, glucocorticoids; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MTX, methotrexate; UVA/UVB, ultraviolet A/B.

From Firestein GS et al: Firestein & Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2021, Elsevier.

TABLE 8 Treatment Approach for Musculoskeletal Features of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

First-Line TherapySecond-Line TherapyThird-Line TherapyExperimental Therapy
ArthritisHCQ or CQMTXBelimumabAbatacept
Low doses of glucocorticoidsLeflunomideRTXSifalimumab
Anti-TNF
AVNAvoid high doses of corticosteroidAntiaggregation in aPL positivityCore decompression
Percutaneous drilling
Arthroplasty
MyositisHigh-dose corticosteroidMTXIVIG
AzathioprineRTX

aPL, Antiphospholipid; AVN, avascular necrosis; CQ, chloroquine; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; MTX, methotrexate; RTX, rituximab; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

From Hochberg MC: Rheumatology, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.

TABLE 7 Recommended Drug Monitoring in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

DrugDosageDose AdjustmentToxicities Requiring MonitoringBaseline EvaluationLaboratory Monitoring
Azathioprine50-200 mg/day in 1-3 doses with food25% if eGFR 10-30 ml/min; 50% if eGFR <10 ml/minMyelosuppression, hepatotoxicity, lymphoproliferative diseasesCBC, platelets, Cr, AST or ALTCBC and platelets every 2 wk, with changes in dosage; during monitoring every 1-3 mo
Mycophenolate mofetil1-3 g/day in 2 divided doses with foodMaximum 1 g/day if eGFR <25 ml/minMyelosuppression, hematotoxicity, infectionCBC, platelet, Cr, AST or ALTCBCs and platelets every 1-2 wk with changes in dosage; during monitoring every 1-3 mo
Cyclophosphamide50-150 mg/day in a single dose with breakfast. Increase fluid intake (at least 3 L water/day), empty bladder before bedtime25% if eGFR 25-50 ml/min; 30%-50% if eGFR <25 ml/min; 25% if serum Bil 3.1-5 mg/dl or transaminases >3 times ULNMyelosuppression, hemorrhagic cystitis, myeloproliferative disease, malignanciesCBC, platelet, Cr, AST or ALT, urinalysisCBC with differential every 1-2 wk, with changes in dosage and then every 1-3 mo; keep WBC >4000/mm3 with dose adjustment; urinalysis for hematuria, AST or ALT every 3 mo; urinalysis for hematuria every 6-12 mo following cessation
Methotrexate7.5-25 mg/wk in 1-3 doses with food or milk/water50% if eGFR 10-50 ml/min; avoid use if eGFR <10 ml/min; avoid use in hepatic dysfunction (serum Bil 3.1-5 mg/dl or transaminases >3 times ULN)Myelosuppression, hepatic fibrosis, pneumonitisChest radiograph, hepatitis B/C serology in high-risk patients, AST or ALT, Alb, ALP, CrCBC with platelet, AST, Alb, Cr every 1-3 mo
Cyclosporin A100-400 mg/day in 2 doses at the same time every day with meal or between mealsAvoid in impaired renal functionRenal insufficiency, anemia, hypertensionCBC, Cr, uric acid, AST or ALT, Alb, ALP, blood pressureCr every 2 wk until dose is stable, then monthly; CBC, potassium, AST or ALT, Alb, and ALP every 1-3 mo; drug levels only with doses >3 mg/kg/day
Tacrolimus1-4 mg/day in 2 doses at the same time every dayCautious use in liver or renal insufficiencyRenal insufficiency, neurotoxicity, malignancy, infections, hyperkalemiaCr, potassium, AST or ALT, glucose, blood pressureOnce a week for the first 3-4 wk, then every 1-3 mo; monitor drug trough levels
Rituximab1000 mg on day 1 and 15NoneHBV reactivation (rare)CBC, Cr, AST or ALT, HBV serology (high-risk patients), TSTCBC and platelets

Note that placebo-controlled studies have failed to demonstrate efficacy in controlled clinical trials.

Alb, Serum albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; Bil, bilirubin; CBC, complete blood cell count; Cr, serum creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HBV, hepatitis B; LFTs, liver function tests; MTX, methotrexate; TST, tuberculin skin testing; ULN, upper limit of normal; WBC, white blood cell count.

From Firestein GS et al: Firestein & Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2021, Elsevier.

Figure 4 Recommended Drugs for the Treatment of SLE According to Stratification of Disease Severity

The grading of recommendation/level of evidence refers to extrarenal manifestations. aPL, Antiphospholipid antibodies; AZA, azathioprine; BEL, belimumab; CNI, calcineurin inhibitors; CYC, cyclophosphamide; GC, glucocorticoids; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MTX, methotrexate; PO, per os; Pre, prednisone; RTX, rituximab; SLEDAI, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index.

From Firestein GS et al: Firestein & Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2021, Elsevier.

TABLE 6 Indications for Immunosuppressive Therapy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

General Indications
Involvement of major organs or extensive involvement of non-major organs (skin) refractory to other agents, or bothFailure to respond to or inability to taper glucocorticoids to acceptable doses (<7.5 mg/day) for long-term use
Specific Organ Involvement
Renal
Proliferative or membranous nephritis, or mixed
Hematologic
Severe thrombocytopenia (platelets <20-30,000/mm3)Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-like syndrome
Severe autoimmune hemolytic or aplastic anemia (hemoglobin <8 g/dl) not responding to glucocorticoids
Pulmonary
Lupus pneumonitis and/or alveolar hemorrhage
Cardiac
Myocarditis with depressed left ventricular function, pericarditis with impending tamponade
Gastrointestinal
Abdominal vasculitis, peritonitis
Nervous System
Transverse myelitis, optic neuritis, psychosis refractory to glucocorticoids, mononeuritis multiplex, severe peripheral neuropathy, acute confusional state

From Firestein GS et al: Firestein & Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2021, Elsevier.

TABLE E10 Treatment of Main Hematologic Features of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

First-Line TherapySecond-Line TherapyThird-Line TherapyExperimental Therapy
ThrombocytopeniaGlucocorticoidsAzathioprine
CYC
IVIG
RTXMMF
Cyclosporine
Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists
Autoimmune anemiaGlucocorticoidsCYC
IVIG
MMFRTX
Danazol
Pure RBC aplasiaGlucocorticoidsCYC
IVIG
Danazol
Cyclosporine
MMF
EPO
Hemophagocytic syndromeGlucocorticoidsCYC
Cyclosporine
PE
IVIG
RTX
TTPGlucocorticoidsPECYCRTX

CYC, Cyclophosphamide; EPO, erythropoietin; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; MMF, mycophenolate; PE, plasma exchange; RBC, red blood cell; RTX, rituximab; TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Methylprednisolone pulses (3 × 1000 mg) are recommended.

In patients with concomitant infection.

From Hochberg MC: Rheumatology, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.

    1. Azathioprine can be used for thrombocytopenia or hemolytic anemia. Check for TPMT genetic mutation before the first use.
    2. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or rituximab may be considered for severe leukopenia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, or autoimmune thrombocytopenia (Fig. E6).

FIG E6 Suggested Algorithm for the Management of Immune Thrombocytopenia in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

!!flowchart!!

AZA, Azathioprine; CsA, cyclosporine A; GC, glucocorticoids; IS, immunosuppressive; IV CYC, intravenous cyclophosphamide; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; IV MP, intravenous methylprednisolone; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; PLTs, platelets; RTX, rituximab; TPO, thrombopoietin.

From Firestein GS et al: Firestein & Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2021, Elsevier.

    1. Central nervous system manifestations:
    2. Headaches are treated symptomatically. Most headaches will not be SLE-related and should be treated according to the underlying cause.
    3. Anticonvulsants and antipsychotics may be indicated.
    4. Standard therapy for other neuropsychiatric SLE symptoms is not established.
  1. Renal disease: The histologic classification of LN according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society is summarized in Table E11. Severity of LN is described in Table E12. Treatment recommendations for LN are summarized in Table E13. (Class III, IV, or IV/V with cellular crescents LN; see Table E14.) INDUCTION: 6-mo treatment.

TABLE E11 Histologic Classification of Lupus Nephritis According to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (2003)

ClassDescription
IMinimal mesangial lupus nephritis
Normal glomeruli by light microscopy, but mesangial immune deposits by immunofluorescence
IIMesangial proliferative lupus nephritis
Purely mesangial hypercellularity of any degree or mesangial matrix expansion by light microscopy, with mesangial immune deposits
A few isolated subepithelial or subendothelial deposits may be visible by immunofluorescence or electron microscopy but not by light microscopy
IIIFocal lupus nephritis
Active or inactive focal, segmental, or global endocapillary or extracapillary glomerulonephritis involving <50% of all glomeruli, typically with focal subendothelial immune deposits, with or without mesangial alterations
IVDiffuse lupus nephritis
Active or inactive diffuse, segmental, or global endocapillary or extracapillary glomerulonephritis involving 50% of all glomeruli, typically with diffuse subendothelial immune deposits, with or without mesangial alterations. This class is divided into diffuse segmental (IV-S) lupus nephritis when 50% of the involved glomeruli have segmental lesions and diffuse global (IV-G) when 50% of the involved glomeruli have global lesions. Segmental is defined as a glomerular lesion that involves less than half of the glomerular tuft. This class includes cases with diffuse wire loop deposits but with little or no glomerular proliferation.
VMembranous lupus nephritis
Global or segmental subepithelial immune deposits or their morphologic sequelae by light microscopy and by immunofluorescence or electron microscopy, with or without mesangial alterations
Class V nephritis may occur in combination with class III or class IV, in which case both will be diagnosed.
Class V nephritis may show advanced sclerotic lesions.
VIAdvanced sclerotic lupus nephritis 90% of the glomeruli globally sclerosed without residual activity

From Hochberg MC: Rheumatology, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.

TABLE E12 Severity of Lupus Nephritis

Histologic Class (ISN/RPS 2003)GFRProteinuria >3 g per 24 hrAdverse Histologic Features
MildIII---
V--
Moderately severeIII+/-+/--
IV-+/--
V-+
SevereIII-IV+/-+/-+
IV++/-+/-
III-IV+§+/-+/-
V++
V + III-IV+/-+/-+/-

+, Presence of feature; -, absence of feature; ISN, International Society of Nephrology; RPS, Renal Pathology Society.

Concomitant treatment with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs may modify urinary sediment or histologic findings and should be taken into consideration.

Reproducible increase of 30% in serum creatinine levels and/or decrease of 10% in glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

Cellular crescents in 30% of glomeruli and/or fibrinoid necrosis in 25% of glomeruli and/or activity index 12 and/or chronicity index 4 and/or combination of activity index 11 and chronicity index 3.

§ Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (doubling of serum creatinine within 2-3 mo).

From Hochberg MC: Rheumatology, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.

TABLE E13 Recommended Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

Histologic Type or SeverityType of Therapy
InductionMaintenance
Proliferative
Mild
  • High-dose glucocorticoids (0.5-1 mg/kg/day for 4-6 wk with gradual tapering to 0.125 mg/kg every other day within 3-4 mo) alone or in combination with AZA (1-2 mg/kg/day)
  • If no response within 3-6 mo, treat as moderately severe.
  • Low-dose glucocorticoids (0.125 mg/kg on alternative days) alone or with AZA (1-2 mg/kg/day)
  • Consider further gradual tapering at the end of each year of response
Moderate
  • MPA (MMF 3 g/day) with glucocorticoids (0.5 mg/kg/day for 4 wk; then taper) for 6 mo. Consider three initial pulses of IV MP (500-750 mg/pulse), or
  • Pulse IV CYC (3 g over 3 mo) with glucocorticoids as above
  • If no response within 6-12 mo, treat as severe.
  • Low-dose glucocorticoids (0.125 mg/kg on alternative days) with MPA (MMF 2 g/day) for 18-24 mo after initial response; then consider gradual tapering, or
  • AZA (2 mg/kg/day)
SevereMonthly pulses of IV CYC (0.5-1 g/m2) in combination with pulse IV MP for 6 mo. Background glucocorticoids (0.5 mg/kg/day for 4 wk; then taper), or
  • MPA (MMF 3 g/day)
  • If no improvement, consider MPA, combination of MPA with calcineurin inhibitor, or rituximab.
Low-dose glucocorticoids (0.125 mg/kg on alternative days) in combination with quarterly pulses of IV CYC for at least 1 yr beyond response, or
  • MPA (MMF 2 g/day)
Membranous
MildHigh-dose glucocorticoids alone or in combination with AZA (2 mg/kg/day)Low-dose glucocorticoids alone or with AZA (1-2 mg/kg/day)
Moderate to severeHigh-dose glucocorticoids in combination with MPA (MMF 3 g/day), or
  • Bimonthly pulse IV CYC (0.5-1 g/m2, six pulses), or
  • CsA (3-5 mg/kg/day) or tacrolimus
  1. Low-dose glucocorticoids
  2. AZA (2 mg/kg/day)
  3. 1CsA (3 mg/kg/day) or tacrolimus
  4. MPA (MMF 2 g/day)

AZA, Azathioprine; CsA, cyclosporine A; IV CYC, intravenous cyclophosphamide; IV MP, intravenous methylprednisolone; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MPA, mycophenolic acid.

From Hochberg MC: Rheumatology, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.

TABLE E14 Severity of Lupus Nephritis

Proliferative Disease
MildType III without severe histologic features (e.g., crescents, fibrinoid necrosis); low chronicity index (i.e., 3); normal renal function; non-nephrotic proteinuria
Moderately severeMild disease as defined above with partial or no response after the initial induction therapy or delayed remission (>12 mo), or focal proliferative nephritis with adverse histologic features or reproducible increase of at least 30% in serum creatinine levels, or diffuse proliferative nephritis (class IV) without adverse histologic features
SevereModerately severe as defined above but not remitting after 6 to 12 mo of therapy, or proliferative disease with impaired renal function and fibrinoid necrosis or crescents in >25% of glomeruli, or mixed membranous and proliferative nephritis, or proliferative nephritis with high chronicity alone or in combination with high activity (chronicity index >4 or chronicity index >3 and activity index >10), or rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (doubling of serum creatinine within 2-3 mo)
Membranous Nephropathy
MildNon-nephrotic proteinuria with normal renal function
ModerateNephrotic-range proteinuria with normal renal function at presentation
SevereNephrotic-range proteinuria with impaired renal function at presentation (at least 30% increase in serum creatinine)

Concomitant therapy with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs may modify urinary sediment and/or histologic findings and should be taken into consideration.

From Hochberg MC: Rheumatology, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.

    1. The typical treatment induction period is 6 mo. The use of intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) with corticosteroids given at monthly intervals is more effective in preserving renal function than is treatment with glucocorticoids alone. Low-dose “Euro-Lupus” protocol may be equally efficacious and less toxic for certain populations (e.g., Caucasians, Blacks) than high-dose regimen. MMF is considered equivalent to CYC based on high-quality studies, with better tolerability and fertility profile. MMF may be preferred in African Americans and Hispanics. MMF and azathioprine are good options for maintenance treatment.
    2. There is interest in and positive data for use of calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus, for treatment of LN. Newer and possibly less toxic voclosporin has entered phase III trial and when added to MMF showed better results in renal responses compared with MMF alone.9
  1. Severe nonrenal organ disease:
    1. Evidence from systematic randomized controlled trials for non-renal lupus treatment is comparatively limited.
    2. High-dose intravenous CYC is used as an induction treatment. Azathioprine or MMF may be used as maintenance.
    3. IVIG may be considered in severe disease especially when concomitant infection is present.
    4. Plasmapheresis or plasma exchange may be considered in critical situations: First-line therapy in Guillain-Barré syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP); second-line for SLE-related hemolytic anemia, cerebritis, and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH). Infectious complications are common.
  2. Fever/infection post-immunosuppressive therapy
    1. Immunosuppressive therapy can result in neutropenia and increased susceptibility to infection
    2. Fig. E7 illustrates an approach to SLE patients with fever and other signs of infection post-immunosuppressive therapy

FIG E7 Initial Assessment and Management of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Who Receive Immunosuppressive Therapy and are Seen with Fever or Other Symptoms and Signs Suggestive of Infection

!!flowchart!!

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS): T 38° C or <36° C, tachycardia (heart rate >90/min), tachypnea (respiratory rate >20/min), white blood cells (WBC) >12,000/mm3; comorbidities: Age older than 65 yr, diabetes, chronic cardiopulmonary disease. Consider empiric therapy for Pneumocystis pneumonia in severe hypoxemia or diffuse pulmonary infiltrates. Consider tuberculosis and other opportunistic central nervous system (CNS) infections. AZA, Azathioprine; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CBC, complete blood count; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GM, galactomannan; H1N1, influenza H1N1; HRCT, high-resolution chest tomography; IV CYC, intravenous cyclophosphamide; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MTX, methotrexate; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; T, temperature; VATS, video-assisted thoracoscopy.

Modified from Papadimitraki ED et al: Systemic lupus erythematosus: cytotoxic drugs. In Tsokos G [ed]: Systemic lupus erythematosus, ed 5, St Louis, 2010, Elsevier, pp. 1083-1108.

  • Therapy targeting B cells:
    1. Rituximab: Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Randomized controlled trials for rituximab as an adjunct induction agent were negative in terms of both renal and nonrenal outcomes but were felt to be limited by study design. Some observational studies have shown efficacy in those who have failed other regimens.1,10
    2. Epratuzumab: An anti-CD22 agent. Studies initially showed positive data, but in July 2015 both phase III trials for SLE failed to meet their primary endpoint, and this medication is no longer studied.
    3. Belimumab: Decreases activation of B cells. When used in addition to standard therapy, patients on belimumab showed improvement in cutaneous and musculoskeletal disease. Belimumab-treated patients had decreased SLE activity, a reduced time to disease flare, and lower glucocorticoid exposure. Patients with central nervous system or serious kidney disease were excluded. There is interest in adding belimumab to standard LN regimen, but data from BLISS-LN are not yet available.8,11
    4. Abatacept: Downregulates T-cell activation. Data are limited regarding improvement in arthritis, fatigue, sleep if added to routine therapy. Negative data as adjunct agent for lupus arthritis when added to MMF or CYC. Shows limited positive efficacy in patients refractory to other treatments.1
    5. Interferon therapy: Interferon α (INFα) has been linked to increased disease activity in SLE. INFα blocking therapies are in phase II clinical trials. Sifalimumab, a monoclonal antibody against INFα, reduced moderate to severe mucocutaneous involvement in SLE and decreased active joint count and fatigue scores in preliminary data analysis. Development of sifalimumab has been terminated in favor of anifrolumab, a similar INFα blocking agent. The TULIP-1 study of that molecule did not meet response criteria based on score used in the BLISS trial. TULIP-2 used BICLA as a response measure and showed statistically significant improvement compared to placebo. The phase III trial is ongoing.12,13
    6. There is continuous interest in studying B-cell and interferon-based treatment, but no FDA approved treatment, other than noted earlier, is currently used clinically.
    7. Novel potential targeted treatment approaches may include blocking interleukin-17 (IL-17), IL-12/23, and JAK inhibitors (early data for 4-mg baricitinib showed positive results). Research remains very active and ongoing to find new therapeutic targets.14,15
  • Recommended assessment and monitoring of patients with SLE with nonrenal, noncentral nervous system manifestations are summarized in Box 1.
  • SLE in pregnancy (Table E15): Pregnancy in the setting of SLE is associated with a higher risk of complications compared with healthy women (preterm labor, unplanned cesarean delivery, fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, and eclampsia). Ideally, conception should be attempted in a state of disease remission or stability. If pregnancy occurs during a period of disease relapse, medications need to be adjusted for maternal and fetal safety. Mothers with active SLE should be tested for anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies once before or early in pregnancy, due to their associated increase in risk for neonatal lupus and congenital heart block.16

BOX 1 Recommended Assessment and Monitoring of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With Nonrenal, Noncentral Nervous System Manifestations

ANA, Antinuclear antibodies; anti-RNP, anti-ribonucleoprotein; anti-Sm, anti-Smith; aPLs, antiphospholipid antibodies; BMD, bone mineral density; BMI, body mass index; CBC, complete blood count; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CLASI, cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CQ, chloroquine; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IS, immunosuppressive; LE, lupus erythematosus; NB, nota bene; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; VAS, visual analog scale.

Patient General Assessment

In addition to the standard care of patients without lupus of the same age and sex, the assessment of patients with SLE must include the evaluation of:

  • Disease activity by a validated index at each visit
  • Organ damage annually
  • General quality of life by patient history and/or by a 0-10 VAS (patient global score) at each visit
  • Comorbidities
  • Drug toxicity
Cardiovascular Risk Factors

At baseline and during follow-up at least once a year:

  • Assess smoking, vascular events (cerebral and cardiovascular), physical activity, oral contraceptives, hormonal therapies, and family history of cardiovascular disease
  • Perform blood tests: Blood cholesterol, glucose
  • Examine for blood pressure and BMI (and/or waist circumference)
  • NB: Some patients may need more frequent follow-up (e.g., those taking glucocorticoids).
Osteoporosis Risk

All patients with SLE:

  • Should be assessed for adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, regular exercise, and smoking habits
  • Should be screened and followed for osteoporosis according to existing guidelines (1) for postmenopausal women and (2) for patients taking glucocorticoids or on any other medication that may reduce BMD
Cancer Risk

Cancer screening is recommended according to the guidelines for the general population, including cervical smear tests.

Infection Risk

Screening: Patients with SLE should be screened for:

  • HIV based on the patient’s risk factors
  • HCV and HBV based on the patient’s risk factors, particularly before IS drugs including high-dose glucocorticoids are given
  • Tuberculosis, according to local guidelines, especially before IS drugs including high-dose glucocorticoids are given
  • CMV testing should be considered during treatment in selected patients.

Vaccination: Patients with SLE are at high risk of infections, and prevention should be recommended. The administration of inactivated vaccines (especially flu and pneumococcus), following CDC guidelines for patients who are immunosuppressed, should be encouraged strongly in patients with SLE who take IS drugs, preferably administered when the SLE is inactive. For other vaccinations, an individual risk-benefit analysis is recommended.

Monitoring: At follow-up visits, continuous assessment of the risk of infection by taking into consideration the presence of:

  • Severe neutropenia (<500 cells/mm3)
  • Severe lymphopenia (<500 cells/mm3)
  • Low IgG (<500 mg/dl)
Frequency of Assessments

In patients with no activity, no damage, and no comorbidity, assessments are recommended every 6-12 mo. During these visits, preventive measures should be emphasized.

Laboratory Assessment

It is recommended to monitor the following autoantibodies and complement:

  • At baseline: ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-Ro, anti-La, anti-RNP, anti-Sm, antiphospholipid, C3, C4
  • Reevaluation of aPLs in previously negative patients before pregnancy, surgery, transplant, and use of estrogen-containing treatments or in the presence of a new neurologic or vascular event; anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies before pregnancy; anti-dsDNA/C3 C4 may support evidence of disease activity or remission

Other laboratory assessments. At 6- to 12-mo intervals, patients with inactive disease should have:

  • CBC
  • ESR
  • CRP
  • Serum albumin
  • Serum creatinine (or eGFR)
  • Urinalysis and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio

NB: If a patient is on a specific drug treatment, monitoring for that drug is required as well.

Mucocutaneous Involvement

Mucocutaneous lesions should be characterized, according to existing classification systems, as to whether they may be:

  • LE specific
  • LE nonspecific
  • LE mimickers
  • Drug-related

Lesions should be assessed for activity and damage using validated indices (e.g., CLASI).

Eye Assessment

In patients treated with glucocorticoids or antimalarials, a baseline eye examination is recommended according to standard guidelines. An eye examination during follow-up is recommended:

  • In selected patients taking glucocorticoids (high risk of glaucoma or cataracts)
  • In patients on antimalarial drugs. (Low risk: HCQ: No further testing is required until after 5 yr of baseline, and after the first 5 yr of treatment, eye assessment is recommended yearly; High risk: Eye assessment is recommended yearly, especially when using CQ.)

From Hochberg MC: Rheumatology, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.

TABLE E15 Approach to the Management of Pregnancy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

  • Planning of pregnancy
    1. Discuss possible wish for pregnancy at every visit or change of medication
    2. Perform risk stratification according to disease status, presence of specific autoantibodies, and drugs used
    3. Ensure that lupus is inactive for at least 6 mo
    4. Discourage pregnancy if Cr >2 mg/dl
    5. Drugs allowed during pregnancy: GCs, HCQ, AZA, CsA
  • Determine aPL and other antibodies that may be of relevance (anti-SSA, anti-SSB)
  • After conception
    1. Obtain baseline serology and chemistry tests (Cr, Alb, uric acid, anti-dsDNA, C3/C4)
    2. Monitor closely blood pressure and proteinuria. Should this develop, differentiate between active nephritis and preeclampsia
    3. In women with anti-SSA and/or anti-SSB antibodies or with a prior episode of CHB, monitor for CHB between 18 and 24 wk of gestation
    4. Presence of generalized lupus activity, active urine sediment, and low serum complement are in favor of lupus nephritis
    5. For patients with APS, consider a combined heparin and aspirin regimen to reduce risk for pregnancy loss and thrombosis. Patients with APA may be treated with aspirin, although there are no adequate data to support its use

Alb, Serum albumin; aPL, antiphospholipid antibodies; APS, antiphospholipid antibodies/antiphospholipid syndrome; AZA, azathioprine; CHB, congenital heart block; Cr, serum creatinine; CsA, cyclosporin A; dsDNA, double-stranded DNA; GCs, glucocorticoids; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine.

From Firestein GS et al: Firestein & Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2021, Elsevier.

    1. Recommended during pregnancy: Hydroxychloroquine, low-dose aspirin, antihypertensives (methyldopa, labetalol, nifedipine)
    2. Selective use allowed during pregnancy: NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, azathioprine, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, biologics
    3. Contraindicated: Cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, leflunomide
Disposition

  • Most patients with SLE experience remissions and exacerbations.
  • 5-yr survival rate has improved to more than 90% in patients with newly diagnosed SLE since the advent of potent immunosuppressive therapy. The 15-yr survival rate is now 85%.3
  • Early death related to SLE activity and infections; late death due to cardiovascular disease.
  • LN progression rate to ESRD in 10% to 30% within 15 yr.
  • African Americans, Asian Americans, and Hispanic Americans in general have a worse prognosis. The leading cause of death in SLE patients in developed countries is premature atherosclerosis. The quality of life for many SLE patients is poor due to fatigue, chronic pain, and cognitive impairment.2
Referral

  • Rheumatology consultation for all patients with SLE
  • Hematology consultation for patients with significant hematologic abnormalities (e.g., severe hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia)
  • Nephrology consultation in patients with proteinuria and/or suspected renal involvement
  • Dermatology consultation for patients with unexplained or unusual skin rash
  • Cardiology consultation for patients with lupus carditis, arrhythmias
  • Ophthalmology referral for all patients on hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine

Pearls & Considerations

Related Content

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Patient Information)Discoid Lupus (Related Key Topic)Renal Lupus (Related Key Topic)

Related Content

    1. Chowdhary V.R. : Broad concepts in management of systemic lupus erythematosusMayo Clin Proc. ;92(5):744-761, 2017.
    2. Gmez-Puerta J.A. : Racial and ethnic differences in mortality and cardiovascular events among patients with end-stage renal disease due to lupus nephritisArthritis Care Res. ;67:1453-1462, 2015.
    3. Lam N.V. : Systemic lupus erythematosus: primary care approach to diagnosis and managementAm Fam Physician. ;94(4):284-294, 2016.
    4. Bosch X. : Systemic lupus erythematosus and the neutrophilN Engl J Med. ;365:758-760, 2011.
    5. Aringer M. : European League against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis Rheumatol. ;71(9):1400-1412, 2019.
    6. Bruce I. : Factors associated with damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception CohortAnn Rheum Dis. ;74:1706-1713, 2015.
    7. Petri M. : Vitamin D in systemic lupus erythematosus: modest association with disease activity and the urine protein-to-creatinine ratioArthritis Rheum. ;65:1865-1871, 2013.
    8. Furie R. : A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis Rheum. ;63:3918-3930, 2011.
    9. Rovin B. : A randomized, controlled double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of dose-ranging voclosporin with placebo in achieving remission in patients with active lupus nephritisKidney Int. ;95(1):219-231, 2019.
    10. Condon M. : Prospective observational single-centre cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness of treating lupus nephritis with rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil but no oral steroidsAnn Rheum Dis. ;72:1280-1286, 2013.
    11. Navarra S.V. : Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trialLancet. ;377:1721-1731, 2011.
    12. Khamashta M. : Sifalimumab, an anti-interferon-a monoclonal antibody, in moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyAnn Rheum Dis. ;75(11):1909-1916, 2016.
    13. Morand E. : For the TULIP-2 Trial Investigators: trial of anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosusN Engl J Med. ;382:211-221, 2020.
    14. Van Vollenhoven R. : Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, an IL-12 and IL-23 inhibitor, in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a multicentre, double-blind, phase 2, randomized, controlled studyLancet. ;392(10155):1330-1339, 2018.
    15. Wallace D. : Baricitinib for systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trialLancet. ;392(10143):222-231, 2018.
    16. Clowse M.E. : A national study of the complications of lupus in pregnancyAm J Obstet Gynecol. ;199(2):127.e1-127.e6, 2008.