AUTHORS: Sahar Mahani, MD and Craig L. Basman, MD, FACC, FSCAI
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a clinical syndrome that suggests limitation of coronary blood flow to the myocardium as a result of atherosclerotic lesions. Atherosclerosis can be defined as the narrowing of the artery due to plaque formation in the setting of lipid accumulation inside the arterial walls. It is silent in the early stages and characterized by exertional symptoms in later stages as described in the following text.
This topic addresses only stable CAD. Acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), angina pectoris, and myocardial infarction (MI) are addressed as separate topics elsewhere.
|
The 2017 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics update from the American Heart Association estimated that 16.5 million Americans ≥20 yr of age have CAD. There is a slight male predominance at 55%, with incidence increasing with age. CAD prevalence is 7.9% for men and 5.1% for women.1
The most prevalent risk factors include tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, family history, age, male sex, and peripheral vascular disease. Coronary plaque, especially noncalcified plaque, is more prevalent and extensive in HIV-infected men, independent of CAD risk factors.2,3
The process of atherosclerosis begins when the endothelium is damaged or dysfunctional by a variety of different pathways/disease states: Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, trauma, toxins from drugs or tobacco use, or endothelial dysfunction sometime thought to be related to genetics. When the endothelium is dysfunctional, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol circulating in the blood begins to accumulate within the intima. As the cholesterol accumulates within this plaque precursor, it begins to oxidize over time, which subsequently signals monocytes to migrate into the intima and convert to macrophages-this accumulation is known as a fatty streak. The macrophage cells enlarge and engulf cholesterol but can become overwhelmed and subsequently undergo apoptosis, leaving behind foam cells (the remnants of cholesterol-filled macrophages), as well as releasing inflammatory cytokines. Atherogenesis is further propagated by this resultant cellular necrosis within the forming plaque, promoting inflammatory mediator expression, intimal thickening, and migration of more macrophage cells.
Initially atheromatous plaques develop in an outward direction-positive remodeling, with enlargement of the external radius of the artery, thereby maintaining the inner luminal diameter and thus blood flow. Luminal obstruction and vascular calcification are both later stages of atherogenesis. As the process continues, a well-defined core of extracellular lipids form-the collection is, at this stage, called an atheroma or fibrous plaque. Signals from the apoptotic macrophages prompt smooth muscle cell migration from the media, accelerating plaque formation by multiple actions, including secretion of collagen and elastin forming a protein fibrous cap, deposition of calcium, and releasing signals for neovascularization. By this time in the formation of the atheroma, the internal elastin membrane has become dysfunctional, allowing the passage of smooth muscle cells and perforations of neovascularization. Due to the previously mentioned changes and thickening of the intimal layer, there can be luminal narrowing, which reduces flow and ultimately can lead to symptoms of ischemia. This process of atherosclerosis typically occurs over many years.4
See Fig. 1. ACC/HFA guidelines for stress testing and advanced imaging are summarized in Tables 1 to 3 to .
TABLE 3 ACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Angiography to Assess Risk in Patients With Known or Suspected Stable Ischemic Heart Disease
Class | Indication | Level of Evidence |
---|---|---|
I (indicated) | B | |
B | ||
C | ||
IIa (good supportive evidence) | C | |
C | ||
C | ||
III (no benefit) | B | |
B | ||
C | ||
C |
ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; EF, ejection fraction; IHD, ischemic heart disease; LV, left ventricle; SIHD, stable ischemic heart disease.
From Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
TABLE 2 ACC/AHA Guidelines for Stress Testing and Advanced Imaging for Patients With Known Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Who Require Noninvasive Testing for Risk Assessment
Test | Exercise Status | ECG Interpretable | Additional Considerations | Recommendation | Level of Evidence | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Able | Unable | Yes | No | ||||
Patients Able to Exercise | |||||||
Exercise ECG | X | X | I | B | |||
Exercise ECG with MPI or echo | X | X | Abnormalities other than LBBB or ventricular pacing | I | B | ||
Exercise ECG with MPI or echo | X | X | IIa | B | |||
Pharmacologic stress CMR | X | X | IIa | B | |||
CCTA | X | X | IIb | B | |||
Pharmacologic stress imaging or CCTA | X | X | III | C | |||
Patients Unable to Exercise | |||||||
Pharmacologic stress with nuclear MPI or echo | X | Either | I | B | |||
Pharmacologic stress CMR | X | Either | IIa | B | |||
CCTA | X | Either | Without previous stress test | IIa | C | ||
Regardless of Ability to Exercise | |||||||
Pharmacologic stress with nuclear MPI or echo | Either | X | LBBB present | I | B | ||
Exercise or pharmacologic stress with nuclear MPI, echo, or CMR | Either | Either | Known coronary stenosis being considered for revascularization | I | B | ||
CCTA | Either | Either | Indeterminate result of functional testing | IIa | C | ||
Either | Either | Unable to undergo stress imaging | IIb | C | |||
Either | Either | Alternative to invasive coronary angiography when functional testing indicates moderate to high risk | IIb | C | |||
Multiple stress tests or cardiac imaging at the same time | Either | Either | III |
ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG, electrocardiography; echo, echocardiography; LBBB, left bundle branch block; MPI, myocardial perfusion imaging.
From Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
TABLE 1 ACC/AHA Guidelines for Stress Testing and Advanced Imaging for Initial Diagnosis in Patients With Suspected Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Who Require Noninvasive Testing
Test | Exercise Status | ECG Interpretable | Pretest Probability of Ischemic Heart Disease | Recommendation | Level of Evidence | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Able | Unable | Yes | No | Low | Intermediate | High | |||
Patients Able to Exercise | |||||||||
Exercise ECG | X | X | X | I | A | ||||
Exercise ECG with MPI or echo | X | X | X | X | I | B | |||
Exercise ECG | X | X | X | IIa | C | ||||
Exercise ECG with MPI or echo | X | X | X | X | IIa | B | |||
Pharmacologic stress CMR | X | X | X | X | IIa | B | |||
CCTA | X | Either | X | IIb | B | ||||
Exercise echo | X | X | X | IIb | C | ||||
Pharmacologic stress with nuclear MPI, echo, or CMR | X | X | Any | III | C | ||||
Exercise stress with MPI | X | X | X | III | C | ||||
Patients Unable to Exercise | |||||||||
Pharmacologic stress with nuclear MPI or echo | X | Either | X | X | I | B | |||
Pharmacologic stress echo | X | Either | X | IIa | C | ||||
CCTA | X | Either | X | X | IIa | B | |||
Pharmacologic stress CMR | X | Either | X | X | IIa | B | |||
Exercise ECG | X | X | Any | III | C | ||||
Other Reasons for Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography | |||||||||
Continued symptoms after normal test results Inconclusive stress test results Unable to undergo stress test | Either | Either | X | IIa | C | ||||
CAC | Either | Either | X | IIb | C |
ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; CAC, coronary artery calcium (imaging); CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG, electrocardiography; echo, echocardiography; MPI, myocardial perfusion imaging.
From Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
Figure 1 Diagnosis of patients with suspected ischemic heart disease.
∗CCTA is reasonable only for patients with intermediate probability of IHD. ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association; CCTA, computed coronary tomography angiography; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG, electrocardiogram; echo, echocardiography; IHD, ischemic heart disease; MPI, myocardial perfusion imaging; Pharm, pharmacologic; UA, unstable angina; UA/NSTEMI, unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
From 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons, J Am Coll Cardiol 60:e44-e164, 2012.
BOX 1 Noninvasive Risk Stratification
High risk (>3% annual mortality rate)
Intermediate risk (1%-3% annual mortality rate)
|
Figure E2 Coronary artery calcification and computed tomography angiography.
A, Electrocardiogram-gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography shows calcification of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and a branch. B, At a lower level, calcification (arrows) of the LAD artery and circumflex coronary artery (CCA) is visible. The right coronary artery (RCA) is noncalcified. C, A curved reconstruction showing the left coronary artery (LCA) and the LAD artery and CCA along their axes. Multiple calcifications are visible (red arrows). A noncalcified stenosis of the CCA (yellow arrow) is also shown. Ao, Aorta; LV, left ventricle.
From Webb WR et al: Fundamentals of body CT, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2015, Saunders.
A, Axial maximum intensity projection (MIP) slab image showing the courses of the proximal coronary arteries. B, An oblique coronal MIP reformatted image of the right coronary artery (RCA). Focal hyperdensities within the RCA (arrows) are foci of calcific atherosclerosis. The proximal left main coronary artery (LMA) is also visualized. C, An oblique axial MIP reformatted image of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. A small septal perforator (S) and diagonal branches (D) arise from the LAD. Nearby coronary veins (V) are also visualized. D and E, Volume-rendered reformatted images of the coronary arteries. AM, Acute marginal; Co, conus branch; LCX, left circumflex artery; OM, obtuse marginal; Sa, SA (sinoatrial) nodal branch.
From Soto JA, Lucey BC: Emergency Radiology: the requisites, ed 2, Philadelphia, 2017, Elsevier.
∗∗The algorithms do not represent a comprehensive list of recommendations (see text for all recommendations).The use of bile acid sequestrant is relatively contraindicated when triglycerides are ≥200 mg/dl and is contraindicated when triglycerides are ≥500 mg/dl.Dietary supplement niacin must not be used as a substitute for prescription niacin. ACC, American College of Cardiology; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; AHA, American Heart Association; ARB, angiotensin-receptor blocker; ASA, aspirin; ATP III, Adult Treatment Panel 3; BP, blood pressure; CCB, calcium channel blocker; CKD, chronic kidney disease; JNC VII, Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; LV, left ventricular; MI, myocardial infarction; NHLBI, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; NTG, nitroglycerin; SIHD, stable ischemic heart disease.
From Fihn SD et al: 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons, J Am Coll Cardiol 60:e44-e164, 2012.
TABLE 4 ACCF/AHA Guidelines for Risk Factor Modification
Class | Indication | Level of Evidence |
---|---|---|
Lipid Management | ||
I (indicated) | B | |
B | ||
A | ||
IIa (good supportive evidence) | For patients who do not tolerate statins, LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy with bile acid sequestrants, niacin, or both is reasonable. | B |
Blood Pressure Management | ||
I (indicated) | B | |
A | ||
| B | |
Diabetes Management | ||
IIa (good supportive evidence) | B | |
C | ||
IIb (weak supportive evidence) | Initiation of pharmacotherapy interventions to achieve a target HbA1c might be reasonable. | A |
III (not indicated) | Therapy with rosiglitazone should not be initiated in patients with SIHD. | C |
Physical Activity | ||
I (indicated) |
| B |
B | ||
A | ||
IIa (good supportive evidence) | It is reasonable for clinicians to recommend complementary resistance training at least 2 days/wk. | C |
Weight Management | ||
I (indicated) |
| B |
C | ||
Smoking Cessation | ||
I (indicated) | Smoking cessation and avoidance of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke at work and home should be encouraged for all patients with SIHD. Follow-up, referral to special programs, and pharmacotherapy are recommended, as is a stepwise strategy for smoking cessation (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange, Avoid). | B |
Management of Psychologic Factors | ||
IIa (good supportive evidence) | It is reasonable to consider screening patients with SIHD for depression and to refer or treat when indicated. | B |
IIb (weak supportive evidence) | Treatment of depression has not been shown to improve cardiovascular disease outcomes but might be reasonable for its other clinical benefits. | C |
Alcohol Consumption | ||
IIb (weak supportive evidence) | In patients with SIHD who drink alcohol, it might be reasonable for nonpregnant women to have 1 drink (4 oz of wine, 12 oz of beer, or 1 oz of spirits) a day and for men to have 1 or 2 drinks a day unless alcohol is contraindicated (such as in patients with a history of alcohol abuse or dependence or those with liver disease). | C |
Exposure to Air Pollution | ||
IIa (good supportive evidence) | It is reasonable for patients with SIHD to avoid exposure to increased air pollution to reduce their risk for cardiovascular events. | C |
ACE, Angiotensin-converting enzyme; ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SIHD, stable ischemic heart disease.
From Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
ACS, Acute coronary syndrome; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; GDMT, Goal directed medical therapy; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SIHD, stable ischemic heart disease.
From Madhavan MV et al: Coronary artery disease in patients ≥80 yr of age, J Am Coll Cardiol 71:2015-2040, 2018. With permission. In Warshaw G et al: Hams primary care geriatrics, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2022, Elsevier.
TABLE 6 ACC/AHA Guidelines for Revascularization to Improve Symptoms in Patients With Significant Anatomic (>50% Left Main or >70% Nonleft Main Coronary Artery Disease) or Physiologic (Fractional Flow Reserve <0.80) Coronary Artery Stenoses
Clinical Setting | Recommendation | Level of Evidence | |
---|---|---|---|
≥1 significant stenosis amenable to revascularization and unacceptable angina despite GDMT | I | CABG or PCI | A |
≥1 significant stenoses and unacceptable angina in whom GDMT cannot be implemented because of medication contraindications, adverse effects, or patient preferences | IIa | CABG or PCI | C |
Previous CABG with ≥1 significant stenosis associated with ischemia and unacceptable angina despite GDMT | IIa | PCI | C |
IIb | CABG | C | |
Complex 3-vessel CAD (e.g., SYNTAX score ≥22) with or without involvement of the proximal LAD artery and a good candidate for CABG | IIa | CABG preferred over PCI | B |
Viable ischemic myocardium that is perfused by coronary arteries that are not amenable to grafting | IIb | TMR as an adjunct to CABG | B |
No anatomic or physiologic criteria for revascularization | III | CABG or PCI | C |
ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; GDMT, guideline-directed medical therapy; LAD, left anterior descending; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SYNTAX, synergy between PCI with taxus and cardiac surgery; TMR, transmyocardial revascularization.
From Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
TABLE E5 ACC/AHA Guidelines for Revascularization to Improve Survival Versus Medical Therapy in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease
Anatomic Setting | Class | Recommendation | Level of Evidence |
---|---|---|---|
Unprotected Left Main or Complex Coronary Artery Disease | |||
CABG and PCI | I | Heart team approach | C |
CABG and PCI | IIa | Calculation of STS and SYNTAX scores | B |
Unprotected Left Main | |||
CABG | I | B | |
PCI | IIa | For SIHD when both of the following are present: 1. Anatomic conditions associated with a low risk for PCI procedural complications and a high likelihood of a good long-term outcome 2. Clinical characteristics that predict a significantly increased risk for adverse surgical outcomes | B |
IIb | For SIHD when both of the following are present: 1. Anatomic conditions associated with a low to intermediate risk for PCI procedural complications and an intermediate to high likelihood of a good long-term outcome 2. Clinical characteristics that predict increased risk for adverse surgical outcomes (e.g., STS-predicted operative mortality >2%) | B | |
III | For SIHD in patients (versus performing CABG) with unfavorable anatomy for PCI and who are good candidates for CABG | B | |
Three-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease with or Without Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Disease | |||
CABG | I | B | |
IIa | It is reasonable to choose CABG over PCI in patients with complex 3-vessel CAD (e.g., SYNTAX score ≥22) who are good candidates for CABG | B | |
PCI | IIb | B | |
Two-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease With Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Disease | |||
CABG | I | B | |
PCI | IIb | B | |
Two-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Without Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Disease | |||
CABG | IIa | With extensive ischemia | B |
IIb | Without extensive ischemia | C | |
PCI | IIb | B | |
One-Vessel Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Disease | |||
CABG | IIa | With LIMA | B |
PCI | IIb | B | |
One-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Without Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Disease | |||
CABG | III | Harm | B |
PCI | III | Harm | B |
Left Ventricular Dysfunction | |||
CABG | IIa | EF of 35%-50% | B |
CABG | IIb | EF <35% without significant left main disease | B |
PCI | N/A | Insufficient data | |
Survivors of Sudden Cardiac Death With Presumed Ischemia-Mediated Ventricular Tachycardia | |||
CABG | I | B | |
PCI | I | C | |
No Anatomic or Physiologic Criteria for Revascularization | |||
CABG | III | Harm | B |
PCI | III | Harm | B |
ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CAD, coronary artery disease; EF, ejection fraction; LIMA, left internal mammary artery; N/A, not applicable; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SIHD, stable ischemic heart disease; STS, Society of Thoracic Surgery; SYNTAX, synergy between PCI with taxus and cardiac surgery.
From Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
TABLE 7 Risk Estimators for Cardiovascular Events in Patients Without Known Coronary Artery Disease
Clinical Risk Estimator | Purpose of Risk Estimator | Limitations | Web or Mobile App Available |
---|---|---|---|
ASCVD Risk Estimator | 10-yr risk of ASCVD event (CV death, MI, stroke) | Not validated for patients ≥80 yr old, excludes family history | Yes |
Framingham Risk Score | Estimates risk for CV death, MI, stable and unstable angina | Excludes family history | Yes |
MESA Risk Score | 10-yr risk for CV death, MI, cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization | Excludes family history | Yes |
Reynolds CVD Risk Score | Estimate risk for CV death, MI, stroke, revascularization | Does not account for treatment of hypertension | Yes |
Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III | Estimate risk for death or MI | Excludes DM or family history | Yes |
ASCVD, Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CV, cardiovascular; DM, diabetes mellitus; MESA, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; MI, myocardial infarction.
From Warshaw G et al: Hams primary care geriatrics, ed 7, Philadelphia, 2022, Elsevier.
TABLE 8 ACC/AHA Guidelines for Follow-Up Noninvasive Testing in Patients With Known Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: New, Recurrent, or Worsening Symptoms (Not Consistent With Unstable Angina)
Test | Exercise Status | ECG Interpretable | Additional Considerations | Recommendation | Level of Evidence | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Able | Unable | Yes | No | ||||
Patients Able to Exercise | |||||||
Exercise ECG | X | X | I | B | |||
Exercise ECG with MPI or echo | X | X | I | B | |||
Exercise ECG with MPI or echo | X | Either | Previous requirement for imaging or known to be at high risk for multivessel CAD | IIa | B | ||
Pharmacologic stress MPI, echo, or CMR | X | X | III | C | |||
Patients Unable to Exercise | |||||||
Pharmacologic stress with nuclear MPI or echo | X | Either | I | B | |||
Pharmacologic stress CMR | X | Either | IIa | B | |||
Exercise ECG | X | X | III | C | |||
Regardless of Ability to Exercise | |||||||
CCTA | Either | Either | To assess patency of coronary stent or bypass graft ≥3 mm in diameter | IIb | C | ||
Either | Either | In absence of known moderate or severe calcification and to assess coronary stent <3 mm in diameter | IIb | C | |||
Either | Either | Known moderate or severe calcification or assessment of stent <3 mm in diameter | III | C |
ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; CAD, coronary artery disease; CCTA, cardiac computed tomography angiography; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG, electrocardiography; echo, echocardiography; MPI, myocardial perfusion imaging.
From Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
TABLE 9 ACC/AHA Guidelines for Follow-Up Noninvasive Testing in Patients With Known Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Asymptomatic or Stable Symptoms
Test | Exercise Status | ECG Interpretable | Pretest Probability of Ischemia | Additional Considerations | Recommendation | Level of Evidence | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Able | Unable | Yes | No | |||||
Exercise or pharmacologic stress with MPI, echo, or CMR at ≥2-yr intervals | X | X | Previous evidence of silent ischemia or at high risk for recurrent event | Unable to exercise, uninterpretable ECG, or incomplete revascularization | IIa | C | ||
Exercise ECG at ≥1-yr intervals | X | X | Previous silent ischemia or at high risk for recurrent event | IIb | C | |||
Exercise ECG | X | X | No previous silent ischemia and not at high risk for recurrent events | IIb | C | |||
Exercise or pharmacologic stress imaging or CCTA | Either | Either | <5-yr intervals after CABG or <2 yr intervals after PCI | III | C |
ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CCTA, cardiac computed tomography angiography; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG, electrocardiography; echo, echocardiography; MPI, myocardial perfusion imaging; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
From Zipes DP: Braunwalds heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, ed 11, Philadelphia, 2019, Elsevier.
Coronary Artery Disease (Patient Information)
Acute Coronary Syndrome (Related Key Topic)
Angina Pectoris (Related Key Topic)
Hypercholesterolemia (Related Key Topic)
Hyperlipoproteinemia, Primary (Related Key Topic)
Myocardial Infarction (Related Key Topic)