AUTHOR: Glenn G. Fort, MD, MPH
Zika virus infection is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that emerged as a global public health threat in 2016. The infection usually causes subclinical or mild flulike illness, but severe manifestations such as microcephaly in babies born to infected mothers and Guillain-Barré syndrome in adults can occur. There is no treatment or vaccine at this time.
TABLE E1 Clinical Features of Zika Virus Compared With Dengue and Chikungunya
Features | Zika | Dengue | Chikungunya |
---|---|---|---|
Fever | + to ++ | +++ | +++ |
Maculopapular rash | +++ | + | ++ |
Pruritus | ++ | /+ | /+ |
Conjunctivitis | ++ | | +/ |
Arthralgia | ++ | + | +++ |
Myalgia | + | ++ | + |
Headache | + | ++ | ++ |
Facial edema | +/ | ++ | + |
Palatal petechiae | +/ | ++ | + |
Hemorrhage | | ++ | |
Shock | | + | |
aNote that one study of all three viruses of patients in Nicaragua suggested more similarities among the three viruses with regard to fever, conjunctivitis, arthralgia, and headache.
Primarily adapted from a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Presentation by Ingrid Rabe, Zika Virus: What clinicians need to know: a clinician outreach and communication activity (COCA) call, Atlanta, GA, January 26, 2016.
From Oduyebo T et al: Update: interim guidelines for health care providers caring for pregnant women and women of reproductive age with possible Zika virus exposure-United States, 2016, MMWR 65[5]:122-127, 2016, fig. 1 p. 124.
From Petersen E et al: Update: interim guidelines for health care providers caring for pregnant women and women of reproductive age with possible Zika virus exposure-United States, 2016, MMWR 65[12]:315-322, 2016, fig. 1, p. 319.
From Petersen E et al: Update: interim guidelines for health care providers caring for pregnant women and women of reproductive age with possible Zika virus exposure-United States, 2016. MMWR 65(12):315-322, 2016, fig. 2, p. 320.
S., October 2017. Abr, Auditory Brain Stem Response; CSF, Cerebrospinal Fluid; Czs, Congenital Zika Syndrome; IgM, Immunoglobulin M; Nat, Nucleic Acid Test; Prnt, Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test. All Infants Should Receive a Standard Evaluation at Birth and at Each Subsequent Well-Child Visit by Their Health Care Providers Including (1) Comprehensive Physical Examination, Including Growth Parameters and (2) Age-Appropriate Vision Screening and Developmental Monitoring and Screening Using Validated Tools. Infants Should Receive a Standard Newborn Hearing Screen at Birth, Preferably Using Auditory Brain Stem Response.automated Abr by Age 1 Mo if Newborn Hearing Screen Passed but Performed with Otoacoustic Emission Methodology.§laboratory Evidence of Possible Zika Virus Infection During Pregnancy is Defined as (1) Zika Virus Infection Detected by a Zika Virus RNA Nat on any Maternal, Placental, or Fetal Specimen (Referred to as Nat-Confirmed); or (2) Diagnosis of Zika Virus Infection, Timing of Infection Cannot Be Determined or Unspecified Flavivirus Infection, Timing of Infection Cannot Be Determined by Serologic Tests on a Maternal Specimen (I.e., Positive/Equivocal Zika Virus IgM and Zika Virus Prnt Titer 10, Regardless of Dengue Virus Prnt Value; or Negative Zika Virus IgM, and Positive or Equivocal Dengue Virus IgM, and Zika Virus Prnt Titer 10, Regardless of Dengue Virus Prnt Titer). The Use of Prnt for Confirmation of Zika Virus Infection, Including in Pregnant Women, is Not Routinely Recommended in Puerto Rico (Https://www.cdc.gov/Zika/Laboratories/Index.html).¶this Group Includes Women Who Were Never Tested During Pregnancy and Those Whose Test Result was Negative Because of Issues Related to Timing or Sensitivity and Specificity of the Test. Because the Latter Issues are Not Easily Discerned, All Mothers with Possible Exposure to Zika Virus During Pregnancy Who Do Not have Laboratory Evidence of Possible Zika Virus Infection, Including Those Who Tested Negative with Currently Available Technology, Should Be Considered in This Group.laboratory Testing of Infants for Zika Virus Should Be Performed as Early as Possible, Preferably Within the First Few Days after Birth, and Includes Concurrent Zika Virus Nat in Infant Serum and Urine, and Zika Virus I.M.testing in Serum. If CSF is Obtained for Other Purposes, Zika Virus Nat and Zika Virus I.M.testing Should Be Performed on CSF.laboratory Evidence of Congenital Zika Virus Infection Includes a Positive Zika Virus Nat or a Nonnegative Zika Virus IgM with Confirmatory Neutralizing Antibody Testing, if Prnt Confirmation is Performed.
From Adebanjo T et al: Update: interim guidance for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of infants with possible congenital Zika virus infection-United States, 2017, MMWR 66(41):1089-1099, 2017, fig. 1, p. 1093.
BOX E1 Recommended Zika Virus Laboratory Testing for Infants and Children When Indicated1,,
BOX E2 Recommended Clinical Evaluation and Laboratory Testing for Infants With Possible Congenital Zika Virus Infection
CBC, Complete blood count; CT, computed tomography; ECG, electrocardiogram; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Adapted from Staples JE et al: Interim guidelines for the evaluation and testing of infants with possible congenital Zika virus infection-United States, MMWR 65(3):63-67, 2016.
1 Paixao ES et al: Mortality from congenital Zika syndrome - nationwide cohort study in Brazil, N Engl J Med. 386(8):757-767, 2022.
More information on laboratory testing for Zika virus infection is available at https://www.cdc.gov/zika/public-health-partners/epidemiologic-investigation-toolkit.html
Indications for testing during acute disease include infants and children <18 yr who (1) traveled to or resided in an affected area within the past 2 wk and (2) have ≥2 of the following manifestations: Fever, rash, conjunctivitis, or arthralgia. Infants in the first 2 wk of life (1) whose mothers have traveled to or resided in an affected area within 2 wk of delivery and (2) have ≥2 of the following manifestations: Fever, rash, conjunctivitis, or arthralgia.
To an expert in obstetrics and gynecology to evaluate a pregnant woman who may have been exposed to the Zika virus. Recommended long-term follow-up for infants with possible congenital Zika virus infection is summarized in Box E3.
BOX E3 Recommended Long-Term Follow-Up for Infants With Possible Congenital Zika Virus Infection
Adapted from Staples JE et al: Interim guidelines for the evaluation and testing of infants with possible congenital Zika virus infection-United States, MMWR 65(3):63-67, 2016.
BOX E4 Recommendations for Counseling Persons in Areas of Active Zika Virus Transmission Interested in Attempting Conception
Adapted from Adebanjo T et al: Update: interim guidance for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of infants with possible congenital Zika virus infection-United States, MMWR 66(41):1089-1099, 2017.
BOX E5 Recommendations for Prevention of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus for Couples in Which a Man Has Traveled to or Resides in an Area With Active Zika Virus Transmission
Other couples concerned about sexual transmission∗
|
From Oduyebo T et al: Update: interim guidance for health care providers caring for pregnant women with possible Zika virus exposure-United States, MMWR 66(29):781-793, 2017.
∗Couples who do not desire pregnancy should use the most effective contraception methods that can be used correctly and consistently in addition to condoms, which also reduce the risk for sexually transmitted infections. Couples planning conception have a number of factors to consider, which are discussed in more detail in Petersen EE et al: Update: interim guidance for health care providers caring for women of reproductive age with possible Zika virus exposure-United States, 2016, MMWR 65(29);739-744, 2016.