Author: Maria Camila Velez Florez, MD and Richard O. Bido-Medina, MD, PhD
Formerly known as "Dementia, Delirium, Amnestic, and Other Cognitive Disorders," the now-named "Neurocognitive Disorders (NCDs)" include three conditions: Delirium, major neurocognitive disorder, and mild neurocognitive disorder. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), substance/medication-induced major or mild neurocognitive disorder (SMNCD), a subtype of NCDs, is associated with several neurocognitive impairments caused by excessive substance consumption or medication abuse and not explained by delirium, episodes of intoxication or withdrawal, or another co-occurring medical or mental health condition.1
The most well-studied examples of SMNCD are alcohol-induced major NCD or alcohol-related dementia (ARD), among which Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome (WKS) and Marchiafava-Bignami syndrome are two examples. Some have speculated that alcohol-induced psychosis, formerly known as alcoholic hallucinosis, may also be an example of an ARD presenting with prominent neuropsychiatric symptoms. Other substances and medications known to cause SMNCD are inhalants, anticholinergic agents, and benzodiazepines.
| ICD 11 CODES | |||
| 6D84.0 | Dementia due to use of alcohol | ||
| 6D84.1 | Dementia due to use of sedatives, hypnotics or anxiolytics | ||
| 6D84.2 | Dementia due to use of volatile inhalants | ||
| 6D84.Y | Dementia due to other specified psychoactive substance | ||
| DSM-5-TR CODES | |||
| F06.70 | Mild Neurocognitive Disorder without behavioral disturbance | ||
| F06.71 | Mild Neurocognitive Disorder with behavioral disturbance | ||
| Major Neurocognitive Disorder without behavioral disturbance | |||
| Note: No additional medical code is used. The ICD codes can be used and, in addition, the Substance Use Disorder (if comorbid) at the time of diagnosis can be coded. | Substance/Medication-Induced Neurocognitive Disorder major or mild (Specify severity: mild, moderate, or severe) | ||
TABLE E1 Stages of Adolescent Substance Use
| Stage | Description | ||
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 |
From Kliegman, RM et al: Nelson textbook of pediatrics, ed 22, Philadelphia, 2025, Elsevier.
Persons with major NCD experience a substantial decline in function (loss of independence) as a result of profound cognitive impairment, whereas individuals with mild NCD experience only a modest cognitive decline and, as a result, function relatively independently. Clinical diagnosis of NCDs, in general, requires significant cognitive impairment (representing a change from baseline) in one or more domains of cognitive functions (i.e., attention, memory, language, executive, social cognition) which is typically reported as a concern by either the patient, an informant, or a clinician. In addition, this impairment is supported by objective testing (i.e., neuropsychologic evaluation or quantitative bedside assessment). It is important to rule out transient causes of cognitive clouding, such as delirium or acute intoxication or withdrawal. For the NCD to be causally associated with the use of a substance or medication, said substance/medication should be capable of producing such significant decline; this also implies a timeline relationship in which the substance use initiated before the decline and, frequently, a period of abstinence from the substance, results in improvement. In addition, for diagnostic accuracy, other potential confounders of cognitive decline, such as some medical or mental conditions, should be ruled out. For diagnostic purposes, the clinician should also specify if there is a comorbid substance use disorder, whether or not there is the presence of behavioral disturbances, and the severity in terms of the impact on functioning (i.e., mild, moderate, severe), as these diagnostic specifiers will help guide the level of support, management, and evolution of the natural course of the disorder: Mild (impairment only in instrumental activities of daily living), moderate (impairment in basic day-to-day functions such as clothing and feeding), and severe (completely dependent on others).
TABLE E3 Assessing the Seriousness of Adolescent Substance Use
| VARIABLE | 0 | +1 | +2 |
| Age (yr) | >15 | >15 | |
| Sex | Male | Female | |
| Family history of substance use | Yes | ||
| Setting of substance use | In group | Alone | |
| Affect before substance use | Happy | Always poor | Sad |
| School performance | Good, improving | Recently poor | |
| Use disorder before driving | None | Yes | |
| History of accidents | None | Yes | |
| Time of week | Weekend | Weekdays | |
| Time of day | After school | Before or during school | |
| Type of substance | Marijuana, beer, wine | Hallucinogens, amphetamines | Whiskey, opiates, cocaine, barbiturates |
Total score: 0-3, less worrisome; 3-8, serious; 8-18, very serious.
From Kliegman, RM et al: Nelson textbook of pediatrics, ed 22, Philadelphia, 2025, Elsevier.
Because the pathophysiologic mechanism of MSNCDs is related to the prolonged, sustained, and/or excessive consumption of the substance or medication, recovery from the insulting agent (i.e., stopping alcohol use) is crucial. Although, typically, the impairment is established, stopping the use of the substance or medication can prevent further decline. Often, management is focused on NPSs. DSM-5-TR codes for the presence of NPSs, among patients with NCDs, by using the descriptor "with behavioral disturbances." The behavioral disturbances observed in NCD comprise a range of symptoms such as apathy, anxiety, delusions, depression, disinhibition, hallucinations, and sleep disturbances, among others. Psychiatrists try to map these NPSs onto specific domains/disorders such as generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, or schizophrenia and treat accordingly, though there is no consensus on the appropriate treatment for NPSs among patients with NCDs. Usefulness in neurodegenerative NCDs is sometimes used to suggest treatments for substance use/medication-induced NCDs.12
The management of individuals with ARD and WKS should involve consideration of parenteral thiamine. WKS patients have potential for recovery with abstinence and thiamine supplementation. Improvements in general knowledge, visual long-term memory, and verbal fluency have been found in abstinent individuals with Korsakoff syndrome (KS) over 2 yr, and cognitive improvement is associated with higher premorbid education and fewer detoxifications in the past. Early observations suggest that even a substantial proportion (21%) of individuals with KS can make a full recovery. Treatment with oral thiamine does not achieve an adequate plasma level. Although there is no consensus on dose of thiamine treatment, it is usually given in doses of 500 mg three times daily, for 7 days intravenously.9 This treatment should be continued until improvement in signs and symptoms plateaus.
A systematic review assessing the effects of pharmacologic agents on neurocognitive function in patients with alcohol use disorder, ARD, and WKS found modafinil to be the most promising, particularly among patients with more severe deficits.12 Preliminary evidence also suggests that clonidine and fluvoxamine may improve neurocognitive function in patients with WKS. However, the studies in the review were generally small, reported inconsistent results, and did not examine long-term effects.
Evidence supporting the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in patients with ARD or WKS is limited to several case reports of rivastigmine and donepezil; a controlled trial of rivastigmine found no cognitive improvement.12
Memantine may also be mildly effective for agitation and psychosis, and it is generally well tolerated. Patients with ARD and WKS have preliminarily shown cognitive improvement following treatment with memantine. Cognitive enhancers may be considered in cases of substance use/medication-induced NCD or in multimorbid NCD if the side-effect profile permits. Monitoring closely for side effects such as GI distress, bradycardia, and syncope is important.
Though some antidepressants have demonstrated efficacy in treating agitation in AD,14 these have not been studied extensively in SMNCD. The same is true for antiepileptic drugs and antipsychotic agents.
Although newer modalities of treatment of motor neurone disease that target reduction of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaque deposits through anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies (i.e., aducanumab and lecanemab) have become part of the therapeutic arsenal, particularly for AD,15 these have not been studied for MSNCD, likely due to a different or mixed pathophysiologic mechanisms.
In summary, personalizing the medication regimen for selected target symptoms of NCDs, after getting informed consent from the patient or health care proxy, and starting medications at low doses and titrating doses gradually, appears to be the best approach. In addition, vigorous monitoring of side effects and response is required.
Depending on outcomes of management of the offending agents and condition and abstinence, patients may require rehabilitation stays or, if the MSNCD is major and chronic, longitudinal care facility placement. In acute exacerbations of NPSs, risk assessment for potential harm to self or others must be assessed to determine the level of containment required to ensure the patients and caregivers safety, in certain cases requiring inpatient psychiatric level of care (i.e., psychiatric geriatric units).
Public health approaches should include education about NCDs and NPSs associated with substance abuse.
Education focuses on substance use disorder approaches and on caregiver advice and stress management.