section name header

Learning Objectives

After completing this chapter, the reader will be able to:

Glossary

Introduction

The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) is a multidisciplinary professional organization of providers, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, allied health professionals, and researchers dedicated to patients receiving optimal nutrition care. ASPEN provides numerous evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and standards of practice, which are referenced throughout this chapter. Nutritional support nursing is a professional nursing specialty that focuses on the care of individuals with potential or known nutritional alterations. The nutrition support nurse encompasses nursing activities that focus on:

The scope of practice includes, but is not limited to, direct patient care; consultation with nurses and other health-care professionals in a variety of clinical settings; education of patients, students, colleagues, and the public; participation in research; and administrative functions. Nurses can attain certification as a nutrition support clinician (CNSC) through the National Board of Nutrition Support, an independent credentialing board established by ASPEN.

All nurses, whether or not specialized in nutrition support, must recognize the importance of adequate nutrition and the adverse effects of malnutrition. Specialized nutritional support, such as parenteral or enteral nutrition, is indicated in some patients and will be administered by specialized or certified nurses as well as the generalist nurse. The focus of this chapter is administration of parenteral nutrition (PN). Goals of PN include:

Websites

American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN): https://www.nutritioncare.org

National Board of Nutrition Support Certification, Inc.: https://www.nutritioncare.org/NBNSC

Nursing Process

The nursing process is a six-step process for problem-solving to guide nursing action (see Chapter 1 for details on the steps of the nursing process). The following table focuses on nursing diagnoses, nursing outcomes classification (NOC), and nursing interventions classification (NIC) for patients receiving nutritional support. Nursing diagnoses should be patient-specific and outcomes and interventions individualized. The NOC and NIC presented here are suggested directions for development of specific outcomes and interventions.

Nursing Diagnoses Related to Nutritional SupportNursing Outcomes Classification (NOC)Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC)
Risk for imbalanced fluid volume related to: PN regimen and changes in output (e.g., diarrhea, fistula drainage) or excess fluid intakeFluid balance, hydrationFluid management, fluid monitoring
Risk for electrolyte imbalance related to: Dependence upon PNElectrolyte and acid-base balanceElectrolyte monitoring; laboratory data interpretation
Risk for unstable blood glucose level related to: Dependence upon PNBlood glucose levelHyperglycemia and hypoglycemia management
Risk for impaired liver function related to: Long-term dependence upon PNLiver function; knowledge: disease process
Risk for infection, related to: Impaired skin as evidenced by presence of VADImmune status, knowledge of infection management, risk control, risk detectionInfection control, infection protection
Imbalanced nutrition: Less than body requirements, related to: Inability to ingest/absorb nutrientsNutritional status, nutrient intake; food and fluid intake; weight controlFeeding, nutrition management, nutrition therapy
Impaired skin integrity, related to: Presence of VADTissue integrity: Skin and mucous membranesSkin care, skin surveillance, incisional (VAD) site care
Readiness for enhanced self-care related to: Desire to enhance ability to perform self-care HPN activitiesAdherence behavior; self-care statusCoping enhancement; energy management; learning facilitation
Risk for caregiver role strain related to: Complexity of care activitiesCaregiver role endurance; caregiver stressors; caregiver emotional health; caregiver performance; caregiver-patient relationshipCaregiver support

Source: Ackley et al., 2020; Herdman et al., 2021.

Chapter Highlights

Thinking Critically: Case Study

A 45-year-old man is admitted with severe exacerbation of his Crohn's disease. He is 6 feet 1 inch tall, weighs 132 lb (60 kg), and has experienced a 45-lb weight loss in the past 3 months (25%). He is weak and pale and has dry mucous membranes, a red beefy tongue, and cracks at the sides of his mouth. He has an ileostomy and has developed a draining enterocutaneous fistula. Because of severe malabsorption as a result of the Crohn's disease, PN is ordered. He is to receive a solution of 20% dextrose, 50 g of protein/L with standard electrolytes, and daily multivitamins and trace elements. The goal is 2 L of this solution per day. With lipids, this will provide an average of 2,260 calories per day and 100 g of protein. The solution is initiated at 1 L/day and is increased according to patient tolerance. The PN will be infused through a peripherally inserted central catheter.

Case Study Questions

    1.What are the points of care in monitoring this patient?

    2.Why is the presence of the enterocutaneous fistula significant in terms of this patient's nutritional needs (considering increased fluid requirements and wound healing)?

    3.For which potential complications related to PN is this patient at risk?

Media Link: Chapter post tests and answers are provided on FADavis.com, along with case studies and critical thinking activities.

References