AUTHOR: Maheswara Satya Gangadhara Rao Golla, MD
Myocardial infarction (MI) is a clinical syndrome characterized by symptoms of myocardial ischemia, persistent electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, and release of biomarkers of myocardial necrosis resulting from an insufficient supply of oxygenated blood to an area of the heart. MI may be classified as ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) depending on the ECG findings on MI presentation. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) refers to acute myocardial ischemia without myocardial necrosis (unstable angina) and myocardial necrosis and infarction (NSTEMI or STEMI). According to the European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology guidelines, the following criteria for acute evolving or recent MI (NSTEMI and STEMI) satisfies the diagnosis:
New generation troponin assays are extremely sensitive to small changes in serum troponin levels at the cost of diagnostic specificity for MI related to plaque rupture or erosion.
Universal classification of acute MI:
|
The clinical presentation of myocardial infarction is usually based on a history of substernal pressure-type chest pain radiated to the neck, lower jaw, left arm, or mid-back lasting 20 min or more that is not completely relieved by sublingual nitroglycerin. The pain may not be severe. Some patients may present with atypical symptoms such as nausea/vomiting, shortness of breath, fatigue, palpitations, and diaphoresis. The elderly in particular may present with dizziness or syncope. The patients who tend to present with atypical symptoms are more likely to be women, diabetic patients, or elderly patients and less frequently receive reperfusion therapy and other evidence-based therapies than patients with a typical chest pain presentation. Records show that up to 30% of patients with STEMI present with atypical symptoms.
The various causes of myocardial ischemia are described along with the differential diagnosis of chest pain.
Figure 2 Trends of troponin and CK-MB following revascularization in MI.
CK-MB, Creatine kinase-MB; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; URL, upper reference limit.
Modified from Shapiro BP, Jaffe AS: Cardio biomarkers. In Murphy JG, Lloyd MA [eds]: Mayo Clinic cardiology: concise textbook, ed 3, Rochester, MN, 2007, Mayo Clinic Scientific Press, and New York, 2007, Informa Healthcare USA. Used with permission of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.
Figure 1 Electrocardiographic findings of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
(1) T-wave abnormalities of AMI. A, Prominent hyperacute T wave. B through E, T-wave inversions of non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI). (2) ST-segment depression. A, Flat. B, Downsloping. C, Upsloping. (3) ST-segment elevation. A, Convex ST-segment elevation. B, Obliquely straight ST-segment elevation. C, Convex ST-segment elevation. (4) Pathologic Q waves. A, Pathologic Q wave of completed myocardial infarction. B, Simultaneous ST-segment elevation with pathologic Q wave 2 hr into the course of ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI).
From Vincent JL et al: Textbook of critical care, ed 6, Philadelphia, 2011, Saunders.
TABLE 1 Leads Showing Abnormal Electrocardiographic Findings in Myocardial Infarction.
Limb Leads | Precordial Leads | |
---|---|---|
Lateral | I, aVL | V5, V6 |
Anterior | V1, V2, V3 | |
Anterolateral | I, aVL | V2-V6 |
Diaphragmatic | II, III, aVF | |
Posterior | V1-V3∗ |
aVF, Augmented vector foot; aVL, augmented vector left.
∗None of the leads is oriented toward the posterior surface of the heart. Therefore in posterior infarction, changes that would have been present in the posterior surface leads will be seen in the anterior leads as a mirror image (e.g., tall and slightly wide R waves in V1 and V2, comparable to abnormal Q waves, and tall and wide, symmetric T waves in V1 and V2).
From Park MK: Parks pediatric cardiology for practitioners, ed 6, Philadelphia, 2014, Elsevier.
TABLE 2 Electrocardiographic Manifestations of Myocardial Infarction
ST Elevation | |||
Electrocardiographic Manifestations of Acute Myocardial Ischemia (in the Absence of Left Bundle Branch Block) | |||
New ST elevation at the J point in two contiguous leads with the following cut points: | |||
ST Depression and T Wave Changes | |||
Electrocardiographic Manifestations of Ischemia in the Setting of Left Bundle Branch Block |
Electrocardiographic Criterion | Points | ||
---|---|---|---|
ST-segment elevation ≥1 mm and concordant with the QRS complex | 5 | ||
ST-segment depression ≥1 mm in lead V1, V2, or V3 | 3 | ||
ST-segment elevation ≥5 mm and discordant with the QRS complex | 2 | ||
A score of ≥3 had a specificity of 98% for acute MI | |||
Electrocardiographic Changes Associated with Previous Myocardial Infarction (in the Absence of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Left Bundle Block) | |||
Any Q wave in leads V2-V3 ≥0.02 sec or a QS complex in leads V2 and V3 | |||
Q wave ≥0.03 sec and ≥0.1-mV deep or QS complex in leads I, II, aVL, aVF, or V4-V6 in any 2 leads of a contiguous lead grouping (I, aVL; V1-V6; II, III, aVF) | |||
R wave ≥0.04 sec in V1-V2 and R/S ≥1 with a concordant positive T wave in absence of a conductions defect. |
aVF, Augmented vector foot; aVL, augmented vector left; MI, myocardial infarction.
Imaging studies such as a high-quality portable chest X-ray, transthoracic echocardiography, and a contrast chest computed tomography (CT) scan should be used to differentiate MI from aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and other intrathoracic causes of chest pain (i.e., pneumonia and pneumothorax) in patients for whom this distinction is initially unclear, or to assess for complications of AMI such as pulmonary edema. Transthoracic echocardiography may provide evidence of focal wall motion abnormalities and facilitate triage in patients with ECG findings that are difficult to interpret.
For STEMI patients, TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) risk index, TIMI risk score (30-day outcomes), and GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score (6-mo outcomes) are commonly available risk assessment models. In the TIMI risk score for STEMI, the mean 30-day mortality was 6.7%. It is composed of eight baseline variables. The risk score showed a >40-fold graded increase in mortality, with scores ranging from 0 to >8 (P <0.0001); 30-day mortality was 0.1% among patients with a score of 0, 2.25 with a score of 5, and >8.8% among patients with a score of 8 or greater. The higher the score, the higher the 30-day mortality rate. The variables are divided between historic, exam, and presentation:
For NSTEMI patients, TIMI risk score (14-day outcomes) and GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score (in hospital outcomes) are available. See variables for TIMI risk score below.
In TIMI score for the NSTEMI patients, each variable scores one point. The risk score of 6 to 7 carries estimated major acute coronary event (MACE) rate of 41% during 14 days of post-MI. Risk assessment is a continuous process that should be repeated throughout hospitalization and at time of discharge.
TABLE 6 Recommendations for β-Blocker Therapy for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
Recommendation | COR | LOE |
---|---|---|
Oral β-blockers should be initiated in the first 24 hr in patients with STEMI who do not have any of the following: Signs of heart failure or evidence of a low-output state Increased risk for cardiogenic shock∗:
| I | B |
β-blockers should be continued during and after hospitalization for all patients with STEMI and no contraindications to their use. | I | B |
Patients with initial contraindications to the use of β-blockers in the first 24 hr after STEMI should be reevaluated to determine their subsequent eligibility. | I | C |
It is reasonable to administer IV β-blockers at initial encounter to patients with STEMI and no contraindications to their use who are hypertensive or have ongoing ischemia. | IIa | B |
COR, Class of recommendation; IV, intravenous; LOE, level of evidence.
∗The greater the number of risk factors present, the higher the risk for development of cardiogenic shock.
Modified from OGara PT et al: 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, J Am Coll Cardiol 61:e78, 2013. In Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease, a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
BOX 1 CABG in Patients With Acute MI
From Hillis LD et al: 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, J Am Coll Cardiol 58:e123-e210, 2011. In Parrillo JE et al: Critical care medicine, principles of diagnosis and management in the adult, ed 5, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
TABLE 5 Contraindications to and Cautions in the Use of Fibrinolytics for Treating ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction∗
Absolute Contraindications | |||
Any previous intracranial hemorrhage Known structural cerebral vascular lesion (e.g., arteriovenous malformation) Known malignant intracranial neoplasm (primary or metastatic) Ischemic stroke within 3 mo except acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hr Suspected aortic dissection Active bleeding or bleeding diathesis (excluding menses) Significant closed-head or facial trauma within 3 mo Intracranial or intraspinal surgery within 2 mo Severe uncontrolled hypertension (unresponsive to emergency therapy) For streptokinase, previous treatment within the previous 6 mo | |||
Relative Contraindications | |||
History of chronic, severe, poorly controlled hypertension Significant hypertension at initial evaluation (SBP >180 mm Hg or DBP >110 mm Hg) History of previous ischemic stroke >3 mo Dementia Known intracranial pathology not covered in Absolute Contraindications Traumatic or prolonged (>10 min) cardiopulmonary resuscitation Major surgery (<3 wk) Recent (within 2 to 4 wk) internal bleeding Noncompressible vascular punctures Pregnancy Active peptic ulcer Oral anticoagulant therapy |
DBP, Diastolic blood pressure; MI, myocardial infarction; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
∗Viewed as advisory for clinical decision making and may not be all-inclusive or definitive.
Could be an absolute contraindication in low-risk patients with MI.
From OGara PT et al: 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, J Am Coll Cardiol 61:e78, 2013. In Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease, a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
TABLE 4 Dosing Regimens of Commonly Used Thrombolytic Agents
Thrombolytic Agents | Dosing Regimen | ||
---|---|---|---|
t-PA (alteplase) | 15 mg bolus IV, followed by 0.75 mg/kg body weight (not to exceed 50 mg) over 30 min, followed by 0.5 mg/kg (not to exceed 35 mg) over 60 min | ||
r-PA (reteplase) | Two 10-U IV boluses, given 30 min apart | ||
TNK-t-PA (tenecteplase) | Single bolus IV 0.5 mg/kg (dose rounded to the nearest 5 mg, ranging from 30 to 50 mg) | ||
Streptokinase | 1.5 million U IV over 60 min |
IV, Intravenous; PA, plasminogen activator; r-PA, recombinant plasminogen activator; TNK-t-PA, tenecteplase tissue plasminogen activator; t-PA, tissue plasminogen activator; U, units.
From Andreoli TE et al: Andreoli and Carpenters Cecil essentials of medicine, ed 8, Philadelphia, 2010, Saunders.
TABLE 3 Indications for Primary Angioplasty and Comparison With Fibrinolytic Therapy
Indications | |||
Alternative recanalization strategy for ST segment elevation or LBBB acute MI within 12 hr of symptom onset (or >12 hr if symptoms persist) | |||
Cardiogenic shock developing within 36 hr of ST segment elevation/Q wave acute MI or LBBB acute MI in patients >75 yr old who can be revascularized within 18 hr of shock onset | |||
Recommended only at centers performing >200 PCI/yr with backup cardiac surgery and for operators performing <75 PCI/yr | |||
Advantages of Primary PCI | |||
Higher initial recanalization rates | |||
Reduced risk of intracerebral hemorrhage | |||
Less residual stenosis; less recurrent ischemia or infarction | |||
Usefulness when fibrinolysis contraindicated | |||
Improvement in outcomes with cardiogenic shock | |||
Disadvantages of Primary PCI (Compared With Fibrinolytic Therapy) | |||
Access, advantages restricted to high-volume centers, operators | |||
Longer average time to treatment | |||
Greater dependence on operators for results | |||
Higher system complexity, costs |
LBBB, Left bundle branch block; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention (includes balloon angioplasty, stenting).
From Goldman L, Schafer AI: Goldmans Cecil medicine, ed 24, Philadelphia, 2012, Saunders.
Figure 3 Reperfusion therapy for patients with STEMI.
∗Patients with cardiogenic shock or severe heart failure initially seen at a non-PCI-capable hospital should be transferred for cardiac catheterization and revascularization as soon as possible, irrespective of time delay from MI onset. +Angiography and revascularization should not be performed within the first 2 to 3 hr after administration of fibrinolytic therapy. ACS, Acute coronary syndrome; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; Cath, catheterization; DIDO, door-in to door-out; EKG, electrocardiogram; FMC, first medical contact; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Modified from OGara PT et al: 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, JACC 61(4):e78-e140, 2013.
In patients who have been treated with fondaparinux (as upfront therapy) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), an additional anticoagulant with anti-IIa activity should be administered at the time of PCI because of the risk of catheter thrombosis. ASA,Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin); CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; DAPT, dual-antiplatelet therapy; GPI, glycoprotein inhibitor; LOE, level of evidence; pts, patients; UFH, unfractionated heparin.
From Amsterdam EA et al: 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, J Am Coll Cardiol 64:e139-228, 2014. In Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease, a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
In patients treated with dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after DES implantation who have a high risk of bleeding (e.g., use of oral anticoagulant therapy, major intracranial surgery) or develop significant overt bleeding, discontinuation of P2Y12 inhibitor therapy after 6 mo for ACS may be reasonable. The optimal duration of prolonged DAPT is not established. BMS, Bare-metal stent; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; DES, drug-eluting stent; lytic, fibrinolytic therapy; NSTE-ACS, non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Modified from Levine GN et al: 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease, J Am Coll Cardiol 68(10):1082-115, 2016. In Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease, a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
The prognosis after MI depends on multiple factors:
Heart Attack (Patient Information)
Acute Coronary Syndrome (Related Key Topic)
Angina Pectoris (Related Key Topic)
Coronary Artery Disease (Related Key Topic)