section name header

Basics

Description
Epidemiology

Incidence

HCO in the general population: Unknown

Prevalence

  • End-stage liver disease (ESLD): Over 400,000 (0.15%) in the US
  • SIRS/sepsis over 130 per 100,000 persons
  • Hyperthyroidism: 1.5% in general population, more common in women than men (5:1).

Mortality

  • ESLD: About 35,000 deaths per year and the 9th leading cause of death in the US.
  • Sepsis: In hospital mortality is 30–50%; it is the 10th leading cause of death in the US.
  • Thyroid storm mortality is 10–20%.
Etiology/Risk Factors
Physiology/Pathophysiology
Anesthetic GOALS/GUIDING Principles

Diagnosis

Symptoms

History

Etiology of HCO, functional status, end-organ dysfunction, degree of circulatory compromise

Signs/Physical Exam

  • Tachycardia, tachypnea
  • Hypotension, wide pulse pressure
  • Jugular venous distention and hum
  • Hyperdynamic precordium
  • Midsystolic murmur (2nd and 3rd LICS), S3
  • Bounding femoral artery pulses (pistol shots)
  • Warm extremities
Treatment History
MedicationS
Diagnostic Tests & Interpretation

Labs/Studies

  • BMP to assess for acidosis, renal insufficiency
  • CBC: Pancytopenia, leukocytosis
  • LFTs, PT/INR, PTT: Hepatocellular integrity, ESLD, sepsis, liver function, coagulopathy
  • Fibrinogen, FDP: Fibrinolysis in sepsis, ESLD
  • ABG and lactate: Acid–base, hypoperfusion
  • Troponins: Myocardial ischemia or leak
  • BNP > 400 pg/ml implies CHF
  • CXR: Cardiomegaly, effusions, edema.
  • EKG: Tachycardia, ischemia, long QTc
Circumstances to delay/Conditions
Classifications

No classification specific to HCO

Treatment

Preoperative Preparation

INTRAOPERATIVE CARE

Choice of Anesthesia

  • Neuraxial anesthesia is not recommended as it further reduces preload and afterload (4) [B].
  • Peripheral nerve blocks should be considered, as appropriate.
  • No evidence favors either inhalational versus TIVA; both techniques reduce SVR (4) [A].
  • Regardless of the anesthetic technique, vasopressors should be in line and ready for immediate administration.

Monitors

  • Standard ASA monitors may be adequate in minor surgery and in the absence of heart failure.
  • Invasive monitors: Indicated when compromised hemodynamics suggest heart failure.
  • Arterial line for continuous BP and metabolic assessment (serial ABGs, lactate levels, etc.).
  • Central venous pressure does not accurately reflect intravascular volume but is still used to guide volume therapy. Central venous access is optimal for vasoactive drug administration.
  • CO monitors: Most have limited absolute precision and accuracy in the setting of HCO but provide trends, which is clinically useful information for goal-directed volume therapy and hemodynamic management.
    • Pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (PAC-TD): Despite its lack of precision and accuracy, it is still considered the clinical gold standard to validate novel CO monitoring modalities (5) [A]. Compared to Fick CO determination, PAC-TD systematically underestimates CO in the HCO range (>7 L/min).
    • Continuous venous oximetry: Central venous (SCVO2) and pulmonary artery mixed venous (SVO2) oximetry estimate adequacy of CO based on the difference between the oxygen delivery (DO2) and VO2. It is of limited value in the setting of diffuse systemic AV shunting as high oxygen saturation does not rule out organ hypoperfusion.
    • Arterial pressure-based CO monitors (APCOs) exhibit poor agreement in unstable hemodynamics compared to PAC-TD, may underestimate CO in HCO states, and is conceptually deficient when the artery used is in the setting of vasoconstriction (ESLD).
    • Esophageal Doppler (ED) estimates CO by measuring descending aortic flow velocity and has been used to successfully guide volume therapy; it has increased bias with increasing COs (5) [A].
    • Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE): Visual assessment of ventricular filling, contractility, and regional wall motion. It is a useful hemodynamic monitor in HCO.
  • Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) continuously displays regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) of blood in target tissues. Conceptually, NIRS may be the best method of assessing adequacy of CO in low BP and shunt physiology but data is limited at this time.

Induction/Airway Management

  • Most agents lower SVR, contractility, and MAP. Tachycardia increases VO2; bradycardia decreases CO.
  • Etomidate has minimal decrease in SVR; however, adrenal suppression is possible even after a single dose.
  • Ketamine can drop SVR if catecholamines are depleted.

Maintenance

  • Inhalational anesthesia or TIVA; no evidence exists to suggest superiority of one technique over another.
  • Volume and hemodynamic management can be guided by dynamic monitors (stroke volume variation, SVV), TEE, or tissue DO2 (tissue oximetry, lactate); not by a preset value of CO or MAP (4) [B].
  • Point of care testing for frequent ABGs and lactate
  • Protective ventilator lung strategies:
    • Low tidal volumes minimize the impact of positive pressure on the lungs but may be inadequate for SVV or CO estimates by APCOs.
    • Permissive hypercapnia should be carefully considered as it may aggravate an already low pH due to hypoperfusion (4) [A].
  • Patients often cannot tolerate a full MAC of volatile anesthetic; however, this constitutes a high risk for recall; EEG or BIS monitoring may be appropriate.

Extubation/Emergence

Standard extubation criteria

Follow-Up

Bed Acuity

Telemetry, intensive care unit (ICU) based on underlying condition, hemodynamic status, and extent of surgery

Medications/Lab Studies/Consults
Complications

References

  1. Moller S , Henricksen J. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. J Hepatol. 2010;53:179190.
  2. Hunter J , Doddi M. Sepsis and the heart. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(1):311.
  3. Mehta PA , Dubrey SW. High output heart failure. QJM. 2009;102(4):235241.
  4. Eissa D , Carton EG , Buggy DJ. Anaesthetic management of patients with severe sepsis. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(6):734743.
  5. Mayer J , Suttner S. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform. Curr Op Anaesth. 2009;22(6):804808.

Additional Reading

See Also (Topic, Algorithm, Electronic Media Element)

Clinical Pearls

Author(s)

Rashmi R. Rathor , MD

Ivan M. Kangrga , MD, PhD