Author: Tara C. Bouton, MD, MPH, TM and Glenn G. Fort, MD, MPH
Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is an infection of the lung and occasionally surrounding structures, caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Two states of M. tuberculosis infection are recognized: Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and acute tuberculosis disease, although infection and immunologic control exist across a spectrum. LTBI is a state of persistent immune response to stimulation by M. tuberculosis antigens without evidence of clinically manifested active TB and with bacillary replication absent or below some undefined threshold as a result of immunologic control. Most persons with LTBI never become sick with TB; however, 5% to 15% have progression to tuberculosis disease.1 Multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB is defined as disease caused by strains of Mtb that are at least resistant to treatment with isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (RIF) (two of the most effective first-line drugs); extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB refers to disease caused by MDR strains that are also resistant to treatment with any fluoroquinolone and bedaquiline or linezolid.
TABLE E1 Clinical Manifestations of Active Tuberculosis in Early Versus Late HIV Infectiona
| Early HIV Infection | Late HIV Infection | |
| Tuberculin test result | Usually positive | Usually negative |
| Adenopathy | Common | Unusual |
| Pulmonary distribution | Upper lobe | Lower and middle lobe |
| Cavitation | Often present | Typically absent |
| Extrapulmonary disease | 10%-15% of cases | 50% of cases |
HIV, Human immunodeficiency virus.
a For practical purposes, "early" and "late" may be defined as CD4+ cell counts greater than 300 cells/mm3 and less than 200 cells/mm3, respectively.
From Bennett JE et al: Mandell, Douglas, and Bennetts principles and practice of infectious diseases, ed 9, Philadelphia, 2020, Elsevier.
Figure E1 Chest Radiograph Demonstrating Multiple Bilateral Pulmonary Tuberculomas in an Asymptomatic 35-Yr-Old Man from Poland

(From Bennett JE et al: Mandell, Douglas, and Bennetts principles and practice of infectious diseases, ed 9, Philadelphia, 2020, Elsevier.)
TABLE E2 Target Groups for Latent Tuberculosis Infection Screening
| Individuals With Increased Risk of Infection | |||
| Contacts of individuals with untreated infectious active tuberculosis | |||
| Individuals who have immigrated to the United States within the past 5 yr from tuberculosis endemic areas | |||
| Individuals who work and/or reside in high-risk congregate settings (e.g., hospitals, homeless shelters, prisons, nursing homes) | |||
| Individuals With Conditions Associated With Increased Risk for Reactivation | |||
| High Risk for Reactivation (Risk of Reactivation Is at Least Six Times Higher Than for Healthy Individuals) | |||
| Human immunodeficiency virus infection | |||
| Severe immunosuppression (e.g., individuals receiving medication for solid-organ transplantation, chemotherapy, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors) | |||
| Certain malignancies (e.g., hematologic malignancies, head and neck cancers) | |||
| Silicosis | |||
| End-stage renal disease | |||
| Radiographic evidence of prior granulomatous disease (e.g., fibrotic lesions on chest imaging) | |||
| Children <5 yr with a positive tuberculin skin test reaction | |||
| Moderate Risk for Reactivation (Risk of Reactivation Is Less Than Six Times Higher Than for Healthy Individuals) | |||
| Corticosteroid use (≥15 mg daily for ≥1 mo) | |||
| Diabetes mellitus | |||
| Underweight or malnourished individuals (includes malabsorptive conditions, such as gastrectomy, jejunoileal bypass surgeries) | |||
| Substance abuse (e.g., smoking, alcohol abuse, injection drug use) | |||
| Radiographic evidence of solitary or small granulomas |
From Broaddus VC et al: Murray & Nadels textbook of respiratory medicine, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2022, Elsevier.
Figure E2 Latent tuberculosis infection screening algorithm.


Individuals at high likelihood of having LTBI, due to demographic or specific exposure history or an untreated previously positive TST or IGRA, and a high probability of a presently false-negative result, due to immunodeficiency or immunosuppression, should be considered for treatment. *IGRA preferred for individuals with prior bacillus Calmette-Guérin and individuals at high risk for becoming lost to follow-up. TST preferred for children younger than 5 yr. Dual testing (not shown) may be considered for certain situations. IGRA, Interferon gamma release assay; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection; Mtb, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; TB, tuberculosis; TST, tuberculin skin test.
(From Broaddus VC et al: Murray & Nadels textbook of respiratory medicine, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2022, Elsevier.)
TABLE E3 Comparison of Assays Used in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis
| Clinical Laboratory Question | Diagnostic Assay | Advantages | Limitations |
| Are mycobacteria present in a clinical specimen? | Culture on solid media (Löwenstein-Jensen egg-based or Middlebrook agar-based media) | Gold standard for isolating Mycobacterium tuberculosis; detects 10-100 organisms/ml; shows colony morphology, detects mixed infection, allows quantification of growth; provides organisms for speciation, strain identification, susceptibility testing | Visible growth takes 3-8 wk |
| Culture in liquid broth | Sensitivity and specificity similar to solid media; automated systems decrease workload; provides organisms for speciation, strain identification, and susceptibility testing; turn positive in a mean of 10 days for smear-positive and 20 days for smear-negative specimens | Does not show colony morphology, detect mixed cultures, or quantify growth | |
| Acid-fast stain (Ziehl-Neelsen, Kinyoun, auramine rhodamine) | Same-day results; simple technology; inexpensive light microscope; fluorescence microscope required for auramine-rhodamine stain | Less sensitive than culture, requiring 10,000 organisms/ml; cannot distinguish M. tuberculosis from other mycobacteria | |
| Nucleic acid amplification (e.g., PCR) | Same-day results; sensitivity intermediate between acid-fast stain and culture; identifies organisms as members of M. tuberculosis complex | Requires advanced laboratory techniques; cannot distinguish dead from viable organisms; culture still needed for speciation, strain identification, and susceptibility testing | |
| Nucleic acid amplification with GeneXpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra | Expensive equipment; detects dead bacilli; culture needed for other susceptibility testing | ||
| Urinary antigen detection (e.g., ELISA for LAM) | Point-of-care testing; relatively high sensitivity in advanced untreated AIDS (<50 CD4 T cells/mm3) | Sensitivity very low in situations other than advanced AIDS | |
| Is a mycobacterium isolated from a clinical specimen a member of M. tuberculosis complex? (M. tuberculosis, Mycobacterium bovis, M. bovis-BCG, Mycobacterium africanum, Mycobacterium microti, or Mycobacterium canettii ) | Nucleic acid amplification | (See above) | (See above) |
| Nucleic acid probes | Results available in 2 h; sensitivity and specificity approach 100%; does not require amplification | Requires at least 105 organisms; most useful for pure culture, not directly on clinical specimen; cannot distinguish among members of M. tuberculosis complex | |
| BACTEC p-nitroacetyl-aminohydroxypropiophenone assay (NAP) | Provides preliminary identification of M. tuberculosis complex (NAP susceptible) | Need for paired cultures increases cost (growth with and without NAP) | |
| High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) | Same-day results; sensitivity and specificity approach 100%; can distinguish M. bovis BCG from other members of M. tuberculosis complex | Requires HPLC technology; only useful with pure culture | |
| To which species of M. tuberculosis complex does a clinical isolate belong? | Colony morphology and biochemical assays (e.g., niacin test, heat-sensitive catalase, nitrate reduction, pyrazinamide monodrug resistance) | Classic approach for speciation of M. tuberculosis | Time-consuming and labor-intensive |
| PCR genomic analysis | May rapidly distinguish among M. tuberculosis complex species | Not yet commercially available for this purpose | |
| Do different M. tuberculosis isolates represent the same strain? | Genotyping by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, spoligotyping, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit analysis, and whole-genome sequencing | The CDC offers free strain typing through the National Tuberculosis Genotyping and Surveillance Network | Sophisticated assay available only at specialized centers |
| Is an M. tuberculosis isolate drug resistant? | Agar proportion method | Quantifies the proportion of organisms resistant to a drug | Requires as long as 8 wk |
| Liquid BACTEC method | Results within 5-14 days | Does not quantify proportion of resistance | |
| Molecular line probe assays and whole-genome sequencing for chromosomal mutations associated with drug resistance (see above for GeneXpert MTB/RIF) | Allow same-day determination of drug resistance; line probe assay can be performed directly on smear positive sputum samples or culture isolates; can detect resistance to isoniazid, rifampin, quinolones, and second line injectables | Need to be validated in multiple clinical settings and not yet FDA approved |
AIDS, Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; BCG, bacillus Calmette-Guérin; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CFU, colony-forming unit; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; LAM, lipopolysaccharide lipoarabinomannan; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
From Bennett JE et al: Mandell, Douglas, and Bennetts principles and practice of infectious diseases, ed 9, Philadelphia, 2020, Elsevier.
TABLE E4 Pharmacology and Adverse Effects of Antituberculosis Medications
| Drug | Pharmacology | Adverse Effects |
| INH |
| |
| RIF |
| |
| PZA | ||
| EMB | ||
| Levofloxacin | ||
| Moxifloxacin | ||
| Bedaquiline | ||
| Linezolid | ||
| Clofazimine | ||
| Cycloserine | ||
| Delamanid |
| |
| Pretomanid |
|
Cmax, Maximum concentration; CNS, central nervous system; CrCl, creatinine clearance; CYP3A4, cytochrome P450 enzyme; EMB, ethambutol; GI, gastrointestinal; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; INH, isoniazid; NAT2, N-acetyltransferase 2; RIF, rifampin; PZA, pyrazinamide; tiw, three times weekly.
From Broaddus VC et al: Murray & Nadels textbook of respiratory medicine, ed 7, Philadelphia 2022, Elsevier.
BOX E1 Persons in Whom Treatment Should Be Initiated to Prevent Progression to Tuberculosis
Adapted from Cherry JD et al: Feigin and Cherrys textbook of pediatric infectious diseases, ed 8, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
TABLE E5 Recommendations for Regimens to Treat Latent Tuberculosis Infection
| Priority Rank* | Regimen | Recommendation (strong or conditional) | Evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) |
| Preferred | 3 mo INH plus rifapentine given once weekly | Strong | Moderate |
| Preferred | 4 mo RIF given daily | Strong | Moderate (HIV negative) |
| Preferred | 3 mo INH plus RIF given daily | Conditional | Very low (HIV negative) |
| Conditional | Low (HIV positive) | ||
| Alternative | 6 mo INH given daily | Strong§ | Moderate (HIV negative) |
| Conditional | Moderate (HIV positive) | ||
| Alternative | 9 mo isoniazid given daily | Conditional | Moderate |
HIV, Human immunodeficiency virus; INH, isoniazid; RIF, rifampin.
* Preferred: Excellent tolerability and efficacy, shorter treatment duration, higher completion rates than longer regimens and therefore higher effectiveness. Alternative: Excellent efficacy but concerns regarding longer treatment duration, lower completion rates, and therefore lower effectiveness.
No evidence reported in HIV-positive persons.
§ Strong recommendation for those persons unable to take a preferred regimen (e.g., due to drug intolerability or drug-drug interactions).
From Sterling TR et al: Guidelines for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69(1):1-11, 2020, Table 3.
TABLE E6 Dosages for Recommended Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment Regimens
| Drug | Duration | Dose and Age Group | Frequency | Total Doses |
| INH* and rifapentine | 3 mo | Adults and children aged ≥12 yr | Once weekly | 12 |
| INH: 15 mg/kg rounded up to the nearest 50 or 100 mg; 900 mg maximum | ||||
| Rifapentine: | ||||
| 10-14 kg, 300 mg | ||||
| 14.1-25 kg, 450 mg | ||||
| 25.1-32 kg, 600 mg | ||||
| 32.1-49.9 kg, 750 mg | ||||
| ≥50 kg, 900 mg maximum | ||||
| Children aged 2-11 yr | ||||
| INH*: 25 mg/kg; 900 mg maximum | ||||
| Rifapentine: See earlier | ||||
| RIF¶ | 4 mo | Adults: 10 mg/kg | Daily | 120 |
| Children: 15-20 mg/kg** | ||||
| Maximum dose: 600 mg | ||||
| INH* and RIF¶ | 3 mo | Adults | Daily | 90 |
| INH*: 5 mg/kg; 300 mg maximum | ||||
| RIF¶: 10 mg/kg; 600 mg maximum | ||||
| Children | ||||
| INH*: 10-20 mg/kg; 300 mg maximum | ||||
| RIF¶: 15-20 mg/kg; 600 mg maximum | ||||
| INH* | 6 mo | Adults: 5 mg/kg | Daily | 180 |
| Children: 10-20 mg/kg | ||||
| Maximum dose: 300 mg | ||||
| Adults: 15 mg/kg | Twice weekly§ | 52 | ||
| Children: 20-40 mg/kg | ||||
| Maximum dose: 900 mg | ||||
| 9 mo | Adults: 5 mg/kg | Daily | 270 | |
| Children: 10-20 mg/kg | ||||
| Maximum dose: 300 mg | ||||
| Adults: 15 mg/kg | Twice weekly§ | 76 | ||
| Children: 20-40 mg/kg | ||||
| Maximum dose: 900 mg |
INH, Isoniazid; RIF, rifampin.
* Isoniazid is formulated as 100- and 300-mg tablets.
Rifapentine is formulated as 150-mg tablets in blister packs that should be kept sealed until use.
§ Intermittent regimens must be provided via directly observed therapy (i.e., a health care worker observes the ingestion of medication).
¶ RIF (rifampicin) is formulated as 150- and 300-mg capsules.
** The American Academy of Pediatrics acknowledges that some experts use rifampin at 20-30 mg/kg for the daily regimen when prescribing for infants and toddlers. (From American Academy of Pediatrics: Tuberculosis. In Kimberlin DW et al [eds]: Red book: 2018 report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, ed 31, Itasca, IL, 2018, American Academy of Pediatrics, pp. 829-853.)
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends an isoniazid dosage of 10-15 mg/kg for the daily regimen and 20-30 mg/kg for the twice-weekly regimen.
From Sterling TR et al: Guidelines for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69(1):1-11, 2020, Table 4.