section name header

Basics

Description
Physiology Principles
Anatomy

PEEP exerts most of its direct effects at the level of the alveoli and distal bronchi. Atelectasis, however, occurs mostly in the dependent portions of the lungs during general anesthesia or with the use of neuromuscular blockade.

Physiology/Pathophysiology
Perioperative Relevance
Pediatric Considerations
FRC decreases under general anesthesia and paralysis. In infants, who typically have very compliant chest walls, PEEP helps in maintaining the FRC, because it compensates for the prevailing tendency toward alveolar collapse that results from the interaction between the uneven and opposing forces generated by lung elastic recoil (favoring collapse) and by the smaller forces generated by the chest wall (promoting lung expansion). PEEP at levels of 3–6 cm H2O has been shown to increase FRC in ventilated children without respiratory disease. Its effects on increasing FRC is more pronounced in children receiving 100% FiO2 (prevention of reabsorption atelectasis is the likely mechanism). Optimal intraoperative PEEP settings have not been clearly established for children, but likely vary depending on age, comorbidities, and body size.
One lung ventilation: Application of low to moderate levels of PEEP to the dependent lung can improve arterial oxygenation depending upon individual amounts of atelectasis, presence of intrinsic PEEP, and TV settings (4) [A]. PEEP usually improves oxygenation in patients who respond to recruitment maneuvers. Conversely, by increasing mean pressure in the dependent lung, it can shunt blood to the non-dependent and non-ventilated lung, worsening V/Q mismatch.
Prone positioning: Benefits are probably less pronounced, and optimal levels are likely lower than in the same subjects in the supine position. This is due to the different effects on the distribution of ventilation and perfusion as compared to supine subjects, leading to greater V/Q mismatch in prone patients (2) [B].
COPD: These patients are prone to develop intrinsic PEEP and require personalized ventilator management; the I:E ratio should be adjusted to provide a longer expiratory time. A low respiratory rate is also recommended. The application of low levels of extrinsic PEEP (less than intrinsic PEEP) in supported ventilator modes can help alleviate intrinsic PEEP by maintaining the peripheral bronchi open. In particular, during one lung ventilation, these patients tend to develop intrinsic PEEP. The application of extrinsic PEEP may worsen air trapping.
Asthma: Flow limitation and airway inflammation can result in intrinsic PEEP. Thus, as in COPD patients, low respiratory rates and adequate expiratory time should be established. PEEP in controlled, mechanical ventilation may lead to hyperinflation. Conversely, spontaneously breathing patients will have a reduced work of breathing with modest amounts of PEEP.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): PEEP increases oxygenation and improves respiratory mechanics by minimizing the amount of cyclic opening and closing of alveoli (associated with the systemic release of inflammatory markers and multiple organ dysfunction). Current evidence recommends the use of higher levels of PEEP for PaO2:FiO2 levels 200 mm Hg and lower levels of PEEP for PaO2:FiO2 between 201–300 mm Hg. It is recommended that PEEP be increased with FiO2 in a stepwise fashion to maintain end expiratory transpulmonary pressure (Ttp) between 0–10 cm H2O. Ttp can be calculated by subtracting the esophageal pressure (a surrogate of pleural pressure) from airway pressure. Esophageal balloon catheters can be used to measure esophageal pressure (6) [B]. In patients with ARDS, an initial higher level of PEEP (>12 cm H2O) may confer a survival benefit with respect to lower levels (7) [A].
The typical initial setting of PEEP is 5 cm H2O; titration is usually up or down by 2–3 cm H2O while monitoring for changes in:
  • Hemodynamics: Heart rate, BP, and urine output
  • Arterial line (if present): Changes in pulse pressure or stroke volume variation, possibly reversed by volume loading.
  • Oxygenation: Increases in SpO2 saturation and PaO2 on arterial blood gases.
  • ETCO2: Increased values may suggest decreased intrapulmonary shunt or increased cardiac output (improved CO2 delivery for exhalation).
  • Respiration mechanics: A reduced gradient between plateau pressure and end expiratory pressure suggests a PEEP-induced increase in lung recruitment shown by an increase in respiratory compliance. However, high PEEP can cause barotrauma such as pneumothorax or subcutaneous emphysema. Peak and airway pressures must be constantly monitored.
  • FiO2 titration: High FiO2 can result in absorption atelectasis; if possible, titrate FiO2 downward.
  • Intrinsic PEEP is suspected when the expiratory flow waveform fails to return to 0 at the end of expiration.
  • "Best PEEP": Requires concurrent measurements of the cardiac output and PaO2.
  • Outcome studies of PEEP during anesthesia: There is no sufficiently powered study to indicate any improvement in mortality or in pulmonary complications following the use of PEEP. There is, however, data indicating higher PaO2/FiO2 ratios on postoperative day 1 and less atelectasis by CT scan in patients who received PEEP during anesthesia (5) [A].
  • Contraindications: PEEP should be avoided or used cautiously in patients with the following conditions:
    • Hypotension/hypovolemia
    • Increased ICP
    • Focal pneumonias: PEEP may cause overdistension of alveoli in the healthy lung, causing compression of their capillaries and leading to diversion of blood flow to the affected lung segments, causing hypoxemia.
    • Bronchopleural fistulas: PEEP may lead to overpressurization of the pleural cavity causing a tension pneumothorax. PEEP can also delay healing of a bronchopleural fistula (1) [A].
Equations

Lung compliance = Vt/(Ppl - PEEP); Vt = Tidal volume, Ppl = Plateau pressure

References

  1. Acosta P , Santisbon E , Varon J. The use of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Clin. 2007;23:251261. (A)
  2. Petersson J , Ax M , Frey J , et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure redistributes regional blood flow and ventilation differently in supine and prone humans. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:13611369. (B)
  3. Futier E , et al. Intraoperative recruitment maneuver reverses detrimental pneumoperitoneum-induced respiratory effects in healthy weight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopy. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:13101319. (B)
  4. Karzai W , Schwarzkopf K. Hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:14021411. (A)
  5. Imberger G , McIlroy D , Pace NL , et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anesthesia for the prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2010;9. (A)
  6. Talmor D , Sarge T , Malhotra A , et al. Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. NEJM. 2008;359:20952104. (B)
  7. Briel M , et al. Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010;303(9):865873. (A)

Additional Reading

See Also (Topic, Algorithm, Electronic Media Element)

Clinical Pearls

Author(s)

Justin C. Shields , MD

andrea Vanucci , MD, DEAA